novaBBS - sci.physics.relativity - Re: No one won Einstein in history

Re: No one won Einstein in history

<sa0dv7$1n16$3@gioia.aioe.org>

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=61947&group=sci.physics.relativity#61947

copy link Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!i7o2SE/wdlps/e8I4h8RQQ.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: yve...@hfioiwns.mx (Yves Everly)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: No one won Einstein in history
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 19:36:08 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <sa0dv7$1n16$3@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <06ba24b6-710c-4846-b369-138257df2697n@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: i7o2SE/wdlps/e8I4h8RQQ.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Thoth/1.8.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2

by: Yves Everly - Fri, 11 Jun 2021 19:36 UTC

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> The QM experiment 2 Slit was done without observers and Einstein won the
> argument. Bohr's result did not happen. Light does not have to be
> observed to keep the particle distribution in the 2 slit experiment.
> OCR and backward time physics are QM experimentally ruled out...

nonsense, how would you even know the outcome. An experiment without an
outcome is not experiment. The only thing changed there was the observer
substituted by a detector. You do something wrong with your apparatus,
illegal probably in many countries.

Re: No one won Einstein in history

<sa0j46$1n16$6@gioia.aioe.org>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=61953&group=sci.physics.relativity#61953

copy link Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!i7o2SE/wdlps/e8I4h8RQQ.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: yve...@hfioiwns.mx (Yves Everly)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: No one won Einstein in history
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 21:04:06 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <sa0j46$1n16$6@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <06ba24b6-710c-4846-b369-138257df2697n@googlegroups.com>
<sa0dv7$1n16$3@gioia.aioe.org>
<8d51e9d6-eb85-48e5-a92a-46cdbaaa173an@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: i7o2SE/wdlps/e8I4h8RQQ.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Thoth/1.8.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2

by: Yves Everly - Fri, 11 Jun 2021 21:04 UTC

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 12:36:13 PM UTC-7, Yves Everly wrote:
>> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> > The QM experiment 2 Slit was done without observers and Einstein won
>> > the argument. Bohr's result did not happen. Light does not have to be
>> > observed to keep the particle distribution in the 2 slit experiment.
>> > OCR and backward time physics are QM experimentally ruled out...
>> nonsense, how would you even know the outcome.
>
> Because they did the experiment you moron...
> Bohr's science claimed a different outcome than what was experimentaly
> measured.

Stop snipping, imbecile. The reason for which you don't understand
jackshit.

Re: No one won Einstein in history

<463eb594-57a2-4a41-88dc-4ba1d4d318e2n@googlegroups.com>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=61965&group=sci.physics.relativity#61965

copy link Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:130e:: with SMTP id o14mr6524128qkj.296.1623458315840;
Fri, 11 Jun 2021 17:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4410:: with SMTP id v16mr6668779qkp.387.1623458315740;
Fri, 11 Jun 2021 17:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 17:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <sa0j46$1n16$6@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:1c0:c802:3880:253a:fe39:fc47:1f01;
posting-account=Dg6LkgkAAABl5NRBT4_iFEO1VO77GchW
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:1c0:c802:3880:253a:fe39:fc47:1f01
References: <06ba24b6-710c-4846-b369-138257df2697n@googlegroups.com>
<sa0dv7$1n16$3@gioia.aioe.org> <8d51e9d6-eb85-48e5-a92a-46cdbaaa173an@googlegroups.com>
<sa0j46$1n16$6@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <463eb594-57a2-4a41-88dc-4ba1d4d318e2n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: No one won Einstein in history
From: mitchrae...@gmail.com (mitchr...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 00:38:35 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

by: mitchr...@gmail.com - Sat, 12 Jun 2021 00:38 UTC

On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 2:04:11 PM UTC-7, Yves Everly wrote:
> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 12:36:13 PM UTC-7, Yves Everly wrote:
> >> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >> > The QM experiment 2 Slit was done without observers and Einstein won
> >> > the argument. Bohr's result did not happen. Light does not have to be
> >> > observed to keep the particle distribution in the 2 slit experiment.
> >> > OCR and backward time physics are QM experimentally ruled out...
> >> nonsense, how would you even know the outcome.
> >
> > Because they did the experiment you moron...
> > Bohr's science claimed a different outcome than what was experimentaly
> > measured.
> Stop snipping, imbecile. The reason for which you don't understand
> jackshit.

I understand you are your own shit...
Observer Created Reality has been experimentally
disproved. Einstein won in history not Bohr.

Mitchell Raemsch

Star Trek Lives!

tech / sci.physics.relativity / Re: No one won Einstein in history

Subject	Author
Re: No one won Einstein in history	Yves Everly
Re: No one won Einstein in history	Yves Everly
Re: No one won Einstein in history	mitchr...@gmail.com