Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Life would be so much easier if we could just look at the source code. -- Dave Olson


tech / sci.math / Re: Shit for brains in Logic Morons of logic George Boole, William Jevons, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Godel, Rudolf Carnap, Jan Burse& Dan Christensen as moronette cadets of Boole, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Willard Quine, Alfred North Whitehead, Irving Copi

SubjectAuthor
o Re: Shit for brains in Logic Morons of logic George Boole, WilliamArchimedes Plutonium

1
Re: Shit for brains in Logic Morons of logic George Boole, William Jevons, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Godel, Rudolf Carnap, Jan Burse& Dan Christensen as moronette cadets of Boole, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Willard Quine, Alfred North Whitehead, Irving Copi

<0ecd82b8-9920-4be0-bc09-42aea256b2fan@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=61920&group=sci.math#61920

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:162a:: with SMTP id e10mr18963509qvw.49.1623084224029;
Mon, 07 Jun 2021 09:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:4248:: with SMTP id p69mr25106454yba.112.1623084223902;
Mon, 07 Jun 2021 09:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweak.nl!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 09:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9247b668-64f5-429e-8b4b-349c88e1672dn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:387:b:3:0:0:0:26;
posting-account=fsC03QkAAAAwkSNcSEKmlcR-W_HNitEd
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:387:b:3:0:0:0:26
References: <93824c6f-e8c1-4428-a801-11c9b4c2913cn@googlegroups.com> <9247b668-64f5-429e-8b4b-349c88e1672dn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <0ecd82b8-9920-4be0-bc09-42aea256b2fan@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Shit for brains in Logic Morons of logic George Boole, William
Jevons, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Godel, Rudolf Carnap, Jan Burse& Dan
Christensen as moronette cadets of Boole, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Willard Quine,
Alfred North Whitehead, Irving Copi
From: plutoniu...@gmail.com (Archimedes Plutonium)
Injection-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 16:43:44 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: Archimedes Plutonium - Mon, 7 Jun 2021 16:43 UTC

Zelos Malum that mindless hack of Sweden who every night ejaculates over sci.math with his mindless scree such as "and why must we do Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, geometrically"
Is Zelos a escapee from a Sweden asylum and sci.math his GPS while in the wilderness?

11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Length: 137 pages

Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1307 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 137 pages
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor