Balanced and COUNTERPOINT Google search list of Andrew Wiles and Terence Tao instead of this massive propaganda of math genius goodie two show when they are failures of mathematics cannot do a valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus because he knows no geometry proof of FTC, and is so stupid in math, that the fool Wiles never realized Calculus is...

Harvard is good about slanted biased b.s. but Princeton Univ seems to swim in b.s. propaganda. I say this because a Google search list on Dr. Hau shows a COUNTERPOINT to her work of slow light, right on Dr. Lene Hau's first page. And that tells me, that Harvard is straight up, and honest.

But as for Princeton Univ, they must hire some full time employee whose job it is to make sure Terence Tao and Andrew Wiles have a Google Search list in the millions and all of them piping one tune hymn-- the baby boy genius Tao and the Wiles awards up the kazoo. When in reality, both Wiles and Tao are failures of mathematics, for neither understood calculus was geometry and that the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus needed a Geometry proof.

1> Google sugarcoats Andrew Wiles and Terence Tao search list, with no COUNTERPOINT, just a propaganda sugarcoating of hits, for the purpose of covering up their failures in math. I am not sure if Princeton Univ hires someone full time for the express purpose of sugar coating their alumni, with not a chance of any Counterpoint in their Google search list.
>
1> Google Search hits should be Balanced and Point Counterpoint,-- not Wiles's first 1 million search hits all saying-- "oh, the goodie two shoe genius" When the reality on the ground is far far different for Andrew Wiles, for so stupid was Wiles in mathematics of Fermat's Last theorem, FLT, that the fool Wiles never even spotted the huge mistake in Eulers so called alleged proof of FLT in exponent 3. Euler missed proving the case when all three A, B, C of A^3 + B^3 = C^3. all three were even numbers, and that oversight, makes Euler's so called proof a sham. Yet Wiles the dumb fool of FLT, could not even spot that Euler mistake, and here, the world gives Wiles awards awards after awards.
>
> Balanced and COUNTERPOINT where the ignorant Dr. Wiles of mathematics cannot do a valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus because he knows no geometry proof of FTC, and is so stupid in math, that the fool Wiles never realized Calculus is geometry, yet Google gives this cretin a million search hits of -- genius, genius.
>
> Google on Wiles and Tao has become a repeating propaganda machine rather than being a honest broker of journalism news.
>
> Give any famous scientist, give them all a POINT -- Counterpoint on first page of a Google Hit.
>
> Google right now, is like PBS Newshour that interviews only Republicans, and never allows a Democrat viewpoint.
>
> Not this monstrosity of 2 million hits all saying genius.
>

Balanced and Counterpoint Google Search list, and stop this crazy 5 million hit list all saying Wiles is a goodie two shoe in math when the reality on the ground is Wiles is a math failure with never even a geometry proof of Calculus, the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. No, the fool Wiles still panders a fake proof of a "limit analysis". Wiles is so dumb, very dumb in math that he cannot even spend a 1/2 hour in cutting out a paper cone, droping a Kerr lid inside and slanting it and seeing that the figure produced is never a ellipse but is the Oval. And yet Google Search gives this cretin of math 5 million hits all in praise when he should never even have been in math, so great was his failure.

Balanced & Counterpoint Google Search for Terence Tao, not this -- all praise and glory of a baby boy genius when the reality is that Dr. Tao is so stupid in math that he fails to recognize Calculus is geometry and therefor, he must do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. He never could and his only proof of FTC is the failure with a "limit analysis" which is a whitewash cover up of math, a hornswaggle and a sham trickster, but not a proof of FTC.

So, why does Google have this Dr. Tao with millions of hits yet a dunce and a failure of math. He needs a Point Counterpoint Google search list on his first page, stating that "Where is Tao's geometry proof of FTC"?

And questioning whether Dr. Tao and a bunch of other so called scholars are paying Kibo Parry of Boston's "world std isp" paying him to stalk harrass AP going on 28 years now, in the sci.math and sci.physics newsgroups. Is there some college network paying world std to stalk and harrass AP.

Same thing in physics where prominent physicists are given a all praise and glory but never a COUNTERPOINT on their first page of a Google Search.

Balanced & Counterpoint Google Search for Steven Weinberg, not this -- all praise and glory when Steven cannot even ask the question, which is the real electron of atoms-- is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle.

Science needs balanced and counterpoint journalism, not the all slanted in one direction and Google Search is journalism, whether they like to believe so, or not believe so. Google Search is like the PBS Newshour, but a very skewed, bias and prejudicial news. What if PBS only ever interviewed Republicans and never Democrats, that would be slanted.

Just as Steven Weinberg's Google search list comes up with millions of hits but all slanted in favor of Weinberg, when Steven failed physics. The muon has been around since the 1930s and Steven was so logically dumb in physics, he could never notice that if you multiply 9 times 105MeV you get the neutron and proton rest mass within Sigma Error. Meaning, meaning that the real proton is 840MeV with a muon stuck inside the proton doing the Faraday Law of producing electricity as the muon thrusts through the proton 8 ring torus.

So, can Steven even ask the question in his own mind, which is the real true electron of atoms? Is it the muon, or is it the 0.5MeV particle.

And so, a Google Search list of Steven Weinberg should have on its first page a Counterpoint, a Balance list of results. When you Google search (Steven Weinberg) you get millions of flowery glowing -- he is a genius nonsense. To get a CounterPoint you need to Google search "Steven Weinberg plutonium" to get a more accurate view of Steven Weinberg's life and contributions to physics-- he failed.

So Google, please Balance the search results of Steven Weinberg, by putting the below Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics...

Put that thread on the first page of Steven Weinberg's Google Search of just "steven weinberg"

AP
King of Science, especially Physics

On Wednesday, June 9, 2021 at 5:56:36 PM UTC+1, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

Have you ever considered stamp collecting, or coin collecting? Or better yet, try bird watching; it will get you outside in the sunshine for a bit. Maybe help to reverse whatever personality disorder is traumatizing your life on an ongoing basis. Volunteering at a charity shop a couple of times a week; some human contact unrelated to the mental diarrhea you keep putting through your keyboard on here.

Can't hurt.

Do you really want to be remembered as the thinking man's John Gabriel? There have got to be better legacies surely?

Try it. You might like it.

Ross investigating if Princeton Univ has a full time employee who keeps Counterpoints in a Google Search list from appearing on first page of Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Ed Witten.

On Wednesday, June 9, 2021 at 12:07:46 PM UTC-5, ross.pro...@gmx.com wrote:
> Have you ever considered stamp collecting, or coin collecting? Or better yet, try bird watching; it will get you outside in the sunshine for a bit. Maybe help to reverse whatever personality disorder is traumatizing your life on an ongoing basis. Volunteering at a charity shop a couple of times a week; some human contact unrelated to the mental diarrhea you keep putting through your keyboard on here.
>

AP writes: Apparently Ross with his pinhead of logic never studied formal logic, never learned what non sequitur means as to asking Princeton Univ Dr. Christopher Eisgruber or Provost Deborah Prentice if they collect stamps or watch birds, although I did see a shining bright red cardinal out my window this morning. But Ross with your feeble intelligence and zip for logic, ask them if they have a full time employee at Princeton Univ who is payed to keep all Counterpoints in a Google Search of Tao or Wiles, keep those off the first page. Because Harvard's Dr. Hau has a Counterpoint in her first page of Google search hits meaning that Harvard is honest, but that perhaps Princeton Univ is dishonest in academics in fostering a Google Search list of Terence Tao and Andrew Wiles of 5 million hits, all raving glowing "genius" and not one CounterPoint in any page.

So, Ross, how is Princeton Univ able to do this propaganda of their alumni? How do they pull it off, and why would they want to be seen as dishonest compared to Harvard being above-board-honest?

Is it that Princeton Univ hit a dry spell of no achievements in math or science. Why the fools cannot even understand Calculus is geometry, yet not a Princeton math professor able to do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

> Can't hurt.
>

A geometry proof is no hurt no pain at all, but Princeton Univ needs at least a brain or two to get started.

> Do you really want to be remembered as the thinking man's John Gabriel? There have got to be better legacies surely?
>

Or as Edward Witten of Princeton Univ, so dumb in physics he could never ask the simple question a High School student asks-- which is the real electron of atoms-- is it the muon and the 0.5MeV particle the Dirac Magnetic Monopole. No, the Princeton Univ Ed Witten is absent of a logical brain comparable to Ross.

> Try it. You might like it.

I think Ed is too far past gone in science to even understand the question. And of course , Ed Witten needs a COUNTERPOINT in his first page of a Google Search list. A counterpoint saying to the effect-- Ed was so stupid in physics, he could not ask the simple question.

74th published book

HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

#1-4, 105th published book

Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.

Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
Length: 39 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : March 24, 2020
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)



#1-5, 112th published book

New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.

Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book.. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
Length: 20 pages

Product details
• ASIN : B0875SVDC7
• Publication date : April 15, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 1134 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 20 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-6, 135th published book

QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) 

Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.

Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.

Product details
• ASIN : B08K47K5BB
• Publication date : September 25, 2020
• Language : English
• File size : 587 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print length : 25 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #334 in General Chemistry