On Wednesday, August 7, 2019 at 11:31:02 AM UTC+3, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 7, 2019 at 8:54:17 AM UTC+3, Simply Curious wrote:
> > On Wednesday, August 7, 2019 at 1:29:14 AM UTC-4, William Elliot wrote:
> > > Who are the posters at sci.math that are off topic or mathematical
> > > idiots?
> >
> > Hello, I am a recently hired tour director, so apologies if I miss out. I will be your host for now on exploring the shit show that is sci.math.
> >
> > We have the cranks which are the ones that might flood the posts.
> >
> > John Gabriel, JG, Jew Lover, or that Latin name I can't be bothered I can't be bothered to find out is one of them. Has invaded quite a few message boards and is now stuck here. Has strong views that the Greeks were basically gods and everything after that has been more or less worthless.
> >
> > His bestest friend in the world Bassam King something or BKK also has serious disagreements with the EEEEEVIL math conspiracy or something. Though I feel like they would be in serious debate with each other too. It appears that unlike JG, doesn't view geometry as the foundation of all of mathematics. I think it is arithmetic or something. Sometimes it is hard to understand him because he is Arabic and the English doesn't come off the greatest..
> >
> > Archimedes Plutonium or AP has certainly lost his marbles. Whereas the two above are at least able to slightly comprehend what is being said, AP is in his own world.
> >
> > The ganthinter dude is a physicist by the name of Wolfgang Muckenheim whos opinions on set theory and modern mathematics questionable by mathematicians. I wouldn't say he is a mathematical idiot, dude is/was a physicist, so it comes to shock how he misses key points of set theory in general. I don't know.
> >
> > Mitch, god knows what he is on about. Something about infinitesimals and god and gravity. He seems new here.
> >
> > Pentcho is crying out against the theory of relativity using various pointless quotes and misunderstandings on it in the criticism. In sci math, not sci physics. For reasons.
> >
> > Finally, Peteolcott specializes in the logic field of mathematics on the nature of the incompleteness theorems.
> >
> > And Peltry, who I see as neutral, questions the general nature of abstraction for abstraction sake in mathematics. He is fine with me.
> >
> > Those are the generally 'anti mainstream' people.
> >
> > Then, for the 'mainstream' people, so to speak, Zelos Malum is an actual mathematician. He must be here for the same reason I am, mild amusement. Dan has said himself is here to warn visitors that enter or something. I don't know. I just simply study for my own sake, this just being mild amusement. Chris, 'Me' [thats his name], Konyberg, Fred, and Sergio I don't know as much about. As to me, have the core idea of modesty in light of things you don't know and understand, and show typically have much disdain for what I refer to cranks above, though not exclusively.
> >
> > That is your tour of the shit show that is sci.math. If you are looking for actual answers to questions, you are probably better with stack exchange[Quora might be doable but doesn't allow for much elaboration in questions].
> >
> > If, however, your serious studies in math and science are becoming stressful, hop on by here to get a good hearty laugh.
> Why not starting with your unknown self? wonder!
>
> Please see here who is writing, and ask him the following questions
>
> 1) Did you finish high school? Wonder!
> 2) Had you been admitted in college or university? Wonder!
> 3) What are your highest achievements in mathematics? Wonder!
> 4) Did you ever were able to grasp any too elementary issue published publically here on sci.math by the *KING* OR anybody else who attacks the fake mathematics? wonder!
>
> Morons opinions are generally in the opposite meanings, FOR SURE
> BKK