Google sugarcoats Terence Tao and Andrew Wiles search list, with no COUNTERPOINT, just a propaganda sugarcoating of hits, for the purpose of covering up their failures in math. I am not sure if Princeton Univ hires someone full time for the express purpose of sugar coating their alumni, with not a chance of any Counterpoint in their Google search list.

Google Search hits should be Balanced and Point Counterpoint,-- not Tao's first 1 million search hits all saying-- "oh, the goodie two shoe boy is a genius"

Balanced and COUNTERPOINT where the ignorant Dr. Tao cannot do a valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus because he knows no geometry proof of FTC, and is so stupid in math, that the fool Tao never realized Calculus is geometry, yet Google gives this cretin a million search hits of -- baby boy genius

Kibo Parry Moroney explaining why Dr. Tao is too dumb to know calculus is geometry and thus do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

On Saturday, June 5, 2021 at 8:43:51 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "failure"
> fails at math and science:
> While it is an interesting idea that a very rare liver condition could
> have made you so dumb and stoopid and illogical, it doesn't seem likely
> to be the cause. However I suggest calling or writing the doctor and
> ask something like this:
>
> "Doctor, you told me I have a very rare liver condition, and in addition
> I am very illogical as well as being unusually dumb and stoopid. Could
> you tell me if this rare hamartoma condition could possibly be the cause
> of being so dumb and stoopid? Like perhaps the hamartoma secretes some
> sort of slow poison into the blood stream which kills brain cells or
> something, making me totally and completely illogical? Should I donate
> my brain to science? Perhaps immediately?"

Balanced & Counterpoint Google Search for Terence Tao, not this -- all praise and glory of a baby boy genius when the reality is that Dr. Tao is so stupid in math that he fails to recognize Calculus is geometry and therefor, he must do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. He never could and his only proof of FTC is the failure with a "limit analysis" which is a whitewash cover up of math, a hornswaggle and a sham trickster, but not a proof of FTC.

So, why does Google have this Dr. Tao with millions of hits yet a dunce and a failure of math. He needs a Point Counterpoint Google search list on his first page, stating that "Where is Tao's geometry proof of FTC"?

And questioning whether Dr. Tao and a bunch of other so called scholars are paying Kibo Parry of Boston's "world std isp" paying him to stalk harrass AP going on 28 years now, in the sci.math and sci.physics newsgroups. Is there some college network paying world std to stalk and harrass AP.

Same thing in physics where prominent physicists are given a all praise and glory but never a COUNTERPOINT on their first page of a Google Search.

Balanced & Counterpoint Google Search for Steven Weinberg, not this -- all praise and glory when Steven cannot even ask the question, which is the real electron of atoms-- is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle.

Science needs balanced and counterpoint journalism, not the all slanted in one direction and Google Search is journalism, whether they like to believe so, or not believe so. Google Search is like the PBS Newshour, but a very skewed, bias and prejudicial news. What if PBS only ever interviewed Republicans and never Democrats, that would be slanted.

Just as Steven Weinberg's Google search list comes up with millions of hits but all slanted in favor of Weinberg, when Steven failed physics. The muon has been around since the 1930s and Steven was so logically dumb in physics, he could never notice that if you multiply 9 times 105MeV you get the neutron and proton rest mass within Sigma Error. Meaning, meaning that the real proton is 840MeV with a muon stuck inside the proton doing the Faraday Law of producing electricity as the muon thrusts through the proton 8 ring torus.

So, can Steven even ask the question in his own mind, which is the real true electron of atoms? Is it the muon, or is it the 0.5MeV particle.

And so, a Google Search list of Steven Weinberg should have on its first page a Counterpoint, a Balance list of results. When you Google search (Steven Weinberg) you get millions of flowery glowing -- he is a genius nonsense. To get a CounterPoint you need to Google search "Steven Weinberg plutonium" to get a more accurate view of Steven Weinberg's life and contributions to physics-- he failed.

So Google, please Balance the search results of Steven Weinberg, by putting the below Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics...

Put that thread on the first page of Steven Weinberg's Google Search of just "steven weinberg"

AP
King of Science, especially Physics