1-Google we need you to have a Balanced Searth hit on Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, where none can do a valid, let alone geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, on the first page of a search for them
17 views
by
Robert's profile photo
Robert wrote:
May 25, 2021, 2:05:20 PM

As Robert precisely emphasises and entices us in, on the fact that too many modern day puffed up con-artists of mathematics run around chasing fame and fortune but never any math truth and reality. They are very very poor teachers of the subject as seen by most students veer away from taking math, when in fact, math can be, yes, can be the easiest subject of the Sciences as seen by Harold Jacobs book Mathematics a Human Endeavor, or Archimedes Plutonium TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS.

But few if any mathematicians want to make math simple easy and fun. No, instead they go the opposite way to make math a reaping of fame and fortune on their ill gotten gains by making math obfuscation, obtuse, obnoxious and abhorrent, and ugly in classrooms.

And Google needs to address the "fame and fortune seeking math professor" that destroys the subject of mathematics for they perpetuate nonsense such as a "limit analysis proof" on the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, yet these con-artists of Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, John Baez, Chandler Davis, Jill Pipher, Ken Ribet, all know that Calculus is geometry. Yet ask anyone of them, ask them, where is their geometry proof of FTC, and not a mindless non sequitur that is a limit analysis.

Too busy chasing after fame and fortune Dr. Wiles ? Too busy chasing after fame and fortune Dr. Tao?

Thank you Google, thank you for having Balanced Reported Google Search hits of Dan Christensen for on his 1st page of Google hits the 7th entry on 1st page reads:

Re: Canada's Dan Christensen of Univ Western Ontario flunked the Math Test of...
>Can you provide a Geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus? If not, well, you flunked mathematics.
>Dan Christensen flunked the Math Test of a...

Thank you Google, and please, please put such a Balanced Reporting hit on 1st page of Terence Tao, of Andrew Wiles, of Thomas Hales, of John Stillwell, of John Baez, of Jill Pipher, of Ken Ribet, of Chandler Davis, because, Google, their hits are nothing but skewed propaganda where in the case of Tao, every other paragraph is peppered with "oh, oh, he is such a genius" when the true facts is that Terence Tao is a math failure who runs a torture chamber on youngster students math education for the imp Terence Tao still teaches a ellipse is a slant cut in single cone when the truth is the oval is that slant cut never the ellipse, and still teaches the error filled Boole logic of AND truth table being TFFF when in reality it is TTTF, because Tao's teaching of such logic leads to 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, but worst, worst of all Dr. Tao knows Calculus is geometry, yet the imp can never do a geometry proof of FTC.

Please, Google, have fair and Balanced Search Engine hits, and we are very tired of the first 100,000 hits on Tao saying what a wonderful genius he is, yet this wreck of math cannot even acknowledge Calculus is geometry and give a proof thereof.

AP
King of Science, especially Physics

"Are you the same Archimedes Plutonium being mentioned on this old blog post?:

https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2013/01/31/where-have-all-the-usenet-kooks-gone/

If so, then wow! You've basically wasted your life in a sense.

I suppose in another sense the stamina is quite impressive and you might get logged in some future internet historian's notes on this kind of behaviour (is that the goal, a kind of thin residual abstract immortality?).

John Gabriel can only fantasize about earning such a historical footnote at this point. He'd be better off trying to save up for a module or two at the Open University, but you can only help people that want to be helped I guess.

We can only hope all of you get well whilst there is still some lead in the pencil.

Kind Regards"

Google we need you to have a Balanced Searth hit on Steven Weinberg, Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Roger Penrose, Brian Greene, Lisa Randall all too stupid to even ask the question which is the real electron of atoms? The muon or 0.5MeV particle.

Kibo Parry Moroney list of fame seekers of physics, but never truth seekers of physics, for Kibo even fails in doing a correct percentage.

Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
Arthur B. McDonald
Francois Englert
Saul Perlmutter
Brian P. Schmidt
Adam G. Riess
Makoto Kobayashi
Toshihide Maskawa
Yoichiro Nambu
John C. Mather
George F. Smoot
Roy J. Glauber
David J. Gross
Hugh David Politzer
Frank Wilczek
Raymond Davis Jr.
Masatoshi Koshiba
Riccardo Giacconi
Gerardus 't Hooft
Martinus J.G. Veltman
Jerome I. Friedman
Henry W. Kendall
Richard E. Taylor
Carlo Rubbia
Simon van der Meer
William Alfred Fowler
Kenneth G. Wilson
James Watson Cronin
Val Logsdon Fitch
Sheldon Lee Glashow
Steven Weinberg
..
..
little fishes
..
..
Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV

Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
more and more layers of error thinking physics
..
..
John Baez
Brian Greene
Lisa Randall
Alan H. Guth
Michael E. Brown
Konstantin Batygin
Ben Bullock
Larry Harson
Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
None at all - he was a raving nutter.
Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
Edward Witten

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
 > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
 > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>  Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass
 > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

Google, all of the above named physicists deserve on their 1st page of Google hits, deserve a hit saying they are so dumb in physics they cannot even entertain or ask which is the true electron of atoms? Is it the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law, or, is the true real electron a 0.5MeV particle that JJ Thomson thought of in 1897 and all the stupid bandwagoners in physics followed down that bandwagon trail, never once thinking-- perhaps that 0.5MeV particle was Dirac's long sought for magnetic monopole. No, the above list of so called physicists are rumdummies of physics, not physicists. And Google is only gold plating rumdummies of physics without a Balanced Search.

And well, there is even recent evidence coming out of Princeton Univ that the 0.5MeV particle is a composite of 2 particles, agreeing with AP's theory that the 0.5MeV particle is one of two Dirac magnetic monopoles.

Google -- please put this thread from sci.physics Usenet unto the first page of all the above listed so called physicists in a Google hit of them, so as the world wide audience can see a Balanced view of these persons in physics.

74th published book

HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

#1-4, 105th published book

Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.

Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
Length: 39 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : March 24, 2020
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)



#1-5, 112th published book

New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.

Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book.. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
Length: 20 pages

Product details
• ASIN : B0875SVDC7
• Publication date : April 15, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 1134 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 20 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-6, 135th published book

QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) 

Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.