novaBBS - rec.bicycles.tech - Aluminum vs Carbon Fiber

Aluminum vs Carbon Fiber

<888668f8-0c0a-49ee-8054-a70e9f022c86n@googlegroups.com>

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=41139&group=rec.bicycles.tech#41139

copy link Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech

X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4292:: with SMTP id o18mr33911qtl.75.1631142043080;
Wed, 08 Sep 2021 16:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:21a3:: with SMTP id be35mr4109424oib.31.1631142042788;
Wed, 08 Sep 2021 16:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 16:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=83.229.32.180; posting-account=ai195goAAAAWOHLnJWPRm0qjf_39qMws
NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.229.32.180
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <888668f8-0c0a-49ee-8054-a70e9f022c86n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Aluminum vs Carbon Fiber
From: cyclin...@gmail.com (Tom Kunich)
Injection-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 23:00:43 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 0

by: Tom Kunich - Wed, 8 Sep 2021 23:00 UTC

Re: Aluminum vs Carbon Fiber

<2fe11c21-7c24-479a-8659-33ca9e957312n@googlegroups.com>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=41162&group=rec.bicycles.tech#41162

copy link Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech

X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:444d:: with SMTP id w13mr2890641qkp.315.1631196524716;
Thu, 09 Sep 2021 07:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a54:488c:: with SMTP id r12mr2225425oic.115.1631196524391;
Thu, 09 Sep 2021 07:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid2!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 07:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <888668f8-0c0a-49ee-8054-a70e9f022c86n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=83.229.32.180; posting-account=ai195goAAAAWOHLnJWPRm0qjf_39qMws
NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.229.32.180
References: <888668f8-0c0a-49ee-8054-a70e9f022c86n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2fe11c21-7c24-479a-8659-33ca9e957312n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Aluminum vs Carbon Fiber
From: cyclin...@gmail.com (Tom Kunich)
Injection-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 14:08:44 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 7

by: Tom Kunich - Thu, 9 Sep 2021 14:08 UTC

On Wednesday, September 8, 2021 at 4:00:44 PM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XDeqkSUNJk&t=25s
There is an added point that is often overlooked in the love of light - carbon fiber frames fracture from age in the resin. A layup could be very well made but IF it has a near normal percentage of resin in it, the resin slowly ages, grows micro-cracks and eventually fails. What this time period is I couldn't say but TdF racing bikes are so light that it occurs rather rapidly.

"The Computer made me do it."

tech / rec.bicycles.tech / Aluminum vs Carbon Fiber

tech / rec.bicycles.tech / Aluminum vs Carbon Fiber

Subject	Author
Aluminum vs Carbon Fiber	Tom Kunich
Re: Aluminum vs Carbon Fiber	Tom Kunich