Kip Thorne declares that Newton's theory predicted no gravitational deflection of starlight:

Kip Thorne: "A second crucial proof of the breakdown in Newtonian gravity was the relativistic bending of light. Einstein's theory predicted that starlight passing near the limb of the sun should be deflected by 1.75 seconds of arc, whereas NEWTON'S LAW PREDICTED NO DEFLECTION. Observations during the 1919 eclipse of the sun in Brazil, carried out by Sir Arthur Eddington and his British colleagues, brilliantly confirmed Einstein's prediction to an accuracy of about 20 percent. This dealt the final death blow to Newton's law and to most other relativistic theories of gravity." http://commons.erau.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3169&context=space-congress-proceedings

Here is a less dishonest Einsteinian:

Sabine Hossenfelder: "As light carries energy and is thus subject of gravitational attraction, a ray of light passing by a massive body should be slightly bent towards it. This is so both in Newton's theory of gravity and in Einstein's, but Einstein's deflection is by a factor two larger than Newton's. [...] As history has it, Eddington's original data actually wasn't good enough to make that claim with certainty. His measurements had huge error bars due to bad weather and he also might have cherry-picked his data because he liked Einstein's theory a little too much. Shame on him." http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2015/04/a-wonderful-100th-anniversary-gift-for.html

Another blatant lie. Kip Thorne: "If you move toward the [light] source, you see the wavelength shortened but you don't see the speed changed" https://youtu.be/mvdlN4H4T54?t=296

Here is an observer moving toward the light source:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE

Does the wavelength (distance between light pulses) shorten in front of the moving observer? Obviously not. Rather, the frequency and the speed of the pulses increase proportionally for him, in violation of Einstein's relativity.

See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev

Pentcho Valev wrote:

> Sabine Hossenfelder: "As light carries energy and is thus subject of
> gravitational attraction, a ray of light passing by a massive body
> should be slightly bent towards it. This is so both in Newton's theory
> of gravity and in Einstein's, but Einstein's deflection is by a factor
> two larger than Newton's. [...] As history has it, Eddington's original
> data actually wasn't good enough to make that claim with certainty. His
> measurements had huge error bars due to bad weather and he also might
> have cherry-picked his data because he liked Einstein's theory a little
> too much. Shame on him."

UK. Those who only received the *placebo* are considered fully vaccinated
https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=R6B82OWRS7HB