Someone https://dreamheron.wordpress.com/2021/07/05/suppose-they-gave-a-neutron-star-black-hole-merger/ noticed that famous physics bloggers remained silent on LIGO's latest feats. Einsteinians are in panic nowadays, silently leave Einstein's sinking ship and promptly become experts in quantum mechanics, AI, climate science, COVID-19, anything:

https://c6.quickcachr.fotos.sapo.pt/i/Bb713bb56/15112108_dBrrH.png

See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev

Gamma rays are gravitationally deflected or blocked by cosmic matter. Gravitational waves are not, Einsteinians teach:

"Unlike light, gravitational waves don’t care about matter in any way. You can pass gravitational waves through the vacuum of space, through a lens, prism, or other material, or even through the solid Earth itself, and they will continue to propagate at the speed of gravity." https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/12/24/how-gravitational-waves-might-wind-up-proving-einstein-wrong/

Therefore, gamma rays and gravitational waves CANNOT arrive "from the same location of the sky", just two seconds apart:

"On 8:41 am EDT August 17, 2017, LIGO detected a new gravitational wave source, dubbed GW170817 to mark its discovery date. Just two seconds later NASA's Fermi satellite detected a weak pulse of gamma rays from the same location of the sky." https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/news/2017-30

The speed of light is VARIABLE AS PER NEWTON, as originally ("without recourse to contracting lengths, local time, or Lorentz transformations") proved by the Michelson-Morley experiment:

"Moreover, if light consists of particles, as Einstein had suggested in his paper submitted just thirteen weeks before this one, the second principle seems absurd: A stone thrown from a speeding train can do far more damage than one thrown from a train at rest; the speed of the particle is not independent of the motion of the object emitting it. And if we take light to consist of particles and assume that these particles obey Newton's laws, they will conform to Newtonian relativity and thus automatically account for the null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment without recourse to contracting lengths, local time, or Lorentz transformations. Yet, as we have seen, Einstein resisted the temptation to account for the null result in terms of particles of light and simple, familiar Newtonian ideas, and introduced as his second postulate something that was more or less obvious when thought of in terms of waves in an ether." Banesh Hoffmann, Relativity and Its Roots, p.92 https://www.amazon.com/Relativity-Its-Roots-Banesh-Hoffmann/dp/0486406768

This implies that Einstein's spacetime does not exist and neither do LIGO's gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime). LIGO fakers still feel safe, protected by the insane but all-powerful ideology of the Einstein cult, and intensely brainwash their colleagues:

LIGO fakers: "So the fact that the speed of gravitational waves is equal to the speed of electromagnetic waves is simply because they both travel at the speed of information." https://discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/why-does-gravity-travel-at-the-speed-of-light

Is "speed of information" defined in physics? Brainwashed theoretical physicists: "Who cares?"

More here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev

Pentcho Valev wrote:

> "Unlike light, gravitational waves don’t care about matter in any way.
> You can pass gravitational waves through the vacuum of space, through a
> lens,
> prism, or other material, or even through the solid Earth itself, and
> they will continue to propagate at the speed of gravity."
> https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/12/24/how-
gravitational-waves-might-wind-up-proving-einstein-wrong/

This clearly cannot be true. Large masses do indeed affect gravity. If
those waves are "travelling" without the required mass generating them,
then, the young Einstein is in big trouble. Why, because you gravity pops
out places void of everything.

This is not all, since gravity is a directed magnitude above *flat*, a
monopole, the wave "oscillation" is actually an *offset* from the flat.
It's NOT oscillating about a zero cross-over level, but a certain offset.
Which makes the whole thing even lesser understandable.

Hagan Echelbarger wrote:

> This is not all, since gravity is a directed magnitude above *flat*, a
> monopole, the wave "oscillation" is actually an *offset* from the flat.
> It's NOT oscillating about a zero cross-over level, but a certain
> offset. Which makes the whole thing even lesser understandable.

something like this, say the bias offset is a 2.4, then the gravity wave
would have to oscillate 0.0 to 4.8 pp (pak-to-peak), whereas 0.0 is the
flat level. Because the bias offset alone cannot make it through
spacetime. Ie plot this.

sA = 2.4+2.4*cos(2*pi*FcA*t);

In the physics establishment, only Natalia Kiriushcheva found the courage to hint at the truth: LIGO's gravitational waves are fake. She immediately disappeared from public debate - LIGO godfathers must have converted her into an unperson:

George Orwell: "Withers, however, was already an unperson. He did not exist: he had never existed."

"On September 16, 2010, a false signal - a so-called "blind injection" - was fed into both the Ligo and Virgo systems as part of an exercise to "test .... detection capabilities". At the time, the vast majority of the hundreds of scientists working on the equipment had no idea that they were being fed a dummy signal. The truth was not revealed until March the following year, by which time several papers about the supposed sensational discovery of gravitational waves were poised for publication. "While the scientists were disappointed that the discovery was not real, the success of the analysis was a compelling demonstration of the collaboration's readiness to detect gravitational waves," Ligo reported at the time. But take a look at the visualisation of the faked signal, says Dr Kiriushcheva, and compare it to the image apparently showing the collision of the twin black holes, seen on the second page of the recently-published discovery paper. "They look very, very similar," she says. "It means that they knew exactly what they wanted to get and this is suspicious for us: when you know what you want to get from science, usually you can get it." The apparent similarity is more curious because the faked event purported to show not a collision between two black holes, but the gravitational waves created by a neutron star spiralling into a black hole. The signals appear so similar, in fact, that Dr Kiriushcheva questions whether THE "TRUE" SIGNAL MIGHT ACTUALLY HAVE BEEN AN ECHO OF THE FAKE, "STORED IN THE COMPUTER SYSTEM from when they turned off the equipment five years before"." https://www.thenational.ae/arts-culture/why-albert-einstein-continues-to-make-waves-as-black-holes-collide-1.188114

See more: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev