1- Possible explanation for bias & prejudicial Google search engine hits for Wiles, Tao in math-- Princeton Univ pays a fulltime employee to sugar coat their academics so that no AP counterpoint can get to its proper search.

So, the only AP posts as BALANCED and proper COUNTERPOINT to the math of Andrew Wiles or Terence Tao is if you Google Search them and put the term plutonium in the search. Andrew Wiles plutonium or Terence Tao plutonium. As evidenced by this.

with his fake FLT, for he lusts for fame ...
to Plutonium Atom Universe. Math Con-Artist Andrew Wiles with his fake FLT, for he lusts for fame and fortune but never the truth of mathematics. The nitwit ...

Fermat status - Google Groups

Same for Terence Tao.

Whereas a Google Search of Harvard Dr. Hau, with no "plutonium" added gives her a fair balanced search list with a Counterpoint hit of saying Dr. Hau has not finished her experiment, and needs to finish her experiment.

So, to explain this Bias and Prejudice and Systematic Unbalanced and NO COUNTERPOINT to a Wiles or Tao search, that a possible explanation is that Princeton Univ has employee/s full time, whose job is nothing but make their academics and graduates ultra ultra flowery and sugar coated, no matter how much they are fools of science. That Princeton Univ systematically Unbalances and corrupts the Google Search Engine lists.

Evidence: sugar coated Wiles, sugar coated Tao, yet Harvard's Dr. Hau has a fair balanced counterpoint Google Search.

The fact that neither Tao nor Wiles saw that the most important mathematics of -Our Times- was to do a Geometry Proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, because such a proof cleans up and cleans out all of mathematics of any importance, cleans math up for to arrive at a geometry proof of FTC, you cannot have fake Reals, have fake limit analysis, have fake functions when all functions must be polynomials and a huge list of consistency questions, and yet Tao and Wiles totally oblivious that calculus is geometry and yet they never even realized FTC needed a geometry proof, not their silly invalid "limit analysis hornswaggle".

And yet, the Google Search of Tao and Wiles makes them out as some god-like creatures of mathematics, when in reality they are fools and failures of Real true honest Mathematics.

Even Wiles FLT is a invalid fakery. And about the only claim to fame for Tao is his Tao-Green theorem which is also fakery. For in true real math, primes do not exist in mathematics when the real numbers of mathematics are Decimal Grid Numbers. This is why, in Old Math, primes never have a formula, because, well, they are fictional numbers because the Reals are fictional, and only Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers-- all of them begot by one mechanism-- mathematical induction. Not by some legions of kooks who dream up a cobbled together sack of new numbers-- Surreals etc.

So, whether the above hypothesis of Princeton Univ, badly rigging the Google Searches is true or not, the fact that Google Search hits of Tao and Wiles do not allow for Counterpoint, no Counterpoint to Tao in his first page, but only boy genius genius genius; makes Google look like a Bias, Partial Journalism. It would be like that of PBS Newshour only allowing interviews with Republicans, never Democrats.

Please, Google, fix your biased Search lists. Allow a Counterpoint to Andrew Wiles and Terence Tao on the very first page of their search. You did it correctly for Dr Hau at Harvard, then please do it correctly for Princeton Univ.

AP
King of Science, especially Physics
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 31, 2021, 6:59 AM
to sci.math, sci.physics, plutonium atom universe newsgroups
Now here is the Google search of Terence Tao plutonium and it displays what is probably the single most viewed thread in sci.math history of nearly 5,000 views. And this thread should be in the first page of a Google search of "Terence Tao" not terence tao plutonium.

Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, could never do a ...
Re: 2Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test - Google Groups

So if Harvard's Dr. Hau has a first page Google Search with sci.math threads saying Dr. Hau needs to finish her Slow Light experiment to prove light waves are closed loop circuits, much like electricity, on the first page of a Google search of "Harvard Dr. Hau" suggests to me that someone is Corrupting Google Search engines. And probably Princeton Univ pays a full time job for someone to systematically sugar coat some scientists and not others, and to systematically demonize some scientists and elevate fools and failures of math like Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao.

11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Length: 137 pages

Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1307 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 137 pages
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

AP
King of Science, especially Physics