On Tuesday, 23 February 2021 at 01:29:21 UTC+1, tjrob137 wrote:

> In particular, we set clocks the way we do because we
> are FORCED to synchronize them such that inertia and
> space are isotropic.

Ohohohohoh! What have forced you, poor idiot?
Was it your ISO nonsense? Why was GPS staff
resistant, what do you think?

> This is not a "choice", this is
> part and parcel of how the world we inhabit behaves.

There is no choice for us! We have to obey our beloved
gurus. No choice!

On Monday, August 16, 2021 at 8:02:47 AM UTC-4, maluw...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, 23 February 2021 at 01:29:21 UTC+1, tjrob137 wrote:
>
> > In particular, we set clocks the way we do because we
> > are FORCED to synchronize them such that inertia and
> > space are isotropic.
>
> Ohohohohoh! What have forced you, poor idiot?
> Was it your ISO nonsense? Why was GPS staff
<crying snipped>

You already asked this question many times.
You should know the answer by now. Or, are you just trolling?

Poincare spills out the answer many times, and this was way back in ~ 1900.

On Monday, 16 August 2021 at 14:21:36 UTC+2, rotchm wrote:
> On Monday, August 16, 2021 at 8:02:47 AM UTC-4, maluw...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 23 February 2021 at 01:29:21 UTC+1, tjrob137 wrote:
> >
> > > In particular, we set clocks the way we do because we
> > > are FORCED to synchronize them such that inertia and
> > > space are isotropic.
> >
> > Ohohohohoh! What have forced you, poor idiot?
> > Was it your ISO nonsense? Why was GPS staff
> <crying snipped>
>
> You already asked this question many times.
> You should know the answer by now.

If any of your fellow idiots has ever answerred...

On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 05:02:45 -0700 (PDT), Maciej Wozniak
<maluwozniak@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, 23 February 2021 at 01:29:21 UTC+1, tjrob137 wrote:
>
>> In particular, we set clocks the way we do because we
>> are FORCED to synchronize them such that inertia and
>> space are isotropic.
>
>Ohohohohoh! What have forced you, poor idiot?
>Was it your ISO nonsense? Why was GPS staff
>resistant, what do you think?
>
>> This is not a "choice", this is
>> part and parcel of how the world we inhabit behaves.
>
>There is no choice for us! We have to obey our beloved
>gurus. No choice!

Wozis have only 1 choice: between several mental asylums :-)

On Monday, 16 August 2021 at 15:33:18 UTC+2, Helmut Wabnig wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 05:02:45 -0700 (PDT), Maciej Wozniak
> <maluw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Tuesday, 23 February 2021 at 01:29:21 UTC+1, tjrob137 wrote:
> >
> >> In particular, we set clocks the way we do because we
> >> are FORCED to synchronize them such that inertia and
> >> space are isotropic.
> >
> >Ohohohohoh! What have forced you, poor idiot?
> >Was it your ISO nonsense? Why was GPS staff
> >resistant, what do you think?
> >
> >> This is not a "choice", this is
> >> part and parcel of how the world we inhabit behaves.
> >
> >There is no choice for us! We have to obey our beloved
> >gurus. No choice!
> Wozis have only 1 choice: between several mental asylums :-)

Well, I'm one of the best logicians the humanity ever had
and you're just a poor religious maniac; obviously you can't
discuss against me, Wabi - you can only spit and slander.
And you do.

On 8/16/2021 9:33 AM, Helmut Wabnig wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 05:02:45 -0700 (PDT), Maciej Wozniak
> <maluwozniak@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, 23 February 2021 at 01:29:21 UTC+1, tjrob137 wrote:
>>
>>> In particular, we set clocks the way we do because we
>>> are FORCED to synchronize them such that inertia and
>>> space are isotropic.
>>
>> Ohohohohoh! What have forced you, poor idiot?
>> Was it your ISO nonsense? Why was GPS staff
>> resistant, what do you think?
>>
>>> This is not a "choice", this is
>>> part and parcel of how the world we inhabit behaves.
>>
>> There is no choice for us! We have to obey our beloved
>> gurus. No choice!
>
> Wozis have only 1 choice: between several mental asylums :-)
>
And which toilet to clean first.

On Monday, August 16, 2021 at 9:01:27 AM UTC-4, maluw...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, 16 August 2021 at 14:21:36 UTC+2, rotchm wrote:

> > You already asked this question many times.
> > You should know the answer by now.

> If any of your fellow idiots has ever answerred...

It was answer to you already many times. Google kept a record.
If your memory is failing you that much, you should seek medical help.
If you are mentally incapable of searching your past posts & and replies then you should seek medical help.
If you are just here to seek attention, then you should seek medical help for that.

Get the message?

On Monday, 16 August 2021 at 20:51:02 UTC+2, rotchm wrote:
> On Monday, August 16, 2021 at 9:01:27 AM UTC-4, maluw...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Monday, 16 August 2021 at 14:21:36 UTC+2, rotchm wrote:
>
> > > You already asked this question many times.
> > > You should know the answer by now.
>
> > If any of your fellow idiots has ever answerred...
> It was answer to you already many times. Google kept a record.

A lie, as expected from a fanatic idiot. Google kept a record.

On Monday, August 16, 2021 at 3:32:20 PM UTC-4, maluw...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, 16 August 2021 at 20:51:02 UTC+2, rotchm wrote:

> > It was answer to you already many times. Google kept a record.
> A lie, as expected from a fanatic idiot.

So you still deny reality. No wonder you have so many problems.

As I suggested to you, did you read Poincare concerning your subject?
As, why these 'rules' are FORCED upon us?

On Monday, 16 August 2021 at 22:24:12 UTC+2, rotchm wrote:
> On Monday, August 16, 2021 at 3:32:20 PM UTC-4, maluw...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Monday, 16 August 2021 at 20:51:02 UTC+2, rotchm wrote:
>
> > > It was answer to you already many times. Google kept a record.
> > A lie, as expected from a fanatic idiot.
> So you still deny reality. No wonder you have so many problems.

So, what has FORCED poor idiot Tom and why was GPS staff
resistant?

> As I suggested to you, did you read Poincare concerning your subject?

Poincare explaining why GPS staff was resistant to whatever
FORCES poor idiot Tom? Really? Or maybe you still "improve"
the reality?

On Tuesday, August 17, 2021 at 3:12:30 AM UTC-4, maluw...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, 16 August 2021 at 22:24:12 UTC+2, rotchm wrote:

> > As I suggested to you, did you read Poincare concerning your subject?
> Poincare explaining why GPS staff was resistant to whatever
> FORCES poor idiot Tom? Really?

Yes, its all in there. Did you read it?
It looks like that you fear reality. We tell you exactly where the info is and you refuse to go see it.

On Tuesday, 17 August 2021 at 14:50:43 UTC+2, rotchm wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 17, 2021 at 3:12:30 AM UTC-4, maluw...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Monday, 16 August 2021 at 22:24:12 UTC+2, rotchm wrote:
>
> > > As I suggested to you, did you read Poincare concerning your subject?
> > Poincare explaining why GPS staff was resistant to whatever
> > FORCES poor idiot Tom? Really?
> Yes, its all in there. Did you read it?

What an impudent lie, even for your standards, trash. No, I didn't.

> It looks like that you fear reality.

While Poincare was a quite smart guy, no thinking man
would ever mistake his opinions with the reality.

On Tuesday, August 17, 2021 at 9:05:55 AM UTC-4, maluw...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, 17 August 2021 at 14:50:43 UTC+2, rotchm wrote:

> > Yes, its all in there. Did you read it?
> What an impudent lie, even for your standards, trash. No, I didn't.

If you haven't read it, how do you know it's not in there?
Stop being a coward and a liar & go read them!
In many treaties, Poincare explains why we have the standards we have (and to have) & why we are 'forced'
to such standards.

> > It looks like that you fear reality.
> While Poincare was a quite smart guy, no thinking man
> would ever mistake his opinions with the reality.

You are confused, again. Recall that Poincare was hired as the chief engineer to set up and coordinate time in Europe;
In many treaties, he discusses the theoretical and the *Practical applications* aka, "reality", including relativity.

The only reason why you don't want to read them, is because you are a coward. You fear reality.

rotchm wrote:

> On Tuesday, August 17, 2021 at 3:12:30 AM UTC-4, maluw...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> On Monday, 16 August 2021 at 22:24:12 UTC+2, rotchm wrote:
>
>> > A̶s̶ I̶ s̶u̶g̶g̶e̶s̶t̶e̶d̶ t̶o̶ y̶o̶u̶, d̶i̶d̶ y̶o̶u̶ r̶e̶a̶d̶ P̶o̶i̶n̶c̶a̶r̶e̶ c̶o̶n̶c̶e̶r̶n̶i̶n̶g̶ y̶o̶u̶r̶ s̶u̶b̶j̶e̶c̶t̶?
>>
>> Poincare explaining why GPS staff was resistant to whatever FORCES poor
>> idiot Tom? Really?
>
> Y̶e̶s̶, i̶t̶s̶ a̶l̶l̶ i̶n̶ t̶h̶e̶r̶e̶. D̶i̶d̶ y̶o̶u̶ r̶e̶a̶d̶ i̶t̶?
> I̶t̶ l̶o̶o̶k̶s̶ l̶i̶k̶e̶ t̶h̶a̶t̶ y̶o̶u̶ f̶e̶a̶r̶ r̶e̶a̶l̶i̶t̶y̶. W̶e̶ t̶e̶l̶l̶ y̶o̶u̶ e̶x̶a̶c̶t̶l̶y̶ w̶h̶e̶r̶e̶ t̶h̶e̶ i̶n̶f̶o̶
> i̶s̶ a̶n̶d̶ y̶o̶u̶ r̶e̶f̶u̶s̶e̶ t̶o̶ g̶o̶ s̶e̶e̶ i̶t̶.

shut the fuck up, you uneducated piece of shit. Maciej Wozniak is a doctor in physics when compared with trash like you.

Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: What has FORCED poor idiot Tom and why was GPS staff resistantr?
From: rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 12:50:42 +0000
Lines: 8
Xref: aioe.org sci.physics.relativity:560255
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1105:: with SMTP id
e5mr2987563qty.268.1629204642132;
In-Reply-To: <85fa1529-db76-4fdc-9884-a02355195857n@googlegroups.com>
posting-account=BHsbrQoAAAANJj6HqXJ987nOEDAC1EsJ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 184.160.32.227
Message-ID: <85a17bf9-5d35-4730-92e6-780589f4d3b4n@googlegroups.com>

On Tuesday, 17 August 2021 at 19:21:11 UTC+2, rotchm wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 17, 2021 at 9:05:55 AM UTC-4, maluw...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 17 August 2021 at 14:50:43 UTC+2, rotchm wrote:
>
> > > Yes, its all in there. Did you read it?
> > What an impudent lie, even for your standards, trash. No, I didn't.
> If you haven't read it, how do you know it's not in there?

How do I know that Poincare didn't write about GPS staff?
That's a real question.

> Stop being a coward and a liar & go read them!
> In many treaties, Poincare explains why we have the standards we have (and to have) & why we are 'forced'
> to such standards.
> > > It looks like that you fear reality.
> > While Poincare was a quite smart guy, no thinking man
> > would ever mistake his opinions with the reality.
> You are confused, again. Recall that Poincare was hired as the chief engineer to set up and coordinate time in Europe;

Apparently he didn't know that trying to coordinate time non-locally
is a common sense prejudice. Did he, BTW, coordinate them the
way poor idiot Tom imagines he was FORCED to?
He has also written directly that non-euclidean geometries can't
have any use in physics... Well, as a fanatic idiot you take from him
what you like and ignore the rest.

On Wednesday, August 18, 2021 at 2:03:33 AM UTC-4, maluw...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, 17 August 2021 at 19:21:11 UTC+2, rotchm wrote:

> How do I know that Poincare didn't write about GPS staff?
> That's a real question.

And the answer is, is that you don't know because you have not read any of this stuff as you claimed.

> > You are confused, again. Recall that Poincare was hired as the chief engineer to set up and coordinate time in Europe;
> Apparently he didn't know that trying to coordinate time non-locally
> is a common sense prejudice.

He knew about all that and he has written extensively about it. But since you refuse to read his stuff, you are unaware of that.

> Did he, BTW, coordinate them the
> way poor idiot Tom imagines he was FORCED to?

Go read up and you will find out.

> He has also written directly that non-euclidean geometries can't
> have any use in physics...

Irrelevant to the discussion, and a lie again on your part.

On Wednesday, 18 August 2021 at 19:52:49 UTC+2, rotchm wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 18, 2021 at 2:03:33 AM UTC-4, maluw...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 17 August 2021 at 19:21:11 UTC+2, rotchm wrote:
>
> > How do I know that Poincare didn't write about GPS staff?
> > That's a real question.
> And the answer is, is that you don't know because you have not read any of this stuff as you claimed.

No, poor idiot; the answer is: I know because he died in 1905.

> > Apparently he didn't know that trying to coordinate time non-locally
> > is a common sense prejudice.
> He knew about all that and he has written extensively about it.

And - knowing about all that - he still participated?
Foolishness, but well paid Foolishness, I guess?

> > He has also written directly that non-euclidean geometries can't
> > have any use in physics...
> Irrelevant to the discussion, and a lie again on your part.

Well, since you refuse to read his stuff (apart of the part you
like) - you are unaware of that.

On Thursday, August 19, 2021 at 2:21:38 AM UTC-4, maluw...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, 18 August 2021 at 19:52:49 UTC+2, rotchm wrote:

> > And the answer is, is that you don't know because you have not read any of this stuff as you claimed.
> No, poor idiot; the answer is: I know because he died in 1905.

Your logic is severely flawed. It is not because he died before the event that he couldn't have written about the (future) event.
Have you ever heard of "predictions" ? Consequences ?

<diversions snipped>
Stay on topic.

On Thursday, 19 August 2021 at 17:03:58 UTC+2, rotchm wrote:
> On Thursday, August 19, 2021 at 2:21:38 AM UTC-4, maluw...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 18 August 2021 at 19:52:49 UTC+2, rotchm wrote:
>
> > > And the answer is, is that you don't know because you have not read any of this stuff as you claimed.
> > No, poor idiot; the answer is: I know because he died in 1905.
> Your logic is severely flawed. It is not because he died before the event that he couldn't have written about the (future) event.
> Have you ever heard of "predictions" ?

Yes, poor idiot, I have. So, you're insisting that Poincare
has predicted GPS, its staff and that it will be resistant to
whatever FORCES your idiot guru Tom? Well, just another
example you're a piece of incredibly impudent lying shit.

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> --
> a piece of incredibly impudent lying shit.

Nice signature Maciej.

On Thursday, 19 August 2021 at 17:45:59 UTC+2, Python wrote:
> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > --
> > a piece of incredibly impudent lying shit.
> Nice signature Maciej.

But have you already learnt how sqrt function
is defined?

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> On Thursday, 19 August 2021 at 17:45:59 UTC+2, Python wrote:
>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>> --
>>> a piece of incredibly impudent lying shit.
>> Nice signature Maciej.
>
> But have you already learnt how sqrt function
> is defined?

I could teach it to you, for a few hundreds euros.

On Thursday, 19 August 2021 at 23:46:41 UTC+2, Python wrote:
> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > On Thursday, 19 August 2021 at 17:45:59 UTC+2, Python wrote:
> >> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> >>> --
> >>> a piece of incredibly impudent lying shit.
> >> Nice signature Maciej.
> >
> > But have you already learnt how sqrt function
> > is defined?
> I could teach it to you, for a few hundreds euros.

Are you sure you could? You've already tried to teach
me how sqrt is a multivalue functionin R, and you didn't
succeed. I guess you overestimate yourself, as
always, poor halfbrain.