Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. -- Albert Einstein


tech / sci.physics.relativity / Re: Day time and year are not relatives

SubjectAuthor
* Re: Day time and year are not relativesBarry Handshoe
+- Re: Day time and year are not relativesmitchr...@gmail.com
`* Re: Day time and year are not relativesmitchr...@gmail.com
 `- Re: Day time and year are not relativesmitchr...@gmail.com

1
Re: Day time and year are not relatives

<s7mjgv$je3$2@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=59890&group=sci.physics.relativity#59890

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!KVSqCosWnP+GNuNYlRVjAA.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bar...@outlook.com (Barry Handshoe)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Day time and year are not relatives
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 19:37:04 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <s7mjgv$je3$2@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <49422cd1-0411-4bc9-821a-f2315b774444n@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: KVSqCosWnP+GNuNYlRVjAA.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: iPhone Mail/2.4
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Barry Handshoe - Fri, 14 May 2021 19:37 UTC

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> They are fundamental movements that are not relative to anything else...
> Einstein didn't need relativity as he proposed an alternative addendum
> paper in 1905 called his closing velocity...

He mistakenly thought he made a mistake.

Re: Day time and year are not relatives

<4471251a-d022-43e1-82b0-7ff0652108acn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=59893&group=sci.physics.relativity#59893

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1045:: with SMTP id f5mr23767908qte.392.1621033706556;
Fri, 14 May 2021 16:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5846:: with SMTP id de6mr48358469qvb.40.1621033706463;
Fri, 14 May 2021 16:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 16:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <s7mjgv$je3$2@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:1c0:c802:3880:a92a:9e16:20fa:16ad;
posting-account=Dg6LkgkAAABl5NRBT4_iFEO1VO77GchW
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:1c0:c802:3880:a92a:9e16:20fa:16ad
References: <49422cd1-0411-4bc9-821a-f2315b774444n@googlegroups.com> <s7mjgv$je3$2@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <4471251a-d022-43e1-82b0-7ff0652108acn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Day time and year are not relatives
From: mitchrae...@gmail.com (mitchr...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 23:08:26 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: mitchr...@gmail.com - Fri, 14 May 2021 23:08 UTC

On Friday, May 14, 2021 at 12:37:08 PM UTC-7, Barry Handshoe wrote:
> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > They are fundamental movements that are not relative to anything else...
> > Einstein didn't need relativity as he proposed an alternative addendum
> > paper in 1905 called his closing velocity...
> He mistakenly thought he made a mistake.

He was more objective to know he did not need relativity.
His alternative is winning in history instead...

Mitchell Raemsch

Re: Day time and year are not relatives

<d699cabf-b3d3-4897-9dc8-68d3564e78e7n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=59896&group=sci.physics.relativity#59896

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:6e8b:: with SMTP id c11mr19684158qtv.133.1621035075755;
Fri, 14 May 2021 16:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a37:9d81:: with SMTP id g123mr15600292qke.280.1621035075596;
Fri, 14 May 2021 16:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!usenet.pasdenom.info!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 16:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <s7mjgv$je3$2@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:1c0:c802:3880:a92a:9e16:20fa:16ad;
posting-account=Dg6LkgkAAABl5NRBT4_iFEO1VO77GchW
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:1c0:c802:3880:a92a:9e16:20fa:16ad
References: <49422cd1-0411-4bc9-821a-f2315b774444n@googlegroups.com> <s7mjgv$je3$2@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d699cabf-b3d3-4897-9dc8-68d3564e78e7n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Day time and year are not relatives
From: mitchrae...@gmail.com (mitchr...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 23:31:15 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: mitchr...@gmail.com - Fri, 14 May 2021 23:31 UTC

On Friday, May 14, 2021 at 12:37:08 PM UTC-7, Barry Handshoe wrote:
> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > They are fundamental movements that are not relative to anything else...
> > Einstein didn't need relativity as he proposed an alternative addendum
> > paper in 1905 called his closing velocity...
> He mistakenly thought he made a mistake.

How are you going to hold him to it?
Why would he propose an alternative
that wins?

Mitchell Raemsch

Re: Day time and year are not relatives

<fbddd563-eb76-46f2-85a6-579cbdec479dn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=59953&group=sci.physics.relativity#59953

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:cf6:: with SMTP id c22mr49945126qkj.123.1621114507252;
Sat, 15 May 2021 14:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:e82:: with SMTP id hf2mr53279196qvb.22.1621114507023;
Sat, 15 May 2021 14:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 14:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <d699cabf-b3d3-4897-9dc8-68d3564e78e7n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:1c0:c802:3880:cc81:1c19:51a5:12fa;
posting-account=Dg6LkgkAAABl5NRBT4_iFEO1VO77GchW
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:1c0:c802:3880:cc81:1c19:51a5:12fa
References: <49422cd1-0411-4bc9-821a-f2315b774444n@googlegroups.com>
<s7mjgv$je3$2@gioia.aioe.org> <d699cabf-b3d3-4897-9dc8-68d3564e78e7n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <fbddd563-eb76-46f2-85a6-579cbdec479dn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Day time and year are not relatives
From: mitchrae...@gmail.com (mitchr...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 21:35:07 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: mitchr...@gmail.com - Sat, 15 May 2021 21:35 UTC

On Friday, May 14, 2021 at 4:31:17 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, May 14, 2021 at 12:37:08 PM UTC-7, Barry Handshoe wrote:
> > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > They are fundamental movements that are not relative to anything else...
> > > Einstein didn't need relativity as he proposed an alternative addendum
> > > paper in 1905 called his closing velocity...
> > He mistakenly thought he made a mistake.
> How are you going to hold him to it?
> Why would he propose an alternative
> that wins?
>
> Mitchell Raemsch

Day and night are not relatives...
Neither are the Earth years.
This proves not all motions are relative.
Something changes relativity.
Even Einstein said it could happen...
He did not need relativity.

Mitchell Raemsch

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor