East-West light speed anisotropy experiment update.
---

Note:
Due to the relatively enormous force variations as the water flow
rate was varied in the Fizeau ether drag device, a positive result
would be absolutely impossible.
---

My device, which was designed to detect an east-west light speed
anisotropy, was based on Fizeau's device and it was never capable
of detecting the linear path length changes from source to screen.

Using my device, I also note a fringe shift when the water flow
rate is varied. I also know that it's generated entirely through
physical distortion in the body of the apparatus, because the
fringes that shift are generated from a single split beam which
doesn't involve the water path at all.

The Michelson/Morley interferometer, although extremely
sensitive to physical distortions in the body of the apparatus,
was also insensitive to linear changes along the light paths.
The same applies wherever a half silvered mirror is used to split
a light beam.

This movie will kick start my latest quest.
https://youtu.be/zkDRw1s4XlY

-----

Max Keon

maxke...@gmail.com wrote:

> My device, which was designed to detect an east-west light speed
> anisotropy, was based on Fizeau's device and it was never capable of
> detecting the linear path length changes from source to screen.

shocked to read, that the severely seemingly retard parasite, capitalist
Richard Branson, year 2021, with *your_money*, in the epicenter of
"corona", finally almost succeeded in what a russian *female_dog* named
*_Laika_* ("Лайка" - "the barking") accomplished *3_Nov_1957* using the
"super-galactic" now legendary *Sputnik_2 spaceship*!

If not mistaken the "astronaut" Laika went a bit farther than the
capitalist 80 km distance earth-space.

On 7/12/21 8:28 PM, maxke...@gmail.com wrote:
> Using my device, I also note a fringe shift when the water flow rate
> is varied. I also know that it's generated entirely through physical
> distortion in the body of the apparatus, because the fringes that
> shift are generated from a single split beam which doesn't involve
> the water path at all.

Yes, mechanical stability is essential, and VERY difficult at the
sub-wavelength level.

> The Michelson/Morley interferometer, although extremely sensitive to
> physical distortions in the body of the apparatus, was also
> insensitive to linear changes along the light paths.

Nonsense. We have a Michelson interferometer in our lab, with the arms
open in the air. Speaking is quite visible in its signal, due to
variations in air density; so is blowing across one arm.

[We use the Michelson interferometer to stabilize our
lasers, not any test of relativity.]

> This movie will kick start my latest quest.
> https://youtu.be/zkDRw1s4XlY

That apparatus is hopeless -- if the rotation axis differs from vertical
by a tiny amount, the variations in gravitational strain in the arm
will induce variations in length, which can be comparable to a
wavelength. Brillet and Hall estimated they were seeing a variation due
to being off vertical by a few microradians. Sun and moon affect the
local vertical by more than that as they vary in position relative to
the lab.

Tom Roberts

On Wednesday, 28 July 2021 at 19:30:51 UTC+2, tjrob137 wrote:
> On 7/12/21 8:28 PM, maxke...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Using my device, I also note a fringe shift when the water flow rate
> > is varied. I also know that it's generated entirely through physical
> > distortion in the body of the apparatus, because the fringes that
> > shift are generated from a single split beam which doesn't involve
> > the water path at all.
> Yes, mechanical stability is essential, and VERY difficult at the
> sub-wavelength level.

And we're all FORCED!!! To THE BEST WAY!!!! To the way
of our idiot guru!!!! (and his good doggie Tom).