Using the dm. Everything works perfectly?

i6^2 = 36i^2 ==> i60^2 === 3'600i^2 = 36m^2
i6^3 = 216i^3 => i60^3 = 216'000i^3 = 216m^3

i9^2 = 81i^2 ==> i90^2 === 8'100i^2 = 81m^2
i9^3 = 729i^3 => i90^3 = 729'000i^3 = 729m^3

i10^2 = 100i^2 ==> i100^2 === 10'000i^2 = 100m^2
i10^3 = 1000i^3 => i100^3 = 1000'000i^3 = 1000m^3.

Maybe why do you think that: i10^2 = 10i?
Unfortunately it is false, since the T.d.i. intends:
i10^2 = 100i^2 = = 1m^2 ... How do you mean:
i10^3 = 1000i^3 = 1m^3.

It would seem that no one has ever understood that:
=> 5i *10i = 50i^2..said 0.5m^2..How will you understand that:
1i *5i *10i = 50i^3 ... incorrectly stated: 0.05 of 1000i^3.
In fact it is fully defined in 50kg. without commas ..

The logic is quite simple: consider "i" = relative.units
of all the integers, basically the T.n.p. 1/i = 10i/i..10/i = 100i
So ask yourself what could it be like If: i * 10i = i .. and i *100i = 10i?
As long as you do not apply this Principle you will continue to get it all wrong-;))

Basically the substance is made of dm. : 100i^2 is m^2..and 1000i^3 is m^3.
So it becomes fundamental: c * i^2 = 1hg and let i^3 = Unit Liter-kg-
1i, 2i, 4i.6i, 8i, 10i, 12i=1.2..14i=1.4..16i=1.6..18i=1.8..20i =2m..100i = 10.
So a healthy brain does not think 1 * 1 = 1..think 10i *10i = 100i^2- :)))

Greetings from Socratis T.n.p. 2i *2i *3i = 12i^3 ...2i *2 *3 =1200i^3 = 1.2m^3.

Using the dm. Everything works perfectly?

Simple ... when the dm is the minimum unit, so the m becomes 10dm ...
1i * 10i * 20i, embodies the perfection of calculation, and produces; 200i^3 ...
As you can see 1i, it is a perfect neutral ... while if I go down in Unit c, for example:
My i becomes 10c, so 10c * 100c * 200c = 200'000c^3 = 200 Liters kg.

However it is difficult for those who think, 1i * 10i * 20i = 0.1 * 1 * 2 = 0.2 = 2i.
Indeed, according to them; 0.1 * 10i = 0.1m, and not 0.1m^2; 0.1 * 20i becomes 0.2
and not 20i^2 = 0.2m^2- Strange they do everything according to m^2, without knowing
how does the system they claim to use and teach ...

Greetings from Socratis T.n.p. 3i * 4i * 5i = 60i^3 .... 3i * 4 * 5 = 6000i^3 = 6m^3.

Very simple .. when the dm is the minimum unit, so the m becomes 10dm ...
1i * 10i * 20i, embodies the perfection of three-dimensional calculation and
produces, correctly 1dm * 10dm * 20dm = 200dm^3 = 0.2m^3-

However it's hard to explain to idiots- :))
dm12^3 = 1728dm^3 ==> m12^3 = 1728m^3-
But, it's hard to get it into the mind of the idiots ..
since they don't understand that: 12m = 120dm ...
for which; dm120^3 = 1728'000i^3 = 1728m^3 - :)))

I apologize to the Ignorant Normals for being made Ignorant
by their teachers ... Idiots, Unable to reason. Socratis T.n.p - :)))

Arcane to reveal; The T.d.i. says 1; only when he makes 1m^2 Ex:

i * 1m => |__|__|__|__|__||__|__|__|__|__| = 10i^2 ==> therefore:
are Necessary; 10 strips of 10i^2 to have: 100i^2 ... = 1m^2
Which satisfies the product i * 100i = 100i^2-
Note: 10m/0.1 = 100i

c * 1m => ;__;__;__;__;__;;__;__;__;__;__; = i^2 =100c^2, therefore:
are needed; 100 strips of 100c^2, to have: 10'000c^2 = 100i^2:
Which satisfies the product c *10'000c = 10'0000c^2 = 100i^2
Note: 100m/0.01 = 10'000c.

• * 1m => •__•__•__•__•__•__•__•__•__•__• = 1000 •^2 ==> therefore:
It takes 1000 strips of 1000 •^2, to have: 1000'000 •^2 ===> 1m^2.
That satisfies the product •1*1000'000 •^2 = •1000 *1000• =100i^2
Note: 1000m/0.001 = 1000'000 •

Once I wondered; Since the Profs state : 10i * 10i = 10i?
Then why ; 1mm * 1m Shouldn't it produces ==> 10i-Linear?
Therefore now I know, that the Profs were wrong in denying the
logic of 10i * 10i= 100i^2,, Alias; c100 * 100c .... • 1000 * 1000 •.

The clever one tries, because he knows he doesn't know enough-
The Idiot, He doesn't search, because he counts on the nonsense he learns-
I don't know how many will be able to accept what I have sown!
And they will be able to say: c10 * 10c = 100c^2 ====> 0.01m^2.
Except for venial errors due to inattention => Socratis T.n.p.- :)))

i^3 + i2^3 + i3^3 + i4^3 == i *10i *10i = 100i^3-
i^3+i2^3+i3^3+i4^3+i5^3 = i *15i *15i= 225i^3-
It applies to any unit- : Rome. 22. June 2021-
T.n.p. = Theory. neutral. small. c10^3=1000c^3-

However, as an aspirant Logician, I seek, and sometimes resolve; Arcana.
Arcane to reveal; The T.d.i. says 1; only when he makes 1m^2 Ex:

i*1m => |__|__|__|__|__||__|__|__|__|__| = 10i^2 ===> pertanto :

=> 5i *2i = 10i^2 = 0.1m^2
=> 5i*20i = 100i^2
i1 *5i*20i = 100i^3 = 100kg.

c1*1m => ;__;__;__;__;__;;__;__;__;__;__; = 100c^2 ==> pertanto :

=> 5c * 2c = 10c^2
=> 5c *20c = 100c^2
c1 *5c *20c=100c^3 = 100g.

• *1m => •__•__•__•__•__••__•__•__•__•__• =1000•^2 ==> pertanto :

=> •5 * 2• = 10•^2
=> •5 * 20• = 100•^2
•1 *5• *20• = 100•^3 = 100mg.

Note: the difference between areas and volumes is made by the relative unit,
Therefore, no unit can be Truly Neutral, If it were
it would cripple both the squares and the volumes, which is what you do.

In fact, for you, 1m = 1m^2 = 1m^3. They are the same, and if that's not enough
Decimate; 1000i^2 saying: 1000i^2 * i = 1m. instead of 1000i^3.
What a beautiful thing ... 1000kg = 1kg ... 1000i = 10i ... Genius stuff ... Crazy - :)))

i^3 + i2^3 + i3^3 + i4^3 + i^5 == i *15i*15i= 225i^3-
i^3+i2^3+i3^3+i4^3+i5^3+i6^3 = i *21i *21i = 441i^3-
T.n.p.==> Teory. neutral. small. i*10i *100i= 1000i^3-

Note: the difference between areas and volumes is made by the relative unit,
Therefore, no unit can be Truly Neutral,, If it were
it would cripple both the squares and the volumes, which is what you do.
If You Wrong Squares and Volumes .what are you doing with Mathematics?

Indeed, for you; 0.1m = 0.1m^2 = 0.1m^3. They are the same,
and if not just Use 0.1 as a decimator and Not as a Unit factor-
So do 3 beautiful and Magical-Masonic-Mafia-Corrupted things:
1. burn the volumes in dm. Making them disappear-die-kill-deny-
2) decimate the squares in dm --- Steal-ridge-lie-ignore-
Don't you know that all squares are made from n. i^2 => 10i *20i = 200i^2
3) Don't pay taxes on stolen money = .delinquere sine causa-

You actually do the opposite of what you should: Bring the m to dm- so
200m = 2000i, make sure you have correct results :: i1 * 1i * 2000i = 2000i^3-
But what are you doing, you ignoramuses? 200m * 0.1 * 0.1 = 2m, Idiots stuff- :)))
I would like to point out that with the T.n.p. No one could be wrong, for two
very simple reasons; i1): 1i = Unit => i2): i1 * i1 * 2000i = Volume 3d.

i^3 + i2^3 + i3^3 + i4^3 + i5^3 + i6^3 = i * i21^2 = 441i^3-
i^3+i2^3+i3^3 + i4^3+i5^3+i6^3+i7^3 = i * i28^2 = 784i^3-
T.n.p. ==> Theory. neutral. small. i * 10i * 200i = 2000i^3-

If anyone were to feel hatred, for the one who corrects him, he would mean;
that ; He does not love Himself, nor the Truth that represses within Himself - :)

> If someone were to feel hatred, for the one who corrects him. It would mean;
> that; He doesn't love Himself, nor the Truth that represses within Himself - :)

Choose the only True and Excellent System, La T.n.p.
0.1 * 0.1 * 100 = 1? but 1 What? T.n.p. It lights you up ...
i1 * i1 * 1000i = 1000i^3 = 1m^3- ==> like:
m1 * m1 * 1000m = 1000m^3.

Greetings from Barbara T.n.p. ii * iiiii = 10i^2 = 20c *50c = 1000c^2 = 0.1m^2-
i * 2i * 5i ==============> 10i^3 = 10-kg => for i^3 = 1kg.
10c*20c*50c = 10'000c^3 = 10kg. = 0.01m^3
Nobody, Intelligent, could dispute the perfection of T.n.p.
In fact, only the idiots who do not understand their system contest it.

If someone were to cultivate hatred, for those who correct him, it would mean;
that ; He does not love Himself, nor the Truth that represses within Himself

Use the only True and Excellent System, La T.n.p.
0.1 * 0.2 * 100 = 2 ? but 2 What ? T.n.p. Enlightens you ...
i1 * i2 * 1000i = 2000i^3 = 2m^3- ==> like:
m1 * m2 * 1000m = 2000m^3.

Greetings from Barbara T.n.p. iii * iiiii = 15i^2 = 30c *50c =1500c^2 = 0.15m^2-
i * 3i * 5i = 15i^3 = 15-kg = 10c * 30c * 50c = 15'000c^3 = 15kg. = 0.015m^3
Nobody, who reasons, could dispute the perfection of T.n.p.

In fact, only the idiots who do not understand 1dm^3 = 1L.1kg contest it.
how would they understand that 2i *2 *3 = 1.2m^3 ... They just need 1.2 = 12dm-
2dm + 20dm + 30dm = 52dm ... who knows why 52dm would produce 12dm- :)
Actually 2 * 3 = 600i^2 * 2i = 1200i^3 which proves 0.2 = 2dm = 2i = 20c-
Until they understand that the dm..are true fundamental units of
Mathematical system, they will remain Imbeciles who will be wrong forever- :))

Poor Students will be informed that 2i * 20i * 30i = 1.2 = 12.dm.
We make the product in cm, 0.2 = 20cm, 2m = 200c, 3m = 300c. Then ;
20c * 200c * 300c = 1'200'000c^3 = 1200.L-kg = 1.2m^3- Barbara T.n.p.- :))

If someone were to cultivate hatred, for those who correct him, it would mean:
that ; He does not love, neither Himself, nor the Truth that represses within Himself.
Basically: to those who have it will be given, to those who do not have, that nothing that he has will be taken away.
Because those who cannot manage the little, he would not be able to manage the much.

If 100c * 100c made 100c, then 10c * 10c would be enough to make 100c, so
the script doesn't think enough, it just says that 1/4 *4 = 1, which is false,
Since 25c * 400c = 10'000c^2 = 1m^2.
If anything, it could say that 25c * 4c = 100c = 1m.Lin. But he doesn't see that
For him ; 0.25 * 0.04 = 0.01..alias 1cm, but in truth it is wrong to say 10c * 10c = 1c.
Unfortunately he is not oriented to understand that it is 10c * 10c = 0.01m^2 = 100c^2.

Their problem is the misuse of the system they claim to modify
But if all this results in the loss of the current Volumes, there is a serious problem
To be eradicated as soon as possible.

Who could help you is the T.n.p. starting from mm^3 = 1mg. and therefore if it
it does not care to give an account to the big square and cubone, as it has squares and
cubes, in its 4 sets, from mm^3 = 1mg, to cm^3 = 1g, to dm^3 = 1kg, to m^3 = 1000kg ..

I remind you that I write exclusively for Passion, Love, Truth and Justice ...
Therefore I have a small allergy to; cheaters, false, selfish, deluded,. how much idiots
But I know, for sure, that T.n.p. It will be the end of suffering: yours and the world- :))

i * i * i = 1kg. Confirmed by 10c * 10c *10c = 1000c^3 = 1000g. = 1kg.
i * i * 10i = 10i^3 Confirmed by 10c * 10c * 100c = 10'000c^3 === 10kg.
i * 10i * 0i = 100i^3 Confirmed by 10c * 100c *100c = 100'000c^3 = 100kg.
10i*10i*10i = 1000i^3 -It is difficult to explain reality, to idiots as well as blind.

Se qualcuno dovesse coltivare odio, per chi lo corregge.vorrebbe dire :
che ; Egli non ama; né Se stesso; né la Verità che reprime dentro di Se.
In fondo : a chi ha sarà dato, e, a chi non ha sarà tolto, quel niente che ha.
Poiché chi non sa gestire il poco, non sarà in grado di gestire il molto.

Se 100c *100c facesse 100c, allora basterebbe 10c *10c a fare 100c, quindi
il copione, non ragiona abbastanza, e, si limita a dire che 1/4*4 =1, che è falso,
Visto che 25c *400c =10'000c^2 = 1m^2.

Semmai, potrebbe dire che 25c *4c = 100c = 1m.Lin. Ma non lo fa, visto che :
per Lui ; 0.25 *0.04 = 0.01..alias 1cm, ma in verità sbaglia nel dire 10c*10c=1c.
Purtroppo non si orienta a capire che si tratta di 10c * 10c = 0.01m^2 = 100c^2.

Il loro problema consiste nel cattivo uso del sistema che pretendono di manipolare
Se tutto questo produce la perdita dei Volumi correnti, esiste un grave problema da
estirpare nel più breve tempo possibile.
Vi potrebbe aiutare è la T.n.p. che comincia dal mm^3 = 1mg. e pertanto se ne
frega di rendere conto al quadratone e cubone, in quanto gode di quadratini e
volumi, nei suoi 4 insiemi, dal 1•^3=1mg, a 1c^3 =1g, a 1i^3 =1kg, a 1m^3=1000kg..

Ti ricordo che, scrivo esclusivamente per Passione, Amore, Verità e Giustizia...
Per cui ho una piccola allergia per; imbroglioni, falsi, egoisti, illusi condizionati-
Ma so, bene, che la T.n.p. Sarà la fine della sofferenza : Vostra e del Mondo-:)))

i * i * i = 1kg. confermato da 10c *10c *10c =1000c^3 =1000g. = 1kg..
i *i *10i = 10i^3 confermato da 10c *10c *100c = 10'000c^3 ===> 10kg.
i *10i *10i = 100i^3 confermato da 10c*100c*100c =100'000c^3 =100kg.
10i*10i*10i = 1000i^3 -E' difficile spiegare la realtà, agli idioti condizionati-

Jill Pipher, Ken Ribet of AMS are math failures. Because both are too lazy and too dumb in mathematics to do what a High School student can do-- drop a Kerr or Mason lid inside a paper cone and see that the slant of the circle lid causes a crescent shape area to be added onto the circle, forming a OVAL, never the ellipse.

But of course both Pipher and Ribet are failures and losers of mathematics and still teach their propaganda that the slant cut is a ellipse.

Both Pipher and Ribet are such failures of geometry that they still believe a single cone with 1 axis of symmetry can yield a ellipse with 2 axes of symmetry, how stupid is that????

Both Pipher and Ribet should be fired out of the AMS as math propagandists and math failures.

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
•
•

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 26Jan2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.

Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.

In November of 2019, I was challenged to make the definition of Oval a well defined definition. I took up that task, and fortunately I waited a long time since, 2016, my discovery that the oval was the slant cut into a cone, not the ellipse. I say fortunately because you need physics in order to make a well defined definition of oval. You need the knowledge of physics, that electricity is perpendicular to magnetism and this perpendicularity is crucial in a well defined definition of oval. When I discovered the ellipse was never a conic in 2016, I probably could not have well defined the oval at that time, because I needed the 3 years intervening to catch up on a lot of physics, but by November 2019, I was ready willing and able. Then in August of 2020, I discovered a third new proof of Ellipse is a cylinder section never a conic section, using solid 3rd dimension geometry of ovoid and ellipsoid.

Cover picture is a cone and a cylinder on a cutting board and that is an appropriate base to place those two figures because sectioning means cutting, and the cuts we want to make into a single cone and a cylinder is a slant cut not a cut parallel to the base of the figures, nor a cut that leaves the figure open ended but a slant cut that leaves the figure a closed loop.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 2021 KB
• Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 50 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#11-2, 11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

Copying is fine, but it is not enough to improve ... the system ...
It happens that some bad things, must be Eliminated, to be wrong ..
in the basic concepts on which they have been made so difficult for anyone.

Unfortunately, do not look for how: squares and volumes can and must be unified !!
So I think it is necessary, that all squares must exist: 100i^2 inclusive.That they marry
with the volumes to facilitate the T.d.i. system. which is now very difficult to understand.

4i *11i= 44i^2 ==> 1i *4i *11i = 44i^3
4i * 6i = 24i^2 ==> 1i * 4i *6i == 24i^3
To unify them, just a simple dm =1i..What are you waiting for? The witch ?

../////////////////// /////////////////////////.|
|__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__||__| ..| => 4i *11i =44i^2 =>1i *4i *11i =44i^3
|__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__||__| ..|
|__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__||__| ..| => 2i *11i =22i^2 ==>1i *2i *11i =22i^3
|__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__||__|./===>1i *11i=11i^2 ==>1i *1i *11i =11i^3

The beauty...that you don't appreciate, is ..that: 50i^2..would marry 50i^3 ...
I hope that in the near future, anyone who can solve the volumes, but
even everything that is now a complicated and labyrinth of divided functions !!

If I think that 5dm *10dm =5dm..I think you are looking for it..for free the misfortunes.
If you confuse 5dm, with 50dm^2, I feel sorry for you and I'm sorry for you, But,
I hope you will make up for it for the world .. Whole that for now, force.to
tell you: 1dm *5dm *10dm =0.05 =5cm, instead of 50dm^3? 50.Litri- :))

Saluti T.n.p.7^3 + 11^3 = 18* (77+16)= 1674m^3
========> 8^3 + 11^2 = 19* (88 +9) = 1843m^3
========> 9^3 + 11^3 = 20* (99 +4) = 2060m^3
=======> 10^3 + 11^3 = 21*(110+1) = 2331m^3

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jill Pipher, Ken Ribet of AMS are math failures. Because both are too
> lazy and too dumb in mathematics to do what a High School student can
> do-- drop a Kerr or Mason lid inside a paper cone and see that the
> slant of the circle lid causes a crescent shape area to be added onto
> the circle, forming a OVAL, never the ellipse.

Not so lazy as Archimedes Plutonium, who has never tried to drop an
actual cardboard ellipse inside a paper cone. Any reasonable sized
ellipse. Not once.

Had he done so, he would have found that the ellipse fits perfectly
inside the cone, no gaps anywhere.

This shows that an ellipse (which is one variety of "oval") IS a conic
section. I would guess (though I don't know) that such a conic section
was originally the definition of an ellipse.

You should also be aware that the distinguished mathematicians you
continually slagg off have no interest in conic sections. It's 2,000
years and more since they were at the forefront of mathematical research.
What they are now doing is completely beyond your (and my) understanding.

A bit of respect for them would not go amiss.

--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).