Jack Dorsey's Twitter, no protection of innocent people from maruading demonizing forgers using Twitter to demonize innocent people. My first guesses would be Jan Burse, Kibo Parry Moroney, Dan Christensen.

Jack Dorsey's Twitter, no protection of innocent people from maruading demonizing forgers using Twitter to demonize innocent people.

archimedes plutonium (@Theophite) | Twitterhttps://twitter.com › theophite
The latest Tweets from archimedes plutonium (@Theophite). Pronouns in bio. , more or less. sealand (occupied doggerland)

If I were to guess who the forger was, foremost I would guess Jan Burse in Switzerland who has been attacking AP for 10 years, even forged AP and tore down AP's Wikipedia page.

Second I would guess Kibo Parry, Moroney who has nonstop stalked AP since 1993, 28 years. The man is a total menace and needs a room in a asylum.

Third, I would guess Dan Christensen in Canada, stalker of 7 years, another asylum candidate.

So, Jack, your Twitter company does not seem to address the fact it can be used to stalk and nonstop attack innocent people throughout the world.

For AP, Archimedes Plutonium (true legal name) has never used Twitter, never read Twitter, and there is my name, on first page of Google Search by some insane attack dog.

AP
King of Science, especially Physics

On Wednesday, August 15, 2018 at 4:34:55 PM UTC-5, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> With the tractrix its like with the wheelchair.
>
> |_
> |_|
> * *
>
> The two wheels * * form the infinity symbol:
>
> oo
>
> But still the handle | forms the unit one:
>
> 1
>
> So the wheelchair is extremly important.
>
> Why did you flunk the wheelchair AP brain farto?
>
> Archimedes Plutonium schrieb:
> > Burse report: Walter Thurnherr, Lino Guzzella, asked-- If Too dumb to FIX wrong error filled math, are they too dumb and lazy to experiment and tell us if CO2 comes in two or more isomers, and if so, well, we cannot afford to extinct any more animals
> >
> > On Saturday, August 11, 2018 at 12:43:18 PM UTC-5, burs...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> Among 10^604 wheelchairs would
> >> two wheelchairs look the same?
> >>
> >> |_ |_
> >> |_| ... |_|
> >> * * * *
> >>
> >> \___ 10^604 __/
> >>
> >
> > Walter Thurnherr what is Burse's wheelchair nonsense about?
> >
> > Too dumb to FIX wrong error filled math such as 2 OR 10 =12 is fake logic and should be 2 AND 10 = 12, then there is the ellipse, which all of these mentioned folk still continue to teach is a conic section when a bright High School student with a cone, cylinder and a circle lid can prove hands on, that the ellipse is never a conic section, always a cylinder section. Likely, too dumb and lazy to experiment and tell us if CO2 comes in two or more isomers, and if so, well, we cannot afford to extinct any more animals.
> >
> >
> > Newsgroups: sci.physics
> > Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 11:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> > Subject: allotropes and isomers Re: science that saves large wild animals Re:
> > O3 ozone characteristics//animal CO2
> > From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
> > Injection-Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 18:14:40 +0000
> >
> > allotropes and isomers Re: science that saves large wild animals Re: O3 ozone characteristics//animal CO2
> >
> > Alright, page 270 of Mortimer, 4th ed, 1979, Chemistry: A conceptual approach explains on page 270 allotropy concept
> >
> > --- quoting ---
> > The existence of an element in more than one form in the same physical state is called allotropy, and the forms are called allotropes. A number of elements exhibit allotropy, for example, carbon, sulfur, and phosphorus. Oxygen exists in a triatomic form, ozone, in addition to the common diatomic modification.
> > The ozone molecule is diamagnetic and has an angular structure. Both oxygen-to-oxygen bonds have the same length (127 pm), which is intermediate between the double-bond distance (110 pm) and the single-bond distance (148 pm). The molecule may be represented as a resonance hybrid:
> >
> > --- end quoting---
> >
> > Alright, I quoted that passage especially because I sense that theory and experimental chemistry and physics discover what the geometry of a molecule is, by measuring distances from atoms in the molecule.
> >
> > This is important as to find out whether CO2 has two isomers. So it is a experimental exercise in finding out if the animal CO2 is a C atom that is angular to O2 and is all in one plane, the xy-plane. While fire CO2 has the carbon atom C in the z-axis.
> >
> > So a difficult experiment to measure the distances of the C and O atoms of CO2 to discover if CO2 has two isomers. Mortimer defines isomers on page 425, saying "Isomers are substances that have the same molecular formula but differ in the way the constituent atoms are arranged in molecules."
> >
> > AP
> >
> > Newsgroups: sci.physics
> > Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 12:05:18 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> > Subject: Proving CO2 migrates between poles twice a year Re: science that
> > saves large wild animals Re: O3 ozone characteristics//animal CO2
> > From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
> > Injection-Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 19:05:18 +0000
> >
> > Proving CO2 migrates between poles twice a year Re: science that saves large wild animals Re: O3 ozone characteristics//animal CO2
> >
> > So far this is just a speculation, based on the fact that CO2 is the most dense common gas— which plants need a low lying dense gas to breathe in CO2 and whose abundance is a mere .04%.
> >
> > But why would CO2 migrate yearly between poles? Probably because ot is dense and tiny in abundance.
> >
> > So, what is the first proof evidence that CO2 migrates between the poles? The first proof evidence are the 2011 pictures taken (NASA ??) showing that in May and October the relative abundance of CO2 apparently is a migratory flow.
> >
> > Pictures can always be taken and offer themselves as experimental proof..
> >
> > AP
> >
> > Newsgroups: sci.physics
> > Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 13:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> > Subject: how science proves isomers Re: O3 ozone characteristics//animal CO2
> > From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
> > Injection-Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 20:20:52 +0000
> >
> >
> > how science proves isomers Re: O3 ozone characteristics//animal CO2
> >
> > - show quoted text -
> > So, please correct me if wrong, the only way that chemistry and physics has of "proving a molecules geometry" is the measuring of the distances of its constituent atoms. Is that the sum total of how we prove a geometry?
> >
> > If so, well, it is difficult to measure animal CO2 versus fire CO2 because the animal CO2 has all three atoms- C, O, O in the same xy plane and stuck to that plane, whereas the fire CO2 has the carbon Atom versatile and moving around in the z axis, not stuck to the xy plane.
> >
> > So that is going to be a tough tough measurement by physicists and chemists, that animal CO2 is a isomer different from fire CO2, for the distances appear to be the same, but are not, for one is a planar CO2 while the other rotates along the z-axis.
> >
> > But, physicists and chemists are forced to perform that experiment.
> >
> > But another experiment that can tell us even more, is to get 2 small terrariums, vacuum out all the gases, then inject one with only animal CO2, the other with only fire CO2. Insert plants. If I am correct or partly correct the animal CO2 plants are the only plants to grow, the fire CO2 either the plants die or have stunted growth.
> >
> > AP
> >
> >
> > Burse reports: Daniel Vassella
> > Rene Fasel, asked which is AP's 2nd greatest theory- Sun and Stars are powered by Faraday Law of atoms, or, AP theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
> >
> >
> >
> > ETH Zurich
> >
> > Paul Biran
> > Marc Burger
> > Patrick Cheridito
> > Manfred Einsiedler
> >
> > Paul Embrechts
> > Giovanni Felder
> > Alessio Figalli
> > Norbert Hungerbuhler
> > Tom Ilmanen
> > Horst Knorrer
> > Emmanuel Kowalski
> > Urs Lang
> > Rahul Pandharipande
> > Richard Pink
> > Tristan Riviere
> > Dietmar Salamon
> > Martin Schweizer
> > Mete Soner
> > Michael Struwe
> > Benjamin Sudakov
> > Alain Sznitman
> > Josef Teichmann
> > Wendelin Werner
> > Thomas Willwacher
> >
> > President Lino Guzzella (engineering)
> >
> > Zurich ETH, physics dept
> > Charalampos Anastasiou, Niklas Beisert, Adrian Biland, Gianni Blatter, Marcella Carollo, Christian Degen, Leonardo Degiorgi, Gunther Dissertori, Klaus Ensslin, Tilman Esslinger, Jerome Faist, Matthias Gaberdiel, Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder, Vadim Geshkenbein, Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home, Roland Horisberger, Sebastian Huber, Thomas Markus Ihn, Atac Imamoglu, Steven Johnson, Ursula Keller, Klaus Kirch, Simon Lilly, Joel Mesot, Renatto Renner, Andre Rubbia, Werner Schmutz, Thomas Schulthess, Manfred Sigrist, Hans-Arno Synal, Matthias Troyer, Andreas Vaterlaus, Rainer Wallny, Andreas Wallraff, Werner Wegscheider, Audrey Zheludev, Oded Zilberberg
> >
> >
> > University Bern
> > Christian Leumann
> > Walter Benjamin
> > Emil Theodor Kocher
> > Kurt Wuthrich
> > Friedrich Durrenmatt
> > Daniel Vassella
> > Rene Fasel
> > Mani Matter
> >
> > /\-------/\
> > \::O:::O::/
> > (::_ ^ _::)
> > \_`-----'_/
> > You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Switzerland?
> > And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, and true real Calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, your students deserve better.
> >
> > Yes, there Jan Burse, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars.
> >
> > But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the idiotic idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is 105 MeV.
> >
> > What answer did they give? Burse?
> >
> > AP
> >