The paper in the following link described a new theory of gravity called DTG.
http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf
DTG describes gravity between the earth and the moon as a composite force as follows:

1. It is an attractive EM force derived from the fact that the earth and the moon are expanding in the same direction in the E-Matrix as the universe expands.

2. The earth and the moon are confined to follow the divergent structure of the E Matrix as the earth and the moon are expanding in the same direction in the E-Matrix. This gives rise to a repulsive effect called the CRE force.between the earth and the moon.

3. Gravity between the earth and the moon is the combined result of the above opposing forces. That’s why gravity is so weak compared to the electromagnetic force and the nuclear forces.

4. It turns out that ts.he combination of the attractive EM force in combination with the repulsive CRE force are essential for the moon to maintain a stable orbit around the earth for billions of years.

Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> wrote:
> The paper in the following link described a new theory of gravity called DTG.
> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf
> DTG describes gravity between the earth and the moon as a composite force as follows:
>
> 1. It is an attractive EM force derived from the fact that the earth and
> the moon are expanding in the same direction in the E-Matrix as the universe expands.
>
> 2. The earth and the moon are confined to follow the divergent structure
> of the E Matrix as the earth and the moon are expanding in the same
> direction in the E-Matrix. This gives rise to a repulsive effect called
> the CRE force.between the earth and the moon.
>
> 3. Gravity between the earth and the moon is the combined result of the
> above opposing forces. That’s why gravity is so weak compared to the
> electromagnetic force and the nuclear forces.
>
> 4. It turns out that ts.he combination of the attractive EM force in
> combination with the repulsive CRE force are essential for the moon to
> maintain a stable orbit around the earth for billions of years.
>
>

Ken Seto could not pass high school physics now if he tried, really tried.
He’d get to the chapter on uniform circular motion and the explanation that
there is no equilibrium in uniform circular motion, and he’d just crap his
pants and toss up his hands.

So if you’re wondering if it’s worthwhile to click on a free link to
something written by someone who can’t follow high school physics, don’t
bother.

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The paper in the following link described a new theory of gravity called DTG.
>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf
>> DTG describes gravity between the earth and the moon as a composite force as follows:
>>
>> 1. It is an attractive EM force derived from the fact that the earth and
>> the moon are expanding in the same direction in the E-Matrix as the universe expands.
>>
>> 2. The earth and the moon are confined to follow the divergent structure
>> of the E Matrix as the earth and the moon are expanding in the same
>> direction in the E-Matrix. This gives rise to a repulsive effect called
>> the CRE force.between the earth and the moon.
>>
>> 3. Gravity between the earth and the moon is the combined result of the
>> above opposing forces. That’s why gravity is so weak compared to the
>> electromagnetic force and the nuclear forces.
>>
>> 4. It turns out that ts.he combination of the attractive EM force in
>> combination with the repulsive CRE force are essential for the moon to
>> maintain a stable orbit around the earth for billions of years.
>>
>>
>
> Ken Seto could not pass high school physics now if he tried, really tried.
> He’d get to the chapter on uniform circular motion and the explanation that
> there is no equilibrium in uniform circular motion, and he’d just crap his
> pants and toss up his hands.
>
> So if you’re wondering if it’s worthwhile to click on a free link to
> something written by someone who can’t follow high school physics, don’t
> bother.
>

In fact, quoting Resnick and Halliday, a text Seto once had but never
understood:

“In section 4-4 we pointed out that if a body is moving at uniform speed v
in a circle of radius r, it experiences an acceleration a whose magnitude
is v^2/r. The direction of a is always radially inward toward the center of
rotation. Thus a is a variable vector because, even though the magnitude
remains constant, its direction changes continuously as the motion
progresses.

“Recall that there need not be any motion in the direction of an
acceleration. In general, there is no fixed relation between the direction
of the acceleration a and the velocity v of a particle, as Fig 4-7 shows.
As it happens, for a particle in uniform circular motion the acceleration a
and velocity v are always at right angles to each other.

“Every accelerated body must have a force F acting on it, defined by
Newton’s second law (F=ma). Thus (assuming we are in an inertial frame), if
we see a body undergoing uniform circular motion, we can be certain that a
net force F, given in magnitude by F = ma = mv^2/r must be acting on the
body; the body is *not* in equilibrium. The direction of F at any instant
must be the direction of a at that instant, namely, radially inward.”

And so Halliday and Resnick point out that the moon having a stable orbit
for millions of years does *not* imply any cancellation of opposing forces,
and does not imply that if there is an acceleration of the moon towards the
earth then there is motion of the moon toward the earth.

But, as I said, Seto cannot pass first-year physics.

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

On 7/10/2021 3:08 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> wrote:
[]

> So if you’re wondering if it’s worthwhile to click on a free link to
> something written by someone who can’t follow high school physics, don’t
> bother.
>
Forget about high school physics, he cannot even pass a fourth grade
math test!

On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 3:08:17 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The paper in the following link described a new theory of gravity called DTG.
> > http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf
> > DTG describes gravity between the earth and the moon as a composite force as follows:
> >
> > 1. It is an attractive EM force derived from the fact that the earth and
> > the moon are expanding in the same direction in the E-Matrix as the universe expands.
> >
> > 2. The earth and the moon are confined to follow the divergent structure
> > of the E Matrix as the earth and the moon are expanding in the same
> > direction in the E-Matrix. This gives rise to a repulsive effect called
> > the CRE force.between the earth and the moon.
> >
> > 3. Gravity between the earth and the moon is the combined result of the
> > above opposing forces. That’s why gravity is so weak compared to the
> > electromagnetic force and the nuclear forces.
> >
> > 4. It turns out that ts.he combination of the attractive EM force in
> > combination with the repulsive CRE force are essential for the moon to
> > maintain a stable orbit around the earth for billions of years.
> >
> >
> Ken Seto could not pass high school physics now if he tried, really tried..
> He’d get to the chapter on uniform circular motion and the explanation that
> there is no equilibrium in uniform circular motion, and he’d just crap his
> pants and toss up his hands.

You can’t even understand how an object can whirl at the end of a string. You insisted that only centripetal acceleration involved. Sad.
>
> So if you’re wondering if it’s worthwhile to click on a free link to
> something written by someone who can’t follow high school physics, don’t
> bother.
>
> --
> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 6:25:42 PM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 7/10/2021 3:08 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> []
> > So if you’re wondering if it’s worthwhile to click on a free link to
> > something written by someone who can’t follow high school physics, don’t
> > bother.
> >
> Forget about high school physics, he cannot even pass a fourth grade
> math test!
Come back when you and your moronic daughter solve (-6/-2).

Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 3:08:17 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The paper in the following link described a new theory of gravity called DTG.
>>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf
>>> DTG describes gravity between the earth and the moon as a composite force as follows:
>>>
>>> 1. It is an attractive EM force derived from the fact that the earth and
>>> the moon are expanding in the same direction in the E-Matrix as the universe expands.
>>>
>>> 2. The earth and the moon are confined to follow the divergent structure
>>> of the E Matrix as the earth and the moon are expanding in the same
>>> direction in the E-Matrix. This gives rise to a repulsive effect called
>>> the CRE force.between the earth and the moon.
>>>
>>> 3. Gravity between the earth and the moon is the combined result of the
>>> above opposing forces. That’s why gravity is so weak compared to the
>>> electromagnetic force and the nuclear forces.
>>>
>>> 4. It turns out that ts.he combination of the attractive EM force in
>>> combination with the repulsive CRE force are essential for the moon to
>>> maintain a stable orbit around the earth for billions of years.
>>>
>>>
>> Ken Seto could not pass high school physics now if he tried, really tried.
>> He’d get to the chapter on uniform circular motion and the explanation that
>> there is no equilibrium in uniform circular motion, and he’d just crap his
>> pants and toss up his hands.
>
> You can’t even understand how an object can whirl at the end of a string.
> You insisted that only centripetal acceleration involved. Sad.

Yup. At constant speed this is so.

>>
>> So if you’re wondering if it’s worthwhile to click on a free link to
>> something written by someone who can’t follow high school physics, don’t
>> bother.
>>
>> --
>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>

--
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 5:37:30 PM UTC-7, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 3:08:17 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> The paper in the following link described a new theory of gravity called DTG.
> >>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf
> >>> DTG describes gravity between the earth and the moon as a composite force as follows:
> >>>
> >>> 1. It is an attractive EM force derived from the fact that the earth and
> >>> the moon are expanding in the same direction in the E-Matrix as the universe expands.
> >>>
> >>> 2. The earth and the moon are confined to follow the divergent structure
> >>> of the E Matrix as the earth and the moon are expanding in the same
> >>> direction in the E-Matrix. This gives rise to a repulsive effect called
> >>> the CRE force.between the earth and the moon.
> >>>
> >>> 3. Gravity between the earth and the moon is the combined result of the
> >>> above opposing forces. That’s why gravity is so weak compared to the
> >>> electromagnetic force and the nuclear forces.
> >>>
> >>> 4. It turns out that ts.he combination of the attractive EM force in
> >>> combination with the repulsive CRE force are essential for the moon to
> >>> maintain a stable orbit around the earth for billions of years.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Ken Seto could not pass high school physics now if he tried, really tried.
> >> He’d get to the chapter on uniform circular motion and the explanation that
> >> there is no equilibrium in uniform circular motion, and he’d just crap his
> >> pants and toss up his hands.
> >
> > You can’t even understand how an object can whirl at the end of a string.
> > You insisted that only centripetal acceleration involved. Sad.
> Yup. At constant speed this is so.

Show how you could ever create a constant speed.
Light might have it but not the atom you whirl.

Mitchell Raemsch

On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 8:37:30 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 3:08:17 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> The paper in the following link described a new theory of gravity called DTG.
> >>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf
> >>> DTG describes gravity between the earth and the moon as a composite force as follows:
> >>>
> >>> 1. It is an attractive EM force derived from the fact that the earth and
> >>> the moon are expanding in the same direction in the E-Matrix as the universe expands.
> >>>
> >>> 2. The earth and the moon are confined to follow the divergent structure
> >>> of the E Matrix as the earth and the moon are expanding in the same
> >>> direction in the E-Matrix. This gives rise to a repulsive effect called
> >>> the CRE force.between the earth and the moon.
> >>>
> >>> 3. Gravity between the earth and the moon is the combined result of the
> >>> above opposing forces. That’s why gravity is so weak compared to the
> >>> electromagnetic force and the nuclear forces.
> >>>
> >>> 4. It turns out that ts.he combination of the attractive EM force in
> >>> combination with the repulsive CRE force are essential for the moon to
> >>> maintain a stable orbit around the earth for billions of years.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Ken Seto could not pass high school physics now if he tried, really tried.
> >> He’d get to the chapter on uniform circular motion and the explanation that
> >> there is no equilibrium in uniform circular motion, and he’d just crap his
> >> pants and toss up his hands.
> >
> > You can’t even understand how an object can whirl at the end of a string.
> > You insisted that only centripetal acceleration involved. Sad.
> Yup. At constant speed this is so.

Idiot, there is no constant speed with just centripetal acceleration. Sad......that’s your knowledge of gravity.
> >>
> >> So if you’re wondering if it’s worthwhile to click on a free link to
> >> something written by someone who can’t follow high school physics, don’t
> >> bother.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> >
> --
> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

On 7/10/2021 8:24 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
> On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 6:25:42 PM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> On 7/10/2021 3:08 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> []
>>> So if you’re wondering if it’s worthwhile to click on a free link to
>>> something written by someone who can’t follow high school physics, don’t
>>> bother.
>>>
>> Forget about high school physics, he cannot even pass a fourth grade
>> math test!
> Come back when you and your moronic daughter solve (-6/-2).
>

She's off to college, Stupid Ken! Yet you *still* can't solve (-6)/(-2)
and project your failure onto us! Why you still can't solve (-6)/(-2)
even after 8 years? Maybe you can ask the nurse who changes your diaper
for help with that?

Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 8:37:30 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 3:08:17 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> The paper in the following link described a new theory of gravity called DTG.
>>>>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf
>>>>> DTG describes gravity between the earth and the moon as a composite force as follows:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. It is an attractive EM force derived from the fact that the earth and
>>>>> the moon are expanding in the same direction in the E-Matrix as the universe expands.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. The earth and the moon are confined to follow the divergent structure
>>>>> of the E Matrix as the earth and the moon are expanding in the same
>>>>> direction in the E-Matrix. This gives rise to a repulsive effect called
>>>>> the CRE force.between the earth and the moon.
>>>>>
>>>>> 3. Gravity between the earth and the moon is the combined result of the
>>>>> above opposing forces. That’s why gravity is so weak compared to the
>>>>> electromagnetic force and the nuclear forces.
>>>>>
>>>>> 4. It turns out that ts.he combination of the attractive EM force in
>>>>> combination with the repulsive CRE force are essential for the moon to
>>>>> maintain a stable orbit around the earth for billions of years.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Ken Seto could not pass high school physics now if he tried, really tried.
>>>> He’d get to the chapter on uniform circular motion and the explanation that
>>>> there is no equilibrium in uniform circular motion, and he’d just crap his
>>>> pants and toss up his hands.
>>>
>>> You can’t even understand how an object can whirl at the end of a string.
>>> You insisted that only centripetal acceleration involved. Sad.
>> Yup. At constant speed this is so.
>
> Idiot, there is no constant speed with just centripetal acceleration.

So you’re saying Resnick and Halliday are wrong?
They say there is. I quoted it for you right out of their book.

> Sad.....that’s your knowledge of gravity.
>>>>
>>>> So if you’re wondering if it’s worthwhile to click on a free link to
>>>> something written by someone who can’t follow high school physics, don’t
>>>> bother.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>
>> --
>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>

--
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

On Sunday, 11 July 2021 at 00:25:42 UTC+2, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 7/10/2021 3:08 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> []
> > So if you’re wondering if it’s worthwhile to click on a free link to
> > something written by someone who can’t follow high school physics, don’t
> > bother.
> >
> Forget about high school physics, he cannot even pass a fourth grade
> math test!

Speakinmg abouth math, it's always good to remind your
bunch of idiots had to announce its oldest part false, as it
didn't want to fit the madness of your idiot guru.

Ken Seto wrote:

>> > You can’t even understand how an object can whirl at the end of a
>> > string.
>> > You insisted that only centripetal acceleration involved. Sad.
>> Yup. At constant speed this is so.
>
> Idiot, there is no constant speed with just centripetal acceleration.
> Sad.....that’s your knowledge of gravity.

you exhibit a combination of arrogance, ignorance and incompetence. Your
theory of everything is incomplete, by not supporting faster then light
travel without causality violation.

On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 9:41:45 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 8:37:30 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 3:08:17 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> The paper in the following link described a new theory of gravity called DTG.
> >>>>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf
> >>>>> DTG describes gravity between the earth and the moon as a composite force as follows:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1. It is an attractive EM force derived from the fact that the earth and
> >>>>> the moon are expanding in the same direction in the E-Matrix as the universe expands.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2. The earth and the moon are confined to follow the divergent structure
> >>>>> of the E Matrix as the earth and the moon are expanding in the same
> >>>>> direction in the E-Matrix. This gives rise to a repulsive effect called
> >>>>> the CRE force.between the earth and the moon.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 3. Gravity between the earth and the moon is the combined result of the
> >>>>> above opposing forces. That’s why gravity is so weak compared to the
> >>>>> electromagnetic force and the nuclear forces.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 4. It turns out that ts.he combination of the attractive EM force in
> >>>>> combination with the repulsive CRE force are essential for the moon to
> >>>>> maintain a stable orbit around the earth for billions of years.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> Ken Seto could not pass high school physics now if he tried, really tried.
> >>>> He’d get to the chapter on uniform circular motion and the explanation that
> >>>> there is no equilibrium in uniform circular motion, and he’d just crap his
> >>>> pants and toss up his hands.
> >>>
> >>> You can’t even understand how an object can whirl at the end of a string.
> >>> You insisted that only centripetal acceleration involved. Sad.
> >> Yup. At constant speed this is so.
> >
> > Idiot, there is no constant speed with just centripetal acceleration.
> So you’re saying Resnick and Halliday are wrong?
> They say there is. I quoted it for you right out of their book.

So you failed to understand what Resnick and Haljday are saying.....par for the course.
> > Sad.....that’s your knowledge of gravity.
> >>>>
> >>>> So if you’re wondering if it’s worthwhile to click on a free link to
> >>>> something written by someone who can’t follow high school physics, don’t
> >>>> bother.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 9:41:45 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 8:37:30 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 3:08:17 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> The paper in the following link described a new theory of gravity called DTG.
>>>>>>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf
>>>>>>> DTG describes gravity between the earth and the moon as a composite
>>>>>>> force as follows:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. It is an attractive EM force derived from the fact that the earth and
>>>>>>> the moon are expanding in the same direction in the E-Matrix as the
>>>>>>> universe expands.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2. The earth and the moon are confined to follow the divergent structure
>>>>>>> of the E Matrix as the earth and the moon are expanding in the same
>>>>>>> direction in the E-Matrix. This gives rise to a repulsive effect called
>>>>>>> the CRE force.between the earth and the moon.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3. Gravity between the earth and the moon is the combined result of the
>>>>>>> above opposing forces. That’s why gravity is so weak compared to the
>>>>>>> electromagnetic force and the nuclear forces.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 4. It turns out that ts.he combination of the attractive EM force in
>>>>>>> combination with the repulsive CRE force are essential for the moon to
>>>>>>> maintain a stable orbit around the earth for billions of years.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ken Seto could not pass high school physics now if he tried, really tried.
>>>>>> He’d get to the chapter on uniform circular motion and the explanation that
>>>>>> there is no equilibrium in uniform circular motion, and he’d just crap his
>>>>>> pants and toss up his hands.
>>>>>
>>>>> You can’t even understand how an object can whirl at the end of a string.
>>>>> You insisted that only centripetal acceleration involved. Sad.
>>>> Yup. At constant speed this is so.
>>>
>>> Idiot, there is no constant speed with just centripetal acceleration.
>> So you’re saying Resnick and Halliday are wrong?
>> They say there is. I quoted it for you right out of their book.
>
> So you failed to understand what Resnick and Haljday are saying.....

LOL. What I quoted seems to be very straightforward to me.
What do you think their words mean?

> par for the course.
>>> Sad.....that’s your knowledge of gravity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So if you’re wondering if it’s worthwhile to click on a free link to
>>>>>> something written by someone who can’t follow high school physics, don’t
>>>>>> bother.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

On 7/10/2021 8:52 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
> On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 8:37:30 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 3:08:17 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:

>>>> Ken Seto could not pass high school physics now if he tried, really tried.
>>>> He’d get to the chapter on uniform circular motion and the explanation that
>>>> there is no equilibrium in uniform circular motion, and he’d just crap his
>>>> pants and toss up his hands.
>>>
>>> You can’t even understand how an object can whirl at the end of a string.
>>> You insisted that only centripetal acceleration involved. Sad.
>> Yup. At constant speed this is so.
>
> Idiot, there is no constant speed with just centripetal acceleration. Sad.....that’s your knowledge of gravity.

Stupid Ken, in addition to all your other mistakes, you don't know the
difference between "speed" and "velocity" in science. So, rather than
learn, you made up your own definition. An object whirling at the end
of a string has a constant speed. It does not have a constant velocity.

Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote:
> On 7/10/2021 8:52 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
>> On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 8:37:30 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 3:08:17 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>>>> Ken Seto could not pass high school physics now if he tried, really tried.
>>>>> He’d get to the chapter on uniform circular motion and the explanation that
>>>>> there is no equilibrium in uniform circular motion, and he’d just crap his
>>>>> pants and toss up his hands.
>>>>
>>>> You can’t even understand how an object can whirl at the end of a string.
>>>> You insisted that only centripetal acceleration involved. Sad.
>>> Yup. At constant speed this is so.
>>
>> Idiot, there is no constant speed with just centripetal acceleration.
>> Sad.....that’s your knowledge of gravity.
>
> Stupid Ken, in addition to all your other mistakes, you don't know the
> difference between "speed" and "velocity" in science. So, rather than
> learn, you made up your own definition. An object whirling at the end
> of a string has a constant speed. It does not have a constant velocity.
>

He claims others don’t understand what they read, and HE is the one that
doesn’t know what the words mean.

--
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

On Sunday, 11 July 2021 at 21:14:09 UTC+2, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> Michael Moroney <mor...@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote:
> > On 7/10/2021 8:52 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
> >> On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 8:37:30 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 3:08:17 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >>>>> Ken Seto could not pass high school physics now if he tried, really tried.
> >>>>> He’d get to the chapter on uniform circular motion and the explanation that
> >>>>> there is no equilibrium in uniform circular motion, and he’d just crap his
> >>>>> pants and toss up his hands.
> >>>>
> >>>> You can’t even understand how an object can whirl at the end of a string.
> >>>> You insisted that only centripetal acceleration involved. Sad.
> >>> Yup. At constant speed this is so.
> >>
> >> Idiot, there is no constant speed with just centripetal acceleration.
> >> Sad.....that’s your knowledge of gravity.
> >
> > Stupid Ken, in addition to all your other mistakes, you don't know the
> > difference between "speed" and "velocity" in science. So, rather than
> > learn, you made up your own definition. An object whirling at the end
> > of a string has a constant speed. It does not have a constant velocity.
> >
> He claims others don’t understand what they read, and HE is the one that
> doesn’t know what the words mean.

So you are, poor idiot.

On Sunday, July 11, 2021 at 12:13:45 PM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 7/10/2021 8:52 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
> > On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 8:37:30 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 3:08:17 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >>>> Ken Seto could not pass high school physics now if he tried, really tried.
> >>>> He’d get to the chapter on uniform circular motion and the explanation that
> >>>> there is no equilibrium in uniform circular motion, and he’d just crap his
> >>>> pants and toss up his hands.
> >>>
> >>> You can’t even understand how an object can whirl at the end of a string.
> >>> You insisted that only centripetal acceleration involved. Sad.
> >> Yup. At constant speed this is so.
> >
> > Idiot, there is no constant speed with just centripetal acceleration. Sad.....that’s your knowledge of gravity.
> Stupid Ken, in addition to all your other mistakes, you don't know the
> difference between "speed" and "velocity" in science. So, rather than
> learn, you made up your own definition. An object whirling at the end
> of a string has a constant speed. It does not have a constant velocity.

So moron, explain how only centripetal acceleration can maintain constant speed. Gee you are so fucking stupid

On Sunday, July 11, 2021 at 9:20:20 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 9:41:45 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 8:37:30 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 3:08:17 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> The paper in the following link described a new theory of gravity called DTG.
> >>>>>>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf
> >>>>>>> DTG describes gravity between the earth and the moon as a composite
> >>>>>>> force as follows:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 1. It is an attractive EM force derived from the fact that the earth and
> >>>>>>> the moon are expanding in the same direction in the E-Matrix as the
> >>>>>>> universe expands.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2. The earth and the moon are confined to follow the divergent structure
> >>>>>>> of the E Matrix as the earth and the moon are expanding in the same
> >>>>>>> direction in the E-Matrix. This gives rise to a repulsive effect called
> >>>>>>> the CRE force.between the earth and the moon.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 3. Gravity between the earth and the moon is the combined result of the
> >>>>>>> above opposing forces. That’s why gravity is so weak compared to the
> >>>>>>> electromagnetic force and the nuclear forces.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 4. It turns out that ts.he combination of the attractive EM force in
> >>>>>>> combination with the repulsive CRE force are essential for the moon to
> >>>>>>> maintain a stable orbit around the earth for billions of years.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> Ken Seto could not pass high school physics now if he tried, really tried.
> >>>>>> He’d get to the chapter on uniform circular motion and the explanation that
> >>>>>> there is no equilibrium in uniform circular motion, and he’d just crap his
> >>>>>> pants and toss up his hands.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You can’t even understand how an object can whirl at the end of a string.
> >>>>> You insisted that only centripetal acceleration involved. Sad.
> >>>> Yup. At constant speed this is so.
> >>>
> >>> Idiot, there is no constant speed with just centripetal acceleration.
> >> So you’re saying Resnick and Halliday are wrong?
> >> They say there is. I quoted it for you right out of their book.
> >
> > So you failed to understand what Resnick and Haljday are saying.....
> LOL. What I quoted seems to be very straightforward to me.
> What do you think their words mean?

Moron, then explain how only centripetal acceleration can maintain constant speed. Gee you are so fucking stupid.
> > par for the course.
> >>> Sad.....that’s your knowledge of gravity.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So if you’re wondering if it’s worthwhile to click on a free link to
> >>>>>> something written by someone who can’t follow high school physics, don’t
> >>>>>> bother.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> >>>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

ration On Sunday, July 11, 2021 at 7:26:51 PM UTC-4, Ken Seto wrote:
> On Sunday, July 11, 2021 at 9:20:20 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 9:41:45 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 8:37:30 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>> On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 3:08:17 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> The paper in the following link described a new theory of gravity called DTG.
> > >>>>>>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf
> > >>>>>>> DTG describes gravity between the earth and the moon as a composite
> > >>>>>>> force as follows:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> 1. It is an attractive EM force derived from the fact that the earth and
> > >>>>>>> the moon are expanding in the same direction in the E-Matrix as the
> > >>>>>>> universe expands.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> 2. The earth and the moon are confined to follow the divergent structure
> > >>>>>>> of the E Matrix as the earth and the moon are expanding in the same
> > >>>>>>> direction in the E-Matrix. This gives rise to a repulsive effect called
> > >>>>>>> the CRE force.between the earth and the moon.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> 3. Gravity between the earth and the moon is the combined result of the
> > >>>>>>> above opposing forces. That’s why gravity is so weak compared to the
> > >>>>>>> electromagnetic force and the nuclear forces.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> 4. It turns out that ts.he combination of the attractive EM force in
> > >>>>>>> combination with the repulsive CRE force are essential for the moon to
> > >>>>>>> maintain a stable orbit around the earth for billions of years.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Ken Seto could not pass high school physics now if he tried, really tried.
> > >>>>>> He’d get to the chapter on uniform circular motion and the explanation that
> > >>>>>> there is no equilibrium in uniform circular motion, and he’d just crap his
> > >>>>>> pants and toss up his hands.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> You can’t even understand how an object can whirl at the end of a string.
> > >>>>> You insisted that only centripetal acceleration involved. Sad.
> > >>>> Yup. At constant speed this is so.
> > >>>
> > >>> Idiot, there is no constant speed with just centripetal acceleration.
> > >> So you’re saying Resnick and Halliday are wrong?
> > >> They say there is. I quoted it for you right out of their book.
> > >
> > > So you failed to understand what Resnick and Haljday are saying.....
> > LOL. What I quoted seems to be very straightforward to me.
> > What do you think their words mean?
> Moron, then explain how only centripetal acceleration can maintain constant speed. Gee you are so fucking >stupid.
Better yet, explain how just the centripetal acceleration of the string can make the object whirling around in circles.
> > > par for the course.
> > >>> Sad.....that’s your knowledge of gravity.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> So if you’re wondering if it’s worthwhile to click on a free link to
> > >>>>>> something written by someone who can’t follow high school physics, don’t
> > >>>>>> bother.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

On Sunday, July 11, 2021 at 3:14:09 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> Michael Moroney <mor...@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote:
> > On 7/10/2021 8:52 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
> >> On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 8:37:30 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 3:08:17 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >>>>> Ken Seto could not pass high school physics now if he tried, really tried.
> >>>>> He’d get to the chapter on uniform circular motion and the explanation that
> >>>>> there is no equilibrium in uniform circular motion, and he’d just crap his
> >>>>> pants and toss up his hands.
> >>>>
> >>>> You can’t even understand how an object can whirl at the end of a string.
> >>>> You insisted that only centripetal acceleration involved. Sad.
> >>> Yup. At constant speed this is so.
> >>
> >> Idiot, there is no constant speed with just centripetal acceleration.
> >> Sad.....that’s your knowledge of gravity.
> >
> > Stupid Ken, in addition to all your other mistakes, you don't know the
> > difference between "speed" and "velocity" in science. So, rather than
> > learn, you made up your own definition. An object whirling at the end
> > of a string has a constant speed. It does not have a constant velocity.
> >
> He claims others don’t understand what they read, and HE is the one that
> doesn’t know what the words mean.

You don’t know what centripetal acceleration mean.
> --
> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

On 7/11/2021 7:39 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
> On Sunday, July 11, 2021 at 3:14:09 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Michael Moroney <mor...@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote:

>>> Stupid Ken, in addition to all your other mistakes, you don't know the
>>> difference between "speed" and "velocity" in science. So, rather than
>>> learn, you made up your own definition. An object whirling at the end
>>> of a string has a constant speed. It does not have a constant velocity.
>>>
>> He claims others don’t understand what they read, and HE is the one that
>> doesn’t know what the words mean.
>
> You don’t know what centripetal acceleration mean.

Let me guess, Stupid Ken. You just invented your very own definition of
"centripetal acceleration" because you don't know what the words mean,
and Odd doesn't know your definition.
Unfortunately for you, he does know the standard definition of it and he
doesn't care what your definition is.

On Monday, 12 July 2021 at 02:24:32 UTC+2, Michael Moroney wrote:

> Let me guess, Stupid Ken. You just invented your very own definition of
> "centripetal acceleration" because you don't know what the words mean,

Giant Guru has shown him the way.

On Sunday, July 11, 2021 at 8:24:32 PM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 7/11/2021 7:39 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 11, 2021 at 3:14:09 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> Michael Moroney <mor...@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote:
>
> >>> Stupid Ken, in addition to all your other mistakes, you don't know the
> >>> difference between "speed" and "velocity" in science. So, rather than
> >>> learn, you made up your own definition. An object whirling at the end
> >>> of a string has a constant speed. It does not have a constant velocity.
> >>>
> >> He claims others don’t understand what they read, and HE is the one that
> >> doesn’t know what the words mean.
> >
> > You don’t know what centripetal acceleration mean.
> Let me guess, Stupid Ken. You just invented your very own definition of
> "centripetal acceleration" because you don't know what the words mean,
> and Odd doesn't know your definition.
> Unfortunately for you, he does know the standard definition of it and he
> doesn't care what your definition is.

Moron, I don’t have a my own definition of centripetal acceleration.. You and Odd claimed that centripetal acceleration alone can make an object whirl around on the end of a string. I disagree. So I asked you and Odd how. Now you chicken shit sack of shit refuse to answer and tried to change the discussion to the definition of centripetal acceleration.