On Tuesday, June 25, 2019 at 1:37:50 AM UTC+3, j4n bur53 wrote:
> I ended with this Prolog code using DCG:
>
> fibo, ['B'] --> ['A'], !, fibo.
> fibo, ['A','B'] --> ['B'], !, fibo.
> fibo --> [].
>
> fibos --> [].
> fibos --> fibo, fibos.
>
> Here is an example run:
>
> ?- fibos(['A'],X).
> X = ['A'] ;
> X = ['B'] ;
> X = ['A', 'B'] ;
> X = ['B', 'A', 'B'] ;
> X = ['A', 'B', 'B', 'A', 'B'] ;
> X = ['B', 'A', 'B', 'A', 'B', 'B', 'A', 'B'] ;
> Etc...
> Am Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019 00:30:47 UTC+2 schrieb j4n bur53:
> > L-system for fibonacci length words in Prolog
> > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55786984
> >
> >
> > Am Montag, 24. Juni 2019 23:57:43 UTC+2 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
> > > On 6/23/2019 2:15 AM, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, June 23, 2019 at 10:29:50 AM UTC+3, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > >> On 6/23/2019 12:20 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > >>> On 6/23/2019 12:20 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > >>>> On 6/22/2019 3:33 AM, Me wrote:
> > > >>>>> On Saturday, June 22, 2019 at 12:05:14 PM UTC+2, marij...@gmail..com
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> you don't have the bare minimum idea of what you talk about.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> That's indeed the case. Actually, he's a rather typical crank.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crank_(person)
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I was amused when he thought he invented n-ary trees. A simple grammar
> > > >>>> system, like an L-system does left and right, and all sorts of
> > > >>>> symbols. Wow.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> His "new" number system.
> > > >>
> > > >> LRLR is a node 4 levels down from the root in the tree. left, right,
> > > >> left, right. I am not sure why he thinks this is new. Did he ever
> > > >> program LOGO? Btw, L-systems can be great fun!
> > > >
> > > > Because I have searched a lot and asked many specialized people personally in this field, where nothing I was able to find
> > > >
> > > > But usually, if something was shown **PUBLICALLY** working perfectly and freely by an amateur who isn't any professional (nor like to be) to write it secretly for *Journals*, then the common tendencies among the professional mathematicians who understand it correctly and like to capitalize it **illegally** for themselves is simply to relate it to some older references that never talked **frankly** the same original idea of that talented amateur, where they try very hard to smell any slight tangent thing that may be far related in order to steal the whole complete idea without bothering even to mention from where they had learnt it **FIRST**
> > > >
> > > > And the (Secretive researchers or Wikipedia writers, Vidio authors and alike) are too expert into those types of clever **thefts** since they usually pick up from many others **freely** their works and simply relate them to themselves, were also their higher authorities encourage them so much in this regard just for the sake of ego problems to learn from any **mateure**and for many other "incurable diseases" with their odd behaviours for merely self protection
> > > >
> > > > So, no wonder that one might see soon many, (Papers, wiki piki articles, Videos, etc) arriving at the same thing that was **PUBLICALLY PUBLISHED FIRST**, and with so many fabricated tonnes of older references as always, as usual, NO WONDER!
> > > >
> > > > Keep it for the record for future developments in this regard about "NEW BINARY SYSTEM WITHOUT ZERO"
> > > >
> > > > and many more like topics of mine as "NON EXISTING ANGLES" or "NON-EXISTING NUMBERS", Polynomials with no roots, Complex numbers fictions, ..., ETC
> > >
> > >
> > > Have you every played around with an L-system for fun?

Here an irrefutable example about the common trollhood in logic, philosophy & math as well

But how would they know?

Bkk