Can Ritalin (Methylphenidate) cure "stalking disease"? Does Ritalin stop Dan and Kibo from stalking?

I consider stalkers as insane people. Clear example to me is Dan Christensen and Kibo Parry Moroney, where Dan is a 7 year nonstop stalker and Kibo is a 28 year nonstop stalker.

So we can research stalker disease here on the Internet by simply observing Dan and Kibo as they ply their disease to a world wide audience.

Ritalin (Wikipedia says) is a first line medication for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

And I just am wondering if that broad class of "hyperactivity" includes stalker behavior. I mean stalking people, especially young men stalking women, is hyperactivity.

So, has Dan Christensen and Kibo Parry Moroney with their combined 7 years stalking and 28 years stalking, have either one of them been given Ritalin and can it stop their stalking. Or, perhaps, when Dan and Kibo were young, both were given Ritalin and now they are off of Ritalin, that pent up bad-energy, that insanity behavior is back with them and they resort to old insane ways of stalking.

So, questions into the research of insane Dan and insane Kibo stalkers-- have they ever been on Ritalin and their stalking is a post-partum-ADHD, or, would they now benefit from the medication of Ritalin, if only they would visit a doctor, which I fondly like to call the "shrink". I mean, I get disturbed from these insane nutters just in posts that I can tune in or tune out, and cannot imagine how a psychologists can tolerate a Dan or Kibo in person.

So, we make Dan and Kibo science studies, to see how we can treat insane two people of their stalking disease, disorder. Of course, both Dan and Kibo think they are normal persons, and can never see they are cracking insane dumpster minds of science.

Does Ritalin stop Dan and Kibo from stalking?

AP
King of Science, especially Physics

135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron of

On Saturday, May 8, 2021 at 10:50:10 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> WARNING TO STUDENTS: Don't be a victim of

171st book of AP: AP Problems of Mathematics replacing the Hilbert Problems of 1900s.

Alright David Hilbert set a standard bearer of math purpose in making a list of problems for other mathematicians to solve. Trouble was, David Hilbert never had much logical brains to conduct a full sweeping Standard Bearer job over mathematics as David was pretty much in the weeds of math and logic himself. But, David did lead the way into making a Standard Bearer Job.

AP, the King of Science is going to lead mathematics onward with the new standard bearing problems. And the first problem is going to separate the men from the boys, so to speak of mathematics. David just wanted all math professors to work on solving a list of problems. AP takes that much much further in that AP defines what a valid math professor is in the first place. And AP's definition of a math professor separates the wheat from the chaff, separates the math professor from a acting stooge con artist math professor. In other words, we are going to define what is a valid math professor and what is not a math professor in the first AP problem. If anyone claims to be a math professor from a college or university, is only a math professor if he/ she can do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. If any, so called math professor cannot do a Geometry Proof of FTC, then their degree is stripped of them. They are not math professors but some actor con artist of math.

All math professors have to be on the same page with a Geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

Calculus is Geometry, and you be surprized to know that many math professors never even knew that much.

Calculus is the most important of all mathematics to date. Calculus is the pinnacle peak crowning glory jewel of mathematics. And when we couple the fact that calculus is geometry and the peak of mathematics, it is rather stunning to realize, only one person in all the world from 2015 to 2021 as I write this could deliver a Geometry proof of FTC. In fact AP wrote a book on it (see below).

Limit analysis is not geometry but a petty side show argument that never relates to a making of a proof of FTC.

What a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus does, is straighten out all the horrible and worst math ideas that pollute modern day mathematics.

A geometry proof of FTC forces, yes forces these corrections of Old Math:

(1) What are the real numbers of mathematics, for the Reals are a worthless cobble together bag of nonsense numbers.

(2) The true numbers of mathematics come from Mathematical Induction-- all of them, not just Naturals, and they require empty space between one and the next number. In other words, the true numbers of mathematics are discrete..

(3) The continuum in Old Math was a delusion, and too bad the mathematicians of the 1900s were too dumb to see and follow what physicists were doing with quantum mechanics, instead the blithering idiot fools of mathematics went the exact opposite direction of discrete with Cohen's mindless pursuit of continuum.

(4) Infinity and finite had to be well-defined.

(5) Most damaging of all, a function was never well defined in Old Math, for to well define a function, all functions have to be polynomial functions and nothing else. So a conversion of all other candidates had to be transformed into being a Polynomial.

(6) First Quadrant Only in mathematics had to be acknowledged and understood because of failure of Old Math to ever recognize a primal axiom of Algebra. You cannot have a equation of math if the rightside has a 0 or negative number, or imaginary number all alone on the rightside of the equation. No equation of math exists unless it has a positive, greater than zero number on the rightside of the equation, all alone, at all times. Old Math was far far too dumb in logic to ever realize that equations are balancing beams of some constant Reality on the rightside plate, all alone, at all times of the balancing beam and where you have Substantive Reality on the leftside of the balancing beam. Only a goofball would think it is okay to have "nothing as in 0" all alone on the rightside plate or even worse-- imaginary or negative reality-- all alone on the rightside plate. This was one of the worst insane cases of Old Math thinking. This was asylum mathematics of Old Math.

So, when AP demands a geometry proof of FTC from all so called math professors, forces them to correct much of Old Math lousy and sloppy errors of the past, and makes mathematics, puts mathematics into a clean bill of health.

Math and Logic demands a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and forces math to purge and clean itself up of all the horrible mistaken goofball notions they have carried with them for the past 400 years of sloppy error filled Old Math.