Thoroughly disputed!

"... starting rock fights doesn't serve the charter,
you mean petty bastards."

I'd thank Virgil I suppose,
always thoroughly disputative
about the mathematics -
I know I can't "trust" underestimation -
this though is a convenient recourse.

Conscientious formalists won't let that "luxury".

This was a quote from the context about induction
as is defined from above and below "infinity",
infinite induction.

"Infinite" or "unbounded" induction is of course
totally de rigeur, it's a usual matter of stipulated
application of fact.

Here something as simple as "sets" or "parts" of
the whole of them, the things, sees a usual interesting
reflection on 0, to 1, the space, about that the continuous
domain as a simple model has that finite combinatorics and
induction have courtesy their incompleteness then
the usual notions of limits besides the measure,
bounded by the real.

These trolls here are pretty much retro-finitist crankety trolls.

These are the howler trolls with the fallacies and mostly simply
trolls, though AP is left alone more of a creative troll.

The point was that conscientious formalists must leave up the space,
as soon as it's formed from any definition from below, the items in the space.

Then, when there's any inductive impasse, the stopping point
across the bridge between the deductive completeness of the
induction in sets and deductive completeness of the induction
in parts, it is simply that way let to be completeness instead of
confusion.

Then otherwise these retro-finitist crankety trolls are easily dispatched.

It's important not to let the howler troll despoil its fetish,
what is usually its mantra and fetish is often some useful
bit of mathematics, poorly interpreted (and maintained,
the "howler troll" with its howler fetish the erroneous).

Maintaining objectivity at all leaves me a troll.

But, Feldmann's not stupid on the troll scale.

Then, the mathematical completeness for Goedel and his
sets, neatly let in the mathematical completeness for the
example of the sets as collections and parts as refinements,
Goedel's mathematical completeness of parts.

Then, the trolls are just usual failures in
a) related rates and the reflective
b) geometrical exercise
c) reasonable abstraction.

I.e., the reason retro-finitist crankety trolls fail is because
they won't admit that their completions don't line up
with others'.

(Who may and for example do.)

The "tidal" of the black hole is not like
the "tidal" of the sea, the tide of the sea
is very much gentle and rocks with the
Earth, courtesy equilibrium over time,
the black hole is the bit the more "vorpal".

It's like
"what is physics if not "string theory"?"
"some other kind of string theory".

Gauss Disquisitiones
Goedel Completeness, Incompleteness, Cohen, model forcing
Des Cartes Disquisitiones
Kanamori, Jech, (i.e., submission), Ehrlich, ...
Cantor, uncountability, sets
Kant
Newton, Leibniz

"I don't know why, maybe it don't."