On 25-Mar-22 9:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>
> 1) The PNN engine is eternal
> 2) If you recharge the lithium batteries with solar panels it lasts forever

Lithium ion batteries have a limited life, and wear our regardless of
how they're charged.

Sylvia

On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 2:11:04 AM UTC-4, pnn calmagorod wrote:
> Il giorno venerdì 25 marzo 2022 alle 01:17:36 UTC+1 Sylvia Else ha scritto:
> > On 25-Mar-22 9:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
> > >
> > > 1) The PNN engine is eternal
> > > 2) If you recharge the lithium batteries with solar panels it lasts forever
> > Lithium ion batteries have a limited life, and wear our regardless of
> > how they're charged.
> What problem!!
> Change Lithium batteries or use orhers or use nuclear reactor (with tons of uranium as reserve)
> You never change the PNN engine!
>
> on the other side the archeological rocketry and its comic bins to lose :-)
>
> E.Laureti
>

We all understand now that you are nothing but a scammer trying to fleece money from people. Don't go away mad, just go away.

On 25-Mar-22 5:11 pm, pnn calmagorod wrote:
> Il giorno venerdì 25 marzo 2022 alle 01:17:36 UTC+1 Sylvia Else ha scritto:
>> On 25-Mar-22 9:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>>>
>>> 1) The PNN engine is eternal
>>> 2) If you recharge the lithium batteries with solar panels it lasts forever
>> Lithium ion batteries have a limited life, and wear our regardless of
>> how they're charged.
>
> What problem!!
> Change Lithium batteries or use orhers or use nuclear reactor (with tons of uranium as reserve)
> You never change the PNN engine!

Pretty sure changing lithium batteries on the way to mars is not practical.

Sylvia

On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:17:34 +1100, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:

>On 25-Mar-22 9:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>>
>> 1) The PNN engine is eternal
>> 2) If you recharge the lithium batteries with solar panels it lasts forever
>
>Lithium ion batteries have a limited life, and wear our regardless of
>how they're charged.
>
>Sylvia

you know nothing about graphene batteries, that is:

1) expected life 45 years

2) more that 1000000 cycles charge/discharge.

On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 05:21:54 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 2:11:04 AM UTC-4, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>> Il giorno venerdì 25 marzo 2022 alle 01:17:36 UTC+1 Sylvia Else ha scritto:
>> > On 25-Mar-22 9:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>> > >
>> > > 1) The PNN engine is eternal
>> > > 2) If you recharge the lithium batteries with solar panels it lasts forever
>> > Lithium ion batteries have a limited life, and wear our regardless of
>> > how they're charged.
>> What problem!!
>> Change Lithium batteries or use orhers or use nuclear reactor (with tons of uranium as reserve)
>> You never change the PNN engine!
>>
>> on the other side the archeological rocketry and its comic bins to lose :-)
>>
>> E.Laureti
>>
>
>We all understand now that you are nothing but a scammer trying to fleece money from people. Don't go away mad, just go away.

you just smell like poo!

On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 6:33:33 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 05:21:54 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 2:11:04 AM UTC-4, pnn calmagorod wrote:
> >> Il giorno venerdě 25 marzo 2022 alle 01:17:36 UTC+1 Sylvia Else ha scritto:
> >> > On 25-Mar-22 9:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > 1) The PNN engine is eternal
> >> > > 2) If you recharge the lithium batteries with solar panels it lasts forever
> >> > Lithium ion batteries have a limited life, and wear our regardless of
> >> > how they're charged.
> >> What problem!!
> >> Change Lithium batteries or use orhers or use nuclear reactor (with tons of uranium as reserve)
> >> You never change the PNN engine!
> >>
> >> on the other side the archeological rocketry and its comic bins to lose :-)
> >>
> >> E.Laureti
> >>
> >
> >We all understand now that you are nothing but a scammer trying to fleece money from people. Don't go away mad, just go away.
> you just smell like poo!

And you write like a 5 year old.

On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 04:31:34 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 6:33:33 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 05:21:54 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 2:11:04 AM UTC-4, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>> >> Il giorno venerd? 25 marzo 2022 alle 01:17:36 UTC+1 Sylvia Else ha scritto:
>> >> > On 25-Mar-22 9:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > 1) The PNN engine is eternal
>> >> > > 2) If you recharge the lithium batteries with solar panels it lasts forever
>> >> > Lithium ion batteries have a limited life, and wear our regardless of
>> >> > how they're charged.
>> >> What problem!!
>> >> Change Lithium batteries or use orhers or use nuclear reactor (with tons of uranium as reserve)
>> >> You never change the PNN engine!
>> >>
>> >> on the other side the archeological rocketry and its comic bins to lose :-)
>> >>
>> >> E.Laureti
>> >>
>> >
>> >We all understand now that you are nothing but a scammer trying to fleece money from people. Don't go away mad, just go away.
>> you just smell like poo!
>
>And you write like a 5 year old.

absolutely!

Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> wrote:

> you know nothing about graphene batteries, that is:
> 1) expected life 45 years
> 2) more that 1000000 cycles charge/discharge.

If only they were actually manufactured and available to buy,
and not something that might be theoretically possible.
--
/* * * Otto J. Makela <om@iki.fi> * * * * * * * * * */
/* Phone: +358 40 765 5772, ICBM: N 60 10' E 24 55' */
/* Mail: Mechelininkatu 26 B 27, FI-00100 Helsinki */
/* * * Computers Rule 01001111 01001011 * * * * * * */

On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 15:49:37 +0300, om@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:

>Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> wrote:
>
>> you know nothing about graphene batteries, that is:
>> 1) expected life 45 years
>> 2) more that 1000000 cycles charge/discharge.
>
>If only they were actually manufactured and available to buy,
>and not something that might be theoretically possible.

http://shop.gs9.it/supercondensatori/184-sirius-1-12.html

On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 15:49:37 +0300, om@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:

>Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> wrote:
>
>> you know nothing about graphene batteries, that is:
>> 1) expected life 45 years
>> 2) more that 1000000 cycles charge/discharge.
>
>If only they were actually manufactured and available to buy,
>and not something that might be theoretically possible.

translated by google:

https://shop-gs9-it.translate.goog/supercondensatori/184-sirius-1-12.html?_x_tr_sch=http&_x_tr_sl=it&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp

Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 15:49:37 +0300, om@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:
>>Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> wrote:
>>> you know nothing about graphene batteries, that is:
>>> 1) expected life 45 years
>>> 2) more that 1000000 cycles charge/discharge.
>>
>>If only they were actually manufactured and available to buy,
>>and not something that might be theoretically possible.
>
> http://shop.gs9.it/supercondensatori/184-sirius-1-12.html

The Kilowatt labs Sirius 1-12 is not a "graphene battery", it is a
capacitor. The claimed specs do match what you said, but confusing it
with a pretty new (almost-there) battery technology is pretty much a
rookie mistake. Or intentional lying.

Here is the manual:

https://kilowattlabs.com/wp-content/themes/KiloWatt-Labs/Sirius_Hardware_Manuals_Version_1/Low/KiloWatt%20Labs%20Sirius-User%20Manual-1000-12-B-0.6C-A-Gv062019.pdf

PS. Graphene-laced LiPo batteries seem to already be somewhat available,
but their specs certainly aren't what you claimed.

--
/* * * Otto J. Makela <om@iki.fi> * * * * * * * * * */
/* Phone: +358 40 765 5772, ICBM: N 60 10' E 24 55' */
/* Mail: Mechelininkatu 26 B 27, FI-00100 Helsinki */
/* * * Computers Rule 01001111 01001011 * * * * * * */

On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 22:26:27 +0300, om@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:

>Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 15:49:37 +0300, om@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:
>>>Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> wrote:
>>>> you know nothing about graphene batteries, that is:
>>>> 1) expected life 45 years
>>>> 2) more that 1000000 cycles charge/discharge.
>>>
>>>If only they were actually manufactured and available to buy,
>>>and not something that might be theoretically possible.
>>
>> http://shop.gs9.it/supercondensatori/184-sirius-1-12.html
>
>The Kilowatt labs Sirius 1-12 is not a "graphene battery", it is a
>capacitor. The claimed specs do match what you said, but confusing it
>with a pretty new (almost-there) battery technology is pretty much a
>rookie mistake. Or intentional lying.
>
>Here is the manual:
>
>https://kilowattlabs.com/wp-content/themes/KiloWatt-Labs/Sirius_Hardware_Manuals_Version_1/Low/KiloWatt%20Labs%20Sirius-User%20Manual-1000-12-B-0.6C-A-Gv062019.pdf
>
>PS. Graphene-laced LiPo batteries seem to already be somewhat available,
>but their specs certainly aren't what you claimed.

You are mistaken
It IS a graphene battery !

Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 22:26:27 +0300, om@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:
>> The Kilowatt labs Sirius 1-12 is not a "graphene battery", it is a
>> capacitor. The claimed specs do match what you said, but confusing it
>> with a pretty new (almost-there) battery technology is pretty much a
>> rookie mistake. Or intentional lying.
>>
>> Here is the manual:
>> https://kilowattlabs.com/wp-content/themes/KiloWatt-Labs/Sirius_Hardware_Manuals_Version_1/Low/KiloWatt%20Labs%20Sirius-User%20Manual-1000-12-B-0.6C-A-Gv062019.pdf
>
> You are mistaken
> It IS a graphene battery !

No, it is not. Read The Fine Manual. If you keep insisting it is a
battery you are either deluded or mendacious.
--
/* * * Otto J. Makela <om@iki.fi> * * * * * * * * * */
/* Phone: +358 40 765 5772, ICBM: N 60 10' E 24 55' */
/* Mail: Mechelininkatu 26 B 27, FI-00100 Helsinki */
/* * * Computers Rule 01001111 01001011 * * * * * * */

On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 10:45:53 +0300, om@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:

>Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 22:26:27 +0300, om@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:
>>> The Kilowatt labs Sirius 1-12 is not a "graphene battery", it is a
>>> capacitor. The claimed specs do match what you said, but confusing it
>>> with a pretty new (almost-there) battery technology is pretty much a
>>> rookie mistake. Or intentional lying.
>>>
>>> Here is the manual:
>>> https://kilowattlabs.com/wp-content/themes/KiloWatt-Labs/Sirius_Hardware_Manuals_Version_1/Low/KiloWatt%20Labs%20Sirius-User%20Manual-1000-12-B-0.6C-A-Gv062019.pdf
>>
>> You are mistaken
>> It IS a graphene battery !
>
>No, it is not. Read The Fine Manual. If you keep insisting it is a
>battery you are either deluded or mendacious.

how do you call something that you can charge and then gives energy
back to you?

On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 5:49:31 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 10:45:53 +0300, o...@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:
>
> >Doctor Who <d...@tardis.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 22:26:27 +0300, o...@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:
> >>> The Kilowatt labs Sirius 1-12 is not a "graphene battery", it is a
> >>> capacitor. The claimed specs do match what you said, but confusing it
> >>> with a pretty new (almost-there) battery technology is pretty much a
> >>> rookie mistake. Or intentional lying.
> >>>
> >>> Here is the manual:
> >>> https://kilowattlabs.com/wp-content/themes/KiloWatt-Labs/Sirius_Hardware_Manuals_Version_1/Low/KiloWatt%20Labs%20Sirius-User%20Manual-1000-12-B-0.6C-A-Gv062019.pdf
> >>
> >> You are mistaken
> >> It IS a graphene battery !
> >
> >No, it is not. Read The Fine Manual. If you keep insisting it is a
> >battery you are either deluded or mendacious.
> how do you call something that you can charge and then gives energy
> back to you?

So you do not know the difference between a battery and a capacitor? You are not a very good fraud.

On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 04:55:22 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 5:49:31 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 10:45:53 +0300, o...@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:
>>
>> >Doctor Who <d...@tardis.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 22:26:27 +0300, o...@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:
>> >>> The Kilowatt labs Sirius 1-12 is not a "graphene battery", it is a
>> >>> capacitor. The claimed specs do match what you said, but confusing it
>> >>> with a pretty new (almost-there) battery technology is pretty much a
>> >>> rookie mistake. Or intentional lying.
>> >>>
>> >>> Here is the manual:
>> >>> https://kilowattlabs.com/wp-content/themes/KiloWatt-Labs/Sirius_Hardware_Manuals_Version_1/Low/KiloWatt%20Labs%20Sirius-User%20Manual-1000-12-B-0.6C-A-Gv062019.pdf
>> >>
>> >> You are mistaken
>> >> It IS a graphene battery !
>> >
>> >No, it is not. Read The Fine Manual. If you keep insisting it is a
>> >battery you are either deluded or mendacious.
>> how do you call something that you can charge and then gives energy
>> back to you?
>
>So you do not know the difference between a battery and a capacitor? You are not a very good fraud.

capacitor or not capacitor they are made of graphene, and the expected
life is 45 years, 1000000 cycles.

On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 11:42:27 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 04:55:22 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 5:49:31 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
> >> On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 10:45:53 +0300, o...@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:
> >>
> >> >Doctor Who <d...@tardis.org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 22:26:27 +0300, o...@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:
> >> >>> The Kilowatt labs Sirius 1-12 is not a "graphene battery", it is a
> >> >>> capacitor. The claimed specs do match what you said, but confusing it
> >> >>> with a pretty new (almost-there) battery technology is pretty much a
> >> >>> rookie mistake. Or intentional lying.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Here is the manual:
> >> >>> https://kilowattlabs.com/wp-content/themes/KiloWatt-Labs/Sirius_Hardware_Manuals_Version_1/Low/KiloWatt%20Labs%20Sirius-User%20Manual-1000-12-B-0.6C-A-Gv062019.pdf
> >> >>
> >> >> You are mistaken
> >> >> It IS a graphene battery !
> >> >
> >> >No, it is not. Read The Fine Manual. If you keep insisting it is a
> >> >battery you are either deluded or mendacious.
> >> how do you call something that you can charge and then gives energy
> >> back to you?
> >
> >So you do not know the difference between a battery and a capacitor? You are not a very good fraud.
> capacitor or not capacitor they are made of graphene, and the expected
> life is 45 years, 1000000 cycles.

You evaded the question so I conclude you do not know the difference. I find it astounding that you can write stuff like this and yet you don't even seem to have the skills to use google to find an answer.

On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 11:12:08 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 11:42:27 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 04:55:22 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 5:49:31 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 10:45:53 +0300, o...@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Doctor Who <d...@tardis.org> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 22:26:27 +0300, o...@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:
>> >> >>> The Kilowatt labs Sirius 1-12 is not a "graphene battery", it is a
>> >> >>> capacitor. The claimed specs do match what you said, but confusing it
>> >> >>> with a pretty new (almost-there) battery technology is pretty much a
>> >> >>> rookie mistake. Or intentional lying.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Here is the manual:
>> >> >>> https://kilowattlabs.com/wp-content/themes/KiloWatt-Labs/Sirius_Hardware_Manuals_Version_1/Low/KiloWatt%20Labs%20Sirius-User%20Manual-1000-12-B-0.6C-A-Gv062019.pdf
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You are mistaken
>> >> >> It IS a graphene battery !
>> >> >
>> >> >No, it is not. Read The Fine Manual. If you keep insisting it is a
>> >> >battery you are either deluded or mendacious.
>> >> how do you call something that you can charge and then gives energy
>> >> back to you?
>> >
>> >So you do not know the difference between a battery and a capacitor? You are not a very good fraud.
>> capacitor or not capacitor they are made of graphene, and the expected
>> life is 45 years, 1000000 cycles.
>
>You evaded the question so I conclude you do not know the difference. I find it astounding that you can write stuff like this and yet you don't even seem to have the skills to use google to find an answer.

prooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooootttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt

that is what you deserve!

Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> wrote:

>>> >> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 22:26:27 +0300, o...@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:
>>> >>> Here is the manual:
>>> >>> https://kilowattlabs.com/wp-content/themes/KiloWatt-Labs/Sirius_Hardware_Manuals_Version_1/Low/KiloWatt%20Labs%20Sirius-User%20Manual-1000-12-B-0.6C-A-Gv062019.pdf
>
> capacitor or not capacitor they are made of graphene, and the expected
> life is 45 years, 1000000 cycles.

This technology does not involve graphene. RTFM.

Graphene-laced LiPo batteries are a different thing,
technology which is becoming available just now.

https://investingnews.com/daily/tech-investing/nanoscience-investing/graphene-investing/graphene-battery-tesla/

--
/* * * Otto J. Makela <om@iki.fi> * * * * * * * * * */
/* Phone: +358 40 765 5772, ICBM: N 60 10' E 24 55' */
/* Mail: Mechelininkatu 26 B 27, FI-00100 Helsinki */
/* * * Computers Rule 01001111 01001011 * * * * * * */

On 26-Mar-22 3:09 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
> Il giorno venerdì 25 marzo 2022 alle 13:22:01 UTC+1 Sylvia Else ha scritto:
>> On 25-Mar-22 5:11 pm, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>>> Il giorno venerdì 25 marzo 2022 alle 01:17:36 UTC+1 Sylvia Else ha scritto:
>>>> On 25-Mar-22 9:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) The PNN engine is eternal
>>>>> 2) If you recharge the lithium batteries with solar panels it lasts forever
>>>> Lithium ion batteries have a limited life, and wear our regardless of
>>>> how they're charged.
>>>
>>> What problem!!
>>> Change Lithium batteries or use orhers or use nuclear reactor (with tons of uranium as reserve)
>>> You never change the PNN engine!
>> Pretty sure changing lithium batteries on the way to mars is not practical.
>
> Jes the best way to use PNN for Proxima Centaury is a nuclear reactor :-)
>
> Give us 6 kilopower reactors :-) and not colonize the unuseful Mars but earth like planets years light away
>
> E.Laureti

Still doesn't address the problem of your drive not working.

Sylvia.

On Sun, 3 Apr 2022 09:23:10 +1000, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:

>On 26-Mar-22 3:09 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>> Il giorno venerdì 25 marzo 2022 alle 13:22:01 UTC+1 Sylvia Else ha scritto:
>>> On 25-Mar-22 5:11 pm, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>>>> Il giorno venerdì 25 marzo 2022 alle 01:17:36 UTC+1 Sylvia Else ha scritto:
>>>>> On 25-Mar-22 9:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) The PNN engine is eternal
>>>>>> 2) If you recharge the lithium batteries with solar panels it lasts forever
>>>>> Lithium ion batteries have a limited life, and wear our regardless of
>>>>> how they're charged.
>>>>
>>>> What problem!!
>>>> Change Lithium batteries or use orhers or use nuclear reactor (with tons of uranium as reserve)
>>>> You never change the PNN engine!
>>> Pretty sure changing lithium batteries on the way to mars is not practical.
>>
>> Jes the best way to use PNN for Proxima Centaury is a nuclear reactor :-)
>>
>> Give us 6 kilopower reactors :-) and not colonize the unuseful Mars but earth like planets years light away
>>
>> E.Laureti
>
>Still doesn't address the problem of your drive not working.
>
>Sylvia.

prove it.

Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> wrote:

> Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
>> Still doesn't address the problem of your drive not working.
> prove it.

You misunderstand how these things work, it's your job to show it works.

Also, if there is a patent (as you repeatedly seem to have claimed),
just give us the number and we'll look it up.

--
/* * * Otto J. Makela <om@iki.fi> * * * * * * * * * */
/* Phone: +358 40 765 5772, ICBM: N 60 10' E 24 55' */
/* Mail: Mechelininkatu 26 B 27, FI-00100 Helsinki */
/* * * Computers Rule 01001111 01001011 * * * * * * */

On Tue, 05 Apr 2022 12:27:23 +0300, om@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:

>Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> wrote:
>
>> Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
>>> Still doesn't address the problem of your drive not working.
>> prove it.
>
>You misunderstand how these things work, it's your job to show it works.
>
>Also, if there is a patent (as you repeatedly seem to have claimed),
>just give us the number and we'll look it up.

we have shown that it works at the pnn road show on 31/10/2021.

On Tuesday, April 5, 2022 at 9:20:58 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Apr 2022 12:27:23 +0300, o...@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:
>
> >Doctor Who <d...@tardis.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid> wrote:
> >>> Still doesn't address the problem of your drive not working.
> >> prove it.
> >
> >You misunderstand how these things work, it's your job to show it works.
> >
> >Also, if there is a patent (as you repeatedly seem to have claimed),
> >just give us the number and we'll look it up.
> we have shown that it works at the pnn road show on 31/10/2021.

Is PNN an acronym for Probably Not Needed?

On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 12:08:02 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, April 5, 2022 at 9:20:58 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2022 12:27:23 +0300, o...@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:
>>
>> >Doctor Who <d...@tardis.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid> wrote:
>> >>> Still doesn't address the problem of your drive not working.
>> >> prove it.
>> >
>> >You misunderstand how these things work, it's your job to show it works.
>> >
>> >Also, if there is a patent (as you repeatedly seem to have claimed),
>> >just give us the number and we'll look it up.
>> we have shown that it works at the pnn road show on 31/10/2021.
>
>Is PNN an acronym for Probably Not Needed?

in english: Non Newtonian Propulsion