novaBBS - sci.physics.relativity - Re: A dark matter galactic halo

A dark matter galactic halo

<58268feb-50cd-4262-8575-4b026851aa9bn@googlegroups.com>

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=63326&group=sci.physics.relativity#63326

copy link Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

X-Received: by 2002:a37:9504:: with SMTP id x4mr5638873qkd.235.1626378951545;
Thu, 15 Jul 2021 12:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:a90:: with SMTP id v16mr5709899qkg.150.1626378951424;
Thu, 15 Jul 2021 12:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 12:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:1c0:c802:3880:311e:e9e5:1ddf:7e7c;
posting-account=Dg6LkgkAAABl5NRBT4_iFEO1VO77GchW
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:1c0:c802:3880:311e:e9e5:1ddf:7e7c
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <58268feb-50cd-4262-8575-4b026851aa9bn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: A dark matter galactic halo
From: mitchrae...@gmail.com (mitchr...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 19:55:51 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

by: mitchr...@gmail.com - Thu, 15 Jul 2021 19:55 UTC

why is it there as it's special place?
Should it not be with all of the universe
instead?

And if it's gravitational tugging is from
all directions by that halo there would be no net
acceleration for the fast stars. that would average
instead.

Cosmology is right about galactic growth.
That is the reality of the fast stars.
Expansion carries them outward instead.
The old halo explanation does not work
but Cosmology does...

Mitchell Raemsch

Re: A dark matter galactic halo

<scrr20$1i7d$1@gioia.aioe.org>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=63338&group=sci.physics.relativity#63338

copy link Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!4mJQ5U1ewI+RfXvzupP5Cw.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: ntad...@gmail.com (Dieterich Whaples)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: A dark matter galactic halo
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:37:36 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <scrr20$1i7d$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <58268feb-50cd-4262-8575-4b026851aa9bn@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4mJQ5U1ewI+RfXvzupP5Cw.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.10.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2

by: Dieterich Whaples - Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:37 UTC

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> why is it there as it's special place?
> Should it not be with all of the universe instead?
>
> And if it's gravitational tugging is from all directions by that halo
> there would be no net acceleration for the fast stars. that would
> average instead.
>
> Cosmology is right about galactic growth.
> That is the reality of the fast stars.
> Expansion carries them outward instead.
> The old halo explanation does not work but Cosmology does...

the contracting event horizon has a smaller temperature so evaporation
slows down... science is waiting through the slower evaporation for the
explosion.

The horizon has to shrink to the singularity.

I've got a bad feeling about this.

tech / sci.physics.relativity / Re: A dark matter galactic halo

Subject	Author
A dark matter galactic halo	mitchr...@gmail.com
Re: A dark matter galactic halo	Dieterich Whaples