On Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:42:02 PM UTC+2, neilist wrote:
> On Nov 21, 4:57 pm, quasi <qu...@null.set> wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:29:35 -0800 (PST), neilist
> >
> > <littora...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >Off topic:
> >
> > >Quasi, how ya been?
> >
> > Good thanks, yourself?
> >
> > I see you've been doing some math. Good for you.
> >
> > Your math postings show traits of honesty and humility which suggests
> > there's hope for you yet.
> >
> > But you're a kind of Jekyll & Hyde. Your personal vendettas with
> > various posters show a totally different side of your personality.
> > Even if the attacks are often witty, they make you look juvenile (and
> > perhaps you actually are?). As I see it, it's a waste of energy, and a
> > waste of your limited time on this planet to learn/do math.
> >
> > On the other hand, you may simply not want to lose the pleasures you
> > get from the flame wars. So most likely, you'll continue, fighting
> > meaningless battles. But there comes a point in those wars where you
> > become indistinguishable from one of the real cranks.
> >
> > >Get the guy off Ullrich, okay?
> >
> > >A fan
> >
> > >(and you know what that stands for, right?)
> >
> > Well, Ullrich doesn't need to be saved -- you do.
> >
> > Anyway, leave me out of it -- I tried my hand at negotiating a truce,
> > and it worked a little, but clearly, it's a very fragile truce.
> > Realistically, it's liable to break at any time. Anyway, I tried.
> >
> > quasi
> You feel proud of yourself with your thoughts of negotiating truces,
> yet won't address Tommy's behavior.
> Understand, I was abandoning abusing Tommy before you requested a
> truce. Thy pride is misplaced.
> And did you see Tommy "breaking" your precious truce in my posts to
> Bassam King Karzeddin?
> I originally began abusing Tommy because I saw him lashing out and
> denigrating others needlessly, including Ullrich, and no one was
> addressing his behavior.
> I started sublty, by telling Tommy to "not be cranky" (ha ha). But he
> didn't listen to me.
> Tommy posts multiple times, sometimes daily, over a range of topics,
> and he can be abusive in a juvenile way as well. How is TOMMY
> different from other cranks?
> Just because Tommy and other cranks put out a little math, doesn't
> justify their bad behavior, as well as their continuous misspellings,
> bad English, and confusing thoughts.
> Same with those cranks James Harris, Bassam King Karzeddin, and Bill
> Newbold. I see a trend - I don't like cranks involving Fermat's Last
> Theorem. Oh, my disgust at Marilyn Vos Ssvant is visceral!
> But you seem to like Tommy, and others like other cranks. You have
> your pals, or pets. Fine.
> So you won't rein in or berate Tommy, but you berate _my_ behavior?
> Inconsistent, thy name is quasi.
> You call me juvenile. Well, when are you going to call Tommy and
> others juvenile? Inconsistent, thy name is quasi.
> And that Archimedes Plutonium. Ugh, what a waste of posting space.
> There's so little math in his shit, it's pointless to even address
> him. I was surprised, though, that he posted anti-Jewish thoughts,
> and I addressed that briefly. Tsk tsk.
> Oh, you want to keep out of it with Tommy and Ullrich and me? Fine.
> Then don't single me out as juvenile.
> Tommy criticizes me for telling someone to drop dead, yet he turns
> around and says the same thing to me; that is, to hang myself.
> And Tommy continues the "Big Lie" that I don't post math. You above
> said I do. So are you going to correct Tommy? No? Inconsistent, thy
> name is quasi.
> Ooooo, if, with reference to the "Big Lie", I start citing certain
> German "historical figures", would I offend some posters, such as the
> Dutch (Dik Winter)? Will that Godwins' Law be evoked to shut me down?
> Quasi, you call me Jekyll and Hyde, but alas YOU are inconsistent.
> You have your buddy Tommy. You're happy? The company you keep
> reflects on YOU, Quasi.

Here is an example of annymous hired Trolls 🧌 like neilists, where good ones like quasi had abandoned the scene

BKk