On Wednesday, 12 May 2021 at 08:35:06 UTC-4, FromTheRafters wrote:
> zelos...@gmail.com presented the following explanation :
> > onsdag 12 maj 2021 kl. 03:33:10 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> >> On Tuesday, 11 May 2021 at 09:02:33 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> tisdag 11 maj 2021 kl. 14:54:55 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> >>>> On Tuesday, 11 May 2021 at 08:42:53 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>> tisdag 11 maj 2021 kl. 14:37:33 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> >>>>>> On Tuesday, 11 May 2021 at 08:21:30 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>>>> tisdag 11 maj 2021 kl. 14:15:16 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> >>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 11 May 2021 at 04:48:15 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> måndag 10 maj 2021 kl. 13:02:44 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> >>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 10 May 2021 at 07:00:14 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> söndag 9 maj 2021 kl. 17:18:59 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The longer it takes for the high priests of the BIG STUPID or
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Church of Academia to admit their mistakes, the more embarrassing
> >>>>>>>>>>>> it will be when they finally have to admit they are wrong and bow
> >>>>>>>>>>>> down to the great John Gabriel.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Euler's biggest blunder was his definition S = Lim S.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/12oUJAfIMFMcXFb8DvgsYxuPfdaB99XYH
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1/3 does not even mean "1 divided by 3". 1/3 is a name given to a
> >>>>>>>>>>>> magnitude whose size has been measured by comparing two parts of a
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ratio with a common divisor.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Example: 1/3 is the name given to _ : _ _ _ or _ _ : _ _ _ _ _ _ ,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> In the first ratio _ : _ _ _ , the common divisor is _
> >>>>>>>>>>>> In the second ratio _ _ : _ _ _ _ _ _ , the common divisor is _ _
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Your comments are piss and shit and you will be ignored because
> >>>>>>>>>>>> you are infinitely stupid and vile reptiles.
> >>>>>>>>>>> this is again just your limited scope of what you think is
> >>>>>>>>>>> mathematics. Please stop being so limited.
> >>>>>>>>>> Rubbish. What I have revealed in my comment is fundamental to
> >>>>>>>>>> understanding the concept of number.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Again, ... Mathematics is the science of measure and number.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Your garbage set theory and group theory are not mathematics and
> >>>>>>>>>> have ZERO use in the real world.
> >>>>>>>>> No it isn't, it is just your preferred view and you want to say it is
> >>>>>>>>> the only one, it isn't.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Group theory has zero uses? EXACTLY ZERO uses. LMAO.
> >>>>>>>>> Except in quantum mechanics, cryptography and many other
> >>>>>>>>> diciplines....so you are wrong yet again!
> >>>>>>>> ROFLMAO. Malum, each time I point out your LIES and DELUSIONALS, it
> >>>>>>>> just seems to embolden you more. Tsk, tsk.
> >>>>>>> as always you are wrong.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://www.britannica.com/science/group-theory
> >>>>>>> "Group theory has applications in physics, chemistry, and computer
> >>>>>>> science, and even puzzles like Rubik’s Cube can be represented using
> >>>>>>> group theory."
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_theory#Applications_of_group_theory
> >>>>>> Yes, Rubick's cube is very "useful". LMAO.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> <unsubstantiated drivel not worth a response.>
> >>>>> Notice how you singled out the one that was a game but not the
> >>>>> cryptographic examples that underpin all modern internet communication?
> >>>> Because the modern internet has ZERO to do with group theory. Get an
> >>>> education, you crank!
> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group-based_cryptography
> >>> https://arxiv.org/pdf/0906.5545.pdf
> >>> http://www.maths.nuigalway.ie/~rquinlan/groups/week12/Dunne_Fraser_McDaid.pdf
> >>>
> >>> To show a few examples how wrong you are.
> >> Nothing on Wikipedia or arxiv can be taken seriously, you crank!
> >>
> >> Maybe try again? LMAO.
> >
> > You keep on making excuses, I cited many things and you don't need to use
> > wikipedia, look up cryptography on any source, AES, ALL OF THEM, and you will
> > see they all use group theory :)
> Most do.

Bollocks. Cryptography is based on 100% number theory. Have you heard of those things called "primes"? LMAO.

There is no set theory or group theory of any practical use whatsoever.