On Thursday, April 6, 2023 at 2:37:49 PM UTC-7, JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
> littor...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > IOW, paleo-anthropology before "coastal dispersal" (aquatic ape) is at least as
> > wrong as geology was before "plate tectonics" (continental drift).
> The funny thing is, though Coastal Dispersal is mainstream, and I've only ever
> encountered one or two people denying it in my entire life, the savanna idiots
> are far too deeply brainwashed to take it to the next level: Aquatic Ape.
>
> They seem to believe that our ancestors were carrying around a savanna on
> their back, to feed from when they got hungry, and in any case no amount of
> time waterside could allow them to adapt at all...
>
> It's this blind, totally religious "Leap of Faith" the savanna crowd makes...

According to most interpretations of the fossil evidence, there appears to not have been much dispersal of any kind in the earliest years of hominid evolution.

So, your dumbass theory has the origins of humans being the result of a process that won't begin for millions of years.

Uh, ur, . . . duh doy dee doy doy.

It's stuff like this that makes it hard to take you or any aquatic-aper seriously.

James McGinn / Genius

My little boy, your "most interpretations of the fossil evidence" are probably as smart as you are...
:-DDD Keep running after your antelope.
https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/

_____

Op vrijdag 7 april 2023 om 09:07:05 UTC+2 schreef Solving Tornadoes:
> On Thursday, April 6, 2023 at 2:37:49 PM UTC-7, JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
> > littor...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > IOW, paleo-anthropology before "coastal dispersal" (aquatic ape) is at least as
> > > wrong as geology was before "plate tectonics" (continental drift).
> > The funny thing is, though Coastal Dispersal is mainstream, and I've only ever
> > encountered one or two people denying it in my entire life, the savanna idiots
> > are far too deeply brainwashed to take it to the next level: Aquatic Ape.
> >
> > They seem to believe that our ancestors were carrying around a savanna on
> > their back, to feed from when they got hungry, and in any case no amount of
> > time waterside could allow them to adapt at all...
> >
> > It's this blind, totally religious "Leap of Faith" the savanna crowd makes...
>
> According to most interpretations of the fossil evidence, there appears to not have been much dispersal of any kind in the earliest years of hominid evolution.
>
> So, your dumbass theory has the origins of humans being the result of a process that won't begin for millions of years.
>
> Uh, ur, . . . duh doy dee doy doy.
>
> It's stuff like this that makes it hard to take you or any aquatic-aper seriously.
>
> James McGinn / Genius

On Friday, April 7, 2023 at 5:26:22 AM UTC-7, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
> My little boy, your "most interpretations of the fossil evidence" are probably as smart as you are...
> :-DDD Keep running after your antelope.
> https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
>
> _____
>
> Op vrijdag 7 april 2023 om 09:07:05 UTC+2 schreef Solving Tornadoes:
> > On Thursday, April 6, 2023 at 2:37:49 PM UTC-7, JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
> > > littor...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > IOW, paleo-anthropology before "coastal dispersal" (aquatic ape) is at least as
> > > > wrong as geology was before "plate tectonics" (continental drift).
> > > The funny thing is, though Coastal Dispersal is mainstream, and I've only ever
> > > encountered one or two people denying it in my entire life, the savanna idiots
> > > are far too deeply brainwashed to take it to the next level: Aquatic Ape.
> > >
> > > They seem to believe that our ancestors were carrying around a savanna on
> > > their back, to feed from when they got hungry, and in any case no amount of
> > > time waterside could allow them to adapt at all...
> > >
> > > It's this blind, totally religious "Leap of Faith" the savanna crowd makes...
> >
> > According to most interpretations of the fossil evidence, there appears to not have been much dispersal of any kind in the earliest years of hominid evolution.
> >
> > So, your dumbass theory has the origins of humans being the result of a process that won't begin for millions of years.
> >
> > Uh, ur, . . . duh doy dee doy doy.
> >
> > It's stuff like this that makes it hard to take you or any aquatic-aper seriously.
> >
> > James McGinn / Genius

Marc, are you just going to ignore the issue I put before you. You are an evasive piece of shit.

some netloon:

> You are an evasive piece of shit.

https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/

On Friday, April 7, 2023 at 5:26:22 AM UTC-7, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
> My little boy, your "most interpretations of the fossil evidence" are probably as smart as you are...
> :-DDD Keep running after your antelope.
> https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
>
> _____
>
> Op vrijdag 7 april 2023 om 09:07:05 UTC+2 schreef Solving Tornadoes:
> > On Thursday, April 6, 2023 at 2:37:49 PM UTC-7, JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
> > > littor...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > IOW, paleo-anthropology before "coastal dispersal" (aquatic ape) is at least as
> > > > wrong as geology was before "plate tectonics" (continental drift).
> > > The funny thing is, though Coastal Dispersal is mainstream, and I've only ever
> > > encountered one or two people denying it in my entire life, the savanna idiots
> > > are far too deeply brainwashed to take it to the next level: Aquatic Ape.
> > >
> > > They seem to believe that our ancestors were carrying around a savanna on
> > > their back, to feed from when they got hungry, and in any case no amount of
> > > time waterside could allow them to adapt at all...
> > >
> > > It's this blind, totally religious "Leap of Faith" the savanna crowd makes...
> >
> > According to most interpretations of the fossil evidence, there appears to not have been much dispersal of any kind in the earliest years of hominid evolution.
> >
> > So, your dumbass theory has the origins of humans being the result of a process that won't begin for millions of years.
> >
> > Uh, ur, . . . duh doy dee doy doy.
> >
> > It's stuff like this that makes it hard to take you or any aquatic-aper seriously.
> >
> > James McGinn / Genius

Marc, you got nothing, you dishonest piece of shit.

savanna arguments:

> Marc, you got nothing, you dishonest piece of shit.

https://www.academia.edu/8732353/Marc_Verhaegens_papers_in_Human_Evolution
https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/

littor...@gmail.com wrote:

> My little boy, your "most interpretations of the fossil evidence" are probably as smart as you are...
> :-DDD Keep running after your antelope.
> https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/

If you have time to waste, and don't mind wasting it, you can always ask
it what it thinks this "Fossil Evidence" is. I mean, the oldest Chimp fossil
is significantly younger than erectus, never mind Lucy or Ardi.

AND IT'S ONLY TEETH!

Teeth are not definitive, not in themselves. They are not good "Evidence"
but merely the best that exist... as much as that sucks.

-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/713876271508193280

littor...@gmail.com wrote:

> https://www.academia.edu/8732353/Marc_Verhaegens_papers_in_Human_Evolution
> https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/

What I love is how the nutters who literally have nothing -- no fossils, no model
to explain where they were and why we can't find any -- telling YOU that you've
got nothing!

Genius has it's limits, mental illness knows no bounds.

-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/713876271508193280