novaBBS - sci.bio.paleontology

a population?

<tt36k6$17eh1$1@dont-email.me>

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=5220&group=sci.bio.paleontology#5220

copy link Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dal...@dalekelly.org (Dale)
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology
Subject: a population?
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 14:38:48 -0500
Organization: https://www.dalekelly.org/
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <tt36k6$17eh1$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 19:38:46 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="433a4d5673a26a33a480fbc88091becc";
logging-data="1292833"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19cvoxBDs0ZUdS+YCFEoueMi7LyFcnqxwc="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.8.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+G1pdDTfTdQoKE4P6RCj/UlisoE=
Content-Language: en-US

by: Dale - Tue, 21 Feb 2023 19:38 UTC

a sampling/testing of a population requires a statistical ASSUMPTION to
describe a population?

this applies to paleontology populations too?

sampling/testing happens with theory that is testable?

a theory is a reversible conjecture?

conjecture is induction or deduction?

--
Mystery? -> https://www.dalekelly.org/

Facebook-> https://www.facebook.com/dalekellytoo/
Instagram -> https://www.instagram.com/dalekellytoo/
Twitter -> https://twitter.com/dalekellytoo/
YouTube-> https://www.youtube.com/@dalekellytoo
GitHub -> https://github.com/dalekellytoo
LinkedIn -> https://www.linkedin.com/in/dalekellytoo/
Pinterest -> https://www.pinterest.com/dalekellytoo/

Re: a population?

<tt36rc$17ga0$1@dont-email.me>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=5221&group=sci.bio.paleontology#5221

copy link Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dal...@dalekelly.org (Dale)
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology
Subject: Re: a population?
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 14:42:38 -0500
Organization: https://www.dalekelly.org/
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <tt36rc$17ga0$1@dont-email.me>
References: <tt36k6$17eh1$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 19:42:36 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="433a4d5673a26a33a480fbc88091becc";
logging-data="1294656"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/iB0yQPEgo8fXR6B3UFFWK0GpPP+CRNvI="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.8.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3dL63uXUK8ptgBRvK6ML605rQGs=
In-Reply-To: <tt36k6$17eh1$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US

by: Dale - Tue, 21 Feb 2023 19:42 UTC

On 2/21/2023 2:38 PM, Dale wrote:
> a sampling/testing of a population requires a statistical ASSUMPTION to
> describe a population?
>
> this applies to paleontology populations too?
>
> sampling/testing happens with theory that is testable?
>
> a theory is a reversible conjecture?
>
> conjecture is induction or deduction?
>
>

sorry ...

a hypothesis is a reversible conjecture?

a theory is a testable hypothesis?

--
Mystery? -> https://www.dalekelly.org/

I wish you humans would leave me alone.

tech / sci.bio.paleontology / a population?

Subject	Author
a population?	Dale
Re: a population?	Dale