Google Search list of "Thomas Hales math" as 100% propaganda, no Counterpoint to the sugary coated hype. Harvard and Dr. Hau at Harvard are honest scientists with a Counterpoint on first page of Google Search, whereas Princeton's Tao and Wiles and then Hales have propaganda Search lists.

Google needs to implement Balanced Search lists with Counterpoint, not all rosy hype but exposed ineptitude Re: Google Search list of Thomas Hales, Andrew Wiles & Terence Tao are just horrible propaganda, of dishonesty of math.

On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 6:27:45 AM UTC-6, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> why would one need to do it geometrically?
The MASTER in Dr. Who's tv series:: Ha..ha..ha, ha, ...Ha, ha ha ha ha ha haw

Google Search list of Thomas Hales, Andrew Wiles & Terence Tao are just horrible propaganda, of dishonesty of math. No Counterpoint, only millions of hits of baby-boy-genius when in fact they are failures of math. See Harvard's Dr. Hau for honest search hits.

Google Search is like PBS newshour who interviews only Republicans, never any Democrat. Journalism needs that Point-- Counterpoint. And all good journalists of News know this, they were taught this in journalism schools.

Dr. Hales never proved Kepler Packing only a hornswaggle mindless argument. And Dr. Hales is so so very dumb in geometry math that the nitwit never examined a Kerr lid dropped into a paper cone does not yield a ellipse at a slant angle, no, the Oval is the result of a slant conic cut. But Hales is too lazy and too dumb to even experiment, something a High School student can prove the Oval is the conic cut at a slant, yet Old Math awards this cripple of geometry as proving Kepler Packing. And worst of all, Dr. Hales is a failure of mathematics because the most important math proof of our times is to prove Fundamental Theorem of Calculus via a geometry proof, not the asinine limit analysis that Hales fobbs off. It is even worrisome to this day, whether Hales even comprehends that Calculus is geometry, and hence requires and demands a geometry proof. See AP's proof below and see where AP gave the world's first valid proof of Kepler Packing Problem. Hales only offered a con-artist fakery, for he seems to seek fame and glory, never the truth of mathematics.

Google Search is a modern day journal. And if Google Search does 2 million hits of Terence Tao all saying one and the same propaganda thing--- oh, oh, how the baby boy is such a genius. And all the same million hits of Andrew Wiles--- oh oh another award.

When in plain truth, both Wiles and Tao are math failures and charlatans and con-artists of math, because neither one of them understood the prescient issue of modern day math-- that calculus is geometry, and that Calculus had to have a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Yet the dumb and ignorant Wiles and Tao can only do a fakery dance of a "limit analysis".

So, why is Google spreading propaganda on science and math, when they should have a hit on first page of Dr. Wiles and Dr. Tao, explaining how dumb and ignorant they are in mathematics.

If Google can do the correct thing with the honest Harvard Dr. Hau which has a CounterPoint in Dr. Hau's first page of a Google Search. Then, why cannot Google have a honest first page Google Search for Wiles and Tao.

The world deserves better than the pollution of fame and fortune seekers of Tao and Wiles, rather than the truth of math itself.


11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Length: 137 pages

Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1307 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 137 pages
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Length: 21 pages

File Size: 1620 KB
Print Length: 21 pages
Publication Date: March 11, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PLSDQWC
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray: Not Enabled
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

24th published book

World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

There has been a alleged proof of KPP by Thomas Hales, but his is a fakery because he does not define what infinity actually means, for it means a borderline between finite and infinite numbers. Thus, KPP was never going to be proven until a well-defined infinity borderline was addressed within the proof. And because infinity has a borderline means that in free space with no borderlines to tackle and contend with, the 12 kissing point density that is the hexagonal close packed is the maximum density. But the truth and reality of Kepler Packing is asking for maximum packing out to infinity. That means you have to contend and fight with the packing of identical spheres up against a wall or border. And so, in tackling that wall, we can shift the hexagonal closed pack to another type of packing, a hybrid type of packing in order to get "maximum packing". So no proof ever of KPP is going to happen unless the proof tackles a infinity border wall. In free-space, a far distance away from a wall barrier of infinity border, then, hexagonal closed pack reigns and is the packing in all of free space-- but, the moment the packing gets nearby the walls of infinity border, then, we re-arrange the hexagonal closed pack to fit in more spheres. Not unlike us packing a suitcase and then rearranging to fit in more.

Cover picture: is a container and so the closed packing must be modified once the border is nearly reached to maximize the number of spheres.
Length: 61 pages

File Size: 1241 KB
Print Length: 61 pages
Publication Date: March 20, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07NMV8NQQ
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled