Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Using TSO is like kicking a dead whale down the beach. -- S. C. Johnson

tech / sci.math / Re: Prolog is a language from the 70's and Prologers still use 70's approaches

SubjectAuthor
* Prolog is a language from the 70's and Prologers still use 70's approachesMostowski Collapse
`* Re: Prolog is a language from the 70's and Prologers still use 70'sFred Gattus
 `* Re: Prolog is a language from the 70's and Prologers still use 70'sMostowski Collapse
  `* Re: Prolog is a language from the 70's and Prologers still use 70'sFred Gattus
   `- Re: Prolog is a language from the 70's and Prologers still use 70's approachesMostowski Collapse

1
Prolog is a language from the 70's and Prologers still use 70's approaches

<cec9aaaa-2c69-47e0-af67-752f81d04e50n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=65185&group=sci.math#65185

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a37:a34a:: with SMTP id m71mr8493517qke.490.1625385380249;
Sun, 04 Jul 2021 00:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:6088:: with SMTP id u130mr10332849ybb.257.1625385380017;
Sun, 04 Jul 2021 00:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2021 00:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.57.53.70; posting-account=UjEXBwoAAAAOk5fiB8WdHvZddFg9nJ9r
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.57.53.70
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <cec9aaaa-2c69-47e0-af67-752f81d04e50n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Prolog is a language from the 70's and Prologers still use 70's approaches
From: burse...@gmail.com (Mostowski Collapse)
Injection-Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2021 07:56:20 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: Mostowski Collapse - Sun, 4 Jul 2021 07:56 UTC

I just wonder how somebody could post such a response:

There isn't in the standard any assertz/1 directive, only
an assertz/1 built-in predicate. A standard compliant version
of that code is:

:- initialization((
assertz(foo(bar)),
assertz(foo(baz))
)).

https://github.com/tau-prolog/tau-prolog/issues/252#issuecomment-860217540

So where does intialization/1 come from? Well its some 70's
nonsense, when compilers were multipass.

Re: Prolog is a language from the 70's and Prologers still use 70's approaches

<sbs8t9$1s0r$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=65199&group=sci.math#65199

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!gGhdzq/fJ2GKCExOV9FjOQ.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: fre...@wrdncas.mx (Fred Gattus)
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Prolog is a language from the 70's and Prologers still use 70's
approaches
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2021 12:17:45 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <sbs8t9$1s0r$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <cec9aaaa-2c69-47e0-af67-752f81d04e50n@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gGhdzq/fJ2GKCExOV9FjOQ.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: SoupGate-Win32/1.04 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Fred Gattus - Sun, 4 Jul 2021 12:17 UTC

Mostowski Collapse wrote:

> I just wonder how somebody could post such a response:
>
> There isn't in the standard any assertz/1 directive, only an assertz/1
> built-in predicate. A standard compliant version of that code is:
> :- initialization(( assertz(foo(bar)), assertz(foo(baz)) )).
> https://github.com/tau-prolog/tau-prolog/issues/
252#issuecomment-860217540
> So where does intialization/1 come from? Well its some 70's nonsense,
> when compilers were multipass.

you mean multipass *parsers* not compilers. Compilers includes many other
things. But prolog is sort of honeypot to attract morons. You kiss ass.
It always is been like that.

Re: Prolog is a language from the 70's and Prologers still use 70's approaches

<sbsf8k$tg4$1@solani.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=65214&group=sci.math#65214

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeder5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: janbu...@fastmail.fm (Mostowski Collapse)
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Prolog is a language from the 70's and Prologers still use 70's
approaches
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2021 16:06:07 +0200
Message-ID: <sbsf8k$tg4$1@solani.org>
References: <cec9aaaa-2c69-47e0-af67-752f81d04e50n@googlegroups.com>
<sbs8t9$1s0r$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2021 14:06:12 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
logging-data="30212"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:60.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.8
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FhmyzvTPD+YnmN0dqO7NQ30sgIY=
X-User-ID: eJwNxMERACEIA8CWBEkcygE0/Zdwt4/FpnFOEAwIYr3C9F/2RccA8uLlAhXOTIO0yidbx9c2fzMxRVh28wN12RYa
In-Reply-To: <sbs8t9$1s0r$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 by: Mostowski Collapse - Sun, 4 Jul 2021 14:06 UTC

No I mean compilers.
Incremental insitu compilers.

Fred Gattus schrieb:
> Mostowski Collapse wrote:
>
>> I just wonder how somebody could post such a response:
>>
>> There isn't in the standard any assertz/1 directive, only an assertz/1
>> built-in predicate. A standard compliant version of that code is:
>> :- initialization(( assertz(foo(bar)), assertz(foo(baz)) )).
>> https://github.com/tau-prolog/tau-prolog/issues/
> 252#issuecomment-860217540
>> So where does intialization/1 come from? Well its some 70's nonsense,
>> when compilers were multipass.
>
> you mean multipass *parsers* not compilers. Compilers includes many other
> things. But prolog is sort of honeypot to attract morons. You kiss ass.
> It always is been like that.
>

Re: Prolog is a language from the 70's and Prologers still use 70's approaches

<sbsjmt$10nv$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=65223&group=sci.math#65223

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!i7o2SE/wdlps/e8I4h8RQQ.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: fre...@wrdncas.mx (Fred Gattus)
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Prolog is a language from the 70's and Prologers still use 70's
approaches
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2021 15:22:06 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <sbsjmt$10nv$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <cec9aaaa-2c69-47e0-af67-752f81d04e50n@googlegroups.com>
<sbs8t9$1s0r$1@gioia.aioe.org> <sbsf8k$tg4$1@solani.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: i7o2SE/wdlps/e8I4h8RQQ.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: SoupGate-Win32/1.04 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Fred Gattus - Sun, 4 Jul 2021 15:22 UTC

Mostowski Collapse wrote:

> No I mean compilers. Incremental insitu compilers.
>
> Fred Gattus schrieb:
>> Mostowski Collapse wrote:
>>
>>> I just wonder how somebody could post such a response:
>>>
>>> There isn't in the standard any assertz/1 directive, only an assertz/1
>>> built-in predicate. A standard compliant version of that code is:
>>> :- initialization(( assertz(foo(bar)), assertz(foo(baz)) )).
>>> https://github.com/tau-prolog/tau-prolog/issues/
>> 252#issuecomment-860217540
>>> So where does intialization/1 come from? Well its some 70's nonsense,
>>> when compilers were multipass.
>>
>> you mean multipass *parsers* not compilers. Compilers includes many
>> other things. But prolog is sort of honeypot to attract morons. You
>> kiss ass.
>> It always is been like that.
>>

then you don't know what you mean, prolog is a imperative scripting
language, above an *interpreter*, not compiler.

however, why on earth the *needles* on those injection bio-weapons are
*black*!! Can't believe what is to see going on in capitalist america.

BREAKING: VACCINE KILLS OVER 100 PEOPLE PER DAY AND OFFERS NO PROTECTION
AGAINST COVID
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Lz8i8ock23WO/

Re: Prolog is a language from the 70's and Prologers still use 70's approaches

<025958d9-0080-43db-89e9-940cb2445613n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=65300&group=sci.math#65300

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a37:9445:: with SMTP id w66mr10972503qkd.410.1625431277214;
Sun, 04 Jul 2021 13:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:b98d:: with SMTP id r13mr13378970ybg.430.1625431277065;
Sun, 04 Jul 2021 13:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2021 13:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <sbsjmt$10nv$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.57.53.70; posting-account=UjEXBwoAAAAOk5fiB8WdHvZddFg9nJ9r
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.57.53.70
References: <cec9aaaa-2c69-47e0-af67-752f81d04e50n@googlegroups.com>
<sbs8t9$1s0r$1@gioia.aioe.org> <sbsf8k$tg4$1@solani.org> <sbsjmt$10nv$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <025958d9-0080-43db-89e9-940cb2445613n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Prolog is a language from the 70's and Prologers still use 70's approaches
From: burse...@gmail.com (Mostowski Collapse)
Injection-Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2021 20:41:17 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2612
 by: Mostowski Collapse - Sun, 4 Jul 2021 20:41 UTC

Is that you micro penis?

Fred Gattus schrieb am Sonntag, 4. Juli 2021 um 17:22:19 UTC+2:
> Mostowski Collapse wrote:
>
> > No I mean compilers. Incremental insitu compilers.
> >
> > Fred Gattus schrieb:
> >> Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> >>
> >>> I just wonder how somebody could post such a response:
> >>>
> >>> There isn't in the standard any assertz/1 directive, only an assertz/1
> >>> built-in predicate. A standard compliant version of that code is:
> >>> :- initialization(( assertz(foo(bar)), assertz(foo(baz)) )).
> >>> https://github.com/tau-prolog/tau-prolog/issues/
> >> 252#issuecomment-860217540
> >>> So where does intialization/1 come from? Well its some 70's nonsense,
> >>> when compilers were multipass.
> >>
> >> you mean multipass *parsers* not compilers. Compilers includes many
> >> other things. But prolog is sort of honeypot to attract morons. You
> >> kiss ass.
> >> It always is been like that.
> >>
> then you don't know what you mean, prolog is a imperative scripting
> language, above an *interpreter*, not compiler.
>
> however, why on earth the *needles* on those injection bio-weapons are
> *black*!! Can't believe what is to see going on in capitalist america.
>
> BREAKING: VACCINE KILLS OVER 100 PEOPLE PER DAY AND OFFERS NO PROTECTION
> AGAINST COVID
> https://www.bitchute.com/video/Lz8i8ock23WO/

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor