Univ Western Ontario, Linda Hasenfratz, Alan Shepard & Dan Christensen-- teaching fake Logic of 2 OR 1= 3 & real electron of atoms is muon not the 0..5MeV monopole//176th book of AP// Logical Fallacy Encyclopedia includes Mistaken Identity.

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
May 15, 2021, 5:20:14 PM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
176th book of AP// Logical Fallacy Encyclopedia includes Mistaken Identity.

When I went to college, Univ Cincinnati, 1968-1972 I took 2 years of formal logic and one year we learned a list of Logical Fallacies from Copi's textbook.
I was wondering if Mistaken Identity is a classed fallacy of logic. For two of the greatest errors of science, mistaken identity of real electron as muon for the 0.5MeV particle that is actually Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms. And also in Logic itself where George Boole had a mistaken identity of the AND truth table for it really is that of TTTF and not what Boole thought of as TFFF. So a fallacy of mistaken identity really really debilatates an entire science. So I need to write a whole new Logic book just on the Fallacies of Logic and include Mistaken Identity. I was wondering if Mistaken Identity should be a separate class of fallacy from the already known list of fallacies.

Is Mistaken Identity part of Non Sequitur Fallacy? I think Mistaken Identity needs its own separate class of fallacy. Mistaken Identity does not come up in arguments or debates as much as Non Sequitur, but when it arrives on the scene in a debate or in a whole entire science, it is devastating to the science, as can be seen with the fake electron when muon is the real true electron of atoms. Or in Logic itself with Boole's logic ending up being that of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.

---Quoting from the Internet of a list of logical fallacies---
The Top 10 Logical Fallacies to Avoid in Arguments
Straw Man Fallacy.
Begging the Question (Circular Reasoning) Fallacy.
Ad Hominem Fallacy.
Post Hoc Fallacy “post hoc ergo propter hoc” (after this, therefore because of this) Fallacy.
Loaded Question Fallacy.
False Dichotomy (False Dilemma, Either/Or) Fallacy.
Equivocation (Doublespeak) Fallacy.
--- end quoting from Internet---

🐜 of Math and 🐛 of Physics Archimedes "Drag Queen of Science"
Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

> When I went to college, Univ Cincinnati, 1968-1972 I took 2 years of formal logic and one year we learned

Impossible. How could anyone take two years of logic and wind up as
totally illogical as Archimedes Plutonium. I mean Plutonium can't even
understand something as simple as Boolean truth tables!

On the other hand he didn't say he _passed_ those classes.

> I was wondering if Mistaken Identity is a classed fallacy of logic.

Plutonium's mistaken identity as some sort of expert in math and physics
certainly is a logical fallacy, of course. A total fallacy, to be exact.

> For two of the greatest errors of science, mistaken identity of real electron as muon for the 0.5MeV particle that is actually Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.

An example of Plutonium's fallacy. Plutonium claims that as fact when
it is simply some sort of hallucination (LSD flashback from Plutonium's
hippie days?), with zero evidence or proof. I mean, how stupid is it to
have ordinary matter as a bunch of muons, which last about 2.2
microseconds, doing a perpetual motion dance? And electrons as magnetic
monopoles when they don't have the property of magnetic monopoles? How
dumb and stoopid is that????

> And also in Logic itself where George Boole had a mistaken identity of the AND truth table for it really is that of TTTF and not what Boole thought of as TFFF.

And this, how could Plutonium be so wrong about something so simple?
Outsmarted by someone too stupid to come in out of the rain?

Kibo, how many of the 67 mistakes of Old Math did Linda and Alan get correct?

On Monday, May 17, 2021 at 12:09:20 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "Drag Queen of Science"
> fails at math and science:

AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 67 fakes and mistakes of Old Math..

Last revision was 16May2021.

Some of these can be found in AP's TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS series, but the entries keep changing and added on new, means I need to have a separate book for these fakes, mistakes and errors of Old Math.

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for ages 18-19 Freshperson College, math textbook series, book 3
Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
Listing the Errors of Old Math, list of 1 to 50.

Alright, well, mathematics is a closed subject. What I mean by that is due to the textbook series of Archimedes Plutonium TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, that once you learn the polynomial transform and learn the two Power Rules of Calculus, you reached the peak, the pinnacle of all of mathematics, and anything further in math is just details of what you learn in that textbook series. Math is a completed science, unlike the other 5 hard sciences of physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy. Those other five will continue to find new ideas, new things, while math remains static and complete. Mathematics is finished complete as far as a science goes. And even though Physics will find new science such as how the proton toruses inside of atoms are configured in geometry, the geometry and calculus used in that configuration, that new science does not change nor does it create or require new math to handle the new physics.

Now I do need to discuss the Errors of Math in General and the errors of math in geometry in particular. I have the feeling that Geometry is the more important of the two-- algebra - geometry. This list appears in most of AP's Teaching True Mathematics textbook series by Archimedes Plutonium, meant to be a guide and orientation, and a organizing of what must be covered before graduating from College, and what math to steer clear of.

Errors mostly, but not always, for some are included because too much time spent on them.

The listings in Mathopedia of errors, mistakes and fakes is based on the idea that Calculus is the supreme achievement of all of mathematics for it is the essential math of doing Physics electricity and magnetism. And in order to have a proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, we must clean up and clean out all the mistakes, fakes and errors of Old Math, erst, we have no Calculus. So calculus is the consistency maker for the rest of all of mathematics.

1) Calculus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, a proof that derivative and integral are inverses of one another, just as addition and subtraction are inverses, or, multiplication and division are inverses. The only way to obtain a geometry proof is to clean up and clean out all the fakes, mistakes and errors of Old Math, such as their fake numbers-- the Reals. Their fake definition of function allowing anything be a function. Their fakery of a continuum when even physics by 1900 with Planck onwards in Quantum Mechanics proving the Universe is discrete Space not a continuum, yet by 1900 onwards those in mathematics following the idiotic continuum in the Continuum Hypothesis with even more avid interest, when they should have thrown the continuum on a trashpile of shame.

2) The true numbers of mathematics are the Decimal Grid Numbers, because you have to need and apply one mechanism only to obtain the true numbers of mathematics-- Mathematical Induction. In Old Math they had just a tiny few intelligent mathematicians, Kronecker, who emerged from the gaggle crowd of kooks to notice that Naturals all come from one single mechanism-- Mathematical Induction. But Old Math never had a crowd of mathematicians with logical brains to say-- all our numbers need to come from the one mechanism of Mathematical Induction.

3) The true numbers of math have empty space between successor and predecessor numbers. For example the 10 Grid is 0, .1, .2, .3, . . . , 9.8, 9.9, 10..0. Where no numbers exist between .1 and .2, etc. Only discrete numbers allow us to give a proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

4) All functions of mathematics must be a polynomial, and if not a polynomial, convert the offering to a polynomial over a specific interval.

5) Space is discrete and all lines in space are strings of attached straight lines.

6) No curves exist in Geometry, only finer and smaller straight line segments attached to one another.
We can still keep the name "curve" as long as we know it is a string of fine tiny straightline segments strung together in what looks like a smooth curve. If curves exist, then the Calculus in Fundamental Theorem of Calculus cannot be proven and thus Calculus does not exist. We all know that we have to have Calculus, and so we throw out onto the trash pile the curve of Old Math. And this is reasonable because starting in 1900 in physics there arose the Quantum Mechanics of Space being discrete. And a discrete space has no continuum, has no curve of Old Math.

7) Space has gaps in between one point and the next point. These gaps are empty space from one point to the next point, for example in 10 Grid there is no number between .1 and .2, and in 100 Grid there exists no number between .01 and .02.

8) Limit analysis was an insane fakery in Old Math, concocted because Old Math needed the excuse of some proof, so they invented the monster con-artist trick that a limit analysis would divert the fact it is no proof at all, but a Non Sequitur argument. Limit analysis is juju totem witchcraft dance around a desire to prove the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Just as idiotic as dancing around a sick person of a virus is going to cure the person.

9) Infinity has a borderline and there is a microinfinity compared to a macroinfinity. For example in 10 Grid, the microinfinity is .1 if we exclude 0 and so there is no number smaller than .1 and no number larger than 10 in 10 Grid, where 10 is macroinfinity.

10) The 1st Quadrant Only in Coordinate System Geometry. Sad that the first coordinate system of Descartes was correct but soon became corrupted with 4 quadrants. See Mathematical Thought, Volume 1, Kline, 1972, page 303. Where Fermat then Descartes starts the Cartesian Coordinate System as 1 axis only and from 0 rightwards, meaning in our modern day math, 1st Quadrant Only. Why did math screw up on coordinate systems? I suppose some clowns thought negative numbers were true and they wanted ease of drawing a circle with center at 0. When they could have just as easily drawn the circle in 1st Quadrant Only.

11) Calculus needed a Geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, but Old Math never provided such, instead they provided some stupid Limit argument. The reason for the creation of the Limit disaster was that the French mathematician Cauchy got sick and tired of hearing his smartest students complain that the width of rectangles in the integral are 0 width, and those smart students could not, for the life of them understand how a rectangle with 0 width has any interior area. So instead of the math community denouncing the limit, instead they elevated the fakery.

12) Further in Calculus, they knew you could do a transform of coordinate points to turn any function into a polynomial function, a method of Lagrange.. However, they in Old Math were too stupid to take this transform to its highest form-- all functions are polynomial functions and only polynomial functions. When you learn that-- the derivative and integral of any and every function of math is a snap breeze simple and easy.

13) With the error filled 4 quadrants, when it should be 1st Quadrant Only, we have Trigonometry's sine and cosine with the fakery of sinusoid wave when it never was that. The sine and cosine are semicircle waves, and no sinusoid wave exists.

14) There is only one Geometry-- Euclidean, and there is not three distinct geometries of elliptical Riemannian or hyperbolic Lobachevsky. Those two are just duals that make up Euclidean.

15) Torus, volume and surface area formulas in Old Math are all screwed up and in error because they imagined bending a cylinder to form a torus. This brings back memories, for I had to do a percentage formula, since I could not follow the fake way of bending a cylinder. Where 78.5% of Disc Torus (pi)R^2h - (pi)r^2h is the volume of Circle Torus, and 78.5% of Disc Torus 2(pi)Rh + 2(pi)rh + 2 ((pi)R^2 - (pi)r^2) is the surface area of Circle Torus..

16) Ellipse is never a single cone slant cut, always a cylinder slant cut. Although you do get an ellipse from double cones of this configuration <> which in Old Math was the hyperbola, but two hyperbolas joined together to form a ellipse.

17) All Parallelepipeds reduced to a Rectangular Box by making 2 cuts and pastes. Volume of the original Parallelepiped is simply a*b*c of the Rectangular Box length*width*depth formed. Old Math never understood that a precise definition of Parallelepiped has two kinds, the parallelepiped that has 90 degree angles and the parallelepiped that has no 90 degree angle.

18) All of Old Logic such as the textbooks by Copi and Boole and Jevons with their messed up operators -- their logic connectors of AND, OR, If->Then, Equal+Not, Boole went insane with logic for he never lived a logical life as he even thought cold bathes and a wet bed would cure him of pneumonia, so insane was Boole he taught class shivering in rain soaked clothes and so when it came time to decide for Boole what AND should be, he thought its table was TFFF, not realizing that if just one statement among many statements is true, then the entire collection is true and thus the true truth table of AND must be TTTF and now in modern day computer making times of 1990s onward we see clearer the Boole error of logic for the computers are expressing the thoroughly wrong and muddle headed Boole logic of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction of 2 AND 1 = either 1 or 2 as in subtraction of the other. And the Boole mistake of AND and OR is easily fixed as we correct AND to be TTTF and we accept only a OR truth table of FTTF.