Message-ID:

An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.

computers / comp.mobile.android / Re: 5G Flap

On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:45:35 -0800, sms wrote:

> So 641 Mb/s down is impressive, though the upload speed is not
> wonderful, and ping and jitter aren't great.

The 5G T-Mobile speeds badgolferman showed are not impressive.
They're _damn_ impressive!

I'm feeling a little left out but I live in the mountainous boonies where
houses have to be 40 acres apart as a minimum (& there is no cable service).

> None of the tests that Harry/Arlen/Andy posted are terrific. Sure
> they're better than LTE on T-Mobile, but only because the LTE speeds are
> so poor.

Steve.
You have _never_ backed up your brazen speed claims with a screenshot.
*Not even once.*

Do you really think your fabricated claims are believable to anyone?
You said you have both Verizon & T-Mobile phones, right?

Post a screenshot of your side-by-side speeds, Steve.
Otherwise, how can we _believe_ a single word of what you claim?

Remember, your _entire_ argument on 5G coverage assumed we were completely
ignorant that the FCC maps have _zero_ 5G coverage on them (they're no
better than 5G coverage maps of the moon, Steve).

Your entire argument, Steve, was based on completely wrong data.
Everything.

You either lied, or you're stupid Steve.
Pick one.

Only sordid politicians base their _entire_ argument on worthless data.

People who brazenly lie like you did, can't be trusted to tell the truth.
I don't trust nospam (he's no different than you are).

But I _do_ trust badgolferman.

> On my Verizon MVNO, the last speed test I did a couple of weeks ago, on
> LTE, was 266 Mb/s down, 27.8 Mb/s up, 25ms ping, and 3.4ms of jitter.
> Okay, I just ran another one and got 214 Mb/s down, 28.1 Mb/s down, 28ms
> ping, and 1.4ms of jitter.

Bullshit Steve.
You bullshit us so much that you long lost the benefit of the doubt.

Take ten seconds to snap a screenshot, Steve.
Ten seconds.

> Looking at the fastest test in Harry/Arlen/Andy's list, it was 255 Mb/s
> down, 6.97 Mb/s up, 29ms ping, and 13ms of jitter--slightly worse
> download speed than what I get on Verizon, much lower upload speed than
> what I get on Verizon, and worse ping and jitter.

Steve,
Stop your bullshit.

I don't care if T-Mobile or Verizon or AT&T has faster or better coverage.
But I'm allergic to people like you whose _entire_ argument is bullshit.

Steve... you tried to bullshit us on the FCC data coverage, didn't you?
Either that, or you were completely ignorant they don't have any 5G on them.

Pick one:
a. You bullshitted us on FCC coverage (it may as well have been the moon)
b. Your entire argument is based on your misinterpretation of FCC data
Pick one.

Stop bullshitting us Steve.
It works on idiots.

Your incessant coverage/speed bullshit doesn't work on intelligent people

> T-Mobile is making a big deal of their quantity of 5G deployment, but as
> other publications have confirmed, T-Mobile low-band 5G is comparable in
> speed to AT&T and Verizon LTE. See
> <https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/verizons-lte-speeds-rival-5g-speeds-on-at-t-and-t-mobile-analyst-says/>.
>
> Verizon is spending big on 5G mmWave but upgrading its already fast LTE
> network to low-band 5G that isn't much faster, if at all, doesn't seem
> to be where they are putting a lot of CapEx dollars.

Yes. We get it you get paid by Verizon Steve.
We can predict a dozen years in advance you'll claim Verizon is great and
T-Mobile sucks, Steve.

We know that.
But you claim to have both a Verizon and T-Mobile phone, right Steve?

Then take the ten seconds for each phone to snapshot your speeds, Steve.
Like this:

Anything else is pure bullshit, Steve.
Screenshots, or you're bullshitting us, Steve.
--
PS: To badgolferman... damn those 5G T-Mobile speeds are impressive!

Re: 5G Flap

<190120221932133169%nospam@nospam.invalid>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=26771&group=comp.mobile.android#26771

copy link Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone comp.mobile.android

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nos...@nospam.invalid (nospam)
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: 5G Flap
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 19:32:13 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <190120221932133169%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <ss6v4k$bc8$1@dont-email.me> <180120221313358377%nospam@nospam.invalid> <ss7874$b4i$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ss7af1$17c$1@dont-email.me> <ss7jf0$sso$1@dont-email.me> <ssaab1$1q9j$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e36870088c95e3369aa8044da7701971";
logging-data="8681"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19i7L6RfubJ/9BnrxF1JglS"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HBRUNahP8yJ55kZ1+yScJZyrHA0=

by: nospam - Thu, 20 Jan 2022 00:32 UTC

Subject	Author
Re: 5G Flap	Andy Burnelli
Re: 5G Flap	nospam
Re: 5G Flap	Andy Burnelli