On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 10:15:45 AM UTC-8, funkma...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 11:47:24 AM UTC-5, cycl...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Monday, November 22, 2021 at 4:16:23 PM UTC-8, John B. wrote:
> > > On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 02:48:51 -0800 (PST), "funkma...@hotmail.com"
> > > <funkma...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >On Sunday, November 21, 2021 at 11:23:19 AM UTC-5, cycl...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >> On Sunday, November 21, 2021 at 3:54:34 AM UTC-8, funkma...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > > >> > On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 5:53:08 PM UTC-5, John B. wrote:
> > > >> > > On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 12:41:24 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
> > > >> > > <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > >On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 10:01:37 AM UTC-8, jeff.li....@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >> > > >> On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 19:55:53 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com>
> > > >> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> (chomp)
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> "No flint? No problem. How to find a rock that will spark like flint."
> > > >> > > >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLAmky6LxE8>
> > > >> > > >> Basic instruction on how to find rocks that can be used to create
> > > >> > > >> sparks to start a fire. No flint or steel required and easy enough
> > > >> > > >> for a cave man to accomplish, even by accident. The resulting sparks
> > > >> > > >> were far from spectacular, but sufficient to ignite dry grass or
> > > >> > > >> cotton char cloth.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >So you believe that Homo Erectus smelted steel to use on "any rock hard enough" to start fires with. You believe that a man with an IQ of 120 or so is comparable with homo erectus with an IQ of 40 or so. It is simply impossible to take one word that comes out of you any more seriously than you would from an infant.
> > > >> > > Ah Tommy, there you go flying off on a tangent. YOU are the one who
> > > >> > > started the conversation about flint and iron being used to start
> > > >> > > fires and as for I.Q.? How do you know what the I.Q. of prehistoric
> > > >> > > man was? Were you there?
> > > >> > well, his emotional and intellectual quotients _are_ both on par with a 7 year old. That point nothwithstanding, I think it's fair to note that despite repeated requests for any evidence of the IQ of homo erectus, tom simply ignores that there isn't any yet still claims it to be true - following the "big lie" playbook like a good little fascist.
> > > >> You simply cannot keep yourself from demonstrating that you're an alpha queer. You have absolutely every trait which is entirely different from a normal person. https://pumpkinperson.com/2014/10/02/the-iq-brain-size-of-homo-erectus/
> > > >> https://pumpkinperson.com/2016/10/26/how-smart-was-homo-erectus/
> > > >>
> > > >> So an average IQ of about 40 is as accurate as they could get.
> > > >
> > > >Too bad "pumpkin person" never wrote that Erectus had an average IQ of 40. Read it again, sparky (another failing grade in reading comprehension for tommy). BTW - one casual blog written by a person going by "pumpkin person" who doesn't list any credible expertise is all you got? Might as well have listed you cats facebook page.
> > > >
> > > >Keep flailing sparky.
> > > But how could one measure, or otherwise determine the I.Q. of
> > > creatures living millions of years in the past.
> > >
> > > If Tommy was set down in some remote area, naked, nothing but his bare
> > > hands, would he survive? Homo erectus did.
> > John, exactly why is it that you do not have even a passing understanding of brain capacity, the use of the pre-frontal cortex and the development of Homo Sapiens into the master species on this planet? I have to admit that the comments of you and flunkmeister would embarrass your 3rd grade teachers.
> Much less so than a 77 year old adult that thinks calling people 'queer' is an insult - At least John and I don't still act like third-graders.
Here's a clue jocko - calling a straight man is an insult and has been so since the time of Lot. But, gee, it doesn't seem an insult to you. I wonder why. Well, actually I don't wonder why.