On Tuesday, January 16, 2024 at 7:36:41 PM UTC-8, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> It is appealing to have magnetic field units be (1/A)(meters/second) and for electric field units be (A)(meters/second) for that makes Voltage be units of energy in the V = A*(B*E).
>
> And where we get the vector cross product using sine for BxE as the area of parallelogram (the parallelogram rule of physics) of (BxE), or using the angle complement of the sine angle we find the vector dot product of B*E to have the same value as cross product. This complementarity of magnetism to electricity; of sine to cosine; of vector cross product to vector dot product, compelling reason to see the A, Ampere in magnetic field is inverse to A in the electric field.
>
> And this ties in well with the calculus of mathematics that the angular momentum derivative with respect to time is energy so that the highest dimension in both math and physics when we speak of geometry dimension is 3rd dimension. So that voltage units as Ampere current * meters^2/seconds^2 fits all logical points of interest.
>
> And in turn, we then obtain superconductivity into the Voltage equation where the Resistance is the term (B*E) and when the sine angle is 90 degrees -- subsequently cosine is thus 0 degrees, both with a value of 1 or superconductivity capable. We interpret that as meaning the flow of electricity as magnetic monopoles is passing through a material where the magnetism and electricity are perfectly aligned at 90 degrees. The more the angle is not 90 degrees the more resistance is involved.
>
> That leaves me to straighten out a very difficult problem of the units of Ampere and Coulomb. And it is here that is most saddening to Old Physics. For they used "charge" to quell all questions of theory, but never defined the two precisely. It is a current no doubt, but the trouble is, it is both wave and particle. How do you define electricity as a wave? How do you have an equation of how many waves of EM spectrum superpositioned on one another then collapse into a particle of 0.5MeV go to compose a unit of electricity. So you measure Ampere as particle or wave, same question for Coulomb.
>
> Halliday and Resnick says of Ampere as the "constant current" and says of Coulomb "quantity of electricity". Does that mean that Coulomb is a variable current? Does it mean the Ampere is not a quantity of electricity? Does it mean we have two different types of current? Or, does it mean that Coulomb is gibberish in an era where no magnetic monopoles were believed to exist.
>
> Funny, how Old Physics used "charge" to explain almost everything that was hard to explain, but when it comes to the basic unit of current, Old Physics lands into a crisis of defining what is Ampere versus Coulomb.
> 
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 16, 2024 at 2:06:50 PM UTC-6 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> I am attempting to define New Physics Ampere and Coulomb. I am not sure I even need the Coulomb as being A*seconds.
>
> Old Physics had missing the Dirac magnetic monopole, instead they used a general term of "charge" a really obnoxious and silly term for which they swept everything under the carpet of trash if they came upon trash in physics. In Old Physics, whenever a person is at a loss for explanation in electromagnetism, the word "charge" would enter the discussion and supposedly explain things, but it never did, for charge is a cover-up-of-ignorance.
>
> So what I am doing is attempting to use geometry volume of math to solve what Voltage as energy is in physics. I am guided by geometry math.
>
> We know that in geometry math that volume = an area moved through a distance. And the formula of Volume in geometry is L * W*D and the formula of Voltage is similar in Current * (magnetic field * electric field). We take the vector cross product (or the dot product) of B*E as a area of volume geometry and then multiply it by current to get a volume of electricity in mathematics. The B*E turns out to use sine or cosine and is the area of a parallelogram. Once we multiply by current we obtain that volume of electricity. And it should be a formula for Voltage as this V = current ((1/A)(meter/sec)* (A)(meter/sec)). That results in current (m^2/s^2) a energy term.
>
> In math geometry the pinnacle peak of geometry is volume, there is nothing further in geometry than 3rd dimension volume. In keeping with geometry, physics pinnacle peak is energy, there is nothing further in physics than energy. And so when I end up with Voltage = A (m^2/s^2), I end up with energy, not much different from E = mc^2 which is wave energy, but for my A(m^2/s^2) that is particle energy of the Dirac magnetic monopole of 0.5MeV.
>
> So I must decipher how waves transform into 0.5MeV Dirac magnetic monopoles to see if my formula A(m^2/s^2) is the true final formula for Voltage.
>
> AP kindly asks Google to let AP run all three, sci.math, sci.physics, PAU as he runs PAU, now--- all pure science, no spam and no govt b.s.
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> Archimedes Plutonium
>
>
> Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. If you, the reader, is wondering why AP posts this to a thread which is off topic in sci.math or sci.physics, is because some stalkers track AP, such as kibo, dan, jan who have been paid to stalk for 3 decades and when they see AP trying to post to his own thread that is on-topic they throw a impossible reCAPTcha suppression and repression at me that only wastes my time. From what AP can make out-- Google is not the only one using reCAPTcha, apparently the US govt rents out reCAPTcha. So if you see a AP post in a thread off topic, is because kooks of reCAPTcha are making it impossible for AP to post to the on-topic thread.
>
> Read all of AP's post in peace and quiet in his newsgroup-- what sci.physics and sci.math should look like when govt spammers are not allowed in a newsgroup to wreck the newsgroup. Govt spammers have their agenda of drag net spam, and then their agenda of spy message codes, such as the "i sick, i cry" baloney, which only ends up ruining the newsgroups and why Google decided to close shop having fought govt bureaucrat mind sets for 30 years, and time to close shop.
>
> AP kindly asks Google to let AP run all three, sci.math, sci.physics, PAU as he runs PAU, now--- all pure science, no spam and no govt b.s.
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> Archimedes Plutonium

Really: It's 'just not how that word works', and usually... you'd skip using it at all.