Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

For God's sake, stop researching for a while and begin to think!


tech / sci.physics.relativity / Re: Inertial frames are subject to gravity

SubjectAuthor
* Re: Inertial frames are subject to gravityEarle Dunhill
`- Re: Inertial frames are subject to gravitymitchr...@gmail.com

1
Re: Inertial frames are subject to gravity

<s89epf$p7r$3@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=60235&group=sci.physics.relativity#60235

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!NY2k1FHI4hXVbHZn+eBqKg.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: due...@outlook.com (Earle Dunhill)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Inertial frames are subject to gravity
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 23:12:48 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <s89epf$p7r$3@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <0b59765b-5a11-4e24-8d7e-906513cee6edn@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: NY2k1FHI4hXVbHZn+eBqKg.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: VSoup/1.2.9.42 (MSIE 8; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Earle Dunhill - Fri, 21 May 2021 23:12 UTC

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> If you had a frame that could make no comparison it would not be in
> steady motion as frame motions are always subject to gravity.
> Unsteady motion is the rule. Einstein got it wrong...

what was the first question??

Re: Inertial frames are subject to gravity

<130e8366-34a6-4a3f-9d17-5ead393e27b7n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=60239&group=sci.physics.relativity#60239

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a37:b643:: with SMTP id g64mr16297893qkf.6.1621645072171;
Fri, 21 May 2021 17:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2291:: with SMTP id o17mr15495620qkh.150.1621645072037;
Fri, 21 May 2021 17:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!usenet.pasdenom.info!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 17:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <s89epf$p7r$3@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:1c0:c802:3880:755e:6975:4179:6fc4;
posting-account=Dg6LkgkAAABl5NRBT4_iFEO1VO77GchW
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:1c0:c802:3880:755e:6975:4179:6fc4
References: <0b59765b-5a11-4e24-8d7e-906513cee6edn@googlegroups.com> <s89epf$p7r$3@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <130e8366-34a6-4a3f-9d17-5ead393e27b7n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Inertial frames are subject to gravity
From: mitchrae...@gmail.com (mitchr...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 00:57:52 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: mitchr...@gmail.com - Sat, 22 May 2021 00:57 UTC

On Friday, May 21, 2021 at 4:12:52 PM UTC-7, Earle Dunhill wrote:
> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > If you had a frame that could make no comparison it would not be in
> > steady motion as frame motions are always subject to gravity.
> > Unsteady motion is the rule. Einstein got it wrong...
> what was the first question??

You can question inertial frames idea or steady motion
without frame comparison... but for every frame
there is gravity's influence giving all motion a
change from steady instead. That is why Einstein
was wrong. Unsteady motion is the rule not
steady.

Mitchell Raemsch

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor