My historic geometric theorem of January 2020 was a devastating blow to the cranks in mainstream academia:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uIBgJ1ObroIbkt0V2YFQEpPdd8l-xK6y

What it so cleverly reveals is that their formulation is flawed and fundamentally a fraud. This knowledge was realised from the New Calculus which is a flawless formulation - the first in human history.

But exactly how ignorant and stupid are mainstream math professors?

Find out here:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1520NjhgiakcrssQxtbxRCDXus_aHXpI9

On Tuesday, 6 July 2021 at 12:17:30 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> My historic geometric theorem of January 2020 was a devastating blow to the cranks in mainstream academia:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uIBgJ1ObroIbkt0V2YFQEpPdd8l-xK6y
>
> What it so cleverly reveals is that their formulation is flawed and fundamentally a fraud. This knowledge was realised from the New Calculus which is a flawless formulation - the first in human history.
>
> But exactly how ignorant and stupid are mainstream math professors?
>
> Find out here:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1520NjhgiakcrssQxtbxRCDXus_aHXpI9

There is a very fancy Geogebra applet for those who want to see my historic geometric theorem in action:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ON1GQ7b6UNpZSEEsbG14eAFCPv8p03pv

and a more fancy version in Greek language:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/120g3VfFFqAzyZWHzHljXZYuWYpl5kUDB

On Tuesday, 6 July 2021 at 19:54:45 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Tuesday, 6 July 2021 at 12:17:30 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > My historic geometric theorem of January 2020 was a devastating blow to the cranks in mainstream academia:
> >
> > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj
> >
> > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uIBgJ1ObroIbkt0V2YFQEpPdd8l-xK6y
> >
> > What it so cleverly reveals is that their formulation is flawed and fundamentally a fraud. This knowledge was realised from the New Calculus which is a flawless formulation - the first in human history.
> >
> > But exactly how ignorant and stupid are mainstream math professors?
> >
> > Find out here:
> >
> > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1520NjhgiakcrssQxtbxRCDXus_aHXpI9
> There is a very fancy Geogebra applet for those who want to see my historic geometric theorem in action:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ON1GQ7b6UNpZSEEsbG14eAFCPv8p03pv
>
> and a more fancy version in Greek language:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/120g3VfFFqAzyZWHzHljXZYuWYpl5kUDB

Students:

Seeing is the first step to believing. Try out the applet with any smooth function you like and see it work. You won't be sorry you did. The applet is easy to use and you can change the function by typing f(x)= followed by your choice in the input area at the bottom of the app.

On Tuesday, 6 July 2021 at 19:56:54 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Tuesday, 6 July 2021 at 19:54:45 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 6 July 2021 at 12:17:30 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > My historic geometric theorem of January 2020 was a devastating blow to the cranks in mainstream academia:
> > >
> > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj
> > >
> > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uIBgJ1ObroIbkt0V2YFQEpPdd8l-xK6y
> > >
> > > What it so cleverly reveals is that their formulation is flawed and fundamentally a fraud. This knowledge was realised from the New Calculus which is a flawless formulation - the first in human history.
> > >
> > > But exactly how ignorant and stupid are mainstream math professors?
> > >
> > > Find out here:
> > >
> > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1520NjhgiakcrssQxtbxRCDXus_aHXpI9
> > There is a very fancy Geogebra applet for those who want to see my historic geometric theorem in action:
> >
> > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ON1GQ7b6UNpZSEEsbG14eAFCPv8p03pv
> >
> > and a more fancy version in Greek language:
> >
> > https://drive.google.com/file/d/120g3VfFFqAzyZWHzHljXZYuWYpl5kUDB
> Students:
>
> Seeing is the first step to believing. Try out the applet with any smooth function you like and see it work. You won't be sorry you did. The applet is easy to use and you can change the function by typing f(x)= followed by your choice in the input area at the bottom of the app.

My goal is to leave this world a better place than how I found it. I bear no malice to those who are truly interested in learning mathematics but am brutal to those fools who should know better but apparently do not and think it's fine to spread their ignorance and their stupidity. I have to say I hate them. I shouldn't hate anyone but I cannot stop hating mainstream academics who libel and denigrate my name. They are lower than the scum of the earth to me.

On Tuesday, July 6, 2021 at 12:17:30 PM UTC-4, I am Super Rectum (aka John Gabriel, Troll Boy) wrote:
> My historic geometric theorem of January 2020 was a devastating blow to the cranks in mainstream academia:
>

Only in your wet dreams, Troll Boy.

WARNING TO STUDENTS: Don't become a victim of JG's fake math

JG here claims to have a discovered as shortcut to mastering calculus without using limits. Unfortunately for him, this means he has no workable a definition of the derivative of a function. It blows up for functions as simple f(x)=|x|. Or even f(x)=0. As a result, he has had to ban 0, negative numbers and instantaneous rates of change rendering his goofy little system quite useless. What a moron!

Forget calculus. JG has also banned all axioms because he cannot even derive the most elementary results of basic arithmetic, e.g. 2+2=4. Such results require the use of axioms, so he must figure he's now off the hook. Again, what a moron!

Even at his advanced age (60+?), John Gabriel is STILL struggling with basic, elementary-school arithmetic. As he has repeatedly posted here:

"There are no points on a line."
--April 12, 2021

"Pi is NOT a number of ANY kind!"
--July 10, 2020

"1/2 not equal to 2/4"
--October 22, 2017

“1/3 does NOT mean 1 divided by 3 and never has meant that”
-- February 8, 2015

"3 =< 4 is nonsense.”
--October 28, 2017

"Zero is not a number."
-- Dec. 2, 2019

"0 is not required at all in mathematics, just like negative numbers."
-- Jan. 4, 2017

“There is no such thing as an empty set.”
--Oct. 4, 2019

“3 <=> 2 + 1 or 3 <=> 8 - 5, etc, are all propositions” (actually all are meaningless gibberish)
--Oct. 22, 2019

No math genius our JG, though he actually lists his job title as “mathematician” at Linkedin.com. Apparently, they do not verify your credentials.

Though really quite disturbing, interested readers should see: “About the spamming troll John Gabriel in his own words...” (lasted updated March 10, 2020) at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.math/PcpAzX5pDeY/1PDiSlK_BwAJ

Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my Math Blog a http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

On Tuesday, 6 July 2021 at 20:00:09 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Tuesday, 6 July 2021 at 19:56:54 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 6 July 2021 at 19:54:45 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 6 July 2021 at 12:17:30 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > My historic geometric theorem of January 2020 was a devastating blow to the cranks in mainstream academia:
> > > >
> > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj
> > > >
> > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uIBgJ1ObroIbkt0V2YFQEpPdd8l-xK6y
> > > >
> > > > What it so cleverly reveals is that their formulation is flawed and fundamentally a fraud. This knowledge was realised from the New Calculus which is a flawless formulation - the first in human history.
> > > >
> > > > But exactly how ignorant and stupid are mainstream math professors?
> > > >
> > > > Find out here:
> > > >
> > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1520NjhgiakcrssQxtbxRCDXus_aHXpI9
> > > There is a very fancy Geogebra applet for those who want to see my historic geometric theorem in action:
> > >
> > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ON1GQ7b6UNpZSEEsbG14eAFCPv8p03pv
> > >
> > > and a more fancy version in Greek language:
> > >
> > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/120g3VfFFqAzyZWHzHljXZYuWYpl5kUDB
> > Students:
> >
> > Seeing is the first step to believing. Try out the applet with any smooth function you like and see it work. You won't be sorry you did. The applet is easy to use and you can change the function by typing f(x)= followed by your choice in the input area at the bottom of the app.
> My goal is to leave this world a better place than how I found it. I bear no malice to those who are truly interested in learning mathematics but am brutal to those fools who should know better but apparently do not and think it's fine to spread their ignorance and their stupidity. I have to say I hate them. I shouldn't hate anyone but I cannot stop hating mainstream academics who libel and denigrate my name. They are lower than the scum of the earth to me.

Students:

Pay attention to that which matters, not what my haters and enemies are constantly spewing out.

The fact that they are continuously attacking me and not addressing the topic (which they can't!) should speak volumes to you!

7/6/2021 Anonymous coward and king troll of sci.math Dan Christensen spammed:

> "There are no points on a line."

Lie. I never said that. What I did say is that a line does not consists of points. When we talk about points on a line, we really mean distances that are indicated much like road signs do for distances travelled along a road.

A line one of innumerable distances between any two points.
A straight line is the shortest distance between two points.

> "Pi is NOT a number of ANY kind!"

True. Pi is merely a symbol for an incommensurable magnitude - apparently a concept too advanced for an imbecile like Dan Christensen.

> "1/2 not equal to 2/4"

Lie. I have NEVER said this. What I have talked about is the difference in the process of measure.
What does this mean? Well, 1/2 is the name given to a measure done by enumerating 1 of two equal parts of the unit.
2/4 is the name given to a measure done by enumerating 2 of four equal parts of the unit.

There is the case in geometry where 1/2 is not necessarily equal to 2/4. For example:

_ / _ _
_ _ / _ _ _ _

The length _ is not equal to the length _ _ .

> “1/3 does NOT mean 1 divided by 3 and never has meant that”

True. My brilliant article on how a genius mind discovers number and indeed how my brilliant ancestors (Ancient Greeks) realised number explains in detail:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hasWyQCZyRN3RkdvIB6bnGIVV2Rabz8w

Also, my article on pi not being a number of any kind:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FFg_9XCkIwTZ9N1jbU4oMYfHHHuFHYf3

The true story of how we got numbers:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-mOEooW03iLYTg1TGY4RTIwakU

No such thing as a "real number" or a "real number line":

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-mOEooW03iLMHVYcE8xcmRZRnc

There is no valid construction of "real number" - it's a myth:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-mOEooW03iLSTROakNyVXlQUEU

> "3 =< 4 is nonsense.”

True. In mathematics, it is called an invalid disjunction.

3 <= 4 means EITHER 3 < 4 OR 3 = 4

Actually, there is no "OR" part, so the logical disjunction is invalid.

> "Zero is not a number."

True. While not a number of any kind, it is very useful in mathematics.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1w2tt7IgoIu-ychDCoYi-4jOAzToy0ViM

> "0 is not required at all in mathematics, just like negative numbers."

Half-truth. While negative numbers are not required in mathematics, they are extremely useful.

> “There is no such thing as an empty set.”

True. Even the father of all mainstream mathematical cranks rejected the idea of empty set. But let's not go too far ... there isn't even a definition of "set" in set theory!

https://youtu.be/KvxjOMW6Q9w

https://youtu.be/1CcSsOG0okg

> “3 <=> 2 + 1 or 3 <=> 8 - 5, etc, are all propositions” (actually all are meaningless gibberish)

True. These are propositions that are implied by the given equations. For example, my historic geometric identity states:

[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h = dy/dx + Q(x,h)

And so, f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> dy/dx + Q(x,h)

The theorem:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj

How it provides a rigorous definition of integral for the flawed mainstream calculus:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uIBgJ1ObroIbkt0V2YFQEpPdd8l-xK6y

> Though really quite disturbing, interested readers should see: “About the spamming troll John Gabriel in his own words...” (lasted updated March 10, 2020) at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.math/PcpAzX5pDeY/1PDiSlK_BwAJ

The day will come when this vicious anonymous troll Dan Christensen is convicted in a court of law.

Download for free the most important mathematics book ever written:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/view

Eram semper recta wrote:

> 7/6/2021 Anonymous coward and king troll of sci.math Dan Christensen
> spammed: "There are no points on a line."
>
> Lie. I never said that. What I did say is that a line does not consists
> of points. When we talk about points on a line, we really mean distances
> that are indicated much like road signs do for distances travelled along
> a road.

Trump is not my president, he was always reading the Snake Poem
before and even after he got elected, with the most colloquial part
being…., “YOU KNEW I WAS A SNAKE BEFORE YOU TOOK ME IN.”
Now we know what he meant, he’d be the one to head Operation Warp
Speed to inject the snake fangs (vaccine needles) filled with poison
into the arms of the WHOLE WORLD.

On Sunday, 11 July 2021 at 05:15:43 UTC-4, Lwane Houser wrote:
> Eram semper recta wrote:
>
> > 7/6/2021 Anonymous coward and king troll of sci.math Dan Christensen
> > spammed: "There are no points on a line."
> >
> > Lie. I never said that. What I did say is that a line does not consists
> > of points. When we talk about points on a line, we really mean distances
> > that are indicated much like road signs do for distances travelled along
> > a road.
> Trump is not my president, he was always reading the Snake Poem
> before and even after he got elected, with the most colloquial part
> being…., “YOU KNEW I WAS A SNAKE BEFORE YOU TOOK ME IN.”
> Now we know what he meant, he’d be the one to head Operation Warp
> Speed to inject the snake fangs (vaccine needles) filled with poison
> into the arms of the WHOLE WORLD.

Nonsense!

Did you get the polio jab? If you hadn't, then you might be walking around with one leg shorter than the other. Would you have liked this?

Don't be an idiot. There are always advantages and disadvantages to every vaccine, but the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Whatever humans touch usually has flaws - it's inevitable, except in my case! The New Calculus is 100% FLAWLESS.

Eram semper recta wrote:

> Nonsense!
>
> Did you get the polio jab? If you hadn't, then you might be walking
> around with one leg shorter than the other. Would you have liked this?
>
> Don't be an idiot. There are always advantages and disadvantages to
> every vaccine, but the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Whatever
> humans touch usually has flaws - it's inevitable, except in my case! The
> New Calculus is 100% FLAWLESS.

which one, are you saying you are so stupid, not knowing those are not
even "vaccines", but gene modifying toxins, experimentally pushed into
your veins? The later nobody would accept, unless renamed "vaccines",
which is a fraud.

Eram semper recta wrote:
> 7/6/2021 Anonymous coward and king troll of sci.math Dan Christensen spammed:
>
>

Dan Christensen is not anonymous, he publishes under his real name.

>> "There are no points on a line."
>
> Lie. I never said that. What I did say is that a line does not consists of points. When we talk about points on a line, we really mean distances that are indicated much like road signs do for distances travelled along a road.
>
> A line one of innumerable distances between any two points.
> A straight line is the shortest distance between two points.
>
>
>> "Pi is NOT a number of ANY kind!"
>
> True. Pi is merely a symbol for an incommensurable magnitude - apparently a concept too advanced for an imbecile like Dan Christensen.
>
>> "1/2 not equal to 2/4"
>
> Lie. I have NEVER said this. What I have talked about is the difference in the process of measure.
> What does this mean? Well, 1/2 is the name given to a measure done by enumerating 1 of two equal parts of the unit.
> 2/4 is the name given to a measure done by enumerating 2 of four equal parts of the unit.
>
> There is the case in geometry where 1/2 is not necessarily equal to 2/4. For example:
>
> _ / _ _
> _ _ / _ _ _ _
>
> The length _ is not equal to the length _ _ .
>
>> “1/3 does NOT mean 1 divided by 3 and never has meant that”
>
> True. My brilliant article on how a genius mind discovers number and indeed how my brilliant ancestors (Ancient Greeks) realised number explains in detail:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hasWyQCZyRN3RkdvIB6bnGIVV2Rabz8w
>
> Also, my article on pi not being a number of any kind:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FFg_9XCkIwTZ9N1jbU4oMYfHHHuFHYf3
>
> The true story of how we got numbers:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-mOEooW03iLYTg1TGY4RTIwakU
>
> No such thing as a "real number" or a "real number line":
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-mOEooW03iLMHVYcE8xcmRZRnc
>
> There is no valid construction of "real number" - it's a myth:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-mOEooW03iLSTROakNyVXlQUEU
>
>
>> "3 =< 4 is nonsense.”
>
> True. In mathematics, it is called an invalid disjunction.
>
> 3 <= 4 means EITHER 3 < 4 OR 3 = 4
>
> Actually, there is no "OR" part, so the logical disjunction is invalid.
>
>> "Zero is not a number."
>
> True. While not a number of any kind, it is very useful in mathematics.
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1w2tt7IgoIu-ychDCoYi-4jOAzToy0ViM
>
>> "0 is not required at all in mathematics, just like negative numbers."
>
> Half-truth. While negative numbers are not required in mathematics, they are extremely useful.
>
>> “There is no such thing as an empty set.”
>
> True. Even the father of all mainstream mathematical cranks rejected the idea of empty set. But let's not go too far ... there isn't even a definition of "set" in set theory!
>
> https://youtu.be/KvxjOMW6Q9w
>
> https://youtu.be/1CcSsOG0okg
>
>> “3 <=> 2 + 1 or 3 <=> 8 - 5, etc, are all propositions” (actually all are meaningless gibberish)
>
> True. These are propositions that are implied by the given equations. For example, my historic geometric identity states:
>
> [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h = dy/dx + Q(x,h)
>
> And so, f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> dy/dx + Q(x,h)
>
> The theorem:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj
>
> How it provides a rigorous definition of integral for the flawed mainstream calculus:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uIBgJ1ObroIbkt0V2YFQEpPdd8l-xK6y
>
>> Though really quite disturbing, interested readers should see: “About the spamming troll John Gabriel in his own words...” (lasted updated March 10, 2020) at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.math/PcpAzX5pDeY/1PDiSlK_BwAJ
>
> The day will come when this vicious anonymous troll Dan Christensen is convicted in a court of law.
>
> Download for free the most important mathematics book ever written:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/view
>

--
The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here
Abraham Lincoln at Gettysburg

On Sunday, July 11, 2021 at 1:26:52 PM UTC+1, Lwane Houser wrote:
> Eram semper recta wrote:
>
> > Nonsense!
> >
> > Did you get the polio jab? If you hadn't, then you might be walking
> > around with one leg shorter than the other. Would you have liked this?
> >
> > Don't be an idiot. There are always advantages and disadvantages to
> > every vaccine, but the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Whatever
> > humans touch usually has flaws - it's inevitable, except in my case! The
> > New Calculus is 100% FLAWLESS.
> which one, are you saying you are so stupid, not knowing those are not
> even "vaccines", but gene modifying toxins, experimentally pushed into
> your veins? The later nobody would accept, unless renamed "vaccines",
> which is a fraud.

It's a rare thing for me to agree with Mr Gabriel, but I do regarding the importance of getting vaccinated. These anti-vaccine conspiracy theories are tedious, childish crap. In my own country an actual conspiracy in this area would require the bribery and/or coercion of hundreds of thousands of people from different fields all across the country simultaneously, to remain silent and fake statistics, every day consistently and in a coordinated fashion, secretly for over a year, (and much else, such as engaging in murder) despite the government being so incompetent that they cannot keep some politician's affair or expenses scandal out of the papers, or get a simple phone app developed properly LOL.

Anti-vaxxers, what gullible morons. I would laugh, but of course it isn't funny when we are in the middle of a global pandemic.

Have a Wonderful Day
QB

Remain Calm and Keep Loving Real Analysis
[Recommended Book of the Day: Logic, an elementary introduction to logic, by Wilfred Hodges]

Quantum Bubbles wrote:

> On Sunday, July 11, 2021 at 1:26:52 PM UTC+1, Lwane Houser wrote:
>> Eram semper recta wrote:
>>
>> > Nonsense!
>> >
>> > Did you get the polio jab? If you hadn't, then you might be walking
>> > around with one leg shorter than the other. Would you have liked
>> > this?
>> >
>> > Don't be an idiot. There are always advantages and disadvantages to
>> > every vaccine, but the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
>> > Whatever humans touch usually has flaws - it's inevitable, except in
>> > my case! The New Calculus is 100% FLAWLESS.
>> which one, are you saying you are so stupid, not knowing those are not
>> even "vaccines", but gene modifying toxins, experimentally pushed into
>> your veins? The later nobody would accept, unless renamed "vaccines",
>> which is a fraud.
>
> It's a rare thing for me to agree with Mr Gabriel, but I do regarding
> the importance of getting vaccinated.

what "vaccinated", can't you read descriptions, those are *NOT* vaccines.
On their website are described as *genetic_operating_systems*. Also 100%
experimental on humans, since all animals died during "experiments" later
years. You guys can't even read datasheets directly from the
manufacturers. What kind of mathematicians are you??

On Sunday, 11 July 2021 at 08:28:38 UTC-4, Peter wrote:
> Eram semper recta wrote:
> > 7/6/2021 Anonymous coward and king troll of sci.math Dan Christensen spammed:
> >
> >
> Dan Christensen is not anonymous, he publishes under his real name.

Rubbish. There are many Dan Christensens and this coward is one who remains unidentified. He is certainly not the Dan Christensen from Ontario University.

On Sunday, 11 July 2021 at 08:46:16 UTC-4, Lwane Houser wrote:
> Quantum Bubbles wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, July 11, 2021 at 1:26:52 PM UTC+1, Lwane Houser wrote:
> >> Eram semper recta wrote:
> >>
> >> > Nonsense!
> >> >
> >> > Did you get the polio jab? If you hadn't, then you might be walking
> >> > around with one leg shorter than the other. Would you have liked
> >> > this?
> >> >
> >> > Don't be an idiot. There are always advantages and disadvantages to
> >> > every vaccine, but the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
> >> > Whatever humans touch usually has flaws - it's inevitable, except in
> >> > my case! The New Calculus is 100% FLAWLESS.
> >> which one, are you saying you are so stupid, not knowing those are not
> >> even "vaccines", but gene modifying toxins, experimentally pushed into
> >> your veins? The later nobody would accept, unless renamed "vaccines",
> >> which is a fraud.
> >
> > It's a rare thing for me to agree with Mr Gabriel, but I do regarding
> > the importance of getting vaccinated.
> what "vaccinated", can't you read descriptions, those are *NOT* vaccines.

They are vaccines. A vaccine is meant to coax the immune system into mounting a response (antibodies) and that's what these vaccines do. The vaccine does not mean you will not get infected, but that if you are, then your immune system is better prepared to fight off the infection.

> On their website are described as *genetic_operating_systems*.

Right. Ultimately when we are dealing with the human body, isn't that what it's all about? :) In one way or another, there are genes involved, hence genetic.

> Also 100% experimental on humans, since all animals died during "experiments" later
> years.

Most experimental animals die because they usually cannot be reused for obvious reasons.

> You guys can't even read datasheets directly from the
> manufacturers. What kind of mathematicians are you??

What mathematicianS? I am the ONLY mathematician on this newsgroup. The rest are absolute morons. In any case, you are being silly expecting "math" academics to be as informed about vaccines - they have zero expertise no matter how much "research" they google. LMAO.

Don't be stupid. Get the jabs because you stand a better chance of survival.. Once you're dead, it will be as if you never existed and your memory lives only in those who knew you while you were still alive. Once they die, that's it.

Mind you, it doesn't matter what you do. Alea iacta est.

Eram semper recta wrote:

>> > It's a rare thing for me to agree with Mr Gabriel, but I do regarding
>> > the importance of getting vaccinated.
>> what "vaccinated", can't you read descriptions, those are *NOT*
>> vaccines.
>
> They are vaccines. A vaccine is meant to coax the immune system into
> mounting a response (antibodies) and that's what these vaccines do. The
> vaccine does not mean you will not get infected, but that if you are,
> then your immune system is better prepared to fight off the infection.

what part of 100% experimental genetic crap cell alteration you don't
understand? Go talk to somebody else. You seems to be an idiot. You are a
GMO, idiot, a property of fraudci and bill and the belinda gates. They
took patents on you before release. The kraken is been released.

On 7/11/2021 5:15 AM, Lwane Houser wrote:
> Eram semper recta wrote:
>
>> 7/6/2021 Anonymous coward and king troll of sci.math Dan Christensen
>> spammed: "There are no points on a line."
>>
>> Lie. I never said that. What I did say is that a line does not consists
>> of points. When we talk about points on a line, we really mean distances
>> that are indicated much like road signs do for distances travelled along
>> a road.
>
> Trump is not my president, he

Of course not, nymshifter. Putin is your president.

On 7/11/2021 8:40 AM, Quantum Bubbles wrote:
> On Sunday, July 11, 2021 at 1:26:52 PM UTC+1, Lwane Houser wrote:
>> Eram semper recta wrote:
>>
>>> Nonsense!
>>>
>>> Did you get the polio jab? If you hadn't, then you might be walking
>>> around with one leg shorter than the other. Would you have liked this?
>>>
>>> Don't be an idiot. There are always advantages and disadvantages to
>>> every vaccine, but the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Whatever
>>> humans touch usually has flaws - it's inevitable, except in my case! The
>>> New Calculus is 100% FLAWLESS.
>> which one, are you saying you are so stupid, not knowing those are not
>> even "vaccines", but gene modifying toxins, experimentally pushed into
>> your veins? The later nobody would accept, unless renamed "vaccines",
>> which is a fraud.
>
>
> It's a rare thing for me to agree with Mr Gabriel, but I do regarding the importance of getting vaccinated.

It is rare for Gabriel to be correct about anything, but this is one of
the rare times.

You have to weigh the risks of both sides, if you get the vaccine there
is a tiny risk of a reaction plus the (absurdly small) risk that the
conspiracy theories have some substance. Absurdly small because the
probability it is a conspiracy without the conspiracy being discovered
is vanishingly small.

The risk of no vaccine: Good chance you'll get Covid and a decent chance
of dying from it if you do with the Delta variant.

The nymshifter is a stooge of (likely) Russia and their desire to meddle
with the US, sowing seeds of doubt about the vaccines.

Michael Moroney wrote:

> It is rare for Gabriel to be correct about anything, but this is one of
> the rare times.
> You have to weigh the risks of both sides, if you get the vaccine there
> is a tiny risk of a reaction plus the (absurdly small) risk that the
> conspiracy theories have some substance. Absurdly small because the
> probability it is a conspiracy without the conspiracy being discovered
> is vanishingly small.
> The risk of no vaccine: Good chance you'll get Covid and a decent chance
> of dying from it if you do with the Delta variant.

go back to sleep, imbecile. Renown doctors, immunologists and
microbiologists, *Noble_Prize* owners and laureates, experts in the field
around the world, are *NOT* "conspiracy theorists". One more proof the
uneducated brainless extreme crank you are. lol

VAXXINE VAMPIRES & THE PATHOGENIC PRIMING OF THE WORLD
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Av34tWuXHThy/

Belarus President Have Been Offered by World Bank & IMF To Implement Covid
Measures https://www.bitchute.com/video/HyruQGmLZcCr/

On Sunday, July 11, 2021 at 12:56:51 PM UTC-4, Lwane Houser wrote:
> Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> > It is rare for Gabriel to be correct about anything, but this is one of
> > the rare times.
> > You have to weigh the risks of both sides, if you get the vaccine there
> > is a tiny risk of a reaction plus the (absurdly small) risk that the
> > conspiracy theories have some substance. Absurdly small because the
> > probability it is a conspiracy without the conspiracy being discovered
> > is vanishingly small.
> > The risk of no vaccine: Good chance you'll get Covid and a decent chance
> > of dying from it if you do with the Delta variant.
> go back to sleep...

Спокойной ночи товарищ.

Dan Christensen wrote:

> On Sunday, July 11, 2021 at 12:56:51 PM UTC-4, Lwane Houser wrote:
>> Michael Moroney wrote:
>>
>> > It is rare for Gabriel to be correct about anything, but this is one
>> > of the rare times.
>> > You have to weigh the risks of both sides, if you get the vaccine
>> > there is a tiny risk of a reaction plus the (absurdly small) risk
>> > that the conspiracy theories have some substance. Absurdly small
>> > because the probability it is a conspiracy without the conspiracy
>> > being discovered is vanishingly small.
>> > The risk of no vaccine: Good chance you'll get Covid and a decent
>> > chance of dying from it if you do with the Delta variant.
>> go back to sleep...
>
> Спокойной ночи товарищ.

not sure, but the "delta" "variant", now *delta_plus* lol, according to
the present scientific data records, from hospitals, are 80% if not all,
those morons *double_"vaccinated" *. Again, I must insist, that's NOT
vaccines. Of course the flu comes in variants, that's why you cannot
vaccinate fooling around against the immune system.

There are double "vaccinated" young people in hospital in need for
pacemakers the rest of their life, because the fraud fraudci. Think about
it.

On Sunday, July 11, 2021 at 1:18:51 PM UTC-4, Lwane Houser wrote:
> Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, July 11, 2021 at 12:56:51 PM UTC-4, Lwane Houser wrote:
> >> Michael Moroney wrote:
> >>
> >> > It is rare for Gabriel to be correct about anything, but this is one
> >> > of the rare times.
> >> > You have to weigh the risks of both sides, if you get the vaccine
> >> > there is a tiny risk of a reaction plus the (absurdly small) risk
> >> > that the conspiracy theories have some substance. Absurdly small
> >> > because the probability it is a conspiracy without the conspiracy
> >> > being discovered is vanishingly small.
> >> > The risk of no vaccine: Good chance you'll get Covid and a decent
> >> > chance of dying from it if you do with the Delta variant.
> >> go back to sleep...
> >
> > Спокойной ночи товарищ.
> not sure, but the "delta" "variant", now *delta_plus* lol, according to
> the present scientific data records, from hospitals, are 80% if not all,
> those morons *double_"vaccinated" *. Again, I must insist, that's NOT
> vaccines. Of course the flu comes in variants, that's why you cannot
> vaccinate fooling around against the immune system.
>
> There are double "vaccinated" young people in hospital in need for
> pacemakers the rest of their life, because the fraud fraudci. Think about
> it.

Вы снова проиграли, товарищ. Может, в следующий раз тебе повезет.

On Sunday, July 11, 2021 at 1:18:51 PM UTC-4, Lwane Houser wrote:
> Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, July 11, 2021 at 12:56:51 PM UTC-4, Lwane Houser wrote:
> >> Michael Moroney wrote:
> >>
> >> > It is rare for Gabriel to be correct about anything, but this is one
> >> > of the rare times.
> >> > You have to weigh the risks of both sides, if you get the vaccine
> >> > there is a tiny risk of a reaction plus the (absurdly small) risk
> >> > that the conspiracy theories have some substance. Absurdly small
> >> > because the probability it is a conspiracy without the conspiracy
> >> > being discovered is vanishingly small.
> >> > The risk of no vaccine: Good chance you'll get Covid and a decent
> >> > chance of dying from it if you do with the Delta variant.
> >> go back to sleep...
> >
> > Спокойной ночи товарищ.
> not sure, but the "delta" "variant", now *delta_plus* lol, according to
> the present scientific data records, from hospitals, are 80% if not all,
> those morons *double_"vaccinated" *. Again, I must insist, that's NOT
> vaccines. Of course the flu comes in variants, that's why you cannot
> vaccinate fooling around against the immune system.
>
> There are double "vaccinated" young people in hospital in need for
> pacemakers the rest of their life, because the fraud fraudci. Think about
> it.

Hey, comrade, how are things down on the "farm" in Moscow? Things aren't looking too good COVID-wise over there. "Record high covid deaths." Anyone you know?

Dan

Dan Christensen wrote:

>> There are double "vaccinated" young people in hospital in need for
>> pacemakers the rest of their life, because the fraud fraudci. Think
>> about it.
>
> Hey, comrade, how are things down on the "farm" in Moscow? Things aren't
> looking too good COVID-wise over there. "Record high covid deaths."
> Anyone you know?

"in the time of war the truth is the first victim". Why should they
intervene, with big truths, when their enemies on record, are about to
depopulate own people? You are are really stupid, ain't you.

On Monday, July 12, 2021 at 2:06:40 PM UTC-4, Blake Studdard wrote:
> Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> >> There are double "vaccinated" young people in hospital in need for
> >> pacemakers the rest of their life, because the fraud fraudci. Think
> >> about it.
> >
> > Hey, comrade, how are things down on the "farm" in Moscow? Things aren't
> > looking too good COVID-wise over there. "Record high covid deaths."
> > Anyone you know?
> "in the time of war the truth is the first victim". Why should they
> intervene, with big truths, when their enemies on record, are about to
> depopulate own people? You are are really stupid, ain't you.

Save it for the gullible Trump supporters in the Bible Belt, comrade. None here AFAIK.