Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Linux is addictive, I'm hooked! -- MaDsen Wikholm's .sig


tech / rec.bicycles.tech / Re: further fuel notes

SubjectAuthor
* further fuel notesAMuzi
`* Re: further fuel notesTom Kunich
 +* Re: further fuel notesAMuzi
 |`* Re: further fuel notesTom Kunich
 | `- Re: further fuel notesJohn B.
 `- Re: further fuel notesJohn B.

1
further fuel notes

<t4jjkr$6c5$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=55261&group=rec.bicycles.tech#55261

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: am...@yellowjersey.org (AMuzi)
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: further fuel notes
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 10:12:27 -0500
Organization: Yellow Jersey, Ltd.
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <t4jjkr$6c5$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 15:12:27 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="1401091453383eba42285360253549a6";
logging-data="6533"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+pmnNUSnT/fCp7uYU9gtpo"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120604 Thunderbird/13.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3/Cj9btOH81EpoCRb1haP1tPUds=
 by: AMuzi - Sat, 30 Apr 2022 15:12 UTC

I found this helpful; tip of the hat to Mr Slocumb who
pointed out that I was confused:

https://www.uti.edu/blog/diesel/cng-lpg-lng-fuel
--
Andrew Muzi
<www.yellowjersey.org/>
Open every day since 1 April, 1971

Re: further fuel notes

<10c5d92d-4e32-4305-97f4-54566f03a8bdn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=55367&group=rec.bicycles.tech#55367

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:18a0:b0:2f3:ae98:dab with SMTP id v32-20020a05622a18a000b002f3ae980dabmr4608441qtc.171.1651613506564;
Tue, 03 May 2022 14:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:17a8:b0:322:7964:1b6c with SMTP id
bg40-20020a05680817a800b0032279641b6cmr2761083oib.25.1651613506366; Tue, 03
May 2022 14:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 14:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <t4jjkr$6c5$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.18.102.200; posting-account=ai195goAAAAWOHLnJWPRm0qjf_39qMws
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.18.102.200
References: <t4jjkr$6c5$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <10c5d92d-4e32-4305-97f4-54566f03a8bdn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: further fuel notes
From: cyclin...@gmail.com (Tom Kunich)
Injection-Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 21:31:46 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 6
 by: Tom Kunich - Tue, 3 May 2022 21:31 UTC

On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 8:12:30 AM UTC-7, AMuzi wrote:
> I found this helpful; tip of the hat to Mr Slocumb who
> pointed out that I was confused:
>
> https://www.uti.edu/blog/diesel/cng-lpg-lng-fuel

At room temperature you have to compress natural gas to 1000 PSI to liquify it so it is a rather dangerous fuel. It also has a burn ratio of 10:1 while gas is 14.7:1. Gasoline is relatively safe whereas LPG is an explosion waiting to happen.

Re: further fuel notes

<t4sa69$p84$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=55374&group=rec.bicycles.tech#55374

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: am...@yellowjersey.org (AMuzi)
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: further fuel notes
Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 17:26:14 -0500
Organization: Yellow Jersey, Ltd.
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <t4sa69$p84$1@dont-email.me>
References: <t4jjkr$6c5$1@dont-email.me> <10c5d92d-4e32-4305-97f4-54566f03a8bdn@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 22:26:17 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0f4eade99fd750e692828aa65d4d2e1d";
logging-data="25860"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19+Z8c+6YhV8qy4NhkyxCGb"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120604 Thunderbird/13.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1YlaAW9kMMm2I9TCn1cbTmiY5Eo=
In-Reply-To: <10c5d92d-4e32-4305-97f4-54566f03a8bdn@googlegroups.com>
 by: AMuzi - Tue, 3 May 2022 22:26 UTC

On 5/3/2022 4:31 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
> On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 8:12:30 AM UTC-7, AMuzi wrote:
>> I found this helpful; tip of the hat to Mr Slocumb who
>> pointed out that I was confused:
>>
>> https://www.uti.edu/blog/diesel/cng-lpg-lng-fuel
>
> At room temperature you have to compress natural gas to 1000 PSI to liquify it so it is a rather dangerous fuel. It also has a burn ratio of 10:1 while gas is 14.7:1. Gasoline is relatively safe whereas LPG is an explosion waiting to happen.
>
Perhaps in theory.
I owned a house next door to a taxi company with a fleet of
propane taxis, 24x7, every day including holidays. In 40
years there were no incidents involving fuel. Robberies,
vandalism, storm damage, minor car-taxi crashes but no fuel
problems.

https://propane.com/for-my-business/fleet-vehicles/badger-cab-company-case-study/

--
Andrew Muzi
<www.yellowjersey.org/>
Open every day since 1 April, 1971

Re: further fuel notes

<3jc37hdikjrprc9scs9efgqbgl9e77p4de@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=55375&group=rec.bicycles.tech#55375

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: slocom...@gmail.com (John B.)
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: further fuel notes
Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 06:10:52 +0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <3jc37hdikjrprc9scs9efgqbgl9e77p4de@4ax.com>
References: <t4jjkr$6c5$1@dont-email.me> <10c5d92d-4e32-4305-97f4-54566f03a8bdn@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d6cd4e9d2e82a275064a931b5a63126a";
logging-data="10464"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/+TBYe7jo8ihFKYY/D58ebyyZRxXiIcKY="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FUimiOuMymvCa5vSqQAku6wtoY8=
 by: John B. - Tue, 3 May 2022 23:10 UTC

On Tue, 3 May 2022 14:31:46 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
<cyclintom@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 8:12:30 AM UTC-7, AMuzi wrote:
>> I found this helpful; tip of the hat to Mr Slocumb who
>> pointed out that I was confused:
>>
>> https://www.uti.edu/blog/diesel/cng-lpg-lng-fuel
>
>At room temperature you have to compress natural gas to 1000 PSI to liquify it so it is a rather dangerous fuel. It also has a burn ratio of 10:1 while gas is 14.7:1. Gasoline is relatively safe whereas LPG is an explosion waiting to happen.

You are wrong again.
Natural gas, often called LNG, may become a liquid under 1,000 PSI. I
don't know and it is of no interest to anyone as LNG is converted to a
liquid by temperature not pressure, -260 degrees(F), and this is done
simply to make it easier to transport in bulk and once it gets to the
end user, say the city gas works, it is vaporized and furnished to
houses at about 1/4 psi, or about 7 - 8 inches of water pressure.

The flammability range of LNG (Methane) in air (21% Oxygen) is
approximately 5.3 to 14% (by volume)
--
Cheers,

John B.

Re: further fuel notes

<3677bc5c-d9fd-4dd4-88ac-9201aa62bd30n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=55395&group=rec.bicycles.tech#55395

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
X-Received: by 2002:a37:9243:0:b0:69b:6009:856d with SMTP id u64-20020a379243000000b0069b6009856dmr15823339qkd.274.1651676159810;
Wed, 04 May 2022 07:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:2b2b:b0:606:3bc2:9811 with SMTP id
l43-20020a0568302b2b00b006063bc29811mr2215422otv.40.1651676159485; Wed, 04
May 2022 07:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 07:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <t4sa69$p84$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.18.102.200; posting-account=ai195goAAAAWOHLnJWPRm0qjf_39qMws
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.18.102.200
References: <t4jjkr$6c5$1@dont-email.me> <10c5d92d-4e32-4305-97f4-54566f03a8bdn@googlegroups.com>
<t4sa69$p84$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <3677bc5c-d9fd-4dd4-88ac-9201aa62bd30n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: further fuel notes
From: cyclin...@gmail.com (Tom Kunich)
Injection-Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 14:55:59 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 19
 by: Tom Kunich - Wed, 4 May 2022 14:55 UTC

On Tuesday, May 3, 2022 at 3:26:20 PM UTC-7, AMuzi wrote:
> On 5/3/2022 4:31 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
> > On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 8:12:30 AM UTC-7, AMuzi wrote:
> >> I found this helpful; tip of the hat to Mr Slocumb who
> >> pointed out that I was confused:
> >>
> >> https://www.uti.edu/blog/diesel/cng-lpg-lng-fuel
> >
> > At room temperature you have to compress natural gas to 1000 PSI to liquify it so it is a rather dangerous fuel. It also has a burn ratio of 10:1 while gas is 14.7:1. Gasoline is relatively safe whereas LPG is an explosion waiting to happen.
> >
> Perhaps in theory.
> I owned a house next door to a taxi company with a fleet of
> propane taxis, 24x7, every day including holidays. In 40
> years there were no incidents involving fuel. Robberies,
> vandalism, storm damage, minor car-taxi crashes but no fuel
> problems.
>
> https://propane.com/for-my-business/fleet-vehicles/badger-cab-company-case-study/

Propane is only one constituent of natural gas and it is deemed a great deal safer. It liquefies at a lower pressure and it is less explosive without the methane and ethane.

Re: further fuel notes

<vr067hd3dl4f85pkrp8djjrq3ff500h907@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=55420&group=rec.bicycles.tech#55420

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: slocom...@gmail.com (John B.)
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: further fuel notes
Date: Thu, 05 May 2022 06:04:28 +0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <vr067hd3dl4f85pkrp8djjrq3ff500h907@4ax.com>
References: <t4jjkr$6c5$1@dont-email.me> <10c5d92d-4e32-4305-97f4-54566f03a8bdn@googlegroups.com> <t4sa69$p84$1@dont-email.me> <3677bc5c-d9fd-4dd4-88ac-9201aa62bd30n@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="bf40eb5aa91543b7b71a6f665bf93c5f";
logging-data="28101"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/1FzX3GhPvvNILbJCvJg9fQhmiCHvTUEs="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nGu+OAaQobUnKAkLOzD6oKy8y1Q=
 by: John B. - Wed, 4 May 2022 23:04 UTC

On Wed, 4 May 2022 07:55:59 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
<cyclintom@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, May 3, 2022 at 3:26:20 PM UTC-7, AMuzi wrote:
>> On 5/3/2022 4:31 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
>> > On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 8:12:30 AM UTC-7, AMuzi wrote:
>> >> I found this helpful; tip of the hat to Mr Slocumb who
>> >> pointed out that I was confused:
>> >>
>> >> https://www.uti.edu/blog/diesel/cng-lpg-lng-fuel
>> >
>> > At room temperature you have to compress natural gas to 1000 PSI to liquify it so it is a rather dangerous fuel. It also has a burn ratio of 10:1 while gas is 14.7:1. Gasoline is relatively safe whereas LPG is an explosion waiting to happen.
>> >
>> Perhaps in theory.
>> I owned a house next door to a taxi company with a fleet of
>> propane taxis, 24x7, every day including holidays. In 40
>> years there were no incidents involving fuel. Robberies,
>> vandalism, storm damage, minor car-taxi crashes but no fuel
>> problems.
>>
>> https://propane.com/for-my-business/fleet-vehicles/badger-cab-company-case-study/
>
>Propane is only one constituent of natural gas and it is deemed a great deal safer. It liquefies at a lower pressure and it is less explosive without the methane and ethane.

Well Tommy if you are calling "natural gas" what comes out of oil
wells then yes propane may be a part of it but if you are calling
"natural gas" what flows through the city or town "gas system" then
you are totally wrong.

What is called in the trade "LPG" Liquefied Petroleum Gas is largely
propane gas but if you are talking about "LNG" Liquefied Natural Gas
then it is largely Methane.

LPG is what comes in small tanks and you use in a cooking stove while
LNG is transported by tanker in a liquid form and used, say in city or
town gas systems as a gas.

If you are going to play the game then you really do need to learn the
names of the players.
--
Cheers,

John B.

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor