_Google Search for a Balanced report_ of "Kibo Parry" , 28 year nonstop stalker with incurable stalker disease, who fails at all math with his inability to even do a proper correct percentage.

James Parry - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › James_Parry
James Parry (born July 13, 1967), commonly known by his nickname and username Kibo /ˈkaɪboʊ/, is a Usenetter known for his sense of humor, various ...
‎Background · ‎Growing fame · ‎Kibology and alt.religion... · ‎Hallmarks

Kibo Is God | WIREDhttps://www.wired.com › 1993/04 › kibo-is-god
So who is Kibo? Fans might want to stop reading here (spoiler warning) Kibo is James Parry, a 26-year-old graphic designer who lives in Boston. He's tall and ...

James Kibo Parry - C2 wikihttps://wiki.c2.com › JamesKiboParry
Kibo (kibo@world.std.com) was a particularly vocal member of the digerati, who gave the appearance of being omnipresent by immediately contributing to ...

Kibo : Kibo's official sitehttp://www.kibo.com
Dec 25, 2009 — Kibo's Front Door: gateway to www.kibo.com, official site of James (Kibo) Parry.

Kibo (Creator) - TV Tropeshttps://tvtropes.org › Creator
James "Kibo" Parry was one of the first "net.celebrities", known for his machine- assisted ubiquity in Usenet and the surrealist manner in which he responded to ...

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney, not a comic, not a scientist, not a ...https://groups.google.com › sci.math
@gmail.com> fails at math and science: >Why does Jason Herrmann, kibo Parry Moroney want to kill whales or moon bears??? Wait, are you saying I'm Jason ...

Thanks Google for Balanced Search hits, not all slanted in either praise or demonization. But really, why have his second hit as "Kibo is God" is way way out of place, even in Wild West Google Searches. And more likely should have been "Kibo cesspool mind in sci.math & sci.physics". A replacement of that should be Kibo the stalker trying out a percentage problem.

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
 > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
 > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>  Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass
 > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Length: 137 pages

Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1307 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 137 pages
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Length: 21 pages

File Size: 1620 KB
Print Length: 21 pages
Publication Date: March 11, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PLSDQWC
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray: Not Enabled
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

5th published book

Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
Preface:
First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.

The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.

My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.

Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.

Length: 72 pages

File Size: 773 KB
Print Length: 72 pages
Publication Date: March 12, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PMB69F5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled



#4-1, 134th published book

Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.

Kibo Parry Moroney stalker for 28 years nonstop, and every one of his posts is an ad hominem attack post. So why is he allowed in sci.math and sci.physics. Is someone paying him to stalk. Or is he a psychotic, a daily need to stalk and attack others? I suggested Ritalin since it stabilizes young kids with hyperactive behavior. It may work for Kibo.

And there is no point in Kibo Parry Moroney in sci.math for he never even learned correct percentages where here he is saying that 938 is 12% short of 945, in one of thousands of attacks over 28 years.

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
 > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
 > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>  Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass
 > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 67 fakes and mistakes of Old Math..

Last revision was 16May2021.

Preface: I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds question of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

Some of these can be found in AP's TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS series, but the entries keep changing and added on new, means I need to have a separate book for these fakes, mistakes and errors of Old Math.

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for ages 18-19 Freshperson College, math textbook series, book 3
Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
Listing the Errors of Old Math, list of 1 to 50.

Alright, well, mathematics is a closed subject. What I mean by that is due to the textbook series of Archimedes Plutonium TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, that once you learn the polynomial transform and learn the two Power Rules of Calculus, you reached the peak, the pinnacle of all of mathematics, and anything further in math is just details of what you learn in that textbook series. Math is a completed science, unlike the other 5 hard sciences of physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy. Those other five will continue to find new ideas, new things, while math remains static and complete. Mathematics is finished complete as far as a science goes. And even though Physics will find new science such as how the proton toruses inside of atoms are configured in geometry, the geometry and calculus used in that configuration, that new science does not change nor does it create or require new math to handle the new physics.

Now I do need to discuss the Errors of Math in General and the errors of math in geometry in particular. I have the feeling that Geometry is the more important of the two-- algebra - geometry. This list appears in most of AP's Teaching True Mathematics textbook series by Archimedes Plutonium, meant to be a guide and orientation, and a organizing of what must be covered before graduating from College, and what math to steer clear of.

Errors mostly, but not always, for some are included because too much time spent on them.

The listings in Mathopedia of errors, mistakes and fakes is based on the idea that Calculus is the supreme achievement of all of mathematics for it is the essential math of doing Physics electricity and magnetism. And in order to have a proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, we must clean up and clean out all the mistakes, fakes and errors of Old Math, erst, we have no Calculus. So calculus is the consistency maker for the rest of all of mathematics.

1) Calculus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, a proof that derivative and integral are inverses of one another, just as addition and subtraction are inverses, or, multiplication and division are inverses. The only way to obtain a geometry proof is to clean up and clean out all the fakes, mistakes and errors of Old Math, such as their fake numbers-- the Reals. Their fake definition of function allowing anything be a function. Their fakery of a continuum when even physics by 1900 with Planck onwards in Quantum Mechanics proving the Universe is discrete Space not a continuum, yet by 1900 onwards those in mathematics following the idiotic continuum in the Continuum Hypothesis with even more avid interest, when they should have thrown the continuum on a trashpile of shame.

2) The true numbers of mathematics are the Decimal Grid Numbers, because you have to need and apply one mechanism only to obtain the true numbers of mathematics-- Mathematical Induction. In Old Math they had just a tiny few intelligent mathematicians, Kronecker, who emerged from the gaggle crowd of kooks to notice that Naturals all come from one single mechanism-- Mathematical Induction. But Old Math never had a crowd of mathematicians with logical brains to say-- all our numbers need to come from the one mechanism of Mathematical Induction.

3) The true numbers of math have empty space between successor and predecessor numbers. For example the 10 Grid is 0, .1, .2, .3, . . . , 9.8, 9.9, 10..0. Where no numbers exist between .1 and .2, etc. Only discrete numbers allow us to give a proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

4) All functions of mathematics must be a polynomial, and if not a polynomial, convert the offering to a polynomial over a specific interval.

5) Space is discrete and all lines in space are strings of attached straight lines.

6) No curves exist in Geometry, only finer and smaller straight line segments attached to one another.
We can still keep the name "curve" as long as we know it is a string of fine tiny straightline segments strung together in what looks like a smooth curve. If curves exist, then the Calculus in Fundamental Theorem of Calculus cannot be proven and thus Calculus does not exist. We all know that we have to have Calculus, and so we throw out onto the trash pile the curve of Old Math. And this is reasonable because starting in 1900 in physics there arose the Quantum Mechanics of Space being discrete. And a discrete space has no continuum, has no curve of Old Math.

7) Space has gaps in between one point and the next point. These gaps are empty space from one point to the next point, for example in 10 Grid there is no number between .1 and .2, and in 100 Grid there exists no number between .01 and .02.

8) Limit analysis was an insane fakery in Old Math, concocted because Old Math needed the excuse of some proof, so they invented the monster con-artist trick that a limit analysis would divert the fact it is no proof at all, but a Non Sequitur argument. Limit analysis is juju totem witchcraft dance around a desire to prove the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Just as idiotic as dancing around a sick person of a virus is going to cure the person.

9) Infinity has a borderline and there is a microinfinity compared to a macroinfinity. For example in 10 Grid, the microinfinity is .1 if we exclude 0 and so there is no number smaller than .1 and no number larger than 10 in 10 Grid, where 10 is macroinfinity.

10) The 1st Quadrant Only in Coordinate System Geometry. Sad that the first coordinate system of Descartes was correct but soon became corrupted with 4 quadrants. See Mathematical Thought, Volume 1, Kline, 1972, page 303. Where Fermat then Descartes starts the Cartesian Coordinate System as 1 axis only and from 0 rightwards, meaning in our modern day math, 1st Quadrant Only. Why did math screw up on coordinate systems? I suppose some clowns thought negative numbers were true and they wanted ease of drawing a circle with center at 0. When they could have just as easily drawn the circle in 1st Quadrant Only.

11) Calculus needed a Geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, but Old Math never provided such, instead they provided some stupid Limit argument. The reason for the creation of the Limit disaster was that the French mathematician Cauchy got sick and tired of hearing his smartest students complain that the width of rectangles in the integral are 0 width, and those smart students could not, for the life of them understand how a rectangle with 0 width has any interior area. So instead of the math community denouncing the limit, instead they elevated the fakery.

12) Further in Calculus, they knew you could do a transform of coordinate points to turn any function into a polynomial function, a method of Lagrange.. However, they in Old Math were too stupid to take this transform to its highest form-- all functions are polynomial functions and only polynomial functions. When you learn that-- the derivative and integral of any and every function of math is a snap breeze simple and easy.

13) With the error filled 4 quadrants, when it should be 1st Quadrant Only, we have Trigonometry's sine and cosine with the fakery of sinusoid wave when it never was that. The sine and cosine are semicircle waves, and no sinusoid wave exists.

14) There is only one Geometry-- Euclidean, and there is not three distinct geometries of elliptical Riemannian or hyperbolic Lobachevsky. Those two are just duals that make up Euclidean.

15) Torus, volume and surface area formulas in Old Math are all screwed up and in error because they imagined bending a cylinder to form a torus. This brings back memories, for I had to do a percentage formula, since I could not follow the fake way of bending a cylinder. Where 78.5% of Disc Torus (pi)R^2h - (pi)r^2h is the volume of Circle Torus, and 78.5% of Disc Torus 2(pi)Rh + 2(pi)rh + 2 ((pi)R^2 - (pi)r^2) is the surface area of Circle Torus..

Stalker kibo Parry M. on Dartmouth College: Philip J. Hanlon, Joseph Helble, Asher Auel, Peter Doyle, Anne Gelb, Marcia Groszek, Ethan Levien, Peter J Mucha, Rosa C. Orellana, Scott D. Pauls, Daniel N. Rockmore, Thomas R. Shemanske

Stalkers are insane, and once they latch onto a victim, they just cannot stop.
On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "FireD your ass"

Threatening AP's life:

Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP. Dartmouth College Kibo Parry Moroney, threatening the life of AP with this nonstop 28 year long hate spew stalking.

On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "FireD your ass"

Dartmouth College: Philip J. Hanlon, Joseph Helble, Asher Auel, Peter Doyle, Anne Gelb, Marcia Groszek, Ethan Levien, Peter J Mucha, Rosa C. Orellana, Scott D. Pauls, Daniel N. Rockmore, Thomas R. Shemanske, John, D Trout, Erik van Erp, John Voight, Dorothy I. Wallace, David L. Webb, Dana P. Williams, Peter Winkler
Miles P. Blencowe, Robert R. Caldwell, Brian Charles Chabover, Richard Denton, Robert A. Fesen, Marcelo Gleiser, Ryan Hickox, Mary K. Hudson, James William LaBelle, Kristina Anne Lynch, Robyn Millan, Hans Mueller, Elisabeth Newton, Roberto Onofrio, Alex Rimberg, Barrett N. Rogers, John R. Thorstensen, Lorenza Viola, Martin N. Wybourne, Joseph D. Harris, Walter E. Lawrence, David C. Montgomery, Gary Alan Wegner

Donald Trump, the stalker in chief with constant hate spew causing the Capitol Building be stormed and 3 police officer deaths, and now, the constant hate spew if Kibo Parry Moroney & Earle Jones, looking for some deranged follower to laugh at a kibo joke then storm AP. That is why Kibo delighted in talking to Governor of South Dakota Kristi Noem from kibo postings for the exact address of AP and where the other stalker Jan Burse started to post houses for sale nearby to AP, so as to instruct the deranged unhinged Kibo wannabe gang member.

AP should not have to live where anyday a unhinged Kibo goofball is stalking out AP.

Kibo is an immense threat to the life of AP, for his aim along with his gang of Jan Burse, Dan Christensen, Earle Jones, Ross is to tap into some young lost loner that is unhinged.

On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "FireD your ass"

Kibo Parry Moroney along with his gang of stalkers, 28 years nonstop threatening the life of AP, with his nonstop Hate Spew. I do not want to have to meet with a twisted recruit caused by Kibo Parry Moroney, Earle Jones, Jan Burse, Dan Christensen, Ross, at my backdoor. And just as Donald Trump stirred hatred for 4 years causing the Capitol Building to be stormed, Kibo Parry Moroney is stirring hatred for a assault on Dartmouth College, Earle Jones psychoceramics target practice at Stanford Univ.

On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:49:59 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> FailurePlutonium, Psychoceramics
> "FireD your ass"

Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, not much different than Donald Trump stirring up the hatred to storm the Capital Building, and now we have Jones & Parry whipping up the hatred for 28 years to what? Violence on Stanford Univ or AP? Stalkers are too dumb to know, their endgame is violence especially as they recruit young ones to join their stalker hate team.

If it is Stanford Univ or even Dartmouth College, would it be a first for those institutions? I mean, this is 2021, and Kibo Parry Moroney is still lost in 1990s with "Dartmouth finally fired his ass". And then the Kibo Parry along with Jan Burse maps out a mapp to AP's home-- as to say-- like Donald Trump-- "down Pennsylvania Ave".

Or like Earle Jones setting up psychoceramics all over Stanford Univ for what Earle? For target practice, Earle being such a oaf, not realizing his ratcheted hatred ends up in violence.

FBI, Google, Stanford Univ, Dartmouth College, you have the power to stop this hatred ratcheting from these fools of 28 years of stalking AP, for if not stopped, I hate to see the end result of this 28 year long nonstop hatred of AP.

A few years back, on my doorstep was a crowd of 3 college youngsters, laughing and giggling and knocking on the door. I know the mentality of young people out on a prank, and they wanted me to come out, but, knowing that fools like Parry and Jones have whipped up so much hatred in the last 28 years, that something told me, --- talk to them through the window pane, because in all likelihood, this crowd of 3 maybe a whipped up crowd like the hatemongers who stormed the Capitol under the Trump hatred. So, I kept asking the one, what was his name and what did he want, and never any direct answer, so I told the bunch, leave or I call the police.

But, as Earle Jones psychoceramic hatred and Kibo Parry Moroney "fire his ass" continue to spew hatred in sci.math and sci.physics, someday, that hatred leads to Violence. Luckily, 28 years of nonstop Parry hatred has averted violence, but none of us are getting any younger and the continued Parry and Jones hate stirrings is more than likely to end up in a bad ending.

Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 11, 2021, 1:30:05 AM (2 days ago)



to
Two insane stalkers of sci.math, Kibo for 28 years, terribly insane, and Jones on and off for 25 years. Both insane, for their game is hatred, never any math in sci.math, never any physics in sci.physics. Maybe both were failures in science, and this is how they repay society, by stalking hatred in newsgroups.

And is the reason why one of kibo Parry's second page hit in a Google Search talks about---

What made the Internet bad 30 years ago still applies today --- Quartz

.... Influencers, famous for nothing but their fame? Consider James "Kibo" Parry...

AP writes: I did not read the full website as to what made it bad, but I suspect it is "stalkers". When you have a free access and freedom of speech, it tends to degenerate into "stalkers of an insane mind take over."

AP writes: so, why not pull the plug on stalkers, especially Jones and Parry-- never any math in sci.math, never any physics in sci.physics, just attack after attack after attack is all these insane knuckleheads do.

The MASTER in Dr. Who: Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha,,,, ha ha ha ha ha

"Psychoceramics"
4 views
Skip to first unread message
Subscribe
Earle Jones's profile photo
Earle Jones
Jun 11, 2021, 12:00 AM
to sci.math

Michael Moroney's profile photo
Michael Moroney wrote:
Jun 11, 2021, 1:13 AM
to sci.math
ArchiePoo is the first "psychoceramic" I encountered on Usenet way back
when. Back then Usenet was a very different place, with access limited
to universities, certain large (mostly computer) corporations and
government agencies. That's how ArchiePoo got access - he worked for
Dartmouth College who had the advanced foresight to grant internet
access to all of their students, faculty and staff, and Archie started
spewing from there. After years of warnings ignored by Archie,
Dartmouth finally fired his ass for dragging their reputation through
the mud.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 11, 2021, 8:44:55 AM (2 days ago)




to
Stanford Univ & Google, where is this heading for, for Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, is it heading for Violence on Stanford Univ or AP, for it only keeps escalating higher and higher. FBI, please make a gun check on Kibo and Earle Jones.
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Subscribe
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
unread,
8:35 AM (1 minute ago)



to
Stanford Univ & Google, where is this heading for, for Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, is it heading for Violence on Stanford Univ or AP, for it only keeps escalating higher and higher. FBI, please make a gun check on Kibo and Earle Jones.

AP is currently working on the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with a Geometry proof, the first valid proof of FTC, in fact. And working in sci.math.

AP is currently working on TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 1st year College, in sci.physics, along with books on the drought in Western USA.

Yet for 28 years of stalking by Kibo Parry Moroney and his many gang of stalkers-- Earle Jones, Dan Christensen, Jan Burse, recently Ross.

Attack attack each and every day for 28 years. Never a post on math in sci.math, never a post on physics in sci.physics, just a 28 year long demonization of AP, with the aim of kicking AP out of sci.math and sci.physics.

Just yesterday Earle Jones titles a thread Psychoceramics on AP, and Kibo follows up with "Dartmouth finally fired his ass"

So, I ask Stanford Univ-- where is this hatred by Earle Jones going? Certainly no contribution to sci.math or sci.physics, which leads me to believe the only clear direction is that Earle Jones does violence. Can Stanford or the FBI check to see if Earle Jones is violent, is he buying guns and ammunition, for he sure is not posting math to sci.math nor physics to sci.physics. Could he be violent on the Stanford campus?

Same question-- and more so for Kibo Parry Moroney who spent 28 years of bad mouthing AP, and just yesterday raised the sceptre of "Dartmouth finally fired his ass". An event that occurred in the 1990s and here it is 2021. Kibo never does math in sci.math, never does physics in sci.physics. And where is all that hatred going? Is it going to where Kibo stocks up on guns and ammo. For Stalking behavior of 28 years nonstop is insanity, and insanity can lead to violence. FBI, can you please check up on Kibo Parry Moroney, for I certainly never want to see him show up on my backdoor.

Stalker Kibo Parry Moroney on Dartmouth College: Richard Denton, John D Trout, Erik van Erp, John Voight, Dorothy I. Wallace, David L. Webb, Dana P. Williams, Peter Winkler
Miles P. Blencowe, Robert R. Caldwell, Brian Charles Chabover
On Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 9:08:28 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Stooge" Plutonium
> fails at math and science:

Threatening AP's life:

Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP. Dartmouth College Kibo Parry Moroney, threatening the life of AP with this nonstop 28 year long hate spew stalking.

On Wednesday, June 16, 2021 at 1:32:10 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "FireD your ass"

Dartmouth College: Philip J. Hanlon, Joseph Helble, Asher Auel, Peter Doyle, Anne Gelb, Marcia Groszek, Ethan Levien, Peter J Mucha, Rosa C. Orellana, Scott D. Pauls, Daniel N. Rockmore, Thomas R. Shemanske, John D Trout, Erik van Erp, John Voight, Dorothy I. Wallace, David L. Webb, Dana P. Williams, Peter Winkler
Miles P. Blencowe, Robert R. Caldwell, Brian Charles Chabover, Richard Denton, Robert A. Fesen, Marcelo Gleiser, Ryan Hickox, Mary K. Hudson, James William LaBelle, Kristina Anne Lynch, Robyn Millan, Hans Mueller, Elisabeth Newton, Roberto Onofrio, Alex Rimberg, Barrett N. Rogers, John R. Thorstensen, Lorenza Viola, Martin N. Wybourne, Joseph D. Harris, Walter E. Lawrence, David C. Montgomery, Gary Alan Wegner

Donald Trump, the stalker in chief with constant hate spew causing the Capitol Building be stormed and 3 police officer deaths, and now, the constant hate spew if Kibo Parry Moroney & Earle Jones, looking for some deranged follower to laugh at a kibo joke then storm AP. That is why Kibo delighted in talking to Governor of South Dakota Kristi Noem from kibo postings for the exact address of AP and where the other stalker Jan Burse started to post houses for sale nearby to AP, so as to instruct the deranged unhinged Kibo wannabe gang member.

AP should not have to live where anyday a unhinged Kibo goofball is stalking out AP.

Kibo is an immense threat to the life of AP, for his aim along with his gang of Jan Burse, Dan Christensen, Earle Jones, Ross is to tap into some young lost loner that is unhinged.

On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "FireD your ass"

Kibo Parry Moroney along with his gang of stalkers, 28 years nonstop threatening the life of AP, with his nonstop Hate Spew. I do not want to have to meet with a twisted recruit caused by Kibo Parry Moroney, Earle Jones, Jan Burse, Dan Christensen, Ross, at my backdoor. And just as Donald Trump stirred hatred for 4 years causing the Capitol Building to be stormed, Kibo Parry Moroney is stirring hatred for a assault on Dartmouth College, Earle Jones psychoceramics target practice at Stanford Univ.

On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:49:59 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> FailurePlutonium, Psychoceramics
> "FireD your ass"

Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, not much different than Donald Trump stirring up the hatred to storm the Capital Building, and now we have Jones & Parry whipping up the hatred for 28 years to what? Violence on Stanford Univ or AP? Stalkers are too dumb to know, their endgame is violence especially as they recruit young ones to join their stalker hate team.

If it is Stanford Univ or even Dartmouth College, would it be a first for those institutions? I mean, this is 2021, and Kibo Parry Moroney is still lost in 1990s with "Dartmouth finally fired his ass". And then the Kibo Parry along with Jan Burse maps out a mapp to AP's home-- as to say-- like Donald Trump-- "down Pennsylvania Ave".

Or like Earle Jones setting up psychoceramics all over Stanford Univ for what Earle? For target practice, Earle being such a oaf, not realizing his ratcheted hatred ends up in violence.

FBI, Google, Stanford Univ, Dartmouth College, you have the power to stop this hatred ratcheting from these fools of 28 years of stalking AP, for if not stopped, I hate to see the end result of this 28 year long nonstop hatred of AP.

A few years back, on my doorstep was a crowd of 3 college youngsters, laughing and giggling and knocking on the door. I know the mentality of young people out on a prank, and they wanted me to come out, but, knowing that fools like Parry and Jones have whipped up so much hatred in the last 28 years, that something told me, --- talk to them through the window pane, because in all likelihood, this crowd of 3 maybe a whipped up crowd like the hatemongers who stormed the Capitol under the Trump hatred. So, I kept asking the one, what was his name and what did he want, and never any direct answer, so I told the bunch, leave or I call the police.

But, as Earle Jones psychoceramic hatred and Kibo Parry Moroney "fire his ass" continue to spew hatred in sci.math and sci.physics, someday, that hatred leads to Violence. Luckily, 28 years of nonstop Parry hatred has averted violence, but none of us are getting any younger and the continued Parry and Jones hate stirrings is more than likely to end up in a bad ending.

Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 11, 2021, 1:30:05 AM (2 days ago)



to
Two insane stalkers of sci.math, Kibo for 28 years, terribly insane, and Jones on and off for 25 years. Both insane, for their game is hatred, never any math in sci.math, never any physics in sci.physics. Maybe both were failures in science, and this is how they repay society, by stalking hatred in newsgroups.

And is the reason why one of kibo Parry's second page hit in a Google Search talks about---

What made the Internet bad 30 years ago still applies today --- Quartz

.... Influencers, famous for nothing but their fame? Consider James "Kibo" Parry...

AP writes: I did not read the full website as to what made it bad, but I suspect it is "stalkers". When you have a free access and freedom of speech, it tends to degenerate into "stalkers of an insane mind take over."

AP writes: so, why not pull the plug on stalkers, especially Jones and Parry-- never any math in sci.math, never any physics in sci.physics, just attack after attack after attack is all these insane knuckleheads do.

The MASTER in Dr. Who: Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha,,,, ha ha ha ha ha

"Psychoceramics"
4 views
Skip to first unread message
Subscribe
Earle Jones's profile photo
Earle Jones
Jun 11, 2021, 12:00 AM
to sci.math

Michael Moroney's profile photo
Michael Moroney wrote:
Jun 11, 2021, 1:13 AM
to sci.math
ArchiePoo is the first "psychoceramic" I encountered on Usenet way back
when. Back then Usenet was a very different place, with access limited
to universities, certain large (mostly computer) corporations and
government agencies. That's how ArchiePoo got access - he worked for
Dartmouth College who had the advanced foresight to grant internet
access to all of their students, faculty and staff, and Archie started
spewing from there. After years of warnings ignored by Archie,
Dartmouth finally fired his ass for dragging their reputation through
the mud.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 11, 2021, 8:44:55 AM (2 days ago)




to
Stanford Univ & Google, where is this heading for, for Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, is it heading for Violence on Stanford Univ or AP, for it only keeps escalating higher and higher. FBI, please make a gun check on Kibo and Earle Jones.
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Subscribe
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
unread,
8:35 AM (1 minute ago)



to
Stanford Univ & Google, where is this heading for, for Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, is it heading for Violence on Stanford Univ or AP, for it only keeps escalating higher and higher. FBI, please make a gun check on Kibo and Earle Jones.

AP is currently working on the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with a Geometry proof, the first valid proof of FTC, in fact. And working in sci.math.

AP is currently working on TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 1st year College, in sci.physics, along with books on the drought in Western USA.

Yet for 28 years of stalking by Kibo Parry Moroney and his many gang of stalkers-- Earle Jones, Dan Christensen, Jan Burse, recently Ross.

Attack attack each and every day for 28 years. Never a post on math in sci.math, never a post on physics in sci.physics, just a 28 year long demonization of AP, with the aim of kicking AP out of sci.math and sci.physics.

Just yesterday Earle Jones titles a thread Psychoceramics on AP, and Kibo follows up with "Dartmouth finally fired his ass"

So, I ask Stanford Univ-- where is this hatred by Earle Jones going? Certainly no contribution to sci.math or sci.physics, which leads me to believe the only clear direction is that Earle Jones does violence. Can Stanford or the FBI check to see if Earle Jones is violent, is he buying guns and ammunition, for he sure is not posting math to sci.math nor physics to sci.physics. Could he be violent on the Stanford campus?

Same question-- and more so for Kibo Parry Moroney who spent 28 years of bad mouthing AP, and just yesterday raised the sceptre of "Dartmouth finally fired his ass". An event that occurred in the 1990s and here it is 2021. Kibo never does math in sci.math, never does physics in sci.physics. And where is all that hatred going? Is it going to where Kibo stocks up on guns and ammo. For Stalking behavior of 28 years nonstop is insanity, and insanity can lead to violence. FBI, can you please check up on Kibo Parry Moroney, for I certainly never want to see him show up on my backdoor.

Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 16, 2021, 2:35 AM



to sci.math
Example of the sick mind of Kibo Parry and his 28 years nonstop stalking. As far as stalking, Kibo is likely to be the sickest of sick minds that ever ventured into sci.math and sci.physics. And a example of that 28 year stalking cuss should be seen in the front page of any Google Search of Kibo Parry. Perhaps he works with the US govt and Google cannot ban him but only put up with the nuisance pest.

Michael Moroney wrote:
Jun 16, 2021, 1:49 AM



to sci.math
>Perhaps you forgot something I told you many times, StupidPlutonium...
attack me and I strike back..yet you keep attacking me....
>
>💀 of Math and ☠️ of Physics Archimedes "Putin's Stooge" Plutonium
<plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

> 151st AP book, Part 3// TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 1st year college
>
>WARNING TO STUDENTS, PARENTS and TEACHERS: Archimedes Plutonium is
offering to teach your children his broken physics and math. BEWARE! He
will corrupt the minds of your children! Mr. Plutonium is not content to
be a failure of math and physics all by himself. He wants everyone else
to fail as well! He teaches bizarre false physics and math, such as atoms
contain the unstable muon, the ellipse isn't a conic section, that there
are no negative numbers, no complex numbers, that a sine wave isn't
sinusoidal but semicircles, cycloids or parabolas (depending on his
mood), plus many, many other instances of bad math and physics.
>
>Plutonium has previously tried to corrupt our youth by posting his books
on Usenet. That has failed until now, perhaps in part due to the fact
Usenet is an old, dying medium few modern students even know of, much
less use. However, Mr. Plutonium has somehow duped Amazon into providing
his dangerous books for free on Kindle. This has greatly increased the
danger to our students!
>
>One of his dangerous tricks is teach false Boolean logic such as 10 AND 2
= 12. His method at doing this is particularly insidious. He'll post a
false statement that nobody believes, such as 10 OR 2 = 12, say that it
is false (which it is), but then he'll try to replace it with another
similar false statement such as 10 AND 2 = 12, in order to really confuse
future computer scientists. Plutonium is taking advantage of the fact
that AND means different things in Boolean logic and elementary
arithmetic, as AND is an informal synonym for plus/addition. It is
important for future computer scientists to remember that in the bitwise
Boolean logic used by modern computers, 10 OR 2 = 10 and 10 AND 2 = 2. Of
course in pure Boolean logic the only possible values are true and false
(1 or 0), so in pure Boolean logic the statements "10 AND 2" and "10 OR
2" don't even make sense. Don't let evil Plutonium's bad logic confuse
you!
>
>Additionally, Plutonium has started a Cult of Failure. He is trying to
convince students to worship his evil pagan Plutonium atom god of
failure. This cult is anti-science and anti-mathematics. Its only goal is
to promote failure in math and science.
>
>Nobody knows why he wishes to corrupt the minds of our youth like this.
Perhaps he is envious of their potential success, which he never had
because he is a failure at math and science. Plutonium is not content to
be a failure at math and physics all by himself. He wants everyone to
fail as well. Some claim he is an agent of China, in order for them to
dominate the world economy. Maybe he is a minion of Kim Jong Un of North
Korea. Most likely he is an agent of Putin and Russia, because he has
previously attempted to summon Russian robots in 2017 "to create a new,
true mathematics" in an attempt to destroy mathematics. But the point is,
stay away, if he offers to give or sell you his dangerous books.
Especially now since they are available for free from otherwise
>legitimate Amazon.

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 16, 2021, 2:13 AM



to

Stalker Kibo Parry Moroney on Dartmouth College: Brian Charles Chabover, Richard Denton, John D Trout, Erik van Erp, John Voight, Dorothy I. Wallace, David L. Webb, Dana P. Williams, Peter Winkler, Miles P. Blencowe, Robert R.. Caldwell
On Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 9:08:28 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Stooge" Plutonium
> fails at math and science:

Threatening AP's life:

Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP. Dartmouth College Kibo Parry Moroney, threatening the life of AP with this nonstop 28 year long hate spew stalking.

On Wednesday, June 16, 2021 at 1:32:10 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "FireD your ass"

Dartmouth College: Philip J. Hanlon, Joseph Helble, Asher Auel, Peter Doyle, Anne Gelb, Marcia Groszek, Ethan Levien, Peter J Mucha, Rosa C. Orellana, Scott D. Pauls, Daniel N. Rockmore, Thomas R. Shemanske, John D Trout, Erik van Erp, John Voight, Dorothy I. Wallace, David L. Webb, Dana P. Williams, Peter Winkler
Miles P. Blencowe, Robert R. Caldwell, Brian Charles Chabover, Richard Denton, Robert A. Fesen, Marcelo Gleiser, Ryan Hickox, Mary K. Hudson, James William LaBelle, Kristina Anne Lynch, Robyn Millan, Hans Mueller, Elisabeth Newton, Roberto Onofrio, Alex Rimberg, Barrett N. Rogers, John R. Thorstensen, Lorenza Viola, Martin N. Wybourne, Joseph D. Harris, Walter E. Lawrence, David C. Montgomery, Gary Alan Wegner

Donald Trump, the stalker in chief with constant hate spew causing the Capitol Building be stormed and 3 police officer deaths, and now, the constant hate spew if Kibo Parry Moroney & Earle Jones, looking for some deranged follower to laugh at a kibo joke then storm AP. That is why Kibo delighted in talking to Governor of South Dakota Kristi Noem from kibo postings for the exact address of AP and where the other stalker Jan Burse started to post houses for sale nearby to AP, so as to instruct the deranged unhinged Kibo wannabe gang member.

AP should not have to live where anyday a unhinged Kibo goofball is stalking out AP.

Kibo is an immense threat to the life of AP, for his aim along with his gang of Jan Burse, Dan Christensen, Earle Jones, Ross is to tap into some young lost loner that is unhinged.

On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "FireD your ass"

Kibo Parry Moroney along with his gang of stalkers, 28 years nonstop threatening the life of AP, with his nonstop Hate Spew. I do not want to have to meet with a twisted recruit caused by Kibo Parry Moroney, Earle Jones, Jan Burse, Dan Christensen, Ross, at my backdoor. And just as Donald Trump stirred hatred for 4 years causing the Capitol Building to be stormed, Kibo Parry Moroney is stirring hatred for a assault on Dartmouth College, Earle Jones psychoceramics target practice at Stanford Univ.

On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:49:59 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> FailurePlutonium, Psychoceramics
> "FireD your ass"

Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, not much different than Donald Trump stirring up the hatred to storm the Capital Building, and now we have Jones & Parry whipping up the hatred for 28 years to what? Violence on Stanford Univ or AP? Stalkers are too dumb to know, their endgame is violence especially as they recruit young ones to join their stalker hate team.

If it is Stanford Univ or even Dartmouth College, would it be a first for those institutions? I mean, this is 2021, and Kibo Parry Moroney is still lost in 1990s with "Dartmouth finally fired his ass". And then the Kibo Parry along with Jan Burse maps out a mapp to AP's home-- as to say-- like Donald Trump-- "down Pennsylvania Ave".

Or like Earle Jones setting up psychoceramics all over Stanford Univ for what Earle? For target practice, Earle being such a oaf, not realizing his ratcheted hatred ends up in violence.

FBI, Google, Stanford Univ, Dartmouth College, you have the power to stop this hatred ratcheting from these fools of 28 years of stalking AP, for if not stopped, I hate to see the end result of this 28 year long nonstop hatred of AP.

A few years back, on my doorstep was a crowd of 3 college youngsters, laughing and giggling and knocking on the door. I know the mentality of young people out on a prank, and they wanted me to come out, but, knowing that fools like Parry and Jones have whipped up so much hatred in the last 28 years, that something told me, --- talk to them through the window pane, because in all likelihood, this crowd of 3 maybe a whipped up crowd like the hatemongers who stormed the Capitol under the Trump hatred. So, I kept asking the one, what was his name and what did he want, and never any direct answer, so I told the bunch, leave or I call the police.

But, as Earle Jones psychoceramic hatred and Kibo Parry Moroney "fire his ass" continue to spew hatred in sci.math and sci.physics, someday, that hatred leads to Violence. Luckily, 28 years of nonstop Parry hatred has averted violence, but none of us are getting any younger and the continued Parry and Jones hate stirrings is more than likely to end up in a bad ending.

Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 11, 2021, 1:30:05 AM





to
Stanford Univ & Google, where is this heading for, for Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, is it heading for Violence on Stanford Univ or AP, for it only keeps escalating higher and higher. FBI, please make a gun check on Kibo and Earle Jones.
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Subscribe
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
8:35 AM

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 16, 2021, 2:17 AM


to sci.math
Insane people like Kibo Parry always reverse things around. When a victim of their stalking defends herself/himself, the insane Kibo looks upon a defence as attacking him.

148th published book

Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface:
Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that the Universe, in total is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.

In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.

Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory.

Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus ring and visualize each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus perpendicular at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law, producing electricity.

Length: 316 pages

Product details
• ASIN : B08T82M2LP
• Publication date : January 16, 2021
• Language: : English
• File size : 887 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 316 pages
• Lending : Enabled

#1-2, 48th published book

Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

--------------------------
Table of Contents
--------------------------

1) A visual image of a Atom Totality

2) Simply multiply 9 times 105MeV and there you get the rest mass of proton and neutron.

3) The tau-electron 1777MeV is merely 105MeV multiply by 17 is 1785 with Sigma Error of 0.4%.

4) Particle in the 840MeV range so that we can say we discovered the proton particle isolated of its internal muon.

5) Found a 840MeV particle in experimental physics, but, is it the proton torus without its interior occupied by a muon?

6) The theory of 9s, as help in physics.

7) How we picture the interior of Atoms, and the Atom Totality.

8) The Principle of Scooting-Over, applied.

9) An ongoing commentary of the geometry of atoms, both interior and exterior.

10) Galaxies form Rings in Faraday Coil, and Faraday bar-magnet // Cosmic Proton, Cosmic Muon.

11) Is there a Cosmic Faraday Law going on?
Length: 148 pages

Product details
File Size: 2370 KB
Print Length: 148 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: June 10, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07SW87BF5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #285,417 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#826 in Astronomy (Books)
#166 in Astronomy (Kindle Store)
#671 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-3, 74th published book

HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

#1-4, 105th published book

Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.

Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
Length: 39 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : March 24, 2020
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)



#1-5, 112th published book

New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.

Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book.. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
Length: 20 pages

Product details
• ASIN : B0875SVDC7
• Publication date : April 15, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 1134 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 20 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)

Examples of Kibo Parry M. stalking in sci.math, and the question is open as to whether he flunked Rensselaer for he still thinks 938 is 12% short of 945, and whether he stalked students at Rensselaer and was dismissed. All open questions of a insane stalker.

Re: 5) AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 67 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. Last revision was 8JUN2021. Under-Construction: AP recently is reinventing Multivariable Calculus, and will end up throwing out Old Math's Gradient theorem, Green's
by
Michael Moroney
Jun 17, 2021, 11:57 AM

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP with his incited hatred of 28 years stalking
148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1
Jun 16, 2021, 12:09 AM
by
Graham Cooper

Re: 1- Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP, with his inciting hatred of 28 years stalking leading to Violence
Mutt Buncher Re: 3- Kibo Parry Moroney says Dr. Tao, Hales, Stillwell, Wiles, educators NSF Kelvin
Jun 16, 2021
by
Efftard K. Donglemeier

Re: l) AP's 175th book//Physicsopedia-- Listing of 125 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics. New entrees under construction: AP is reinventing Multivariable Calculus so that AP throws on the trash pile the Green's theorem, Gradient theorem, Stokes
by Michael Moroney Jun 13, 2021, 4:47:35 PM

Re: 3-Google we need you to have a Balanced Search hit on Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, where none can do a valid, let alone geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, on the first page of a search for them..
by Dave Richardson
May 26, 2021, 3:17 PM

Re: 1-Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Steven Weinberg who cannot entertain the question of which is the real electron of atoms-- is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle?
by Mina Arvuti lähedal May 30, 2021, 7:54 AM

Re: someone in sci.math is using the trick of delaying AP posts from reaching the viewing board--
by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse)
Dec 24, 2018, 4:33:44 PM

Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block,Ernest Abers,Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
by Michael Moroney Mar 3, 2019, 6:38:18 PM

Re: Dan Christensen says close all math, physics, chemistry dept. in ALL Canadian Colleges with their fake electron (muon is real electron), fake geometry proof of calculus (Old Math sums up 0 width rectangles), fake Lewis 8 Structure (dissociation...
byGiant Radioactive Easter Bunnie Jan 21, 2021, 5:38:37 PM

Re: AP, King of Science, true electron is the muon//Only true physics books in existence-- teaches the meaning of Angular Momentum which no physicist before ever had with their silly electron = 0.5MeV, proton 938MeV which does not allow for the existence
by Professor Wordsmith Jun 3, 2020, 9:41:30 AM

Re: Stewart failed Calculus also, and his book should be removed
by Dan Christensen
Jun 24, 2018, 10:52:49 PM

Re: 2Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse)
Jun 9, 2018, 6:35:36 PM

Re: Fire the entire Univ Western Ontario math dept/ still teaching that 1 OR 2 = 3, when every kid knows 1 AND 2 =3/ still teaching a ellipse is conic-- when it is oval
by Quadibloc
Nov 16, 2017, 9:53:05 PM

Re: Fire the entire math depts Stockholm Univ & Gothenburg// for teaching fake Calculus-- never doing a Fund.Theorem of Calculus Diagram
by Jan Nov 22, 2017, 9:57:43 PM

Re: entire STANFORD Univ. math dept fired// unable to acknowledge truth in math, and teaches that 2 OR 3 =5 when it is 2 AND 3= 5
by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse) Nov 12, 2017, 2:23:06 PM

Re: Proof of Kepler Packing//Jan Burse-Alzheimer faggot//ETH Zurich, Dietmar Salamon, Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, looking at it
by Dan Christensen Jul 9, 2017, 11:34:05 PM

Re: *Fire the entire Univ Western Ontario math dept/ still teaching that the contradictory sine graph as sinusoid when it is really semicircle
by Dan Christensen Nov 21, 2017,

Re: 81,045-Student victims of Rose M. Patten Univ Toronto from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F.. West, Michael B. Walker
by Frank Cassa 12Apr2021 7:00 AM

Re: 77,233 Student victims of Lawrence Bacow's Harvard from stalker Kibo Parry Moroney with his 938 is 12% short 945, his 10 OR 4 = 14 with AND as subtraction, and his mindless belief real electron = 0.5MeV when true electron is muon
Filthy stalker of Kibo Parry Moroney, Barry Shein, Nicholas Thompson (Wired cover). The drug
11:57 AM 10Apr2021
by Wayne Decarlo

Re: 7,744-Student victims of Linda Hasenfratz Univ Western Ontario from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz President Alan Shepar
Canadian students victimized by Dan Christensen and his party-- Linda Hasenfratz, Silvia Mittler, Els
11:53 AM 10Apr2021
by Wayne Decarlo

Re: 102,852-Student victims of Dominic Barton, Univ Waterloo from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Dominic Barton, President Feridun Hamdullahpur physics
by konyberg Apr 15, 2021, 3:09:41 PM

Re: 135,568 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron of
#2-1, 137th published book Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series,
May 10, 2021
by Professor Wordsmith

Re: 135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron o
#2-1, 137th published book Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series,
May 10, 2021
by Michael Moroney

Re: 6Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
By Michael Moroney 28 posts 292 views updated 12:31 PM

Re: L. Reif, Marty Walsh, Charlie Baker, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins-- Moroney-- Boston's antiscience stalker fool//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
By Michael Moroney 19 posts 120 views updated 12:28 PM

Re: If Marissa Mayer were still at Google-- probably take her 15 minutes to engineer a better newsgroup
By Michael Moroney 20 posts 156 views updated 12:26 PM

Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
By Michael Moroney 29 posts 422 views updated 12:25 PM

Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block,Ernest Abers,Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
By Michael Moroney 34 posts 244 views updated 12:23 PM

Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work
By Michael Moroney 20 posts 165 views updated 12:22 PM

Re: Racist-math at Reed College-- ellipse is never a conic, David Perkinson, Lyudmila Korobenko, John Lind, Dylan McNamee, Kyle Ormsby, Angelica Osorno
By Michael Moroney 50 posts 405 views updated 12:21 PM

Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
By Michael Moroney 44 posts 461 views updated 12:17 PM

Re: 1.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
Patricio J. Whackmember

Re: 1Moroney barks at math failures Baez, Bullock, Witten. But I see the three as having failed Angular Momentum with their 938 proton and .5MeV electron
12/30/18
j4n bur53

Re: Shit for brains in Logic Morons of logic George Boole, William Jevons, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Godel, Rudolf Carnap, Jan Burse& Dan Christensen as moronette cadets of Boole, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Willard Quine, Alfred North Whitehead, Irving Copi
by zelos...@gmail.com Mar 25, 2021, 12:55:15 AM

Re: Spamming fuckdog Dan Christensen says fire Stanford's John Lipa, Alexander Fetter, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash our
by Mutt Buncher

Re: TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS series by Archimedes Plutonium, only math books to teach correct calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental theorem of Calculus. Old Math cannot even fix its mistake of ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic.
by Michael Moroney

Re: 5-AP's 150th book// TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Freshperson College// Physics textbook series, book 4 by Archimedes Plutonium// Using as template Halliday& Resnick & AP's Senior year High School to AP's 150th book// TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//
by Michael Moroney

Kibo Parry M. on 🤡 Andrew Wiles, and Terence Tao 🤯 of Math
On Sunday, May 16, 2021 at 11:54:00 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🐁 of Math and 🐀 of Physics
>"failure"
On Saturday, June 19, 2021 at 1:50:59 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "Village Idiot of
> fails at math and science:

AP writes: Kibo Parry Moroney pressing hard on Google Search hits to be fair and balanced with a COUNTERPOINT on first page of search list for Andrew Wiles and Terence Tao, for it is silly propaganda that Google search lists are with 5 million sugar coated baby boy genius of Tao and 5 million hits of Andrew Wiles trophy cabinet when the two are failures and losers of math with never a geometry proof of fundamental theorem of calculus. So idiotic was Wiles and Tao, they still believe and teach 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Length: 137 pages

Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1307 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 137 pages
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
Preface:
First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.

The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.

My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.

Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.

Length: 72 pages

File Size: 773 KB
Print Length: 72 pages
Publication Date: March 12, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PMB69F5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 



#6-2, 27th published book

Correcting Reductio Ad Absurdum// Teaching True Logic series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 9NOV2020. This is AP's 27th published book.

Preface:
These are the TRUE Truth Tables of the 4 connectors of Logic

Equal+Not
T = T = T
T = ~F = T
F = ~T = T
F = F = T

If--> then
T --> T = T
T --> F = F
F --> T = U (unknown or uncertain)
F --> F = U (unknown or uncertain)

And
T & T = T
T & F = T
F & T = T
F & F = F

Or
T or T = F
T or F = T
F or T = T
F or F = F

Those can be analyzed as being Equal+Not is multiplication. If-->then is division. And is addition and Or is subtraction in mathematics. Now I need to emphasis this error of Old Logic, the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability unknown, undefined end conclusion.

Now in Old Logic they had for Reductio Ad Absurdum as displayed by this schematic:

| | ~p
| |---
| | .
| | .
| | q
| | .
| | .
| | ~q
| p

Which is fine except for the error of not indicating the end conclusion of "p" is only a probability of being true, not guaranteed as true. And this is the huge huge error that mathematicians have fallen victim of. For the Reductio Ad Absurdum is not a proof method for mathematics, it is probability of being true or false. Math works on guaranteed truth, not probability. This textbook is written to fix that error.
Length: 86 pages

Product details
• ASIN : B07Q18GQ7S
• Publication date : March 23, 2019
• Language : English
• File size : 1178 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print length : 86 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #346,875 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #28 in Logic (Kindle Store)
◦ #95 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #217 in Mathematical Logic
•

Kibo Parry M. the 28 year stalker on Steven Weinberg, Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, John Baez, Dan Christensen Michael Moroney's profile photo Michael Moroney

Kibo Parry M. the 28 year stalker on Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Baez, Dan Christensen

On Steven Weinberg, Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, John Baez, Dan Christensen

Michael Moroney's profile photo
Michael Moroney
Jun 20, 2021, 11:07:11 PM (10 hours ago)

🕷 of Math an🕸️ 🃏 of Physics "Court Jester of Physics"
Michael Moroney's profile photo
Michael Moroney
Jun 20, 2021, 11:11:48 PM (10 hours ago)

💀 of Math and ☠️ of Physics Stooge"

Kibo Parry M. complaining, he has fair Google search list but not Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales with no COUNTERPOINT on first page, only sugar coated propaganda-- oh the baby boy genius when in reality they are Failures of Math, see below

> Michael Moroney's profile photo
> Michael Moroney wrote:
> Jun 20, 2021, 11:07:11 PM
> "Court Jester of Physics"
> Michael Moroney's profile photo
> Michael Moroney wrote:
> Jun 20, 2021, 11:11:48 PM
>Physics Stooge"

All of Wiles & Tao Google search hits are sugar coated baby boy genius, but Google should have a CounterPoint hit on each of their 1st pages. Maybe the below is too harsh but the reality is that Tao & Wiles are math failures, not geniuses

So you Google Search "Harvard Dr. Hau" and you find Balanced Honest Search List with a Counterpoint in Dr. Hau's first page.

But you Google Search Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Thomas Hales and you find nothing but propaganda, brainwash of sugar coated baby boy genius at his award trophy cabinet.

When the truth and reality of the matter is they are math failures, so stupid in math that they cannot be bothered by making a homemade paper cone and dropping a Kerr lid inside and at a slant, it is not a ellipse but a OVAL.

And then those three oafs of math knew that Calculus was geometry, or did they? And calculus being geometry demands a geometrical proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Yet all they can do is the fakery "limit analysis".

Then there is the matter of Logic for you need logic to do a math proof. And yet those three oafs still teach the fakery Boole logic with AND truth table being TFFF when in reality it is TTTF so that you can have 2 AND 1= 3 and not the Boole fakery of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.

Yet the world puts these three oafs on a pedestal of math achievement when the truth of the matter is-- they are con-artists out for fame and fortune, and the truth be damnation.

So those three need this Counterpoint on their first page of a Google hit list.

A thread of this was found in "Terence Tao Plutonium" but it should be found in simply "Terence Tao" as a counterpoint to the awful 5 million hits of sugar coated baby boy genius

novaBBS - sci.math - 1-Shit for brains in math-- Andrew Wiles ...
From: Archimedes Plutonium ... Shit for brains in math-- Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ken Ribet never a geometry proof ...

Now maybe that is too harsh, but the thread in sci.math of these are good for Tao and for Wiles and for Hales.

Re: Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
By Jan 88 posts 4864 views updated 2:20 PM

Re: Why is John Stillwell such a numbskull on Irrational numbers-- his book Mathematics and its History
By Zelos Malum 46 posts 500 views updated 2:29 PM

Re: Thomas Hales flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
By Jan 25 posts 653 views updated 2:26 PM

Re: Andrew Wiles flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
By Zelos Malum 67 posts 1027 views updated 2:22 PM

Google is JOURNALISM and we would be sick and tired of PBS NEWSHOUR if all they ever did was interview a Republican and never a counterpoint of a Democrat. Same thing goes for math propaganda of Tao, Wiles, Hales of 5 million hits of sugar coated nonsense.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 21, 2021, 1:47:29 AM (4 days ago)



to
On Monday, June 21, 2021 at 1:34:35 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> A thread of this was found in "Terence Tao Plutonium" but it should be found in simply "Terence Tao" as a counterpoint to the awful 5 million hits of sugar coated baby boy genius
>
> novaBBS - sci.math - 1-Shit for brains in math-- Andrew Wiles ...
> From: Archimedes Plutonium ... Shit for brains in math-- Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ken Ribet never a geometry proof ...
>

And this is probably how mechanically, they skew the search hits. They put in a command that any "plutonium" in a search hit of Terence Tao cannot be included in a search of "Terence Tao". So that Princeton Univ or Google or UCLA attach a "delete any hit with plutonium" in a Terence Tao search list.

But, Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales need a COUNTERPOINT in their very first Google list. For all three were too stupid in math to do any of these-- calculus, ellipse-oval, Boole corrected.

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Length: 21 pages

File Size: 1620 KB
Print Length: 21 pages
Publication Date: March 11, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PLSDQWC
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray: Not Enabled
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

#8-2, 11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Length: 137 pages

Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1307 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 137 pages
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

5th published book

Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
Preface:
First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.

The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.

21) AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 70 fakes and mistakes of Old Math.

Last revision was 28JUN2021.

Preface: I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds question of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

Some of these can be found in AP's TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS series, but the entries keep changing and added on new, means I need to have a separate book for these fakes, mistakes and errors of Old Math.

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for ages 18-19 Freshperson College, math textbook series, book 3
Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
Listing the Errors of Old Math, list of 1 to 50.

Alright, well, mathematics is a closed subject. What I mean by that is due to the textbook series of Archimedes Plutonium TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, that once you learn the polynomial transform and learn the two Power Rules of Calculus, you reached the peak, the pinnacle of all of mathematics, and anything further in math is just details of what you learn in that textbook series. Math is a completed science because it has this "peak of calculus", unlike the other 5 hard sciences of physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy. Those other five will continue to find new ideas, new things, while math remains static and complete to its peak of calculus understanding. Mathematics is finished complete as far as a science goes because the peak of math is going nowhere. And even though Physics will find new science such as how the proton toruses inside of atoms are configured in geometry, the geometry and calculus used in that configuration, that new science does not change nor does it create or require a new math peak/summit to handle the new physics.

Now I do need to discuss the Errors of Math in General and the errors of math in geometry in particular. I have the feeling that Geometry is the more important of the two-- algebra - geometry. This list appears in most of AP's Teaching True Mathematics textbook series by Archimedes Plutonium, meant to be a guide and orientation, and a organizing of what must be covered before graduating from College, and what math to steer clear of.

Errors mostly, but not always, for some are included because too much time spent on them.

The listings in Mathopedia of errors, mistakes and fakes is based on the idea that Calculus is the supreme achievement of all of mathematics for it is the essential math of doing Physics electricity and magnetism. And in order to have a proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, we must clean up and clean out all the mistakes, fakes and errors of Old Math, erst, we have no Calculus. So calculus is the consistency maker for the rest of all of mathematics.

1) Calculus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, a proof that derivative and integral are inverses of one another, just as addition and subtraction are inverses, or, multiplication and division are inverses. The only way to obtain a geometry proof is to clean up and clean out all the fakes, mistakes and errors of Old Math, such as their fake numbers-- the Reals. Their fake definition of function allowing anything be a function. Their fakery of a continuum when even physics by 1900 with Planck onwards in Quantum Mechanics proving the Universe is discrete Space not a continuum, yet by 1900 onwards those in mathematics following the idiotic continuum in the Continuum Hypothesis with even more avid interest, when they should have thrown the continuum on a trashpile of shame.

2) The true numbers of mathematics are the Decimal Grid Numbers, because you have to need and apply one mechanism only to obtain the true numbers of mathematics-- Mathematical Induction. In Old Math they had just a tiny few intelligent mathematicians, Kronecker, who emerged from the gaggle crowd of kooks to notice that Naturals all come from one single mechanism-- Mathematical Induction. But Old Math never had a crowd of mathematicians with logical brains to say-- all our numbers need to come from the one mechanism of Mathematical Induction.

3) The true numbers of math have empty space between successor and predecessor numbers. For example the 10 Grid is 0, .1, .2, .3, . . . , 9.8, 9.9, 10..0. Where no numbers exist between .1 and .2, etc. Only discrete numbers allow us to give a proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

4) All functions of mathematics must be a polynomial, and if not a polynomial, convert the offering to a polynomial over a specific interval.

5) Space is discrete and all lines in space are strings of attached straight lines.

6) No curves exist in Geometry, only finer and smaller straight line segments attached to one another.
We can still keep the name "curve" as long as we know it is a string of fine tiny straightline segments strung together in what looks like a smooth curve. If curves exist, then the Calculus in Fundamental Theorem of Calculus cannot be proven and thus Calculus does not exist. We all know that we have to have Calculus, and so we throw out onto the trash pile the curve of Old Math. And this is reasonable because starting in 1900 in physics there arose the Quantum Mechanics of Space being discrete. And a discrete space has no continuum, has no curve of Old Math.

7) Space has gaps in between one point and the next point. These gaps are empty space from one point to the next point, for example in 10 Grid there is no number between .1 and .2, and in 100 Grid there exists no number between .01 and .02.

8) Limit analysis was an insane fakery in Old Math, concocted because Old Math needed the excuse of some proof, so they invented the monster con-artist trick that a limit analysis would divert the fact it is no proof at all, but a Non Sequitur argument. Limit analysis is juju totem witchcraft dance around a desire to prove the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Just as idiotic as dancing around a sick person of a virus is going to cure the person.

9) Infinity has a borderline and there is a microinfinity compared to a macroinfinity. For example in 10 Grid, the microinfinity is .1 if we exclude 0 and so there is no number smaller than .1 and no number larger than 10 in 10 Grid, where 10 is macroinfinity.

10) The 1st Quadrant Only in Coordinate System Geometry. Sad that the first coordinate system of Descartes was correct but soon became corrupted with 4 quadrants. See Mathematical Thought, Volume 1, Kline, 1972, page 303. Where Fermat then Descartes starts the Cartesian Coordinate System as 1 axis only and from 0 rightwards, meaning in our modern day math, 1st Quadrant Only. Why did math screw up on coordinate systems? I suppose some clowns thought negative numbers were true and they wanted ease of drawing a circle with center at 0. When they could have just as easily drawn the circle in 1st Quadrant Only.

11) Calculus needed a Geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, but Old Math never provided such, instead they provided some stupid Limit argument. The reason for the creation of the Limit disaster was that the French mathematician Cauchy got sick and tired of hearing his smartest students complain that the width of rectangles in the integral are 0 width, and those smart students could not, for the life of them understand how a rectangle with 0 width has any interior area. So instead of the math community denouncing the limit, instead they elevated the fakery.

12) Further in Calculus, they knew you could do a transform of coordinate points to turn any function into a polynomial function, a method of Lagrange.. However, they in Old Math were too stupid to take this transform to its highest form-- all functions are polynomial functions and only polynomial functions. When you learn that-- the derivative and integral of any and every function of math is a snap breeze simple and easy.

13) With the error filled 4 quadrants, when it should be 1st Quadrant Only, we have Trigonometry's sine and cosine with the fakery of sinusoid wave when it never was that. The sine and cosine are semicircle waves, and no sinusoid wave exists.

14) There is only one Geometry-- Euclidean, and there is not three distinct geometries of elliptical Riemannian or hyperbolic Lobachevsky. Those two are just duals that make up Euclidean.

15) Torus, volume and surface area formulas in Old Math are all screwed up and in error because they imagined bending a cylinder to form a torus. This brings back memories, for I had to do a percentage formula, since I could not follow the fake way of bending a cylinder. Where 78.5% of Disc Torus (pi)R^2h - (pi)r^2h is the volume of Circle Torus, and 78.5% of Disc Torus 2(pi)Rh + 2(pi)rh + 2 ((pi)R^2 - (pi)r^2) is the surface area of Circle Torus..

16) Ellipse is never a single cone slant cut, always a cylinder slant cut. Although you do get an ellipse from double cones of this configuration <> which in Old Math was the hyperbola, but two hyperbolas joined together to form a ellipse.

17) All Parallelepipeds reduced to a Rectangular Box by making 2 cuts and pastes. Volume of the original Parallelepiped is simply a*b*c of the Rectangular Box length*width*depth formed. Old Math never understood that a precise definition of Parallelepiped has two kinds, the parallelepiped that has 90 degree angles and the parallelepiped that has no 90 degree angle.

💩 for 🧠 Archimedes "Putin's Stooge" Plutonium
<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> tarded:

> 21) AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 70 fakes and mistakes of Old Math.
>
1) Ludwig Poehlmann
2) Ludwig Hansen
3) Ludwig van Ludvig
4) Ludwig Plutonium
5) Archimedes Plutonium
6) Archimedes Plutonium
....
70) Archimedes Plutonium

Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell failures of math, who never thought Calculus is geometry and thus, never sought for a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. These people need a Counterpoint on 1st page of their Google Search list stating they were so dumb in math, never connected that calculus is geometry, therefore a geometry proof of FTC is primal concern.

AP revolution in College textbooks TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS read for free the worlds finest math textbooks available-- containing geometry proofs of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

No more of this racket of college textbooks costing $100 or more, and not even have a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

#4-1, 134th published book

Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.

Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.

Product details
• ASIN : B08K2XQB4M
• Publication date : September 24, 2020
• Language : English
• File size : 576 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print length : 23 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,307,085 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #1,241 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #1,345 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
◦ #10,634 in Calculus (Books)
•

#4-2, 45th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Release in General Geometry

Last revision was 2NOV2020.
Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.

This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.

It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.

Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic & transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.

Length: 375 pages

Product details
File Size: 2013 KB
Print Length: 375 pages
Publication Date: May 2, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07RG7BVZW
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #274,398 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#27 in General Geometry
#336 in Geometry & Topology (Books)

#4-3, 55th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.

Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.

The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.

And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.

But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.

Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.

The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.

Length: 236 pages

Product details
File Size: 1390 KB
Print Length: 236 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: August 16, 2019
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07WN9RVXD
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,212,707 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2719 in Calculus (Books)
#417 in Calculus (Kindle Store)



#4-4, 56th published book

COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.
Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.
Length: 54 pages

Stalker attacks//coming from Dartmouth??Philip J. Hanlon, Joseph Helble, Asher Auel, Peter Doyle, Anne Gelb, Marcia Groszek, Ethan Levien, Peter J Mucha, Rosa C. Orellana, Scott D. Pauls, Daniel N. Rockmore//threatening AP's life. Never any math

Stalker attacks//coming from Dartmouth??Philip J. Hanlon, Joseph Helble, Asher Auel, Peter Doyle, Anne Gelb, Marcia Groszek, Ethan Levien, Peter J Mucha, Rosa C. Orellana, Scott D. Pauls, Daniel N. Rockmore//threatening AP's life.

Never any math content to these kibo Parry M. attacks. Just crank repeat.

Stalker attacks//coming from Dartmouth??Philip J. Hanlon, Joseph Helble, Asher Auel, Peter Doyle, Anne Gelb, Marcia Groszek, Ethan Levien, Peter J Mucha, Rosa C. Orellana, Scott D. Pauls, Daniel N. Rockmore, Thomas R. Shemanske, John, D Trout, Erik van Erp, John Voight, Dorothy I. Wallace, David L. Webb, Dana P. Williams, Peter Winkler

On Thursday, July 1, 2021 at 10:09:32 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Splatter-Fart-Shitee"
>
> On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > "FireD your ass"
>
> Dartmouth College: Philip J. Hanlon, Joseph Helble, Asher Auel, Peter Doyle, Anne Gelb, Marcia Groszek, Ethan Levien, Peter J Mucha, Rosa C. Orellana, Scott D. Pauls, Daniel N. Rockmore, Thomas R. Shemanske, John, D Trout, Erik van Erp, John Voight, Dorothy I. Wallace, David L. Webb, Dana P. Williams, Peter Winkler
> Miles P. Blencowe, Robert R. Caldwell, Brian Charles Chabover, Richard Denton, Robert A. Fesen, Marcelo Gleiser, Ryan Hickox, Mary K. Hudson, James William LaBelle, Kristina Anne Lynch, Robyn Millan, Hans Mueller, Elisabeth Newton, Roberto Onofrio, Alex Rimberg, Barrett N. Rogers, John R. Thorstensen, Lorenza Viola, Martin N. Wybourne, Joseph D. Harris, Walter E. Lawrence, David C. Montgomery, Gary Alan Wegner
>
>
> Donald Trump, the stalker in chief with constant hate spew causing the Capitol Building be stormed and 3 police officer deaths, and now, the constant hate spew if Kibo Parry Moroney & Earle Jones, looking for some deranged follower to laugh at a kibo joke then storm AP. That is why Kibo delighted in talking to Governor of South Dakota Kristi Noem from kibo postings for the exact address of AP and where the other stalker Jan Burse started to post houses for sale nearby to AP, so as to instruct the deranged unhinged Kibo wannabe gang member.

> A few years back, on my doorstep was a crowd of 3 college youngsters, laughing and giggling and knocking on the door. I know the mentality of young people out on a prank, and they wanted me to come out, but, knowing that fools like Parry and Jones have whipped up so much hatred in the last 28 years, that something told me, --- talk to them through the window pane, because in all likelihood, this crowd of 3 maybe a whipped up crowd like the hatemongers who stormed the Capitol under the Trump hatred. So, I kept asking the one, what was his name and what did he want, and never any direct answer, so I told the bunch, leave or I call the police.
>
> AP should not have to live where anyday a unhinged Kibo goofball is stalking out AP.
>
> Kibo is an immense threat to the life of AP, for his aim along with his gang of Jan Burse, Dan Christensen, Earle Jones, Ross is to tap into some young lost loner that is unhinged.
>
> On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > "FireD your ass"
>
> Kibo Parry Moroney along with his gang of stalkers, 28 years nonstop threatening the life of AP, with his nonstop Hate Spew. I do not want to have to meet with a twisted recruit caused by Kibo Parry Moroney, Earle Jones, Jan Burse, Dan Christensen, Ross, at my backdoor. And just as Donald Trump stirred hatred for 4 years causing the Capitol Building to be stormed, Kibo Parry Moroney is stirring hatred for a assault on Dartmouth College, Earle Jones psychoceramics target practice at Stanford Univ.
>
> On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:49:59 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > FailurePlutonium, Psychoceramics
> > "FireD your ass"
>
> Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, not much different than Donald Trump stirring up the hatred to storm the Capital Building, and now we have Jones & Parry whipping up the hatred for 28 years to what? Violence on Stanford Univ or AP? Stalkers are too dumb to know, their endgame is violence especially as they recruit young ones to join their stalker hate team.
>
> If it is Stanford Univ or even Dartmouth College, would it be a first for those institutions? I mean, this is 2021, and Kibo Parry Moroney is still lost in 1990s with "Dartmouth finally fired his ass". And then the Kibo Parry along with Jan Burse maps out a mapp to AP's home-- as to say-- like Donald Trump-- "down Pennsylvania Ave".
>
> Or like Earle Jones setting up psychoceramics all over Stanford Univ for what Earle? For target practice, Earle being such a oaf, not realizing his ratcheted hatred ends up in violence.
>
> FBI, Google, Stanford Univ, Dartmouth College, you have the power to stop this hatred ratcheting from these fools of 28 years of stalking AP, for if not stopped, I hate to see the end result of this 28 year long nonstop hatred of AP.
>

>
> But, as Earle Jones psychoceramic hatred and Kibo Parry Moroney "fire his ass" continue to spew hatred in sci.math and sci.physics, someday, that hatred leads to Violence. Luckily, 28 years of nonstop Parry hatred has averted violence, but none of us are getting any younger and the continued Parry and Jones hate stirrings is more than likely to end up in a bad ending.
> 
> Archimedes Plutonium
> Jun 11, 2021, 1:30:05 AM (2 days ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
> Two insane stalkers of sci.math, Kibo for 28 years, terribly insane, and Jones on and off for 25 years. Both insane, for their game is hatred, never any math in sci.math, never any physics in sci.physics. Maybe both were failures in science, and this is how they repay society, by stalking hatred in newsgroups.
>
> And is the reason why one of kibo Parry's second page hit in a Google Search talks about---
>
> What made the Internet bad 30 years ago still applies today --- Quartz
>
> ... Influencers, famous for nothing but their fame? Consider James "Kibo" Parry...
>
> AP writes: I did not read the full website as to what made it bad, but I suspect it is "stalkers". When you have a free access and freedom of speech, it tends to degenerate into "stalkers of an insane mind take over."
>
> AP writes: so, why not pull the plug on stalkers, especially Jones and Parry-- never any math in sci.math, never any physics in sci.physics, just attack after attack after attack is all these insane knuckleheads do.
>
> The MASTER in Dr. Who: Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha,,,, ha ha ha ha ha
>
> "Psychoceramics"
> 4 views
> Skip to first unread message
> Subscribe
> Earle Jones's profile photo
> Earle Jones
> Jun 11, 2021, 12:00 AM
> to sci.math
> 
> Michael Moroney's profile photo
> Michael Moroney wrote:
> Jun 11, 2021, 1:13 AM
> to sci.math
> ArchiePoo is the first "psychoceramic" I encountered on Usenet way back
> when. Back then Usenet was a very different place, with access limited
> to universities, certain large (mostly computer) corporations and
> government agencies. That's how ArchiePoo got access - he worked for
> Dartmouth College who had the advanced foresight to grant internet
> access to all of their students, faculty and staff, and Archie started
> spewing from there. After years of warnings ignored by Archie,
> Dartmouth finally fired his ass for dragging their reputation through
> the mud.
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> Jun 11, 2021, 8:44:55 AM (2 days ago)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> to
> Stanford Univ & Google, where is this heading for, for Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, is it heading for Violence on Stanford Univ or AP, for it only keeps escalating higher and higher. FBI, please make a gun check on Kibo and Earle Jones.
> 0 views
> Skip to first unread message
> Subscribe
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> unread,
> 8:35 AM (1 minute ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
> Stanford Univ & Google, where is this heading for, for Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, is it heading for Violence on Stanford Univ or AP, for it only keeps escalating higher and higher. FBI, please make a gun check on Kibo and Earle Jones.
>
> AP is currently working on the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with a Geometry proof, the first valid proof of FTC, in fact. And working in sci.math..
>
> AP is currently working on TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 1st year College, in sci.physics, along with books on the drought in Western USA.
>
> Yet for 28 years of stalking by Kibo Parry Moroney and his many gang of stalkers-- Earle Jones, Dan Christensen, Jan Burse, recently Ross.
>
> Attack attack each and every day for 28 years. Never a post on math in sci.math, never a post on physics in sci.physics, just a 28 year long demonization of AP, with the aim of kicking AP out of sci.math and sci.physics.
>
> Just yesterday Earle Jones titles a thread Psychoceramics on AP, and Kibo follows up with "Dartmouth finally fired his ass"
>
> So, I ask Stanford Univ-- where is this hatred by Earle Jones going? Certainly no contribution to sci.math or sci.physics, which leads me to believe the only clear direction is that Earle Jones does violence. Can Stanford or the FBI check to see if Earle Jones is violent, is he buying guns and ammunition, for he sure is not posting math to sci.math nor physics to sci.physics. Could he be violent on the Stanford campus?
>
> Same question-- and more so for Kibo Parry Moroney who spent 28 years of bad mouthing AP, and just yesterday raised the sceptre of "Dartmouth finally fired his ass". An event that occurred in the 1990s and here it is 2021. Kibo never does math in sci.math, never does physics in sci.physics. And where is all that hatred going? Is it going to where Kibo stocks up on guns and ammo. For Stalking behavior of 28 years nonstop is insanity, and insanity can lead to violence. FBI, can you please check up on Kibo Parry Moroney, for I certainly never want to see him show up on my backdoor.
>
> Google, what sort of definition do you have for ABUSE. I mean, is not stalking a person for 28 years nonstop, is that not abuse to the maximum? And can this stalking ever stop or will it end in Kibo Parry Moroney violence. When stalkers never get their way on victimizing other people, they end up committing violence on their victims.
>
> AP is doing Calculus and Physics and Weather Drought. Earle Jones is doing pyschoceramics in sci.math and Kibo Parry Moroney is doing 1990s "Dartmouth finally fired his ass" in sci.math on Jun 11, 2021.
>
> Google, Stanford, FBI, I can only see one direction of this ugly stalking-- Violence by these stalkers, perhaps on Stanford Univ, perhaps on AP.
>
>
> "Psychoceramics"
> by Earle Jones writes:
> >"Psychoceramics"
>
> Jun 11, 2021, 12:00 AM
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
> to
> 
> 
> Michael Moroney
>
> Jun 11, 2021, 1:13 AM (7 hours ago)
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
> to
>
> 
> ArchiePoo is the first "psychoceramic" I encountered on Usenet way back
> when. Back then Usenet was a very different place, with access limited
> to universities, certain large (mostly computer) corporations and
> government agencies. That's how ArchiePoo got access - he worked for
> Dartmouth College who had the advanced foresight to grant internet
> access to all of their students, faculty and staff, and Archie started
> spewing from there. After years of warnings ignored by Archie,
> Dartmouth finally fired his ass for dragging their reputation through
> the mud.
>
> Archie (AP) has gone poetic
> 14 views
> Subscribe
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
> earle
>
> Mar 12, 2021, 10:48:35 PM
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
> to
> *
> Looks like our Archimedes Plutonium (aka Archie, AP) had gone into the poetic/scriptual domain.
> This is a very good thing!
> Whatever gets him out of mathematics and science and into the poetry of the earth is a good thing.
>
> He may be able to achieve some fame and notoriety in this emotional world that he has never achieved in the field of science or mathematics. I know -- he has "published" a hundred or so "books" courtesy of the Amazon freebies.
>
> But I think his future is in the linguistic and poetic domain of our thinking. I realize that his first language is not English, but his command of our language is not bad at all.
>
> Keep it up, Archie! Tell us what your think about the domain of our existence. Have you read the book, "Sapiens" -- I recommend it strongly. It is a history of existence, beginning with the 'big bang' and ending yesterday.
>
> Read it!
>
> And avoid any urge to lecture on mathematics and science.
>
> Cheers!
>
> earle
> *
>
>
> Job Offer
> 305 views
> Subscribe
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
> Earle Jones
>
> Nov 18, 2020, 6:32:00 PM
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
> to
> *
> Archie:
>
> There is an opening for a potwasher at Hanover House on the Dartmouth campus. They are looking for someone with experience.
>
> It comes along with email "@dartmouth.edu" which would make people think you know what your are talking about.
>
> Are you interested?
>
> earle
> *
>
> Ohm's Law
> 48 views
> Subscribe
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
> Earle Jones
>
> Jan 27, 2021, 12:40:18 AM
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
> to
> Questions for Archie Poo:
>
> 1. What is Ohm's Law?
>
> 2. You are standing outside and it begins to rain.
> What do you do?
>
> earle
> *
>
> Earle Jones
>
> Jan 25, 2021, 6:22:03 PM
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
> to
> On Mon Jan 25 14:24:05 2021 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > All of my college Teaching True Physics textbooks will follow that history of math form A= B*C*D with its secondary math form of x^2/A^2
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------
> > Table of Contents
> > ---------------------------
> >
> > 1) History of the volume of rectangular box V= L*W*H, and cube, earlier than 4,020 years ago, that starts physics.
> >
> > 2) Ancient Greek history of Atomic theory, magnetism and electricity.
> >
> > 3) Ancient Greek history of Magnetism and Electricity.
> >
> [...clipalot...]
>
> 150 books and you still don't know Ohm's law!
>
> earle
> *
>
> Important Discovery
> 31 views
> Subscribe
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
> Earle Jones
>
> Dec 13, 2020, 7:27:55 PM
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
> to
> *
> I am happy and honored to be able to report an important discovery.
> Mathematician and Physicist, Archimedes Plutonium, announced (on June 3, 2015) that, based on his research, the largest finite number is equal to 10^604.
> I want to report that I have found that this is in error: I have found a larger nujmber -- two in fact.
> My research has uncovered this number: 10^604 + 43 is larger than Plutonium's largest number.
> And then I discovered this:
> The number 10^605 is larger (by a factor of ten) than Plutonium's largest number.
> I believe that further research along the lines of my own work will yield more examples.
>
> Earle Jones
> *
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 17, 2019 at 11:30:20 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
>
> > *
> > Dan: Greetings!
> >
> > You know, and I know, that the so-called "new mathematics" of Archimedes Plutonium is a sad and dangerous set of publications (he now has about 20 "books" that can be downloaded at Amazon.) An unsophisticated mother who wants her kids to have a jump-start in mathematics could be persuaded by his off-base ramblings to present these wild ideas to their kids.
> >
> > That would be a tragedy.
> >
> > Do you think that we could propose to the editors at Amazon that they should somehow read the stuff that they are making available to the public? Do you think that Amazon even reviews the stuff that they sell? I would doubt it.
> >
> > Of all of APs books, I have only seen one review, and it was right to the point: Idiocy, a terrible book!
> >
> > AP is incapable of learning. He makes up his stuff on the fly and then proceeds to provide a "proof." It is obvious that he has no idea of the meaning of a mathematical proof. His pathetic "proof" that the ellipse is not a conic section is a third-grade half-ass attempt, with folding waxy magazine covers and dropping Mason-jar lids to"prove" his preconceived notions.
> >
> > He is clever and very creative. But totally misdirected and incapable of learning. Is it worth an attempt to make this known to Amazon and to suggest that they remove his trash mathematics?
> >
> > I am not a mathematics expert. I was a TA in the Math department at Georgia Tech and taught this stuff to freshmen. I have a BS in Electrical Engineering from Georgia Tech and an MS in EE from Stanford.
> >
> > It bothers me to see the useless ramblings of AP, as well as a few others (Gabriel, et al), receive publication on our NewsGroup and in the Amazon publication list.
> >
> > earle
> > *
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, June 8, 1995 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <3r7klr$8...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>, Archimedes Pl writes:
> >
> > >In article <D9tyE...@cwi.nl>
> > >d...@cwi.nl (Dik T. Winter) writes:
> > >
> > >> You probably misunderstood. Most will have talked about "unit", not 1;
> > >> at least I did. A unit is a number that has an inverse. In the
> > 10-adics
> > >> all numbers except numbers that are multiples of 2 and 5 are units.
> > That
> > >> is why in the 10-adics only 2 and 5 are prime; units are not prime. In
> > the
> > >> "counting numbers" only 1 is a unit.
> > >
> > > I concur Dik.
> > > Say Dik, if I make the doubly infinites as vectors, wherein the
> > >leftward string is the direction and the rightward string the size
> > >(realizing that the size S is 0<S<1 ) in such a way that each of these
> > >vectors is the arctanh of a Ordered Real/Complex number?
> > >
> > =============
> >
> > To put the math in terms that even Dartmouth students will understand:
> >
> > CalTech 1
> > Dartmouth 0
> >
> > =============
>
>
>
> On Friday, November 12, 2004 at 7:30:12 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <nsDjd.19015$6q2....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
> > "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <hu...@humor.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Remember, the letters in "Archimedes Plutonium"
> > > can be re-arranged to spell
> > > "The Delicious Rump Man"
> > > "I Pound His Male Rectum"
> > > "Penis Could Mature Him"
> > > "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"
> > > and many other delightful phrases
> > >
> > > "Archimedes Plutonium" <a_plu...@iw.net> wrote in message
> > > news:418E7777...@iw.net...
> > > > I am an idiot.
> >
> > *
> > Yes, Archy's name is very anagrammable.
> >
> > My favorite: Mr. Meticulous Pinhead.
> >
> > earle
> > *
>
> On Saturday, December 19, 1998 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <75fntt$b...@sjx-ixn9.ix.netcom.com>,
> > sbha...@ix.netcom.com(Steven B. Harris) wrote:
> >
> > >In <367a7e2c$0$2...@nntp1.ba.best.com> "MacMillan"
> > ><theresal...@hotmail.com> writes:
> > >>
> > >>"Archimedes Plutonium" anagram:
> > >>
> > >>"I am the purloined scum"
> >
> > --
> >
> > More anagrams:
> >
> > Archimedes Plutonium =
> > SUPREME HOMICIDAL NUT
> > MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD
> > RECOMPUTED HIS ALUMNI
> > IMPORT EUCLIDIAN MUSH
> > POUND HEURISTIC LEMMA
> > HILARIOUS CEMENT DUMP
> > LUDICROUS HEMP INMATE
> > MODULATES CHIMP URINE
> > MULTI-MENU P-ADICS HERO
> >
> > ...enough?
> >
> > earle
> > --
> > __
> > __/\_\
> > /\_\/_/
> > \/_/\_\ earle
> > \/_/ jones
> >
> >
> >
> > We want our Internet back! Get rid of Spam.
> > See http://www.cauce.org
>
>
> Stanford University, math dept.
>
> Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson*, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
>
>
> President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
>
> Stanford physics dept.
>
> Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian

Is NSF paying Kibo Parry M more to stalk sci.math than Oxford paying Andrew Wiles teach math in classrooms?

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993

Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

\\ ("`****/").
\\ `0_ 0 ) `-.
\\ (_&_.)' ._ )
\\ `--' / /
\\ ==(li)===========
\\
\\

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

Threatening AP's life:

Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP. Dartmouth College Kibo Parry Moroney, threatening the life of AP with this nonstop 28 year long hate spew stalking.

On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "FireD your ass"

Dartmouth College: Philip J. Hanlon, Joseph Helble, Asher Auel, Peter Doyle, Anne Gelb, Marcia Groszek, Ethan Levien, Peter J Mucha, Rosa C. Orellana, Scott D. Pauls, Daniel N. Rockmore, Thomas R. Shemanske, John, D Trout, Erik van Erp, John Voight, Dorothy I. Wallace, David L. Webb, Dana P. Williams, Peter Winkler
Miles P. Blencowe, Robert R. Caldwell, Brian Charles Chabover, Richard Denton, Robert A. Fesen, Marcelo Gleiser, Ryan Hickox, Mary K. Hudson, James William LaBelle, Kristina Anne Lynch, Robyn Millan, Hans Mueller, Elisabeth Newton, Roberto Onofrio, Alex Rimberg, Barrett N. Rogers, John R. Thorstensen, Lorenza Viola, Martin N. Wybourne, Joseph D. Harris, Walter E. Lawrence, David C. Montgomery, Gary Alan Wegner

Donald Trump, the stalker in chief with constant hate spew causing the Capitol Building be stormed and 3 police officer deaths, and now, the constant hate spew of Kibo Parry Moroney & Earle Jones, looking for some deranged follower to laugh at a kibo joke then storm AP. That is why Kibo delighted in talking to Governor of South Dakota Kristi Noem from kibo postings for the exact address of AP and where the other stalker Jan Burse started to post houses for sale nearby to AP, so as to instruct the deranged unhinged Kibo wannabe gang member.

AP should not have to live where anyday a unhinged Kibo goofball is stalking out AP.

Kibo is an immense threat to the life of AP, for his aim along with his gang of Jan Burse, Dan Christensen, Earle Jones, Ross is to tap into some young lost loner that is unhinged.

On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "FireD your ass"

Kibo Parry Moroney along with his gang of stalkers, 28 years nonstop threatening the life of AP, with his nonstop Hate Spew. I do not want to have to meet with a twisted recruit caused by Kibo Parry Moroney, Earle Jones, Jan Burse, Dan Christensen, Ross, at my backdoor. And just as Donald Trump stirred hatred for 4 years causing the Capitol Building to be stormed, Kibo Parry Moroney is stirring hatred for a assault on Dartmouth College, Earle Jones psychoceramics target practice at Stanford Univ.

On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:49:59 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> FailurePlutonium, Psychoceramics
> "FireD your ass"

Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, not much different than Donald Trump stirring up the hatred to storm the Capital Building, and now we have Jones & Parry whipping up the hatred for 28 years to what? Violence on Stanford Univ or AP? Stalkers are too dumb to know, their endgame is violence especially as they recruit young ones to join their stalker hate team.

If it is Stanford Univ or even Dartmouth College, would it be a first for those institutions? I mean, this is 2021, and Kibo Parry Moroney is still lost in 1990s with "Dartmouth finally fired his ass". And then the Kibo Parry along with Jan Burse maps out a mapp to AP's home-- as to say-- like Donald Trump-- "down Pennsylvania Ave".

Or like Earle Jones setting up psychoceramics all over Stanford Univ for what Earle? For target practice, Earle being such a oaf, not realizing his ratcheted hatred ends up in violence.

FBI, Google, Stanford Univ, Dartmouth College, you have the power to stop this hatred ratcheting from these fools of 28 years of stalking AP, for if not stopped, I hate to see the end result of this 28 year long nonstop hatred of AP.

A few years back, on my doorstep was a crowd of 3 college youngsters, laughing and giggling and knocking on the door. I know the mentality of young people out on a prank, and they wanted me to come out, but, knowing that fools like Parry and Jones have whipped up so much hatred in the last 28 years, that something told me, --- talk to them through the window pane, because in all likelihood, this crowd of 3 maybe a whipped up crowd like the hatemongers who stormed the Capitol under the Trump hatred. So, I kept asking the one, what was his name and what did he want, and never any direct answer, so I told the bunch, leave or I call the police.

But, as Earle Jones psychoceramic hatred and Kibo Parry Moroney "fire his ass" continue to spew hatred in sci.math and sci.physics, someday, that hatred leads to Violence. Luckily, 28 years of nonstop Parry hatred has averted violence, but none of us are getting any younger and the continued Parry and Jones hate stirrings is more than likely to end up in a bad ending.

Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 11, 2021, 1:30:05 AM (2 days ago)



to
Two insane stalkers of sci.math, Kibo for 28 years, terribly insane, and Jones on and off for 25 years. Both insane, for their game is hatred, never any math in sci.math, never any physics in sci.physics. Maybe both were failures in science, and this is how they repay society, by stalking hatred in newsgroups.

And is the reason why one of kibo Parry's second page hit in a Google Search talks about---

What made the Internet bad 30 years ago still applies today --- Quartz

.... Influencers, famous for nothing but their fame? Consider James "Kibo" Parry...

AP writes: I did not read the full website as to what made it bad, but I suspect it is "stalkers". When you have a free access and freedom of speech, it tends to degenerate into "stalkers of an insane mind take over."

AP writes: so, why not pull the plug on stalkers, especially Jones and Parry-- never any math in sci.math, never any physics in sci.physics, just attack after attack after attack is all these insane knuckleheads do.

The MASTER in Dr. Who: Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha,,,, ha ha ha ha ha

"Psychoceramics"
4 views
Skip to first unread message
Subscribe
Earle Jones's profile photo
Earle Jones
Jun 11, 2021, 12:00 AM
to sci.math

Michael Moroney's profile photo
Michael Moroney wrote:
Jun 11, 2021, 1:13 AM
to sci.math
ArchiePoo is the first "psychoceramic" I encountered on Usenet way back
when. Back then Usenet was a very different place, with access limited
to universities, certain large (mostly computer) corporations and
government agencies. That's how ArchiePoo got access - he worked for
Dartmouth College who had the advanced foresight to grant internet
access to all of their students, faculty and staff, and Archie started
spewing from there. After years of warnings ignored by Archie,
Dartmouth finally fired his ass for dragging their reputation through
the mud.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 11, 2021, 8:44:55 AM (2 days ago)




to
Stanford Univ & Google, where is this heading for, for Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, is it heading for Violence on Stanford Univ or AP, for it only keeps escalating higher and higher. FBI, please make a gun check on Kibo and Earle Jones.
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Subscribe
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
unread,
8:35 AM (1 minute ago)



to
Stanford Univ & Google, where is this heading for, for Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, is it heading for Violence on Stanford Univ or AP, for it only keeps escalating higher and higher. FBI, please make a gun check on Kibo and Earle Jones.

AP is currently working on the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with a Geometry proof, the first valid proof of FTC, in fact. And working in sci.math.

AP is currently working on TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 1st year College, in sci.physics, along with books on the drought in Western USA.

Yet for 28 years of stalking by Kibo Parry Moroney and his many gang of stalkers-- Earle Jones, Dan Christensen, Jan Burse, recently Ross.

Attack attack each and every day for 28 years. Never a post on math in sci.math, never a post on physics in sci.physics, just a 28 year long demonization of AP, with the aim of kicking AP out of sci.math and sci.physics.

Kibo Parry M on Dartmouth College & Stanford Univ as Splatter-Fart-Shitee schools, with no geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Even though NSF Dr. Panchanathan likely pays Kibo more than professors of math get payed to teach math in classrooms.
On Saturday, July 3, 2021 at 11:04:08 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Splatter-Fart-Shitee"

Kibo Parry Moroney stalker of 27 years of scientists, or, paid for stalker? The 28 year long stalking of AP by kibo Parry Moroney makes one think that the NSF, National Science Foundation is paying for kibo Parry to stalk, paying him and World std perhaps $100 of taxpayer dollars for every stalking post that Kibo emits. So yes, if you are paid such easy money just to post ad hominem spam, then you too would probably want some of that almost free money.

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993

Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

..
.- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
, . `.' ' `.
.' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
. ; .' . `. ;
; . ' `. . '
. ' ` `. |
. '. '
. 0 0 ' `.
' `
; `
.' `
; U `
; '; `
: | ;.. :` `
: `;. ```. .-; | '
'. ` ``.., .' :' '
; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi, I am James kibo Parry Moroney, the ultimate arsewipe failure of science for I preach 938 is 12% short of 945. And my geothermal house works on sunshine collected in the day, (not because the Earth interior is full of radioactivity, no, because I am kibo Parry Moroney the failed arsewipe of science.
` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` `. ````'''''' ' '
` . ' '
/ ` `. ' ' .
/ ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
/ .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
/ .'' ; ` .' `
...'.' ; .' ` .' `
"" .' .' | ` .; \ `
; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
:' | ' ` , `. `
| ' ` ' `. `
` ' ` ; `. |
`.' ` ; `-'
`...'

/\-------/\
\::O:::O::/
(::_ ^ _::)
\_`-----'_/

NSF, Dr. Panchanathan, Kibo Parry M does ad hominem, while AP does science and math in Usenet.


11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Length: 137 pages

Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1307 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 137 pages
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)


y z
| /
| /
|/______ x

More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.

In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.

There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium

35) AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 70 fakes and mistakes of Old Math.

Last revision was 28JUN2021.

Preface: I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds question of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

Some of these can be found in AP's TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS series, but the entries keep changing and added on new, means I need to have a separate book for these fakes, mistakes and errors of Old Math.

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for ages 18-19 Freshperson College, math textbook series, book 3
Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
Listing the Errors of Old Math, list of 1 to 50.

Alright, well, mathematics is a closed subject. What I mean by that is due to the textbook series of Archimedes Plutonium TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, that once you learn the polynomial transform and learn the two Power Rules of Calculus, you reached the peak, the pinnacle of all of mathematics, and anything further in math is just details of what you learn in that textbook series. Math is a completed science because it has this "peak of calculus", unlike the other 5 hard sciences of physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy. Those other five will continue to find new ideas, new things, while math remains static and complete to its peak of calculus understanding. Mathematics is finished complete as far as a science goes because the peak of math is going nowhere. And even though Physics will find new science such as how the proton toruses inside of atoms are configured in geometry, the geometry and calculus used in that configuration, that new science does not change nor does it create or require a new math peak/summit to handle the new physics.

Now I do need to discuss the Errors of Math in General and the errors of math in geometry in particular. I have the feeling that Geometry is the more important of the two-- algebra - geometry. This list appears in most of AP's Teaching True Mathematics textbook series by Archimedes Plutonium, meant to be a guide and orientation, and a organizing of what must be covered before graduating from College, and what math to steer clear of.

Errors mostly, but not always, for some are included because too much time spent on them.

The listings in Mathopedia of errors, mistakes and fakes is based on the idea that Calculus is the supreme achievement of all of mathematics for it is the essential math of doing Physics electricity and magnetism. And in order to have a proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, we must clean up and clean out all the mistakes, fakes and errors of Old Math, erst, we have no Calculus. So calculus is the consistency maker for the rest of all of mathematics.

1) Calculus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, a proof that derivative and integral are inverses of one another, just as addition and subtraction are inverses, or, multiplication and division are inverses. The only way to obtain a geometry proof is to clean up and clean out all the fakes, mistakes and errors of Old Math, such as their fake numbers-- the Reals. Their fake definition of function allowing anything be a function. Their fakery of a continuum when even physics by 1900 with Planck onwards in Quantum Mechanics proving the Universe is discrete Space not a continuum, yet by 1900 onwards those in mathematics following the idiotic continuum in the Continuum Hypothesis with even more avid interest, when they should have thrown the continuum on a trashpile of shame.

2) The true numbers of mathematics are the Decimal Grid Numbers, because you have to need and apply one mechanism only to obtain the true numbers of mathematics-- Mathematical Induction. In Old Math they had just a tiny few intelligent mathematicians, Kronecker, who emerged from the gaggle crowd of kooks to notice that Naturals all come from one single mechanism-- Mathematical Induction. But Old Math never had a crowd of mathematicians with logical brains to say-- all our numbers need to come from the one mechanism of Mathematical Induction.

3) The true numbers of math have empty space between successor and predecessor numbers. For example the 10 Grid is 0, .1, .2, .3, . . . , 9.8, 9.9, 10..0. Where no numbers exist between .1 and .2, etc. Only discrete numbers allow us to give a proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

4) All functions of mathematics must be a polynomial, and if not a polynomial, convert the offering to a polynomial over a specific interval.

5) Space is discrete and all lines in space are strings of attached straight lines.

6) No curves exist in Geometry, only finer and smaller straight line segments attached to one another.
We can still keep the name "curve" as long as we know it is a string of fine tiny straightline segments strung together in what looks like a smooth curve. If curves exist, then the Calculus in Fundamental Theorem of Calculus cannot be proven and thus Calculus does not exist. We all know that we have to have Calculus, and so we throw out onto the trash pile the curve of Old Math. And this is reasonable because starting in 1900 in physics there arose the Quantum Mechanics of Space being discrete. And a discrete space has no continuum, has no curve of Old Math.

7) Space has gaps in between one point and the next point. These gaps are empty space from one point to the next point, for example in 10 Grid there is no number between .1 and .2, and in 100 Grid there exists no number between .01 and .02.

8) Limit analysis was an insane fakery in Old Math, concocted because Old Math needed the excuse of some proof, so they invented the monster con-artist trick that a limit analysis would divert the fact it is no proof at all, but a Non Sequitur argument. Limit analysis is juju totem witchcraft dance around a desire to prove the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Just as idiotic as dancing around a sick person of a virus is going to cure the person.

9) Infinity has a borderline and there is a microinfinity compared to a macroinfinity. For example in 10 Grid, the microinfinity is .1 if we exclude 0 and so there is no number smaller than .1 and no number larger than 10 in 10 Grid, where 10 is macroinfinity.

10) The 1st Quadrant Only in Coordinate System Geometry. Sad that the first coordinate system of Descartes was correct but soon became corrupted with 4 quadrants. See Mathematical Thought, Volume 1, Kline, 1972, page 303. Where Fermat then Descartes starts the Cartesian Coordinate System as 1 axis only and from 0 rightwards, meaning in our modern day math, 1st Quadrant Only. Why did math screw up on coordinate systems? I suppose some clowns thought negative numbers were true and they wanted ease of drawing a circle with center at 0. When they could have just as easily drawn the circle in 1st Quadrant Only.

11) Calculus needed a Geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, but Old Math never provided such, instead they provided some stupid Limit argument. The reason for the creation of the Limit disaster was that the French mathematician Cauchy got sick and tired of hearing his smartest students complain that the width of rectangles in the integral are 0 width, and those smart students could not, for the life of them understand how a rectangle with 0 width has any interior area. So instead of the math community denouncing the limit, instead they elevated the fakery.

12) Further in Calculus, they knew you could do a transform of coordinate points to turn any function into a polynomial function, a method of Lagrange.. However, they in Old Math were too stupid to take this transform to its highest form-- all functions are polynomial functions and only polynomial functions. When you learn that-- the derivative and integral of any and every function of math is a snap breeze simple and easy.

13) With the error filled 4 quadrants, when it should be 1st Quadrant Only, we have Trigonometry's sine and cosine with the fakery of sinusoid wave when it never was that. The sine and cosine are semicircle waves, and no sinusoid wave exists.

14) There is only one Geometry-- Euclidean, and there is not three distinct geometries of elliptical Riemannian or hyperbolic Lobachevsky. Those two are just duals that make up Euclidean.

15) Torus, volume and surface area formulas in Old Math are all screwed up and in error because they imagined bending a cylinder to form a torus. This brings back memories, for I had to do a percentage formula, since I could not follow the fake way of bending a cylinder. Where 78.5% of Disc Torus (pi)R^2h - (pi)r^2h is the volume of Circle Torus, and 78.5% of Disc Torus 2(pi)Rh + 2(pi)rh + 2 ((pi)R^2 - (pi)r^2) is the surface area of Circle Torus..

16) Ellipse is never a single cone slant cut, always a cylinder slant cut. Although you do get an ellipse from double cones of this configuration <> which in Old Math was the hyperbola, but two hyperbolas joined together to form a ellipse.

17) All Parallelepipeds reduced to a Rectangular Box by making 2 cuts and pastes. Volume of the original Parallelepiped is simply a*b*c of the Rectangular Box length*width*depth formed. Old Math never understood that a precise definition of Parallelepiped has two kinds, the parallelepiped that has 90 degree angles and the parallelepiped that has no 90 degree angle.

NSF, Dr. Panchanathan, in addition to $100 per stalker post by Kibo Parry M, does he get "gas mileage and free breakfast" before he reaches the office to start a new stalker day?

I remember myself before going into the Navy as a officer, that the military pays for gas mileage and even a free breakfast at the motel, at the time the Navy flew me to Washington to have a Naval officer ask me if I knew Fourier Transform, then back to Salt Lake City and a motel and breakfast. So Dr. Panchanathan is Kibo Parry M delighting in all these bonuses in his "day of stalking"?

Kibo Parry Moroney stalker of 28 years of scientists, or, paid for stalker? The 28 year long stalking of AP by kibo Parry Moroney makes one think that the NSF, National Science Foundation is paying for kibo Parry to stalk, paying him and World std perhaps $100 of taxpayer dollars for every stalking post that Kibo emits. So yes, if you are paid such easy money just to post ad hominem spam, then you too would probably want some of that almost free money. Even though many in the education sector are irate over paying stalkers to stalk, because, well, they have to actually teach the classroom of math and science, while Kibo rakes in 5x their salary.

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993

Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

Well, Dr. Panchanathan, I guess it can come out of the next trillion dollar spending and maybe "internet stalking" is some form of Infrastructure, keep the bridges and roads in good shape.


Michael Moroney's profile photo
Michael Moroney
Re: Archimedes "kilotard" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
11:29 PM

Michael Moroney's profile photo
Michael Moroney
Re: Archimedes "tard" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
11:25 PM

Michael Moroney's profile photo
Michael Moroney
unread,
Re: Archimedes "doofus" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
11:22 PM

Mathopedia-- Listing of 70 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. 39) AP's 174th book.

Last revision was 28JUN2021.

Preface: I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds question of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

Some of these can be found in AP's TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS series, but the entries keep changing and added on new, means I need to have a separate book for these fakes, mistakes and errors of Old Math.

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for ages 18-19 Freshperson College, math textbook series, book 3
Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
Listing the Errors of Old Math, list of 1 to 50.

Alright, well, mathematics is a closed subject. What I mean by that is due to the textbook series of Archimedes Plutonium TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, that once you learn the polynomial transform and learn the two Power Rules of Calculus, you reached the peak, the pinnacle of all of mathematics, and anything further in math is just details of what you learn in that textbook series. Math is a completed science because it has this "peak of calculus", unlike the other 5 hard sciences of physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy. Those other five will continue to find new ideas, new things, while math remains static and complete to its peak of calculus understanding. Mathematics is finished complete as far as a science goes because the peak of math is going nowhere. And even though Physics will find new science such as how the proton toruses inside of atoms are configured in geometry, the geometry and calculus used in that configuration, that new science does not change nor does it create or require a new math peak/summit to handle the new physics.

Now I do need to discuss the Errors of Math in General and the errors of math in geometry in particular. I have the feeling that Geometry is the more important of the two-- algebra - geometry. This list appears in most of AP's Teaching True Mathematics textbook series by Archimedes Plutonium, meant to be a guide and orientation, and a organizing of what must be covered before graduating from College, and what math to steer clear of.

Errors mostly, but not always, for some are included because too much time spent on them.

The listings in Mathopedia of errors, mistakes and fakes is based on the idea that Calculus is the supreme achievement of all of mathematics for it is the essential math of doing Physics electricity and magnetism. And in order to have a proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, we must clean up and clean out all the mistakes, fakes and errors of Old Math, erst, we have no Calculus. So calculus is the consistency maker for the rest of all of mathematics.

1) Calculus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, a proof that derivative and integral are inverses of one another, just as addition and subtraction are inverses, or, multiplication and division are inverses. The only way to obtain a geometry proof is to clean up and clean out all the fakes, mistakes and errors of Old Math, such as their fake numbers-- the Reals. Their fake definition of function allowing anything be a function. Their fakery of a continuum when even physics by 1900 with Planck onwards in Quantum Mechanics proving the Universe is discrete Space not a continuum, yet by 1900 onwards those in mathematics following the idiotic continuum in the Continuum Hypothesis with even more avid interest, when they should have thrown the continuum on a trashpile of shame.

2) The true numbers of mathematics are the Decimal Grid Numbers, because you have to need and apply one mechanism only to obtain the true numbers of mathematics-- Mathematical Induction. In Old Math they had just a tiny few intelligent mathematicians, Kronecker, who emerged from the gaggle crowd of kooks to notice that Naturals all come from one single mechanism-- Mathematical Induction. But Old Math never had a crowd of mathematicians with logical brains to say-- all our numbers need to come from the one mechanism of Mathematical Induction.

3) The true numbers of math have empty space between successor and predecessor numbers. For example the 10 Grid is 0, .1, .2, .3, . . . , 9.8, 9.9, 10..0. Where no numbers exist between .1 and .2, etc. Only discrete numbers allow us to give a proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

4) All functions of mathematics must be a polynomial, and if not a polynomial, convert the offering to a polynomial over a specific interval.

5) Space is discrete and all lines in space are strings of attached straight lines.

6) No curves exist in Geometry, only finer and smaller straight line segments attached to one another.
We can still keep the name "curve" as long as we know it is a string of fine tiny straightline segments strung together in what looks like a smooth curve. If curves exist, then the Calculus in Fundamental Theorem of Calculus cannot be proven and thus Calculus does not exist. We all know that we have to have Calculus, and so we throw out onto the trash pile the curve of Old Math. And this is reasonable because starting in 1900 in physics there arose the Quantum Mechanics of Space being discrete. And a discrete space has no continuum, has no curve of Old Math.

7) Space has gaps in between one point and the next point. These gaps are empty space from one point to the next point, for example in 10 Grid there is no number between .1 and .2, and in 100 Grid there exists no number between .01 and .02.

8) Limit analysis was an insane fakery in Old Math, concocted because Old Math needed the excuse of some proof, so they invented the monster con-artist trick that a limit analysis would divert the fact it is no proof at all, but a Non Sequitur argument. Limit analysis is juju totem witchcraft dance around a desire to prove the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Just as idiotic as dancing around a sick person of a virus is going to cure the person.

9) Infinity has a borderline and there is a microinfinity compared to a macroinfinity. For example in 10 Grid, the microinfinity is .1 if we exclude 0 and so there is no number smaller than .1 and no number larger than 10 in 10 Grid, where 10 is macroinfinity.

10) The 1st Quadrant Only in Coordinate System Geometry. Sad that the first coordinate system of Descartes was correct but soon became corrupted with 4 quadrants. See Mathematical Thought, Volume 1, Kline, 1972, page 303. Where Fermat then Descartes starts the Cartesian Coordinate System as 1 axis only and from 0 rightwards, meaning in our modern day math, 1st Quadrant Only. Why did math screw up on coordinate systems? I suppose some clowns thought negative numbers were true and they wanted ease of drawing a circle with center at 0. When they could have just as easily drawn the circle in 1st Quadrant Only.

11) Calculus needed a Geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, but Old Math never provided such, instead they provided some stupid Limit argument. The reason for the creation of the Limit disaster was that the French mathematician Cauchy got sick and tired of hearing his smartest students complain that the width of rectangles in the integral are 0 width, and those smart students could not, for the life of them understand how a rectangle with 0 width has any interior area. So instead of the math community denouncing the limit, instead they elevated the fakery.

12) Further in Calculus, they knew you could do a transform of coordinate points to turn any function into a polynomial function, a method of Lagrange.. However, they in Old Math were too stupid to take this transform to its highest form-- all functions are polynomial functions and only polynomial functions. When you learn that-- the derivative and integral of any and every function of math is a snap breeze simple and easy.

13) With the error filled 4 quadrants, when it should be 1st Quadrant Only, we have Trigonometry's sine and cosine with the fakery of sinusoid wave when it never was that. The sine and cosine are semicircle waves, and no sinusoid wave exists.

14) There is only one Geometry-- Euclidean, and there is not three distinct geometries of elliptical Riemannian or hyperbolic Lobachevsky. Those two are just duals that make up Euclidean.

15) Torus, volume and surface area formulas in Old Math are all screwed up and in error because they imagined bending a cylinder to form a torus. This brings back memories, for I had to do a percentage formula, since I could not follow the fake way of bending a cylinder. Where 78.5% of Disc Torus (pi)R^2h - (pi)r^2h is the volume of Circle Torus, and 78.5% of Disc Torus 2(pi)Rh + 2(pi)rh + 2 ((pi)R^2 - (pi)r^2) is the surface area of Circle Torus..

16) Ellipse is never a single cone slant cut, always a cylinder slant cut. Although you do get an ellipse from double cones of this configuration <> which in Old Math was the hyperbola, but two hyperbolas joined together to form a ellipse.

17) All Parallelepipeds reduced to a Rectangular Box by making 2 cuts and pastes. Volume of the original Parallelepiped is simply a*b*c of the Rectangular Box length*width*depth formed. Old Math never understood that a precise definition of Parallelepiped has two kinds, the parallelepiped that has 90 degree angles and the parallelepiped that has no 90 degree angle.

sci.physics

Web results for "Harvard Dr Hau"
3rd hit 1st page "Harvard Dr.Hau"

Thanks Google for Balanced Search Hits on Harvard's Dr. Hau ...

3rd hit 1st page "Harvard Dr.Hau" is fair honest balanced Google Search list with Counterpoint as 3rd hit// Contrast that to the dishonest corrupt ...

sci.physics
Google, great job on Harvard Dr. Hau, lousy pitiful job on Thomas Hales ...
Google, great job on Harvard Dr. Hau, lousy pitiful job on Thomas Hales, Sheldon Glashow as some propaganda pitch as if Search engines have become science-propaganda-kiosks, instead of Balanced Journalism with Counterpoint. Is Google trying to
Archimedes Plutonium Jun 25, 2021, 8:43:01 PM

sci.physics
Balanced & Counterpoint Google Search for Steven Weinberg, not ...

sci.physics
1st page 2nd & 3rd hits for Univ Texas Steven Weinberg, under Google Search ...

sci.physics
Balanced & Counterpoint Google Search list for Steven Weinberg, Sheldon ...
to Plutonium Atom Universe. Balanced & Counterpoint Google Search list for Steven Weinberg, Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, the day when millions of search hits ...

sci.physics
1 -Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Sheldon Glashow who ...

sci.math
Excellent job Google Search for Queen's James Leech, hope of fixing logic and ...

4th hit 1st page is CounterPoint for "James Leech Queen's" with Arthur B. McDonald ...

sci.math

2nd page under "Michael Meighen McGill"

Re: 176,232-Student Victims of Michael Meighen McGill Univ by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of ...

sci.math
Possible explanation for bias & prejudicial Google search engine ...

sci.math
Andrew Wiles plutonium or Terence Tao plutonium. As evidenced by this. with his fake FLT, for he lusts for fame ... to Plutonium Atom Universe. Math Con-Artist ...

sci.math
Re: 2Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test - Google Groups

sci.math
Math Con-Artist Andrew Wiles with his fake FLT, for he lusts for fame ...
to Plutonium Atom Universe. Math Con-Artist Andrew Wiles with his fake FLT, for he lusts for fame and fortune but never the truth of mathematics. The nitwit ...

sci.math
3) AP proved Fermat's Last Theorem in 1991-1993 while Andrew Wiles has a ....

sci.math
2nd page under "Rose M Patten".

8-Student victims of Rose M. Patten Univ Toronto from stalker Dan ...
8-Student victims of Rose M. Patten Univ Toronto from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of ...

8-Student victims of Rose M. Patten Univ Toronto from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus On Monday, April 5, 2021 at 7:45:08 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrot
Archimedes Plutonium Apr 5, 2021, 11:12:19 AM

1st page first 3 hits for Univ Toronto Rose M Patten, under Google Search "Rose M ...
The above was the 1st page of "Rose M Patten plutonium", but no-one other than myself is going to make such a search. Google Search is JOURNALISM, but bad ...

6-Student victims of Rose M. Patten Univ Toronto from stalker Dan ...

sci.math

1st page first 3 hits for Univ Toronto Rose M Patten, under Google Search "Rose M ...

1st page first 3 hits for Univ Toronto Rose M Patten, under Google Search "Rose M Patten plutonium", should be on 1st page of search list for "Rose M Patten"
Archimedes Plutonium Jul 4, 2021, 4:29:00 PM

Kibo Parry under "kibo parry" 6th & 7th hits on 1st page of Google Search list

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney, not a comic, not a scientist, not a ...https://groups.google.com › sci.math
@gmail.com> fails at math and science: >Why does Jason Herrmann, kibo Parry Moroney want to kill whales or moon bears??? Wait, are you saying I'm Jason ...

_Google Search for a Balanced report_ of "Kibo Parry" , 28 year nonstop stalker with incurable stalker disease, who fails at all math with his inability to even do a proper correct percentage.

Jan Burse, under "jan burse" 9th & 10th & 11th hit on 1st page of a Google Search list

9th and 10th hit on first page of a Google Search of "Jan Burse"
----JAN BURSE BARRED FROM comp.lang.prolog ... - Google Groups
REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION - BAN JAN BURSE WADDA Ya SAY JAN? time to take a break... you can answer c.l.p questions 2026. Mostowski Collapse's profile ...

Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan Burse ...
Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan Burse understand Boole logic is all wrong with his 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, is Jan Burse a ...

Narkive
Kick Jan Burse out of sci.math and mathematics for attacks, forgery and ...
We can see already that Jan Burse has elevated his stalking by trying to tear down the website in Wikipedia of Archimedes Plutonium, and then likely-- but no proof  ...

Dan Christensen, under "dan christensen math" 5th hit on 1st page of a Google Search list

Thank you Google, thank you for having Balanced Reported Google Search hits of Dan Christensen for on his 1st page of Google hits the 7th entry on 1st page reads:

Re: Canada's Dan Christensen of Univ Western Ontario flunked the Math Test of...
>Can you provide a Geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus? If not, well, you flunked mathematics.
>Dan Christensen flunked the Math Test of a...

Earle Jones, under "earle jones stanford" 2nd and 3rd hits on 1st page of Google Search list

Re: Earle Jones says Stanford physics dept is too stupid to see a ellipse is not a ...
Earle Jones talks about Stanford Univ; and why they are physics failures with their proton-electron of 938 to 0.5MeV which no hydrogen atom can exist, for the true  ...

Stanford Univ & Google, where is this heading for, for Earle Jones & Kibo ....

MATH

Kibo Parry M on failures of math for they never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, or were aware they had to do such.

                              ..
            .- " `-.   ,..-'''  ```.....'`-..
           ,      . `.'            '        `.
         .'   .' `    `           '   `..     ;
         .   ;  .'                     . `.    ;
         ;   . '                       `.  .   '
          . '                            ` `.  |
        . '.                                  '
       .          0              0            ' `.
      '                                          `
     ;                                            `
    .'                                             `
    ;                      U                        `
    ;    ';                                         `
    :   | ;..                                 :`     `
    :    `;. ```.                           .-; |    '
    '.      `    ``..,                   .'   :'    '
     ;       `        ;'...          ..-''    '     ' On Tuesday, June 29, 2021 at 1:55:32 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Stooge" > fails at math and science:

      `       `        ;  ````'''""'  ;      '    '
       `       `        ;            ;      '    '
        `       `        ;          ;      '    '
         `       `.       ````''''''      '    '
           `       .                     '    '
         /  `       `.                  '    '        .
        /     `       ..            ..'    .'"""""...'
       /   .`   `       ``.........-'     .'` .....'''
      / .'' ;     `                    .'   `
  ...'.'    ;    .' `                .'      `
   ""      .'  .' |    `           .; \       `
           ; .'   |      `. . . . ' .  \       `
           :'     |     '   `       ,   `.     `
                  |    '     `      '     `.    `
                  `   '       `     ;       `.  |
                  `.'          `    ;         `-'
                                `...'

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
 > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
 > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>  Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass
 > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

Recent Publications Science Learned Journals-- NATURE 17-19, AASS SCIENCE, NEW SCIENTIST, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, Princeton Univ Press, UCLA & Oxford student newspaper "Pandemic causing toilet paper be like sandpaper" by team antiscientists, bwr-fml, ..

Archimedes Plutonium
Jul 2, 2021, 10:02 AM 
to sci.math, sci.physics

Recent Publications Science Learned Journals-- NATURE 17-19, AASS SCIENCE, NEW SCIENTIST, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, Princeton Univ Press, "Pandemic causing toilet paper be like sandpaper" by team antiscientists, Alan Mackenzie, bwr-fml, Chris Thomasson, Dan Christensen, Earle Jones, Jan Burse, kibo Parry M, Mostowski Collapse, Ross, et al

Pandemic Causing Toilet Paper be like Sandpaper

Abstract: Notice a rash feeling as the arse cheeks rubb together? Peer through your legs bent forward in bathroom while placing a mirror near butt. The redness measures are 15cm, by 7.5cm in crack of arse (Uncle Al, 1996, NATURE, "Weaned hand to mouth spoon-fed"). One of our Colleagues in Boston, Kibo Parry noticed throughout 2020 of shitting 8 times a day with runs to the bathroom of Diaherra of Mouth, (foaming mouth syndrome) and using toilet paper 3 times the amount of 2019, that he developed the Dan Christensen "red arse".

Text: Bwr-fml conjecture that since the toilet paper industry is under enormous pressure to keep store shelves full of paper, that shortcuts were made in manufacturing with having sandpaper quality restrictions lifted.

To test this hypothesis in February-March, Mostowski Collapse, stopped using toilet paper altogether and washed the Asian method of water alone (careful to use just one hand). And to Mostowski, Mackenzie the dummy control group, to their surprise, the arse rash healed in 1.5 months time.

While Earle Jones and Chris Thomasson went and collected samples of toilet paper and ran them through Stanford Univ mass spectrometer, since no-one had used any of the machines at Stanford since AP told them the real electron of atoms was the muon, not the 0.5MeV particle. And Earle and Chris found that toilet paper since the pandemic contained alarming amounts of plastics, recycled plastics of water bottles, which in the Stanford electron microscope (henceforth renamed Dirac monopole microscope-- Scientific American -- AP King of Science dominating all the sciences, May, 2021)[1,2,3].

Ross and Jan Burse, test studied to see if microplastics can cut the fine structure of the glutis maxima, skin layer, as abrasives on the Roh scale of 21-901, (Sept 5, 2015, Nature). Study due to be completed and reported in the Google Search list of Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Thomas Hales, 5 million hits all sugar coated and no Counterpoint. Under the title "Baby Boy Genius, Wiles & Tao, proves plastic is abrasive and Fermat's Last Theorem.

Follow up studies due out by Princeton Univ Press, when they get time off from securing all Google Search hits of Wiles, Tao, Hales are propaganda with never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus [ see AP's 2015 proof of FTC] and [King of Science, comedy]

Master in Dr. Who: Ha, ha,.... ha,,,... ha,,,, ha, ha,,,,,, hahaha

Archimedes Plutonium
Jul 3, 2021, 12:27 AM 
to sci.math, sci.physics
1>Recent Publications Science Learned Journals-- NATURE 17-19, AASS SCIENCE, NEW SCIENTIST, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, Princeton Univ Press, "Pandemic causing toilet paper be like sandpaper" by team antiscientists, Alan Mackenzie, bwr-fml, Chris Thomasson, Dan Christensen, Earle Jones, Jan Burse, kibo Parry M, Mostowski Collapse, Ross, et al
>
1> Pandemic Causing Toilet Paper be like Sandpaper
>
1> Abstract: Notice a rash feeling as the arse cheeks rubb together? Peer through your legs bent forward in bathroom while placing a mirror near butt. The redness measures are 15cm, by 7.5cm in crack of arse (Uncle Al, 1996, NATURE, "Weaned hand to mouth spoon-fed"). One of our Colleagues in Boston, Kibo Parry noticed throughout 2020 of shitting 8 times a day with runs to the bathroom of Diaherra of Mouth, (foaming mouth syndrome) and using toilet paper 3 times the amount of 2019, that he developed the Dan Christensen "red arse".
>
1> Text: Bwr-fml conjecture that since the toilet paper industry is under enormous pressure to keep store shelves full of paper, that shortcuts were made in manufacturing with having sandpaper quality restrictions lifted.
>

Questions for Dr. Bwr: how long does it take to wipe your arse the Asian method instead of dry toilet paper?

On Friday, July 2, 2021 at 2:20:54 PM UTC-5, bwr fml wrote:
> We can each imagine,
> But from long observation I tend to agree with you.
>

AP: you mean you observed arse wiping by others? I bet that was a bit embarrassing.

> There was a paper a year or two ago that found if subjects spend their
> time imagining how great the outcome of a project is that they have
> far less motivation to actually do the project,

AP: we know the outcome -- wash the arse with pouring water instead of wiping with dry sandpaper toilet paper. Especially that manufactured in covid times as being extra sandpaperish.

>they have already
> wallowed in their success and smeared it all over themselves and have
> less reason to spend the effort to actually do it.

AP: you mean Kibo Parry M. and Dan Christensen wallow in the water?

> Those who don't spend time imagining their success have a much
> greater likelihood of actually completing the work to get the outcome.
>

AP: yes, Bwr, is there a time-saving involved, for just two passes of water from a washcloth and the rubbing of one hand in the arse crack takes less than 1 minute, while I have seen and spent as much as 5 minutes with dry paper wipe.

>to actually select a project, write up the method,
> get credible people to seriously read that and help make it right,
> buy the instruments and equipment, get credible people to
> observe the experiment, all those are a huge hurtle that I doubt

AP: I disagree, most everyone wipes his/her arse every day.

Archimedes Plutonium
Jul 3, 2021, 3:27 PM
to sci.math, sci.physics

2> Recent Publications Science Learned Journals-- NATURE 17-19, AASS SCIENCE, NEW SCIENTIST, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, Princeton Univ Press, "Pandemic causing toilet paper be like sandpaper" by team antiscientists, Alan Mackenzie, bwr-fml, Chris Thomasson, Dan Christensen, Earle Jones, Jan Burse, kibo Parry M, Mostowski Collapse, Ross, et al
>
2> Pandemic Causing Toilet Paper be like Sandpaper
>
2> Abstract: Notice a rash feeling as the arse cheeks rubb together? Peer through your legs bent forward in bathroom while placing a mirror near butt. The redness measures are 15cm, by 7.5cm in crack of arse (Uncle Al, 1996, NATURE, "Weaned hand to mouth spoon-fed"). One of our Colleagues in Boston, Kibo Parry noticed throughout 2020 of shitting 8 times a day with runs to the bathroom of Diaherra of Mouth, (foaming mouth syndrome) and using toilet paper 3 times the amount of 2019, that he developed the Dan Christensen "red arse".
>
2> Text: Bwr-fml conjecture that since the toilet paper industry is under enormous pressure to keep store shelves full of paper, that shortcuts were made in manufacturing with having sandpaper quality restrictions lifted.
>
2> To test this hypothesis in February-March, Mostowski Collapse, stopped using toilet paper altogether and washed the Asian method of water alone (careful to use just one hand). And to Mostowski, Mackenzie the dummy control group, to their surprise, the arse rash healed in 1.5 months time.
>

Question by the Master of Dr. Who series: ha, ha, ha, ha. Jan Burse, how many trees do we save each year if everyone went to Asian-style-wipe-their-arse, that is, water only.

Jan Burse under his infantile pseudo-name (and he wonders why no-one likes the peckerhead)
Mostowski Collapse wrote:

Jun 28, 2021, 2:47:12 PM
to sci.math
> Breaking News: The infinite sum of Fibonacci Numbers is -1
> Just observe:
>
> 1 + z + 2z2 + 3z3 + 5z4 + ... = 1/(1-(z+z2))
>
> Now set z=1:
>
> 1 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 5 + .. = -1
>
> Q.E.D.

Master of Dr. Who: so your saying we save no trees but lose 1 more, than if we cut trees to make toilet paper.

Archimedes Plutonium
Jul 9, 2021, 1:21 AM
to sci.math

On Saturday, July 3, 2021 at 3:27:25 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 2> Recent Publications Science Learned Journals-- NATURE 17-19, AASS SCIENCE, NEW SCIENTIST, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, Princeton Univ Press, "Pandemic causing toilet paper be like sandpaper" by team antiscientists, Alan Mackenzie, bwr-fml, Chris Thomasson, Dan Christensen, Earle Jones, Jan Burse, kibo Parry M, Mostowski Collapse, Ross, et al
> >
> 2> Pandemic Causing Toilet Paper be like Sandpaper
> >
> 2> Abstract: Notice a rash feeling as the arse cheeks rubb together? Peer through your legs bent forward in bathroom while placing a mirror near butt. The redness measures are 15cm, by 7.5cm in crack of arse (Uncle Al, 1996, NATURE, "Weaned hand to mouth spoon-fed"). One of our Colleagues in Boston, Kibo Parry noticed throughout 2020 of shitting 8 times a day with runs to the bathroom of Diaherra of Mouth, (foaming mouth syndrome) and using toilet paper 3 times the amount of 2019, that he developed the Dan Christensen "red arse".
> >

🐒 of Math and 🦍 of Physics Archimedes "AnalButtfuckManure" Plutonium
<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>
> Recent Publications Science Learned Journals-- NATURE 17-19, AASS SCIENCE, NEW SCIENTIST, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, Princeton Univ Press, UCLA & Oxford student newspaper "Pandemic causing toilet paper be like sandpaper" by team antiscientists, bwr-fml, ..
>
> Archimedes Plutonium
> Jul 2, 2021, 10:02 AM
> to sci.math, sci.physics
>
> Recent Publications Science Learned Journals-- NATURE 17-19, AASS SCIENCE, NEW SCIENTIST, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, Princeton Univ Press, "Pandemic causing toilet paper be like sandpaper" by team antiscientists, Alan Mackenzie, bwr-fml, Chris Thomasson, Dan Christensen, Earle Jones, Jan Burse, kibo Parry M, Mostowski Collapse, Ross, et al
>
> Pandemic Causing Toilet Paper be like Sandpaper
>
> Abstract: Notice a rash feeling as the arse cheeks rubb together? Peer through your legs bent forward in bathroom while placing a mirror near butt. The redness measures are 15cm, by 7.5cm in crack of arse (Uncle Al, 1996, NATURE, "Weaned hand to mouth spoon-fed"). One of our Colleagues in Boston, Kibo Parry noticed throughout 2020 of shitting 8 times a day with runs to the bathroom of Diaherra of Mouth, (foaming mouth syndrome) and using toilet paper 3 times the amount of 2019, that he developed the Dan Christensen "red arse".
>
> Text: Bwr-fml conjecture that since the toilet paper industry is under enormous pressure to keep store shelves full of paper, that shortcuts were made in manufacturing with

Why are you so interested in my ass, poop, toilet paper Mr.
AnalButtfuckManure Plutonium? You having a tough time finding an
appropriate bedwarmer at the local gay bar or something?

Sorry, I'm not at all interested!

Kibo Parry M on why Queen's Univ is a math & science failed school.
Re: 135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron o
#2-1, 137th published book Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series,
May 10, 2021
by Michael Moroney

Question Kibo Parry M. is it because of confessions like Dan Christensen that they fail in math and science?

On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:29:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> Are you ready, kids??? Bend over, er...
>
> Dan

Michael Moroney wrote:

>> Text: Bwr-fml conjecture that since the toilet paper industry is under
>> enormous pressure to keep store shelves full of paper, that shortcuts
>> were made in manufacturing with
>
> Why are you so interested in my ass, poop, toilet paper Mr.
> AnalButtfuckManure Plutonium? You having a tough time finding an
> appropriate bedwarmer at the local gay bar or something?
> Sorry, I'm not at all interested!

You mathematicians, remember to get vaccinated. Or a vaccinated person
might get sick from the virus, they got vaccinated against, because you
are not vaccinated!!

Kibo Parry M, is Steven Weinberg any worse than your 938 is 12% short of 945?
On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 4:52:04 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> megatard
>"little fish"
> The letters in
> rearranged, spell "I pound his
> male rectum".
>

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
 > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
 > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>  Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass
 > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.