On Sunday, April 9, 2023 at 4:00:39 AM UTC-7, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
> Op donderdag 30 maart 2023 om 18:34:03 UTC+2 schreef Solving Tornadoes:
> > > The exploitation of crabs by Last Interglacial Iberian Neanderthals:
> > > the evidence from Gruta da Figueira Brava (Portugal)
> > > Mariana Nabais, Catherine Dupont & João Zilhão 2023
> > > Front.Environ.Archaeol. Sec.Zooarchaeology vol.2
> > > doi org/10.3389/fearc.2023.1097815
> > > Hominin consumption of small prey has been much discussed over the past decades.
> > > Such resources are often considered to be unproductive in the mid-Paleolithic, due to their limited meat yield (low energy return).
> > > But ethnographic studies suggest: small prey incl.shellfish are a reliable, predictable, by no means marginal resource,
> > > there is increasing evidence for their inclusion in hominin diets, mid-Paleolithic & even earlier.
> > > Gruta da Figueira Brava features a MIS 5c-5b Hn occupation that left behind substantial, human-accumulated terrestrial & marine faunal remains,
> > > these are capped by reworked levels + some naturally accumulated, recent Holocene material: the remains of small crab spp & echinoderms.
> > > The brown crab Cancer pagurus predominates in the intact mid-Paleolithic deposit,
> > > reconstruction of its carapace width (based on regression from claw size) shows a preference for rel.large individuals.
> > > The detailed analysis of the Cancer pagurus remains reveals:
> > > complete animals were brought to the site, where they were roasted on coals, and then cracked open to access the flesh.
>
> > So, the fact that hominids ate crabs means they are aquatic? Really?
> Grow up, child,

Fuck you. Answer the fucking question, asshole.

Are you or are you not saying that crab eating makes them aquatic?

Answer the question, asshole.

Claudius Denk / Genius

kudu runner's *only* argument:
> Fuck you. Answer the fucking question, asshole.

:-DDD
https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/

littor...@gmail.com wrote:

> kudu runner's *only* argument:
> > Fuck you. Answer the fucking question, asshole.
> :-DDD
> https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/

I don't even know why you're replying to it. It clearly just craves attention.
Take for example it's cited image of a Chimp fetus which does not include
the image of a Chimp fetus. Not an accident. It's trolling.

-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/714144806246465536

Op zondag 9 april 2023 om 19:49:12 UTC+2 schreef JTEM is so reasonable:
> littor...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > kudu runner's *only* argument:
> > > Fuck you. Answer the fucking question, asshole.
> > :-DDD
> > https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
> I don't even know why you're replying to it. It clearly just craves attention.
> Take for example it's cited image of a Chimp fetus which does not include
> the image of a Chimp fetus. Not an accident. It's trolling.

I always hope there are serious people here who open the link
https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/

On Sunday, April 9, 2023 at 10:45:44 AM UTC-7, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
> kudu runner's *only* argument:
> > Fuck you. Answer the fucking question, asshole.
> :-DDD
> https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/

There's no running after Kudu in my scenario, you dishonest piece of shit.

How Human actually evolved:
https://youtu.be/Z7TwiVul7F0

On Sunday, April 9, 2023 at 10:42:00 AM UTC-7, Claudius Denk wrote:
> On Sunday, April 9, 2023 at 4:00:39 AM UTC-7, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Op donderdag 30 maart 2023 om 18:34:03 UTC+2 schreef Solving Tornadoes:
> > > > The exploitation of crabs by Last Interglacial Iberian Neanderthals:
> > > > the evidence from Gruta da Figueira Brava (Portugal)
> > > > Mariana Nabais, Catherine Dupont & João Zilhão 2023
> > > > Front.Environ.Archaeol. Sec.Zooarchaeology vol.2
> > > > doi org/10.3389/fearc.2023.1097815
> > > > Hominin consumption of small prey has been much discussed over the past decades.
> > > > Such resources are often considered to be unproductive in the mid-Paleolithic, due to their limited meat yield (low energy return).
> > > > But ethnographic studies suggest: small prey incl.shellfish are a reliable, predictable, by no means marginal resource,
> > > > there is increasing evidence for their inclusion in hominin diets, mid-Paleolithic & even earlier.
> > > > Gruta da Figueira Brava features a MIS 5c-5b Hn occupation that left behind substantial, human-accumulated terrestrial & marine faunal remains,
> > > > these are capped by reworked levels + some naturally accumulated, recent Holocene material: the remains of small crab spp & echinoderms.
> > > > The brown crab Cancer pagurus predominates in the intact mid-Paleolithic deposit,
> > > > reconstruction of its carapace width (based on regression from claw size) shows a preference for rel.large individuals.
> > > > The detailed analysis of the Cancer pagurus remains reveals:
> > > > complete animals were brought to the site, where they were roasted on coals, and then cracked open to access the flesh.
> >
> > > So, the fact that hominids ate crabs means they are aquatic? Really?
> > Grow up, child,
>
> Fuck you. Answer the fucking question, asshole.
>
> Are you or are you not saying that crab eating makes them aquatic?
>
> Answer the question, asshole.
>
> Claudius Denk / Genius