2-More to add to AP's 6th book//World's First Valid Proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem, 1993 & 2014 // Math proof series, book 5 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author). A scientist, when he does a math proof or a physics theory, none of them

More to add to AP's 6th book//World's First Valid Proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem, 1993 & 2014 // Math proof series, book 5 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author).

A scientist, when he does a math proof or a physics theory, none of them leave you, none leaves you alone after a while. All of them continually nag you and the nagging never goes away. Such is the case of doing science. And sometimes in this nagging a new twist enters the picture. I have found this to be the case of nearly all my science work. Every time I write something on those discoveries, it is as if a new twist is bursting to come forth.

So on FLT which I proved in early 1990s, as early as 1991, my argument was that of a Basis Vector of Algebra is the reason no exponent 3 or higher has a solution. Of course, there are ample solutions in exponent 2 and more so in exponent 1.

But the new twist that dawned on me, is that a proof of FLT, should involve exp 1 and exp 2 and then exp3 and higher, as a mathematical induction proof.

Maybe we need not start at exp 1, for that is arithmetic A + B = C. Then exp 2 is the Pythagorean Theorem. So we have two starting true cases of the General FLT. For exp 2 we have the basis vector 2+2 = 2x2 =4, where we have a number that is equal under add and multiply. Now for exponent 1 we could say the basis vector is all of Arithmetic. Now for exponent 3, we can have no n+n+n = nxnxn = m, same for higher exponents.

So what I missed in my book was to emphatically suggest that a proof of FLT has to fully incorporate the exponents that do have solutions. Every mathematician before AP , looks at FLT in isolation of exponent 2, and by doing so, cut off their chances of finding a valid proof of FLT. Because the moment your mind asks the question, why no solutions in exp 3 but myriad solutions in exp 2, forces the mind to think that the valid proof has to incorporate in its proof, a mechanism, a mechanism the spans and bridges between exponent 2 and exponent 3, fully incorporate the picture that exp 2 has solutions not exp 3. And that then puts the onus of the mind to look at a Basis Vector where add is the very same as multiply. So that solutions are metaphorically analogous to building concrete block buildings and the concrete blocks are the basis vector.

Every Pythagorean theorem solution in Natural Counting Numbers has its basic building block of 2 and 4, of 2+2= 2x2= 4. You can analyze every P-triple and find it is constructed of 2 and 4. Whereas every exp 3 is wanting a building block for all possible solutions, yet no numbers (not even 0 for the n and m have to be different) have the ability to be n+n+n = nxnxn = m.

So I need to emphatically state in my 6th published book, that a proof of FLT, or even Generalized FLT should look at all exponents and not isolate-out exp2 from the higher exponents.

That is extremely important point of logic, that we tend to shove off to the side and want to focus all our attention on just a part of the puzzle, a part of the problem, separate from the larger problem. We tend to separate, when we should look at the big picture to give us guidance and clues as to the mechanism of the proof.

So, actually, FLT was even absurdly more simple as a math problem and proof than most every other math proof in recorded history. FLT is more simple to prove than even the Pythagorean theorem is to prove. Because this is a proof of FLT. Proof: 2+2= 2x2= 4 allows us to build solutions in exp 2, but there does not exist a n+n+n = nxnxn = m so no solutions ever in exp 3 and the same argument for exp 4 and higher. QED

Totally simple proof is FLT, and if mathematicians had asked, what, ultimately what allows solutions in exp2 and said, well, well, 2+2=2x2 is the building block of all solutions in exp2.

No, my proofs in math and my theories in science and physics will never leave me alone, even if I tried. I can picture myself at my deathbed, and even there, one of my science theories will invade my mind as a die. Such, is the nature of a world of superdeterminism in an Atom Totality.

6th published book

World's First Valid Proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem, 1993 & 2014 // Math proof series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 29Apr2021. This is AP's 6th published book.

Preface:
Real proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem// including the fake Euler proof in exp3 and Wiles fake proof.

Recap summary: In 1993 I proved Fermat's Last Theorem with a pure algebra proof, arguing that because of the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4 that this special feature of a unique number 4, allows for there to exist solutions to A^2 + B^2 = C^2. That the number 4 is a basis vector allowing more solutions to exist in exponent 2. But since there is no number with N+N+N = N*N*N that exists, there cannot be a solution in exp3 and the same argument for higher exponents. In 2014, I went and proved Generalized FLT by using "condensed rectangles". Once I had proven Generalized, then Regular FLT comes out of that proof as a simple corollary. So I had two proofs of Regular FLT, pure algebra and a corollary from Generalized FLT. Then recently in 2019, I sought to find a pure algebra proof of Generalized FLT, and I believe I accomplished that also by showing solutions to Generalized FLT also come from the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4. Amazing how so much math comes from the specialness of 4, where I argue that a Vector Space of multiplication provides the Generalized FLT of A^x + B^y = C^z.

Cover Picture: In my own handwriting, some Generalized Fermat's Last Theorem type of equations.

As for the Euler exponent 3 invalid proof and the Wiles invalid FLT, both are missing a proof of the case of all three A,B,C are evens (see in the text).
Length: 156 pages
File Size: 1503 KB
Print Length: 156 pages
Publication Date: March 12, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PQKGW4M
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 

On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 12:39:28 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> More to add to AP's 6th "book" //AP's Invalid Proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem...

WARNING TO STUDENTS: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science

AP is a malicious internet troll who wants only to mislead and confuse you. He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can only be meant to promote failure in schools. One can only guess at his motives.

Note that AP will often delete his bizarre and hateful postings when his lies are called out, only to repost identical ones moments later in a NEW thread.

Readers should, of course, judge for themselves. In AP's OWN WORDS here:

“Primes do not exist, because the set they were borne from has no division.”
--June 29, 2020

“The last and largest finite number is 10^604.”
--June 3, 2015

“0 appears to be the last and largest finite number”
--June 9, 2015

“0/0 must be equal to 1.”
-- June 9, 2015

“0 is an infinite irrational number.”
--June 28, 2015

“No negative numbers exist.”
--December 22, 2018

“Rationals are not numbers.”
--May 18, 2019

According to AP's “chess board math,” an equilateral triangle is a right-triangle.
--December 11, 2019

Which could explain...

“The value of sin(45 degrees) = 1.”
--May 31, 2019

AP deliberately and repeatedly presented the truth table for OR as the truth table for AND:

“New Logic
AND
T & T = T
T & F = T
F & T = T
F & F = F”
--November 9, 2019

AP seeks aid of Russian agents to promote failure in schools:

"Please--Asking for help from Russia-- russian robots-- to create a new, true mathematics [sic]"
--November 9, 2017

And if that wasn't weird enough...

“The totality, everything that there is [the universe], is only 1 atom of plutonium [Pu]. There is nothing outside or beyond this one atom of plutonium.”
--April 4, 1994

“The Universe itself is one gigantic big atom.”
--November 14, 2019

AP's sinister Atom God Cult of Failure???

“Since God-Pu is marching on.
Glory! Glory! Atom Plutonium!
Its truth is marching on.
It has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat;
It is sifting out the hearts of people before its judgment seat;
Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer it; be jubilant, my feet!
Our God-Pu is marching on.”
--December 15, 2018 (Note: Pu is the atomic symbol for plutonium)

Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

Now everyone is free to chose who they want to believe, do you want to believe Andrew Wiles with his 100 pages or more of math that is everything including the kitchen sink of mathematics thrown at the Fermat's Last Theorem FLT ? Where most people cannot even understand the 1st page-- what the hell is going on. Or, do you want to chose AP's proof of FLT where he proves it in a sentence that everyone in the entire world, even in Grade School can understand, that 2+2 = 2x2 = 4 gives solutions to Pythagorean theorem and A^2 + B^2 = C^2, but if you want solutions for A^3+B^3 = C^3 or higher, you need a special number of n+n+n = nxnxn = m for n and m in exponent 3, yet there exists no such special numbers n and m to satisfy that, hence, FLT.

So, take your pick, do you believe in B.S. of Wiles with his obnoxious over 100 pages of cluttered together phony baloney mess argument. Wherein Andrew Wiles was so stupid on FLT, he failed to even notice that Euler had **no proof** in exponent 3 of FLT because Euler forgot he had to prove the case of where A,B, C in A^3 +B^3= C^3 were even numbers. Euler forgot he had to prove that; and instead assumed there was no three even Counting numbers were no solution. But Andrew Wiles, the math failure he is, never even noticed that Euler had no proof in exponent 3. So, do you believe in a Andrew Wiles 100 page "hornswaggle mess" of elliptic curve argument. Or do you believe in AP when he says the reason 3^2 + 4^2 = 5^2 is because 2+2 = 2x2 = 4, the only two counting numbers with that feature of addition is the same as multiplication.

Now Andrew Wiles was looking for a proof of FLT in early 1990s, as early as 1993 when AP notified the world public that AP had already proven FLT, for I proved it in 1991, but Andrew Wiles had no proof of FLT, even after 1993..

And there was a exciting exchange of ideas from AP and from Princeton Univ and Berkeley where Roland Dreier gives the SUPPORTING ARGUMENT, that the AP proof of FLT is the world's only valid proof of FLT. Although Roland was not prepared to go that far, it is obvious, these almost 30 years later, that AP had the proof, but Wiles is a con-artist failure of FLT.

From: dreier@durban.berkeley.edu  (Roland Dreier) 
Newsgroups: sci.math 
Subject: Re: 1 page proof of FLT 
Date: 18 Aug 93 14:55:02 
Organization: U.C. Berkeley Math. Department. 
Lines: 42 
Message-ID: (DREIER.93Aug18145502@durban.berkeley.edu> 
References: (CBxp0H.817@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> 
(24s7de$cv4@outage.efi.com> 
(CByoqr.7Aw@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> 
(1993Aug18.173020.10123@Princeton.EDU> 

In article (1993Aug18.173020.10123@Princeton.EDU> 
kinyan@fine.princeton.edu (Kin Chung) writes: 
In article (CByoqr.7Aw@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> 
Ludwig.Plutonium@dartmouth.edu (Ludwig Plutonium) writes: 
LP     Hardy in Math..Apology said words to the effect that the 
LP  understanding of any math proof is like pointing out a peak in the 
LP  fog of a mtn range and you can only point so long and do other 
LP  helps and hope the other person will see it and say Oh yes now I 
LP  see it. But you can not exchange eyeballs. Again I repeat the 
LP  arithmetic equivalent of FLT is that for exp2 there exists a 
LP  number equal under add & multiply i.e. 2+2=2x2=4. Immediately a 
LP  smallest P triple is constructible for exp2 i.e. (3,4,5>. But no 
LP  number exists like 2 for exp3 or higher in order to construct P- 
LP  triples for these higher exp. I am very sorry that I cannot make it 
LP  any clearer than that. Time to take a break and reread Hardy Math 
LP  Apology. 

KC   You also say that a smallest P-triple is constructible for exp2   
KC   immediately from the existence of a number N such that 
KC   N+N=NxN, namely N=2. How do you construct a P-triple given N 
KC   with this property? Please note that I am not asking how you do 
KC    it for exp3, but for exp2. 

Before I continue, let me say that this post does not in any way constitute 
an endorsement of LvP's "proof"; what I am about to explain does not 
extend to exponent 3 in the least. However, things are rather easy for 
exponent two.  (Not to be critical, but you really could have figured this 
out yourself :-) 

So suppose we have an N with 2xN=N+N=NxN. Set a=N+1, b=N+N=NxN. 
Then we get 
                     a^2 = (N+1)^2 = N^2+2xN+1 = 2xN^2+1 
also 
                     b^2 = (N+N)^2 = 4xN^2. 
So 
                     a^2+b^2 = 6xN^2+1. 
Now set c=2xN+1.  Then 
                     c^2 = (2xN+1)^2 = 4xN^2 + 4xN + 1 = 4xN^2 + 2xN^2 + 1       
                      = 6xN^2+1. 
So magically a^2+b^2=c^2, just as desired! ! 

If you can figure out how to do that for exponent 3, make yourself famous. 

Roland 
-- 
Roland "Mr. Excitement" Dreier                 dreier@math.berkeley.edu 

How much does Justin Trudeau government in Canada pay Dan Christensen to stalk 24-7-365? Is it $100 per post? Far more money than what Canada math and physics professors are paid to actually teach math and physics in classrooms.

sci.physics

Web results
3rd hit 1st page "Harvard Dr.Hau" is fair honest balanced Google Search list with ...
4 days ago — 3rd hit 1st page "Harvard Dr.Hau" is fair honest balanced Google Search list with Counterpoint as 3rd hit// Contrast that to the dishonest corrupt ...

3rd hit 1st page Harvard Dr. Hau
Re: Archimedes "irrelevant" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
Harvard Dr. Hau
Michael Moroney
Jul 3, 2021, 12:00:34 PM 

sci.physics
Google, great job on Harvard Dr. Hau, lousy pitiful job on Thomas Hales ...
Google, great job on Harvard Dr. Hau, lousy pitiful job on Thomas Hales, Sheldon Glashow as some propaganda pitch as if Search engines have become science-propaganda-kiosks, instead of Balanced Journalism with Counterpoint. Is Google trying to
Archimedes Plutonium Jun 25, 2021, 8:43:01 PM

sci.physics
Balanced & Counterpoint Google Search for Steven Weinberg, not ...

sci.physics
1st page 2nd & 3rd hits for Univ Texas Steven Weinberg, under Google Search ...

sci.physics
Balanced & Counterpoint Google Search list for Steven Weinberg, Sheldon ...
to Plutonium Atom Universe. Balanced & Counterpoint Google Search list for Steven Weinberg, Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, the day when millions of search hits ...

sci.physics
1 -Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Sheldon Glashow who ...

sci.math
Excellent job Google Search for Queen's James Leech, hope of fixing logic and ...

sci.math
Re: 176,232-Student Victims of Michael Meighen McGill Univ by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of ...

sci.math
Possible explanation for bias & prejudicial Google search engine ...

sci.math
Andrew Wiles plutonium or Terence Tao plutonium. As evidenced by this. with his fake FLT, for he lusts for fame ... to Plutonium Atom Universe. Math Con-Artist ...

sci.math
Re: 2Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test - Google Groups

sci.math
Math Con-Artist Andrew Wiles with his fake FLT, for he lusts for fame ...
to Plutonium Atom Universe. Math Con-Artist Andrew Wiles with his fake FLT, for he lusts for fame and fortune but never the truth of mathematics. The nitwit ...

sci.math
3) AP proved Fermat's Last Theorem in 1991-1993 while Andrew Wiles has a ....

sci.math

8-Student victims of Rose M. Patten Univ Toronto from stalker Dan ...
8-Student victims of Rose M. Patten Univ Toronto from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of ...

8-Student victims of Rose M. Patten Univ Toronto from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus On Monday, April 5, 2021 at 7:45:08 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrot
Archimedes Plutonium Apr 5, 2021, 11:12:19 AM

sci.math

1st page first 3 hits for Univ Toronto Rose M Patten, under Google Search "Rose M ...

1st page first 3 hits for Univ Toronto Rose M Patten, under Google Search "Rose M Patten plutonium", should be on 1st page of search list for "Rose M Patten"
Archimedes Plutonium Jul 4, 2021, 4:29:00 PM

On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 1:20:36 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> How much does Justin Trudeau government in Canada pay Dan Christensen to stalk 24-7-365? Is it $100 per post?

No, Archie Poo, I do this as a free public service to the international community to thwart your evil plans to create a generation of math failures just like you and your boyfriend here.

Dan

On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 2:15:50 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 1:20:36 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > How much does Justin Trudeau government in Canada pay Dan Christensen to stalk 24-7-365? Is it $100 per post?
> No, Archie Poo, I do this as a free public service to the international community to thwart your evil plans to create a generation of math failures just like you and your boyfriend here.
>
> Dan

You never told the truth in your 10 years of stalking, why should I believe a word of what you say now.

But if the above is true, then looking at a Mayo Clinic definition of schizophrenia-- is a serious mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally.

The reality is I am not evil, I am doing good science, and I am defending my work.

You on the other hand does not listen to discussion or reasoning, and attacks for no reason at all. This makes you a confessed mentally ill schizophrenic. And I would be tempted to see if psychologists have researched whether schizophrenics, like Dan Christensen are "self righteous shithead morons". How much of schizophrenia is bottle up in being "self righteous moron behavior".

I have seen plenty of self righteous creeps in academia, but none as bad as Dan Christensen.

So if Dan's above statement is fully true, then he has admitted to a world wide audience that he suffers from schizophrenia, and if psychology can substantiate my claim, that Dan needs treatment.

I was giving Dan the benefit of the doubt, that he was paid to stalk, but if Dan is doing stalking of pure volition, means he is incredibly insane and has no place in sci.math or sci.physics.

AP

On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 9:28:06 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 2:15:50 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 1:20:36 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > How much does Justin Trudeau government in Canada pay Dan Christensen to stalk 24-7-365? Is it $100 per post?
> > No, Archie Poo, I do this as a free public service to the international community to thwart your evil plans to create a generation of math failures just like you and your boyfriend here.
> >

> You never told the truth in your 10 years of stalking, why should I believe a word of what you say now.
>

I'm not asking YOU to believe anything, Archie Poo. You are beyond reason. You apparently have a "mission" to promote failure in schools. Some kind of twisted revenge thing? Who knows. Students should be warned about your lies, misinformation and just plain gibberish.

If that really is not your intent, you would post some kind disclaimer like you used to before you went full John-Gabriel on us.

Dan

On 7/8/2021 8:29 AM, Dan Christensen wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 9:28:06 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>> On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 2:15:50 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 1:20:36 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>>>> How much does Justin Trudeau government in Canada pay Dan Christensen to stalk 24-7-365? Is it $100 per post?
>>> No, Archie Poo, I do this as a free public service to the international community to thwart your evil plans to create a generation of math failures just like you and your boyfriend here.
>>>
>
>> You never told the truth in your 10 years of stalking, why should I believe a word of what you say now.
>>
>
> I'm not asking YOU to believe anything, Archie Poo. You are beyond reason. You apparently have a "mission" to promote failure in schools. Some kind of twisted revenge thing? Who knows. Students should be warned about your lies, misinformation and just plain gibberish.
>
I will add that my warnings are also a public service to prevent
millions of math and science failures, especially with COVID
restrictions causing millions of uninformed parents buying texts online.

Another self-righteous arsehole, gone schizophrenic and now needs pyschriatic drugs to calm his obsessive compulsive disorder.

It is difficult to tell in psychology, how many components make up a schizophrenic insane person like Dan Christensen or Kibo Parry M. The self righteousness means no longer able to see "reality", the obsessive compulsive disorder to stalk every day of the year. And of course, never able to talk about math in sci.math or physics in sci.physics.

On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 7:24:02 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 7/8/2021 8:29 AM, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 9:28:06 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 2:15:50 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 1:20:36 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> >>>> How much does Justin Trudeau government in Canada pay Dan Christensen to stalk 24-7-365? Is it $100 per post?
> >>> No, Archie Poo, I do this as a free public service to the international community to thwart your evil plans to create a generation of math failures just like you and your boyfriend here.
> >>>
> >
> >> You never told the truth in your 10 years of stalking, why should I believe a word of what you say now.
> >>
> >
> > I'm not asking YOU to believe anything, Archie Poo. You are beyond reason. You apparently have a "mission" to promote failure in schools. Some kind of twisted revenge thing? Who knows. Students should be warned about your lies, misinformation and just plain gibberish.
> >
> I will add that my warnings are also a public service to prevent
> millions of math and science failures, especially with COVID
> restrictions causing millions of uninformed parents buying texts online.

On 7/8/2021 8:48 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Another self-righteous arsehole, gone schizophrenic and now needs pyschriatic drugs to calm his obsessive compulsive disorder.

That explains yourself perfectly, Archie! You cannot tell the
difference between some nutty idea you thought up and science reality.
I really wonder what you really think "prove" and "discover" mean in
relation to science and math.
>
> It is difficult to tell in psychology, how many components make up a schizophrenic insane person like Dan Christensen or Kibo Parry M. The self righteousness means no longer able to see "reality", the obsessive compulsive disorder to stalk every day of the year. And of course, never able to talk about math in sci.math or physics in sci.physics.
>
> On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 7:24:02 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> On 7/8/2021 8:29 AM, Dan Christensen wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 9:28:06 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 2:15:50 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 1:20:36 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>>>>>> How much does Justin Trudeau government in Canada pay Dan Christensen to stalk 24-7-365? Is it $100 per post?
>>>>> No, Archie Poo, I do this as a free public service to the international community to thwart your evil plans to create a generation of math failures just like you and your boyfriend here.
>>>>>
>>>
>>>> You never told the truth in your 10 years of stalking, why should I believe a word of what you say now.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not asking YOU to believe anything, Archie Poo. You are beyond reason. You apparently have a "mission" to promote failure in schools. Some kind of twisted revenge thing? Who knows. Students should be warned about your lies, misinformation and just plain gibberish.
>>>
>> I will add that my warnings are also a public service to prevent
>> millions of math and science failures, especially with COVID
>> restrictions causing millions of uninformed parents buying texts online.

Again, as I put in my warnings, I wonder if you are some stooge for some
foreign government level agency. Why else would you try to mislead an
entire generation of students? Maybe you really are just plain evil?