This is about:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jWbdlXdfnbE_c4bgrvSN-SenKAzVg42f/view?usp=sharing

About Einstein's equations.

Basicly, I've just seen the tensors.
Schwarzschild found some G.
That is the space of {G}'s.
Who could help me with references to continue or restart?

I searched "relativity" topics. "Everybody" is against the great jew. But me.

Att,

Vinicius

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> Atheism misrepresented Einstein.
> He had a God. He represented it in science.
> On his last day he said the atheists were his problem... and he could
> not see it until then.

join us on the right side of the history oh mankind!

On Saturday, May 1, 2021 at 7:50:57 AM UTC-7, Hardy Neubauer wrote:
> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Atheism misrepresented Einstein.
> > He had a God. He represented it in science.
> > On his last day he said the atheists were his problem... and he could
> > not see it until then.
> join us on the right side of the history oh mankind!

Einstein was proven right.
No one has to believe otherwise.
The 2 slit experiment was tested
without observers and it didn't
change according to what Bohr
said would happen. Einstein's
position over QM has been
proven right instead....
No observer created reality.
Just light collapsing and
disentangling the entangled
quantum waves...

Mitchell Raemsch

I want to know what do I need to simulate the big bang...

I just wrote the space-time curvature... and I have the geodesics equations....

"Something" is missing. : - D

Em sábado, 1 de maio de 2021 às 15:25:40 UTC-3, mitchr escreveu:
> On Saturday, May 1, 2021 at 7:50:57 AM UTC-7, Hardy Neubauer wrote:
> > mitchr wrote:
> >
> > > Atheism misrepresented Einstein.
> > > He had a God. He represented it in science.
> > > On his last day he said the atheists were his problem... and he could
> > > not see it until then.
> > join us on the right side of the history oh mankind!
> Einstein was proven right.
> No one has to believe otherwise.
> The 2 slit experiment was tested
> without observers and it didn't
> change according to what Bohr
> said would happen. Einstein's
> position over QM has been
> proven right instead....
> No observer created reality.
> Just light collapsing and
> disentangling the entangled
> quantum waves...
>
> Mitchell Raemsch

On Monday, May 3, 2021 at 9:30:40 AM UTC-7, Vinicius Claudino Ferraz wrote:
> I want to know what do I need to simulate the big bang...
>
> I just wrote the space-time curvature... and I have the geodesics equations...

Expanding dimension. Then gravity.

Mitchell Raemsch

> "Something" is missing. : - D
> Em sábado, 1 de maio de 2021 às 15:25:40 UTC-3, mitchr escreveu:
> > On Saturday, May 1, 2021 at 7:50:57 AM UTC-7, Hardy Neubauer wrote:
> > > mitchr wrote:
> > >
> > > > Atheism misrepresented Einstein.
> > > > He had a God. He represented it in science.
> > > > On his last day he said the atheists were his problem... and he could
> > > > not see it until then.
> > > join us on the right side of the history oh mankind!
> > Einstein was proven right.
> > No one has to believe otherwise.
> > The 2 slit experiment was tested
> > without observers and it didn't
> > change according to what Bohr
> > said would happen. Einstein's
> > position over QM has been
> > proven right instead....
> > No observer created reality.
> > Just light collapsing and
> > disentangling the entangled
> > quantum waves...
> >
> > Mitchell Raemsch

Vinicius Claudino Ferraz wrote:

> I want to know what do I need to simulate the big bang...
> I just wrote the space-time curvature... and I have the geodesics
> equations... "Something" is missing. : - D

you are a poor country.

Vinicius Claudino Ferraz kirjutas laupäev, 1. mai 2021 kl 00:38:34 UTC+3:
> This is about:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jWbdlXdfnbE_c4bgrvSN-SenKAzVg42f/view?usp=sharing
>
> About Einstein's equations.
>
> Basicly, I've just seen the tensors.
> Schwarzschild found some G.
> That is the space of {G}'s.
> Who could help me with references to continue or restart?
>
> I searched "relativity" topics. "Everybody" is against the great jew. But me.
>
> Att,
>
> Vinicius

Einstein is dead. Remember that.

Em segunda-feira, 3 de maio de 2021 às 13:41:27 UTC-3, mitchr escreveu:
> On Monday, May 3, 2021 at 9:30:40 AM UTC-7, Vinicius Claudino Ferraz wrote:
> > I want to know what do I need to simulate the big bang...
> >
> > I just wrote the space-time curvature... and I have the geodesics equations...
> Expanding dimension. Then gravity.
>
> Mitchell Raemsch

Send some link, please. At least wikipeedia.

Yes, the country is poor. We export Amazon, then we import IPhones.

Yes, Einstein is Spirit inspirer about to reincarnate somewhere. Maybe he is reincarnated at some other planet.

Em terça-feira, 4 de maio de 2021 às 13:15:11 UTC-3, mitchr escreveu:
> I don't use the internet bias...

Try using this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

Einstein is too old for that.

Big bang is a well viewed with telescope and Doppler Effect of high school.

Great bang is a consequence of Penrose's Darkholes and high-dimensional Physics.

Strings and M++.

I have never seeb an introduction to that.

> Em terça-feira, 4 de maio de 2021 às 13:15:11 UTC-3, mitchr escreveu:
> > I don't use the internet bias...
Em quarta-feira, 5 de maio de 2021 às 20:13:59 UTC-3, Vinicius Claudino Ferraz escreveu:
> Strings and M++.
> I have never seeb an introduction to that.

Now this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

Bibliography

1. Becker, Katrin; Becker, Melanie; Schwarz, John (2007). String theory and M-theory: A modern introduction. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-86069-7.
2. Duff, Michael (1998). "The theory formerly known as strings". Scientific American. 278 (2): 64–9. Bibcode:1998SciAm.278b..64D. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0298-64.
3. Gannon, Terry. Moonshine Beyond the Monster: The Bridge Connecting Algebra, Modular Forms, and Physics. Cambridge University Press.
4. Hori, Kentaro; Katz, Sheldon; Klemm, Albrecht; Pandharipande, Rahul; Thomas, Richard; Vafa, Cumrun; Vakil, Ravi; Zaslow, Eric, eds. (2003). Mirror Symmetry (PDF). Clay Mathematics Monographs. 1. American Mathematical Society. ISBN 978-0-8218-2955-4. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-09-19.
5. Maldacena, Juan (2005). "The Illusion of Gravity" (PDF). Scientific American. 293 (5): 56–63. Bibcode:2005SciAm.293e..56M. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1105-56. PMID 16318027. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 1, 2014. Retrieved 29 December 2016.
6. Penrose, Roger (2005). The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe. Knopf. ISBN 978-0-679-45443-4.
7. Smolin, Lee (2006). The Trouble with Physics: The Rise of String Theory, the Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next. New York: Houghton Mifflin Co. ISBN 978-0-618-55105-7.
8. Woit, Peter (2006). Not Even Wrong: The Failure of String Theory and the Search for Unity in Physical Law. Basic Books. p. 105. ISBN 978-0-465-09275-8.
9. Yau, Shing-Tung; Nadis, Steve (2010). The Shape of Inner Space: String Theory and the Geometry of the Universe's Hidden Dimensions. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-02023-2.
10. Zwiebach, Barton (2009). A First Course in String Theory. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-88032-9.

Are these a kind of PhD Ultra Graduate Texts in Mathematics?
I think I'm below graduate. Maybe at 2029, if the humans will not be extinted by a meteor M.

: - D

Vinicius

Em sexta-feira, 7 de maio de 2021 às 15:11:17 UTC-3, mitchr escreveu:
> Einstein was the first of his kind.
> Like Leonardo Da Vinci...
> Their genius objectivity
> and their religion made
> them great.
>
> The Da Vinci code was a fake
> made by fake people. He was
> a real Christian instead...

Don't mixture Leo and Einstein.
The first was a true Mason. Do you know the truth about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shroud_of_Turin ?
It's about his epoch.
Einstein was not communicated, then he could not be excommunicated. Jewism.
I would like to be expelled from the church : - D

On Friday, April 30, 2021 at 2:38:34 PM UTC-7, Vinicius Claudino Ferraz wrote:
> This is about:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jWbdlXdfnbE_c4bgrvSN-SenKAzVg42f/view?usp=sharing
>
> About Einstein's equations.
>
> Basicly, I've just seen the tensors.
> Schwarzschild found some G.

Einstein solved his equation first
before Schwarzschild and said
no to what Schwarzschild wanted
to be famous for. Einstein said
no to a collapsar star singularity.
Einstein was right about his science
not Schawarzschild.

Mitchell Raemsch

> On Friday, April 30, 2021 at 2:38:34 PM UTC-7, Vinicius Claudino Ferraz wrote:
> > This is about:
> >
> > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jWbdlXdfnbE_c4bgrvSN-SenKAzVg42f/view?usp=sharing
> >
> > About Einstein's equations.

Em domingo, 9 de maio de 2021 às 17:36:28 UTC-3, mitchr escreveu:

> > Basicly, I've just seen the tensors.
> > Schwarzschild found some G.
> Einstein solved his equation first
> before Schwarzschild and said
> no to what Schwarzschild wanted
> to be famous for. Einstein said
> no to a collapsar star singularity.
> Einstein was right about his science
> not Schawarzschild.
>
> Mitchell Raemsch

I'm trying to understand this, but it's not math, it's Physics after Math....

[Graduate Texts in Mathematics 48] R.K. Sachs, H.-H. Wu - General relativity for mathematicians

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%E2%80%93de_Sitter_universe

They set u = time, where u = 0 is the big bang.
They suppose G = f(u) * Id. I don't know why.
After 1 page of calculations, "therefore" G's diagonal is = 0, 0, 0, g_{44} = h(u).

I've collected some annotations: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E00KPhWXoAA8b73?format=png&name=small

> > Schwarzschild found some G.

The solutions are immaginary, and they expect them to be approximately real..
The whole universe is immaginary.

> no to a collapsar star singularity.

Good to read inside the book above 7.1.1 The history of a star
They say that 2 * "mass of our Sun" = 1 black hole.
Well, it's not singular, but almost.
I still haven't found the "principia" behind the thing.

Vinicius