Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

1.79 x 10^12 furlongs per fortnight -- it's not just a good idea, it's the law!


tech / sci.math / Re: Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan Burse understand Boole logic is all wrong with his 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, is Jan Burse a insane failure of math and logic??? On Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 9:36:08 AM UTC-5, Jan Burs

SubjectAuthor
* Re: Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan BurseArchimedes Plutonium
+* Re: Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan BurseQuantum Bubbles
|+- Re: Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan Burse understand Boole loFromTheRafters
|`* Re: Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan BurseArchimedes Plutonium
| `- Re: Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan BurseArchimedes Plutonium
`* Re: Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan Burse understand Boole loArchimedes Plutonium
 `* Re: Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan BurseArchimedes Plutonium
  `- Re: Archimedes "certified mentally ill" Plutonium flunked the mathMichael Moroney

1
Re: Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan Burse understand Boole logic is all wrong with his 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, is Jan Burse a insane failure of math and logic??? On Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 9:36:08 AM UTC-5, Jan Burs

<d1120ab3-ae1b-4a88-9e50-9d6a165629f1n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=63078&group=sci.math#63078

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1f7:: with SMTP id x23mr2050282qkn.160.1623906875947;
Wed, 16 Jun 2021 22:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a5b:5c7:: with SMTP id w7mr3600100ybp.164.1623906875738;
Wed, 16 Jun 2021 22:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!news.uzoreto.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweak.nl!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 22:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2f587ec1-3ac2-4c10-983e-be137b93384en@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:387:b:f:0:0:0:17;
posting-account=fsC03QkAAAAwkSNcSEKmlcR-W_HNitEd
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:387:b:f:0:0:0:17
References: <2f587ec1-3ac2-4c10-983e-be137b93384en@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d1120ab3-ae1b-4a88-9e50-9d6a165629f1n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan Burse
understand Boole logic is all wrong with his 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as
subtraction, is Jan Burse a insane failure of math and logic??? On Sunday,
March 21, 2021 at 9:36:08 AM UTC-5, Jan Burs
From: plutoniu...@gmail.com (Archimedes Plutonium)
Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 05:14:35 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: Archimedes Plutonium - Thu, 17 Jun 2021 05:14 UTC

148th published book

Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface:
Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that the Universe, in total is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.

In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.

Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory.

Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus ring and visualize each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus perpendicular at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law, producing electricity.

Length: 316 pages

Product details
• ASIN : B08T82M2LP
• Publication date : January 16, 2021
• Language: : English
• File size : 887 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 316 pages
• Lending : Enabled

#1-2, 48th published book

Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

--------------------------
Table of Contents
--------------------------

1) A visual image of a Atom Totality

2) Simply multiply 9 times 105MeV and there you get the rest mass of proton and neutron.

3) The tau-electron 1777MeV is merely 105MeV multiply by 17 is 1785 with Sigma Error of 0.4%.

4) Particle in the 840MeV range so that we can say we discovered the proton particle isolated of its internal muon.

5) Found a 840MeV particle in experimental physics, but, is it the proton torus without its interior occupied by a muon?

6) The theory of 9s, as help in physics.

7) How we picture the interior of Atoms, and the Atom Totality.

8) The Principle of Scooting-Over, applied.

9) An ongoing commentary of the geometry of atoms, both interior and exterior.

10) Galaxies form Rings in Faraday Coil, and Faraday bar-magnet // Cosmic Proton, Cosmic Muon.

11) Is there a Cosmic Faraday Law going on?
Length: 148 pages

Product details
File Size: 2370 KB
Print Length: 148 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: June 10, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07SW87BF5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #285,417 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#826 in Astronomy (Books)
#166 in Astronomy (Kindle Store)
#671 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-3, 74th published book

HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

#1-4, 105th published book

Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.

Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
Length: 39 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : March 24, 2020
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-5, 112th published book

New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.

Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book.. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
Length: 20 pages

Product details
• ASIN : B0875SVDC7
• Publication date : April 15, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 1134 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 20 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)


Click here to read the complete article
Re: Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan Burse understand Boole logic is all wrong with his 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, is Jan Burse a insane failure of math and logic??? On Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 9:36:08 AM UTC-5, Jan Burs

<66916d45-1ea3-4a86-b472-baa4ef1bf3a1n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=63094&group=sci.math#63094

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4a32:: with SMTP id n18mr5246033qvz.21.1623926941620;
Thu, 17 Jun 2021 03:49:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:2512:: with SMTP id l18mr5294326ybl.16.1623926941494;
Thu, 17 Jun 2021 03:49:01 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!news.niel.me!usenet.pasdenom.info!usenet-fr.net!fdn.fr!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 03:49:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <d1120ab3-ae1b-4a88-9e50-9d6a165629f1n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=51.7.233.47; posting-account=yGRO2woAAADshLPG1OucG7f_VEogoNIn
NNTP-Posting-Host: 51.7.233.47
References: <2f587ec1-3ac2-4c10-983e-be137b93384en@googlegroups.com> <d1120ab3-ae1b-4a88-9e50-9d6a165629f1n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <66916d45-1ea3-4a86-b472-baa4ef1bf3a1n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan Burse
understand Boole logic is all wrong with his 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as
subtraction, is Jan Burse a insane failure of math and logic??? On Sunday,
March 21, 2021 at 9:36:08 AM UTC-5, Jan Burs
From: ross.pro...@gmx.com (Quantum Bubbles)
Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 10:49:01 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: Quantum Bubbles - Thu, 17 Jun 2021 10:49 UTC

On Thursday, June 17, 2021 at 6:14:40 AM UTC+1, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
148th published book
"Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Preface:
Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that the Universe, in total is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom. "

This is so stupid. This Plutonium Atom Totality Theory is clearly nonsense. Any serious reflection reveals the universe to actually be a giant Helium Atom. How can we know this through reflection? Easily: Helium is inert overall, which is reflected in the universe being mostly vacuum and has 4 hadrons in it's core, reflecting a duality of dualities, that, as seen through the lens of the Kline approach to projective geometry, obviously give rise to holographic principles in quantum cosmology, encoded in matrices over complex fields. The quantum randomness within the Helium atom however means that we get random projective singularities (points at 'infinity') which manifest themselves as so called 'black holes', even though they are mostly transparent. Furthermore the two electrons, complementing only the two protons, but not the two neutrons, entails that the universe has an intrinsic neutral force gap that drives its internal metric expansion without the need for an outside, or "extrinsic" geometry to exist; allowing the neutral space manifold to expand without the requirements of a mechanical or electrical force.

This qualitative balance between qualitative infinities, only partially captured by 'continuum' mathematics, with its pseudo-intellectual 'platonic' pretetntions, was intuitively known by pragmatists like C.S. Peirce, why recognized the three metaphysical categories and the failure of determinism that balances of qualitative infinities produce. He even stumbled on Cantor's ideas, but wasn't deluded like Cantor was.

It just makes sense when you think about it, not that the financially motivated mainstream academia will ever acknowledge QB's genius on this.

Chuckle. See how easy it is? If you know enough buzzwords and are even vaguely good with analogies, you can weave all manner of elaborate pseudo-science bullshit for thousands of words at a time if you want. Computers could probably be programmed to generate whole book loads of this rubbish.

Re: Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan Burse understand Boole logic is all wrong with his 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, is Jan Burse a insane failure of math and logic??? On Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 9:36:08 AM UTC-5, Jan Burs

<safb3l$tfv$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=63096&group=sci.math#63096

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: erra...@nomail.afraid.org (FromTheRafters)
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan Burse understand Boole logic is all wrong with his 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, is Jan Burse a insane failure of math and logic??? On Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 9:36:08 AM UTC-5, Jan Burs
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 07:19:16 -0400
Organization: Peripheral Visions
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <safb3l$tfv$1@dont-email.me>
References: <2f587ec1-3ac2-4c10-983e-be137b93384en@googlegroups.com> <d1120ab3-ae1b-4a88-9e50-9d6a165629f1n@googlegroups.com> <66916d45-1ea3-4a86-b472-baa4ef1bf3a1n@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: erratic.howard@gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 11:19:17 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b00743d5617c2742f1ed49cb216708d1";
logging-data="30207"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18w2J7qSYsymdmeX6kOSiKoMlM5fxFUMOQ="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EKnyGLEufF1gQKrvlJhxrn1kMjY=
X-Newsreader: MesNews/1.08.06.00-gb
X-ICQ: 1701145376
 by: FromTheRafters - Thu, 17 Jun 2021 11:19 UTC

Quantum Bubbles pretended :

[...]

> Chuckle. See how easy it is? If you know enough buzzwords and are even
> vaguely good with analogies, you can weave all manner of elaborate
> pseudo-science bullshit for thousands of words at a time if you want.
> Computers could probably be programmed to generate whole book loads of this
> rubbish.

Turbo Encabulator

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ac7G7xOG2Ag

Re: Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan Burse understand Boole logic is all wrong with his 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, is Jan Burse a insane failure of math and logic??? On Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 9:36:08 AM UTC-5, Jan Burs

<92fc1fd4-f12d-460f-a3d4-c6985e7039d8n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=63131&group=sci.math#63131

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:91c:: with SMTP id v28mr4168656qkv.249.1623940991072; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 07:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:6088:: with SMTP id u130mr6819444ybb.257.1623940990846; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 07:43:10 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.uzoreto.com!tr1.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 07:43:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <d1120ab3-ae1b-4a88-9e50-9d6a165629f1n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:387:b:7:0:0:0:7f; posting-account=fsC03QkAAAAwkSNcSEKmlcR-W_HNitEd
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:387:b:7:0:0:0:7f
References: <2f587ec1-3ac2-4c10-983e-be137b93384en@googlegroups.com> <d1120ab3-ae1b-4a88-9e50-9d6a165629f1n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <92fc1fd4-f12d-460f-a3d4-c6985e7039d8n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan Burse understand Boole logic is all wrong with his 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, is Jan Burse a insane failure of math and logic??? On Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 9:36:08 AM UTC-5, Jan Burs
From: plutoniu...@gmail.com (Archimedes Plutonium)
Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 14:43:11 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 238
 by: Archimedes Plutonium - Thu, 17 Jun 2021 14:43 UTC

#3-2, 50th published book

Geometry of the Chemical Bond; metallic, covalent, ionic//Chemistry Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is the second book of the Series -- True Chemistry. I left off of True Chemistry with trying to solve the Chemical bond when the proton and muon inside of each and every atom is doing the Faraday Law. And since that book was already 1154 pages long, I decided to start afresh in a second book devoted to solving the Geometry of the chemical bond of metallic, covalent and ionic.
Cover Picture: PHYSICS: Part 2: Extended Version: Halliday & Resnick, 1986, pages 654, 655 talking about Capacitors and my collection of some capacitors in my lab. The first one is a two prong wall plug taken apart to show what the prongs fasten onto when plugged-in (two parallel plates). The next three are spade and socket connectors (two parallel plates). Next is circular or hook plates, and last is a cylinder plate and socket.

Length: 134 pages

Product details
Print Length : 134 pages
Publication Date : June 21, 2019
Word Wise : Enabled
ASIN : B07TCVBD93
File Size : 1308 KB
Language: : English
Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
Simultaneous Device Usage : Unlimited
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Lending : Enabled

#3-3, 81st published book

Animal-CO2 of the 3 CO2 isomers// Chemistry Series, book 3
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

CO2 molecule has 3 isomers. An isomer means same chemical formula but different geometries. The 3 isomers of CO2 come from fire-CO2 and animal-CO2. The fire-CO2 has the carbon atom as central in the molecule and one of the oxygen atoms has a unshared dipole. The animal-CO2 has the carbon atom on the periphery with an unshared dipole.
This is very important chemistry science for it impacts Global Warming but also hugely impacts biology because plants can only live on animal-CO2 and the fire-CO2 is a toxic poison to plants, much like CO is a toxic poison to animals.

Here we learn new facts about the molecules CO, N2, CO2, O2 and even H2O, new facts we never understood before, all because the real electron is the muon stuck inside a proton doing the Faraday Law and that chemical bonding is governed not by electrons but by Dirac magnetic monopoles, and that makes the Lewis structure be based on 6 not 8.

New concepts in chemistry: Lewis structure based on 6, not 8, and the unshared dipole. For a Lewis Structure based on 6, not 8, is the only logical way that the strongest bonded molecules end up being CO and N2. With a Lewis 8 Structure, the strongest bonded molecules, by logic, note, by logic would have to be O2 and FH or possibly FB. However, the proof is that bond dissociation energy of CO is the highest, proving Lewis 6 Structure is the true structure of Chemistry.

source: chem.ucsb.edu

in kJ/mol

CO 1076
N2  946
CO2 532
O2  498
C2 as in diamond is 602 kJ/mol
H2O = 492
OH = 425
H2 = 432

Cover Picture is a winter stored potted clover that I am experimenting with and shows a animal-CO2 molecule going in, and going out is a O2 molecule that animals need to breathe.
Length: 15 pages

Product details
ASIN : B084217LB9
Publication date : January 19, 2020
Language : English
File size : 1042 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Print length : 15 pages
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #277,873 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #9 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #297 in Biology (Kindle Store)





#3-4, 38th published book

Hypothesis that Tar restores the Iron in Rust, back to the iron metal object// Chemistry series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Back in 2003 I noticed that while working on my roof, that when I pulled off tar on steel, that the steel was shiny bright iron with no rust while all around where no tar was, was much rust. So that started me to think whether tar acts as a chemical reaction in which it takes the iron atoms out of rust and places those iron-atoms-back-into-the-iron-object. Now that was 2003, and I have not had much time to really dive into experiments on this topic. For one reason-- I have to wait years for the tar to dissolve the rust and perhaps return the iron from iron oxide back into the original iron object. No, I do not have years and I was far too busy with other items of science. But now I plan to do more on this subject. Especially since in 2017 I discovered the real electron of atoms is the muon at 105MeV and real proton is 840MeV, casting brand new light on chemistry and chemical reactions. The iron rust molecule Fe2O3 in New Chemistry where the .5MeV particle is not the electron but is Dirac's magnetic monopole, has to be reviewed in terms of this new found knowledge, and whether or not, tar can return the Fe2 back to the original metal object.

Picture cover: About 5 years ago this hammer and trowel were both iron rusted surfaces, both had iron rust, the trowel worse than the hammer. I put tar on the trowel rusty surface and today with a chisel removed some tar and see the shiny bright iron surface. I suppose if I had coated the hammer back then when I coated the trowel, the hammer would also be bright shiny iron.. So the tar must have done something to not only remove the rust but restore the trowel to "more iron bright shiny surface", some claim (see below in text) that the tar only lifted the rust off the iron surface. I think there is more to it than just adhesion lift, and am thinking the tar takes the iron atoms out of iron oxide and puts the iron atoms back into the original iron object. So this is not a proof by any means, but a hypothesis, and a request for more research.
Length: 32 pages

File Size: 2655 KB
Print Length: 32 pages
Publication Date: April 9, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07QK428KN

#3-5, 119th published book

Research Notebook of AP on True Chemistry Periodic Table of Elements based on 6, not the error-filled table of Old Chemistry, Chemistry Series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real true electron of atoms was the muon and this muon is stuck inside its attendant proton. The muon is of 105MeV while the proton is 840 MeV. The particle that JJ Thomson in 1897 discovered was not the electron of atoms but instead was the Dirac magnetic monopole. Such a huge huge mistake throughout all of chemistry and physics, to think the electron was 0.5MeV orbiting around a proton of 938MeV breaks even the angular momentum concept of physics, for no hydrogen atom can exist with a 0.5 MeV particle traveling almost the speed of light around a 938MeV particle just will not stay together. And besides, in that Bohr-Rutherford model of the atom, their subatomic particles have no function, no job, no task, nothing. In that viewpoint of the atom, there is little wonder that their Table of Elements would be mostly error after error after mistake.
Length: 108 pages

Product details
File Size: 1083 KB
Print Length: 108 pages
Publication Date: May 21, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B0891TTP29
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 

#3-6, 123rd published book

World's first logical teaching of 6.02*10^23, Avogadro's number and "mole"; refurbished with "hyasys" and 5.98*10^23 // Chemistry series, book 6
Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 9Jun2021. This is AP's 123rd published book of science.
Preface: I was worried I did not reach the target audience on this topic of mole and Avogadro's number. The cover picture is a High School physics textbook, a later edition of PSSC that I took when I was in High School circa 1967. It teaches mole and Avogadro's number. So I needed to write this textbook starting High School, because it is shameful to teach wrong science in either High School or University.
Cover Picture is page 448-9 of PSSC Physics, 3rd ed., 1971, Haber-Schaim, Cross, Dodge, Walter, explaining how Rutherford in 1919 weighed the mass of the proton in a experiment. It is disheartening to find I cannot see that experiment in a Google search because of another famous experiment of Rutherford of the gold leaf. And lucky for me that I retrieved this PSSC book I used in High School circa 1967-8 that explains how the proton mass was weighed in physics history. The mass of the proton is vital to understand the mole and Avogadro's number concept. Sad of course that every Old Chemistry and Old Physics textbooks that teaches the concept mole and Avogadro number never mentions the proton mass as crucial to understanding.
Length: 68 pages

Product details
File Size : 796 KB
Publication Date : June 10, 2020
Word Wise : Enabled
Print Length : 68 pages
Language: : English
ASIN : B08B1GCRDH
Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #233,083 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #68 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #69 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #425 in General Chemistry


Click here to read the complete article
Re: Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan Burse understand Boole logic is all wrong with his 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, is Jan Burse a insane failure of math and logic??? On Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 9:36:08 AM UTC-5, Jan Burs

<147362b2-fe82-4b1d-b5dc-fca6ffba6883n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=65182&group=sci.math#65182

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:e982:: with SMTP id z2mr7591282qvn.58.1625383910620;
Sun, 04 Jul 2021 00:31:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:3b86:: with SMTP id i128mr9931212yba.363.1625383910312;
Sun, 04 Jul 2021 00:31:50 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2021 00:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <92fc1fd4-f12d-460f-a3d4-c6985e7039d8n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:387:b:9:0:0:0:7a;
posting-account=fsC03QkAAAAwkSNcSEKmlcR-W_HNitEd
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:387:b:9:0:0:0:7a
References: <2f587ec1-3ac2-4c10-983e-be137b93384en@googlegroups.com>
<d1120ab3-ae1b-4a88-9e50-9d6a165629f1n@googlegroups.com> <92fc1fd4-f12d-460f-a3d4-c6985e7039d8n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <147362b2-fe82-4b1d-b5dc-fca6ffba6883n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan Burse
understand Boole logic is all wrong with his 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as
subtraction, is Jan Burse a insane failure of math and logic??? On Sunday,
March 21, 2021 at 9:36:08 AM UTC-5, Jan Burs
From: plutoniu...@gmail.com (Archimedes Plutonium)
Injection-Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2021 07:31:50 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: Archimedes Plutonium - Sun, 4 Jul 2021 07:31 UTC

Joel are the Swiss physicists of ETH beginning to ask the question of which is the real true electron of atoms? Is it the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law and where AP says the 0.5MeV particle was really Dirac's Magnetic Monopole.

22) AP's 175th book//Physicsopedia-- Listing of 128 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics.

Last revision was 28Jun2021.

Preface: I suppose, going forward, physics should always have a physicsopedia, where major parts of physics are held under question, under suspicion as to correctness. In past history we have called them as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet physics, can have no permanent mainstream. And theories passing as "standard model" is a travesty of science, of logical thinking and just a wide open door of physics corruption and tedious nonsense. The Standard Model of Old Physics is a example of "numerology and algebras turned from circus act into the physics mainstream".

1) The picture of electricity and how it works was only truly begun in 2020 with the cover of this book showing electricity as closed loops, hoola hoops and how these loops flow in circuits taking on the shape of those circuits at the speed of light, where the flowing entity are magnetic monopoles-dipoles and photons. Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1
by Archimedes Plutonium.

2) The thoughts and images of electrons in Old Physics and Old Chemistry were horrendously error filled. The first place I see this huge error is in Feynman Lectures on Physics, not that I want to pick on Feynman for he is one of my heroes, but rather I chose Feynman because his Lectures have been translated into almost all languages and his books widely available and known. On page 14-10 of Volume 1, Feynman... And news out of Princeton Univ as of May 2021, where they are finding that the 0.5MeV Dirac magnetic monopole comes in pairs, even though the Princeton researchers are too stupid yet to know that the 0.5MeV particle is not the atom's electron.

3) Old Physics never had a Primal axiom of Physics-- All is atom and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Old Physics wasted too much time on General Relativity (a fake theory) in the 20th century and too little time on electricity and magnetism.

4) New Physics starts with electricity and magnetism. Old Physics always started with idealizations such as linear momentum, and a force of gravity that had no relation to electricity and magnetism. Idealization physics is more imagination than about the truth of the world.

5) New Physics has the correct particles of physics where the proton is 840MeV, the real electron is the muon of 105MeV and is stuck inside the proton torus thrusting through the proton and producing electricity in the Faraday law. The 0.5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole.

6) The true cosmology theory of science is the Atom Totality theory which began to replace the Big Bang theory starting 1990.

7) Big Bang theory is a joke, never a reality. And a outright contradiction of the Atomic theory, that all matter is composed of atoms. For all matter can be interchanged with "all things". If all things are atoms, then the universe itself , we must admit if we are logical thinkers, is "a thing" and thus the universe must be a atom also. Big Bang contradicts Logic. And if science is anything, it is logical. 

8) When you find in the world, a Generalization of All Matter is made up of Atoms. You have to go with the Logic as the truth. If all Matter is atoms, then the Whole of the Universe is Matter, you must continue to the conclusion that the Whole is also an Atom. If you do not make that conclusion, you have to thence say-- All Matter except the Universe, and that is a silly end conclusion.

9)  A second major physics fallacy is their screwing up of the 1897 Thomson particle they called the electron of 0.5MeV when it is the Dirac magnetic monopole that Thomson had found. It would not be until 1936 that the true electron of atoms is discovered and called the muon. What the 1897 screw-up mis-identity shows most of all, is that physicists throughout the 20th century never had a handle on what angular momentum means. If you understand angular momentum, you would realize that a proton at 938MeV and electron at 0.5MeV cannot support the existence of a hydrogen atom, or any atom for that sake. 

10) Direct consequence of muon being the true electron, determines that the proton is 840MeV and the muon is stuck inside the proton doing a Faraday Law of producing new electricity by turning Space into electromagnetism. This is Dirac's new radioactivity and is the creation of new mass, matter in Space. This means all stars shine not from fusion, but from Faraday Law. Not only do stars grow more massive and bigger, but that all astro-bodies grow bigger. Meaning the Nebular Dust Cloud theory is a gigantic hoax for the growing of the Solar System. 

11) Stars shine not from fusion, but from the muon thrusting through its proton coil. Every atom inside a star and every proton in that star is making new electricity from its muon thrusting through its proton 8 ring coil tokamak.

12) A direct consequence that the muon is stuck inside the proton in all experiments, is this Logical Principle, that in physics, every particle or subatomic particle has a function, a job, a task. Principles of Science are some of the most important teachings and understandings in science. One has a logical hole in the head if they think you can have particles of physics, and those particles have no job, no function, no task to perform. Existence in physics means-- a job to do.

13) A New Periodic Table of Chemical Elements must emerge from a mistaken electron as 0.5MeV when it truly is 105MeV, the muon. Such a table is based not on a Lewis structure of 8 but rather on 6. There are 6 successive elements in a row, and only 6 in a row. See AP's book for details: Research Notebook of AP on True Chemistry Periodic Table of Elements based on 6, not the error-filled table of Old Chemistry, Chemistry Series, book 5. The nucleus of atoms are toruses inside larger toruses, not the Rutherford model of a massive nucleus that was sort of stationary. No, the nucleus is a smaller torus going around in circles inside a large torus, and making more electricity.

14) Nebular Dust Cloud theory is purely a hoax, for the Universe has some 10^11 planet systems, and to think that Nebular Dust is spread so evenly throughout the Universe, when supernova are rare, is a colossal logic brain dump. According to Dirac, each and every atom is growing bigger in the universe every second and minute of the day, just as Dirac implied with his "new radioactivities" in his book "Directions in Physics". AP suggests only a half brain would need something as stupid silly as a Nebular Dust Cloud scattered uniformly from rare supernova, here, there, and everywhere.

15) Direct consequence of Faraday law going on inside each and every atom means the Sun will go Red Giant phase starting now and completed in 140 million years where Earth is like Venus-- not habitable by life. Before the end of 1 to 10 million years hence forward of August 2020, if humanity has not colonized Mars, Europa, Pluto, there is a good chance humanity goes extinct. 

16) The most important number in all of science for humanity, is the number for the yearly increase in Solar radiation by our Sun. As of year 2020, NASA has the figure pegged at 0.005% yearly increase in total solar radiation.. This easily explains a loss of total Insects on Earth at 25% total insect biomass for the past decade. This is a huge alarm bell, for it means, unless humanity makes its future home on Europa, Mars and Pluto, the entire human species goes extinct, and as the Sun further goes Red Giant, humanity must constantly go further out away from the Sun.

17)  Following mistakes of Old Physics is their Unification of Forces, and that they followed a science nitwit of Einstein with his General Relativity, rather than follow the giant of physics of James Clerk Maxwell and continue on with electricity and magnetism as being gravity. No, most of the physicists of the 20th century were airheads following a fakester of Einstein. This is as much a lesson in sociology as is physics. If you follow someone, you better be sure he/she is correct thoroughly correct. Otherwise it is just idiotic hero worship. 

18) Black Holes-- invented by the most ignorant and stupid physicists whose imagination wants to violate the Pauli Exclusion Principle and gain fame and fortune with a brain that has no logical marbles at all. Black hole people were followers of the deluded Einstein with his General Relativity. If you believe in black-holes, you really do not belong in science, and so stupid, that you probably would even fail science fiction. A simple test of any scientist,-- do you believe in black holes-- and shown the exit door of science as a career.

19) Dark Matter, Dark Energy-- this was invented by a group of logical brain dead physicists looking at galaxy rotations and seeing that there was not enough mass in Newton's law of gravity to account for this fast rotation of galaxies, these physicists opted for fame and fortune, rather than admit Electricity and Magnetism, not Newton gravity, causes galaxy rotation. Here again is the power of sociology of follow a leader-- Einstein and his deluded General Relativity. Much of the 20th century physics was a waste of time in following the delusions of Einstein, when it should have followed Maxwell of 1860s then Bohr's quantum mechanics. 

20) Doppler Red Shift one of the horrendous follies of modern physics and astronomy. Please see AP's book to get the truth behind Doppler redshift. Doppler redshift (blueshift) has nothing to do with motion of source and cannot tell you distance//(Physics series for High School Book 6)


Click here to read the complete article
Re: Archimedes "certified mentally ill" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

<sbsqog$1moh$3@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=65258&group=sci.math#65258

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!pze2nG67pItlGYoqCYCiUw.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Archimedes "certified mentally ill" Plutonium flunked the math
test of a lifetime-generation test
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2021 13:22:26 -0400
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <sbsqog$1moh$3@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <2f587ec1-3ac2-4c10-983e-be137b93384en@googlegroups.com>
<d1120ab3-ae1b-4a88-9e50-9d6a165629f1n@googlegroups.com>
<92fc1fd4-f12d-460f-a3d4-c6985e7039d8n@googlegroups.com>
<147362b2-fe82-4b1d-b5dc-fca6ffba6883n@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pze2nG67pItlGYoqCYCiUw.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.9.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Michael Moroney - Sun, 4 Jul 2021 17:22 UTC

👎🏼 of Math and 🖕🏼 of Physics Archimedes "Drag Queen of Physics"
Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

> 22) AP's 175th book//Physicsopedia-- Listing of 128 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics.
>
1) Ludwig Poehlmann
2) Ludwig Hansen
3) Ludwig van Ludvig
4) Ludwig Plutonium
5) Archimedes Plutonium
6) Archimedes Plutonium
....
128) Archimedes Plutonium

Re: Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan Burse understand Boole logic is all wrong with his 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, is Jan Burse a insane failure of math and logic??? On Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 9:36:08 AM UTC-5, Jan Burs

<7bf4c000-fd51-440f-b572-ba410f0de2c5n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=66799&group=sci.math#66799

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:64c:: with SMTP id e12mr7690430qth.144.1626413472316;
Thu, 15 Jul 2021 22:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:81ca:: with SMTP id n10mr10269830ybm.164.1626413472130;
Thu, 15 Jul 2021 22:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!4.us.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 22:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <66916d45-1ea3-4a86-b472-baa4ef1bf3a1n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:387:b:3:0:0:0:39;
posting-account=fsC03QkAAAAwkSNcSEKmlcR-W_HNitEd
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:387:b:3:0:0:0:39
References: <2f587ec1-3ac2-4c10-983e-be137b93384en@googlegroups.com>
<d1120ab3-ae1b-4a88-9e50-9d6a165629f1n@googlegroups.com> <66916d45-1ea3-4a86-b472-baa4ef1bf3a1n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <7bf4c000-fd51-440f-b572-ba410f0de2c5n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan Burse
understand Boole logic is all wrong with his 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as
subtraction, is Jan Burse a insane failure of math and logic??? On Sunday,
March 21, 2021 at 9:36:08 AM UTC-5, Jan Burs
From: plutoniu...@gmail.com (Archimedes Plutonium)
Injection-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 05:31:12 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: Archimedes Plutonium - Fri, 16 Jul 2021 05:31 UTC

Boycott Samsung & Hyundai until they free their moon bears

Stalker Jan Burse and his masterpiece painting of freeing Moon Bears.

\\ ("`****/").
\\ `0_ 0 ) `-.
\\ (_&_.)' ._ )
\\ `--' / /
\\ ==(li)===========
\\
\\
two caged Moon Bears

\\ ("`****/"').
\\ `0_ 0 ) `-.
\\ (_&_.)' ._ )
\\ `--' / /
\\ ==1(li)===========
\\
\\

Re: Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan Burse understand Boole logic is all wrong with his 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, is Jan Burse a insane failure of math and logic??? On Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 9:36:08 AM UTC-5, Jan Burs

<bb871a74-fc89-4786-b1bf-651cee77d888n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=67176&group=sci.math#67176

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:a0d:: with SMTP id dw13mr22860624qvb.41.1626668273036;
Sun, 18 Jul 2021 21:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:7804:: with SMTP id t4mr29731982ybc.355.1626668272810;
Sun, 18 Jul 2021 21:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 21:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7bf4c000-fd51-440f-b572-ba410f0de2c5n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:387:b:5:0:0:0:89;
posting-account=fsC03QkAAAAwkSNcSEKmlcR-W_HNitEd
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:387:b:5:0:0:0:89
References: <2f587ec1-3ac2-4c10-983e-be137b93384en@googlegroups.com>
<d1120ab3-ae1b-4a88-9e50-9d6a165629f1n@googlegroups.com> <66916d45-1ea3-4a86-b472-baa4ef1bf3a1n@googlegroups.com>
<7bf4c000-fd51-440f-b572-ba410f0de2c5n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <bb871a74-fc89-4786-b1bf-651cee77d888n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan Burse
understand Boole logic is all wrong with his 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as
subtraction, is Jan Burse a insane failure of math and logic??? On Sunday,
March 21, 2021 at 9:36:08 AM UTC-5, Jan Burs
From: plutoniu...@gmail.com (Archimedes Plutonium)
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 04:17:53 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: Archimedes Plutonium - Mon, 19 Jul 2021 04:17 UTC

Stalker Kibo Analbuttfuckmanure Sethuraman Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley, are you paying Kibo to stalk sci.math, sci.physics???

On Sunday, July 18, 2021 at 6:16:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"AnalButtfuckManure"

If indeed, NSF Dr. Panchanathan hired the stalker Kibo Parry Moroney going back to 1993 and thereabouts, was a huge mistake, for Usenet is self policing. The govt hiring a paid stalker eventually turns to ruin, for although a nitwit like Kibo Parry can tell a crank and moron. The nitwit Kibo Parry cannot tell a genuine scientist doing science outside the box. So in this sense, Dr. Panchanathan should resign from the NSF.

Sethuraman Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J.. Veysey, Scott Stanley, are you paying Kibo to stalk sci.math, sci.physics???

Is NSF Dr. Panchanathan paying Kibo Parry M more money to stalk sci.math, sci.physics, than the top 5 officials at NSF combined and 5X the amount of pay of MIT professors who teach calculus in classrooms. Same question for Canada's stalker, how much pay from government for his bully tactics

Does NSF pay kibo Parry to stalk more than the combined salaries of Sethuraman Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley.

Kibo Parry M on Philip J. Hanlon Dartmouth College president
On Saturday, July 17, 2021 at 4:05:34 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🐜 of Math and 🐛 of
> fails at math and science:

Kibo, is it because he can never do a geometry proof of calculus, nor can Dr. Panchanathan of National Science Foundation, NSF who possibly is paying kibo more money to stalk for 28 years than what Dartmouth pays professors to actually teach calculus in classrooms.

...
..- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
, . `.' ' `.
..' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
.. ; .' . `. ;
; . ' `. . '
.. ' ` `. |
.. '. '
.. 0 0 ' `.
' `
; `
..' `
; U `
; '; `
: | ;.. :` `
: `;. ```. .-; | '
'. ` ``.., .' :' '
; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' I am Kibo Parry Moroney, the grand failure of science with my 938 is 12% short of 945, and my ellipse is a conic when it never was, and my idiocy of thinking geothermal is not radioactivity but is recycled solar fossil. I stalk on Internet because NSF pays a million dollars and is 5 times the salary of those professors stuck with actually teaching science and all I do is attack dog style in sci.math, sci.physics. And Barry Shein loves to whisper in my ear how 10 OR 2 =12 with AND as subtraction
` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` `. ````'''''' ' '
` . ' '
/ ` `. ' ' .
/ ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
/ .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
/ .'' ; ` .' `
....'.' ; .' ` .' `
"" .' .' | ` .; \ `
; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
:' | ' ` , `. `
| ' ` ' `. `
` ' ` ; `. |
`.' ` ; `-'
`...'

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993

Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Length: 137 pages

Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1307 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 137 pages
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
On Saturday, July 17, 2021 at 11:20:58 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Dr. Panchanathan's NSF govt spammer Kibo Parry M on why Weinberg, Glashow, Higgs fail physics with their never asking the question which is the atom's true real electron? Is it the muon, stuck inside a proton torus of 840MeV doing the Faraday law and 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole?
> On Saturday, July 17, 2021 at 8:36:13 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > fails at math and science:
> HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
>
> Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> Length: 17 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 17 pages
> • File Size : 698 KB
> • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
>
> #1-4, 105th published book
>
> Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
>
> Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
> Length: 39 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : March 24, 2020
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • ASIN : B086BGSNXN
> • Print Length : 39 pages
> • File Size : 935 KB
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> #315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> #4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
>
>
> #1-5, 112th published book
>
> New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
>
> Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
> Length: 20 pages
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> • Publication date : April 15, 2020
> • Language: : English
> • File size : 1134 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 20 pages
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
>
> #1-6, 135th published book
>
> QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
>
> Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy.. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
>
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B08K47K5BB
> • Publication date : September 25, 2020
> • Language : English
> • File size : 587 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • Print length : 25 pages
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
> ◦ #334 in General Chemistry
>
>
>
> #1-7, 138th published book
> The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry.. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
> Length: 41 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> • File Size : 828 KB
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • Print Length : 41 pages
> • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
>
> #1-8, 1st published book
>
> Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
> Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
>
> Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
>
> Foreward:
> I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
> Length: 632 pages
>
>
> Product details
> File Size: 1132 KB
> Print Length: 632 pages
> Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> X-Ray: Not Enabled
> Word Wise: Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> #8526 in Physics (Books)
> #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
>
> #2-1, 137th published book
>
> Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
>
> #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
>
> This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
>
> Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
>
> Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> Length: 64 pages
>
> Product details
> • File Size : 790 KB
> • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 64 pages
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Language: : English
> • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
>
> #2-2, 145th published book
>
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> • Language: : English
> • File size : 682 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 78 pages
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
>
> #2-3, 146th published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Books in this series are.
> Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS High School junior year, book 2
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS High School senior year, book 3
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS 1st year college, book 4
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS Sophomore college, book 5
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS Junior college, book 6
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS Senior college, book 7
>
> Preface: I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B08RK33T8V
> • Publication date : December 28, 2020
> • Language: : English
> • File size : 917 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 114 pages
> • Lending : Enabled
>
>
> #3-1, 2nd published book
>
> True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
>
> Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
>
> Length: 1150 pages
>
>
> Product details
> • File Size : 2167 KB
> • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 1150 pages
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> #1324 in General Chemistry
> #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)


Click here to read the complete article
1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor