Jean Pierre Messager aka YBM aka JPM aka Python wrote at the end of 2019 that his "students" would be producing projects that show my New Calculus to be unworkable and a fake.

Well, I am still waiting for him to reveal to us here on sci.math where these can be found, if they exist at all. Chuckle.

Ironically, a high school French boy translated my free eBook into French without any solicitation from my part at all:

Introduction à la nouvelle méthode d'analyse à variable unique:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uKs2xsM9codbXZMJqmtsWkYersorRhnz

There are currently 4 translations (English, German, Chinese, French) and several in progress.

I guess his students were smart enough to figure out that Jean is an idiot. LMAO.

On 7/8/2021 7:21 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> Jean Pierre Messager aka YBM aka JPM aka Python wrote at the end of 2019 that his "students" would be producing projects that show my New Calculus to be unworkable and a fake.

Shut up imbecile.

On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 10:21:42 AM UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> Jean Pierre Messager aka YBM aka JPM aka Python wrote at the end of 2019 that his "students" would be producing projects that show my New Calculus to be unworkable and a fake.
>

It is unworkable because your "definition" of the derivative of a function blows up to the simplest functions, e.g. f(x)=|x|.

********************************************
WARNING TO STUDENTS: Don't become a victim of JG's fake math

JG here claims to have a discovered as shortcut to mastering calculus without using limits. Unfortunately for him, this means he has no workable a definition of the derivative of a function. It blows up for functions as simple f(x)=|x|. Or even f(x)=0. As a result, he has had to ban 0, negative numbers and instantaneous rates of change rendering his goofy little system quite useless. What a moron!

Forget calculus. JG has also banned all axioms because he cannot even derive the most elementary results of basic arithmetic, e.g. 2+2=4. Such results require the use of axioms, so he must figure he's now off the hook. Again, what a moron!

Even at his advanced age (60+?), John Gabriel is STILL struggling with basic, elementary-school arithmetic. As he has repeatedly posted here:

"There are no points on a line."
--April 12, 2021

"Pi is NOT a number of ANY kind!"
--July 10, 2020

"1/2 not equal to 2/4"
--October 22, 2017

“1/3 does NOT mean 1 divided by 3 and never has meant that”
-- February 8, 2015

"3 =< 4 is nonsense.”
--October 28, 2017

"Zero is not a number."
-- Dec. 2, 2019

"0 is not required at all in mathematics, just like negative numbers."
-- Jan. 4, 2017

“There is no such thing as an empty set.”
--Oct. 4, 2019

“3 <=> 2 + 1 or 3 <=> 8 - 5, etc, are all propositions” (actually all are meaningless gibberish)
--Oct. 22, 2019

No math genius our JG, though he actually lists his job title as “mathematician” at Linkedin.com. Apparently, they do not verify your credentials.

Though really quite disturbing, interested readers should see: “About the spamming troll John Gabriel in his own words...” (lasted updated March 10, 2020) at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.math/PcpAzX5pDeY/1PDiSlK_BwAJ

Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my Math Blog a http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

On Thursday, 8 July 2021 at 10:21:42 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> Jean Pierre Messager aka YBM aka JPM aka Python wrote at the end of 2019 that his "students" would be producing projects that show my New Calculus to be unworkable and a fake.
>
> Well, I am still waiting for him to reveal to us here on sci.math where these can be found, if they exist at all. Chuckle.
>
> Ironically, a high school French boy translated my free eBook into French without any solicitation from my part at all:
>
> Introduction à la nouvelle méthode d'analyse à variable unique:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uKs2xsM9codbXZMJqmtsWkYersorRhnz
>
> There are currently 4 translations (English, German, Chinese, French) and several in progress.
>
> I guess his students were smart enough to figure out that Jean is an idiot. LMAO.

Jean, seriously, this is not good for your reputation as a "lecturer" in France. Chuckle.

On Thursday, 8 July 2021 at 11:30:08 UTC-4, Dan Christensen spammed:

> "There are no points on a line."

Lie. I never said that. What I did say is that a line does not consists of points. When we talk about points on a line, we really mean distances that are indicated much like road signs do for distances travelled along a road.

A line one of innumerable distances between any two points.
A straight line is the shortest distance between two points.

> "Pi is NOT a number of ANY kind!"

True. Pi is merely a symbol for an incommensurable magnitude - apparently a concept too advanced for an imbecile like Dan Christensen.
> "1/2 not equal to 2/4"

Lie. I have NEVER said this. What I have talked about is the difference in the process of measure.
What does this mean? Well, 1/2 is the name given to a measure done by enumerating 1 of two equal parts of the unit.
2/4 is the name given to a measure done by enumerating 2 of four equal parts of the unit.

There is the case in geometry where 1/2 is not necessarily equal to 2/4. For example:

_ / _ _
_ _ / _ _ _ _

The length _ is not equal to the length _ _ .

> “1/3 does NOT mean 1 divided by 3 and never has meant that”

True. My brilliant article on how a genius mind discovers number and indeed how my brilliant ancestors (Ancient Greeks) realised number explains in detail:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hasWyQCZyRN3RkdvIB6bnGIVV2Rabz8w

Also, my article on pi not being a number of any kind:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FFg_9XCkIwTZ9N1jbU4oMYfHHHuFHYf3

The true story of how we got numbers:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-mOEooW03iLYTg1TGY4RTIwakU

No such thing as a "real number" or a "real number line":

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-mOEooW03iLMHVYcE8xcmRZRnc

There is no valid construction of "real number" - it's a myth:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-mOEooW03iLSTROakNyVXlQUEU

> "3 =< 4 is nonsense.”

True. In mathematics, it is called an invalid disjunction.

3 <= 4 means EITHER 3 < 4 OR 3 = 4

Actually, there is no "OR" part, so the logical disjunction is invalid.

> "Zero is not a number."

True. While not a number of any kind, it is very useful in mathematics.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1w2tt7IgoIu-ychDCoYi-4jOAzToy0ViM

> "0 is not required at all in mathematics, just like negative numbers."

Half-truth. While negative numbers are not required in mathematics, they are extremely useful.

> “There is no such thing as an empty set.”

True. Even the father of all mainstream mathematical cranks rejected the idea of empty set. But let's not go too far ... there isn't even a definition of "set" in set theory!

https://youtu.be/KvxjOMW6Q9w

https://youtu.be/1CcSsOG0okg

> “3 <=> 2 + 1 or 3 <=> 8 - 5, etc, are all propositions” (actually all are meaningless gibberish)

True. These are propositions that are implied by the given equations. For example, my historic geometric identity states:

[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h = dy/dx + Q(x,h)

And so, f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> dy/dx + Q(x,h)

The theorem:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj

How it provides a rigorous definition of integral for the flawed mainstream calculus:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uIBgJ1ObroIbkt0V2YFQEpPdd8l-xK6y

> Though really quite disturbing, interested readers should see: “About the spamming troll John Gabriel in his own words...” (lasted updated March 10, 2020) at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.math/PcpAzX5pDeY/1PDiSlK_BwAJ

The day will come when this vicious anonymous troll Dan Christensen is convicted in a court of law.

Download for free the most important mathematics book ever written:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/view

On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 11:59:29 AM UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 July 2021 at 11:30:08 UTC-4, Dan Christensen spammed:
> >
> Lie. I never said that.

A direct quote from April 12, 2021 here at sci.math

> What I did say is that a line does not consists of points.

In other words, "There are no points on a line." Thanks for clearing up, Troll Boy. (What moron!)

[snip]

> > "Pi is NOT a number of ANY kind!"
> True. Pi is merely a symbol for an incommensurable magnitude

Wrong again, Troll Boy. Pi is an irrational number, an element of the set of real numbers.

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_number

> > "1/2 not equal to 2/4"
> Lie. I have NEVER said this.

A direct quote from October 22, 2017 here at sci.math

> What I have talked about is the difference in the process of measure.
> What does this mean? Well, 1/2 is the name given to a measure done by enumerating 1 of two equal parts of the unit.
> 2/4 is the name given to a measure done by enumerating 2 of four equal parts of the unit.
>
> There is the case in geometry where 1/2 is not necessarily equal to 2/4. For example:
>

When will you learn, Troll Boy? 1/2 is ALWAYS EQUAL to 2/4.

[snip]

> > “1/3 does NOT mean 1 divided by 3 and never has meant that”
> True. My brilliant article on how a genius mind discovers number and indeed how my brilliant ancestors (Ancient Greeks) realised number explains in detail...

If you can't dazzle them brilliance, baffle them with bullshit, right, Troll Boy?

> > "3 =< 4 is nonsense.”
> True. In mathematics, it is called an invalid disjunction.
>

Nothing "invalid" about it, Troll Boy.

> 3 <= 4 means EITHER 3 < 4 OR 3 = 4
>

It means 3 < 4 OR 3 = 4, which is always truly.

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth_table#Logical_disjunction_(OR)
[snip]

> > "Zero is not a number."
> True. While not a number of any kind, it is very useful in mathematics.
>

It really is a number, Troll Boy. Deal with it.

> > "0 is not required at all in mathematics, just like negative numbers."

> Half-truth.

Nope. Completely false.

> While negative numbers are not required in mathematics, they are extremely useful.

<yawn!>

> > “There is no such thing as an empty set.”

> True.

Umm... What about the set of all your brilliant mathematical discoveries? Empty.

[snip]

> > “3 <=> 2 + 1 or 3 <=> 8 - 5, etc, are all propositions”

> True.

Nope. The biconditional is logical connective. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_biconditional

3 is not a logical proposition or a statement that is true or false. 3 is a number. So 3 <=> 2+1 would an error in syntax. Deal with it, Troll Boy.

[snip]

> > Though really quite disturbing, interested readers should see: “About the spamming troll John Gabriel in his own words...” (lasted updated March 10, 2020) at

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.math/PcpAzX5pDeY/1PDiSlK_BwAJ

Also, all direct quotes from you, Troll Boy. To the extent that you will be remembered at all, history will not be kind to you. Time to cut your losses and move on Troll Boy.

Dan

7/8/2021 Anonymous coward and king troll of sci.math Dan Christensen spammed:

> "There are no points on a line."

Lie. I never said that. What I did say is that a line does not consists of points. When we talk about points on a line, we really mean distances that are indicated much like road signs do for distances travelled along a road.

A line one of innumerable distances between any two points.
A straight line is the shortest distance between two points.

> "Pi is NOT a number of ANY kind!"

True. Pi is merely a symbol for an incommensurable magnitude - apparently a concept too advanced for an imbecile like Dan Christensen.

> "1/2 not equal to 2/4"

Lie. I have NEVER said this. What I have talked about is the difference in the process of measure.
What does this mean? Well, 1/2 is the name given to a measure done by enumerating 1 of two equal parts of the unit.
2/4 is the name given to a measure done by enumerating 2 of four equal parts of the unit.

There is the case in geometry where 1/2 is not necessarily equal to 2/4. For example:

_ / _ _
_ _ / _ _ _ _

The length _ is not equal to the length _ _ .

> “1/3 does NOT mean 1 divided by 3 and never has meant that”

True. My brilliant article on how a genius mind discovers number and indeed how my brilliant ancestors (Ancient Greeks) realised number explains in detail:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hasWyQCZyRN3RkdvIB6bnGIVV2Rabz8w

Also, my article on pi not being a number of any kind:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FFg_9XCkIwTZ9N1jbU4oMYfHHHuFHYf3

The true story of how we got numbers:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-mOEooW03iLYTg1TGY4RTIwakU

No such thing as a "real number" or a "real number line":

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-mOEooW03iLMHVYcE8xcmRZRnc

There is no valid construction of "real number" - it's a myth:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-mOEooW03iLSTROakNyVXlQUEU

> "3 =< 4 is nonsense.”

True. In mathematics, it is called an invalid disjunction.

3 <= 4 means EITHER 3 < 4 OR 3 = 4

Actually, there is no "OR" part, so the logical disjunction is invalid.

> "Zero is not a number."

True. While not a number of any kind, it is very useful in mathematics.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1w2tt7IgoIu-ychDCoYi-4jOAzToy0ViM

> "0 is not required at all in mathematics, just like negative numbers."

Half-truth. While negative numbers are not required in mathematics, they are extremely useful.

> “There is no such thing as an empty set.”

True. Even the father of all mainstream mathematical cranks rejected the idea of empty set. But let's not go too far ... there isn't even a definition of "set" in set theory!

https://youtu.be/KvxjOMW6Q9w

https://youtu.be/1CcSsOG0okg

> “3 <=> 2 + 1 or 3 <=> 8 - 5, etc, are all propositions” (actually all are meaningless gibberish)

True. These are propositions that are implied by the given equations. For example, my historic geometric identity states:

[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h = dy/dx + Q(x,h)

And so, f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> dy/dx + Q(x,h)

The theorem:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj

How it provides a rigorous definition of integral for the flawed mainstream calculus:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uIBgJ1ObroIbkt0V2YFQEpPdd8l-xK6y

> Though really quite disturbing, interested readers should see: “About the spamming troll John Gabriel in his own words...” (lasted updated March 10, 2020) at https://groups.google.com/forum

The day will come when this vicious anonymous troll Dan Christensen is convicted in a court of law.

Download for free the most important mathematics book ever written:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/view

On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 7:52:08 PM UTC-4, I am Super Rectum (aka John Gabriel, Troll Boy) wrote:

[snipping repetitive portions of JG's posting already debunked here]

Dan

7/9/2021
Anonymous coward and king troll of sci.math Dan Christensen spammed:

> "There are no points on a line."

Lie. I never said that. What I did say is that a line does not consists of points. When we talk about points on a line, we really mean distances that are indicated much like road signs do for distances travelled along a road.

A line one of innumerable distances between any two points.
A straight line is the shortest distance between two points.

> "Pi is NOT a number of ANY kind!"

True. Pi is merely a symbol for an incommensurable magnitude - apparently a concept too advanced for an imbecile like Dan Christensen.

> "1/2 not equal to 2/4"

Lie. I have NEVER said this. What I have talked about is the difference in the process of measure.
What does this mean? Well, 1/2 is the name given to a measure done by enumerating 1 of two equal parts of the unit.
2/4 is the name given to a measure done by enumerating 2 of four equal parts of the unit.

There is the case in geometry where 1/2 is not necessarily equal to 2/4. For example:

_ / _ _
_ _ / _ _ _ _

The length _ is not equal to the length _ _ .

> “1/3 does NOT mean 1 divided by 3 and never has meant that”

True. My brilliant article on how a genius mind discovers number and indeed how my brilliant ancestors (Ancient Greeks) realised number explains in detail:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hasWyQCZyRN3RkdvIB6bnGIVV2Rabz8w

Also, my article on pi not being a number of any kind:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FFg_9XCkIwTZ9N1jbU4oMYfHHHuFHYf3

The true story of how we got numbers:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-mOEooW03iLYTg1TGY4RTIwakU

No such thing as a "real number" or a "real number line":

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-mOEooW03iLMHVYcE8xcmRZRnc

There is no valid construction of "real number" - it's a myth:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-mOEooW03iLSTROakNyVXlQUEU

> "3 =< 4 is nonsense.”

True. In mathematics, it is called an invalid disjunction.

3 <= 4 means EITHER 3 < 4 OR 3 = 4

Actually, there is no "OR" part, so the logical disjunction is invalid.

> "Zero is not a number."

True. While not a number of any kind, it is very useful in mathematics.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1w2tt7IgoIu-ychDCoYi-4jOAzToy0ViM

> "0 is not required at all in mathematics, just like negative numbers."

Half-truth. While negative numbers are not required in mathematics, they are extremely useful.

> “There is no such thing as an empty set.”

True. Even the father of all mainstream mathematical cranks rejected the idea of empty set. But let's not go too far ... there isn't even a definition of "set" in set theory!

https://youtu.be/KvxjOMW6Q9w

https://youtu.be/1CcSsOG0okg

> “3 <=> 2 + 1 or 3 <=> 8 - 5, etc, are all propositions” (actually all are meaningless gibberish)

True. These are propositions that are implied by the given equations. For example, my historic geometric identity states:

[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h = dy/dx + Q(x,h)

And so, f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> dy/dx + Q(x,h)

The theorem:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj

How it provides a rigorous definition of integral for the flawed mainstream calculus:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uIBgJ1ObroIbkt0V2YFQEpPdd8l-xK6y

> Though really quite disturbing, interested readers should see: “About the spamming troll John Gabriel in his own words...” (lasted updated March 10, 2020) at https://groups.google.com/forum

The day will come when this vicious anonymous troll Dan Christensen is convicted in a court of law.

Download for free the most important mathematics book ever written:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/view

On Thursday, 8 July 2021 at 10:21:42 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> Jean Pierre Messager aka YBM aka JPM aka Python wrote at the end of 2019 that his "students" would be producing projects that show my New Calculus to be unworkable and a fake.
>
> Well, I am still waiting for him to reveal to us here on sci.math where these can be found, if they exist at all. Chuckle.
>
> Ironically, a high school French boy translated my free eBook into French without any solicitation from my part at all:
>
> Introduction à la nouvelle méthode d'analyse à variable unique:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uKs2xsM9codbXZMJqmtsWkYersorRhnz
>
> There are currently 4 translations (English, German, Chinese, French) and several in progress.
>
> I guess his students were smart enough to figure out that Jean is an idiot. LMAO.

Hellooooo Jean? Still there? I see you never told me about those projects of your "students"? It's been almost 1.2 years since Jan 2020....

You pathetic fucking crank!

On Thursday, 29 July 2021 at 20:00:57 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 July 2021 at 10:21:42 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > Jean Pierre Messager aka YBM aka JPM aka Python wrote at the end of 2019 that his "students" would be producing projects that show my New Calculus to be unworkable and a fake.
> >
> > Well, I am still waiting for him to reveal to us here on sci.math where these can be found, if they exist at all. Chuckle.
> >
> > Ironically, a high school French boy translated my free eBook into French without any solicitation from my part at all:
> >
> > Introduction à la nouvelle méthode d'analyse à variable unique:
> >
> > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uKs2xsM9codbXZMJqmtsWkYersorRhnz
> >
> > There are currently 4 translations (English, German, Chinese, French) and several in progress.
> >
> > I guess his students were smart enough to figure out that Jean is an idiot. LMAO.
> Hellooooo Jean? Still there? I see you never told me about those projects of your "students"? It's been almost 1.2 years since Jan 2020....
>
> You pathetic fucking crank!

Consultant Cloud et Devops chez Indépendant ??

I am laughing so hard!!!!

On 29.Jul.2021, Eram semper recta wrote:

> Hellooooo Jean? Still there? I see you never told me about those
> projects of your "students"? It's been almost 1.2 years since Jan
> 2020....
>
> You pathetic fucking crank!

First it was free doughnuts, entry into a lottery or Walgreens $100.00
gift certificates as enticements to take "the jab", now it's "We're
coming to your door."

Afghanistan, testament to the power of an armed populace .

On Thursday, 8 July 2021 at 10:21:42 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> Jean Pierre Messager aka YBM aka JPM aka Python wrote at the end of 2019 that his "students" would be producing projects that show my New Calculus to be unworkable and a fake.
>
> Well, I am still waiting for him to reveal to us here on sci.math where these can be found, if they exist at all. Chuckle.
>
> Ironically, a high school French boy translated my free eBook into French without any solicitation from my part at all:
>
> Introduction à la nouvelle méthode d'analyse à variable unique:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uKs2xsM9codbXZMJqmtsWkYersorRhnz
>
> There are currently 4 translations (English, German, Chinese, French) and several in progress.
>
> I guess his students were smart enough to figure out that Jean is an idiot. LMAO.

Just goes to show that getting a Master degree in mathematics or even a PhD means absolutely shit. Sigh,...

On Thursday, 8 July 2021 at 10:21:42 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> Jean Pierre Messager aka YBM aka JPM aka Python wrote at the end of 2019 that his "students" would be producing projects that show my New Calculus to be unworkable and a fake.
>
> Well, I am still waiting for him to reveal to us here on sci.math where these can be found, if they exist at all. Chuckle.
>
> Ironically, a high school French boy translated my free eBook into French without any solicitation from my part at all:
>
> Introduction à la nouvelle méthode d'analyse à variable unique:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uKs2xsM9codbXZMJqmtsWkYersorRhnz
>
> There are currently 4 translations (English, German, Chinese, French) and several in progress.
>
> I guess his students were smart enough to figure out that Jean is an idiot. LMAO.

No response from the psychopath Jean Pierre Messager? Chuckle.

Eram semper recta wrote:

>> I guess his students were smart enough to figure out that Jean is an
>> idiot. LMAO.
>
> No response from the psychopath Jean Pierre Messager? Chuckle.

Try this, you inbreed idiot. Go try donate blood to Red Cross. They will
kick you out, because you are infected. How can you be this stupid,
explain this to me in details.

On Thursday, 8 July 2021 at 10:21:42 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> Jean Pierre Messager aka YBM aka JPM aka Python wrote at the end of 2019 that his "students" would be producing projects that show my New Calculus to be unworkable and a fake.
>
> Well, I am still waiting for him to reveal to us here on sci.math where these can be found, if they exist at all. Chuckle.
>
> Ironically, a high school French boy translated my free eBook into French without any solicitation from my part at all:
>
> Introduction à la nouvelle méthode d'analyse à variable unique:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uKs2xsM9codbXZMJqmtsWkYersorRhnz
>
> There are currently 4 translations (English, German, Chinese, French) and several in progress.
>
> I guess his students were smart enough to figure out that Jean is an idiot. LMAO.

I guess lying psychopath Jean Pierre Messager aka Python has chickened out. :)

His imaginary students obviously could not create these projects as much as the delusional fool desired...

Eram semper recta wrote:

>> I guess his students were smart enough to figure out that Jean is an
>> idiot. LMAO.
>
> I guess lying psychopath Jean Pierre Messager aka Python has chickened
> out.

Pfizer CEO's Israel visit canceled because he is not fully vaccinated
https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/pfizer-ceos-israel-visit-cancelled-because-he-is-unvaccinated-report-661100

Bourla said in December that he has not yet received the
vaccine yet because he does not want to "cut in line."

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla has canceled his expected visit
to Israel after it turned out he has not been fully
vaccinated against the coronavirus, N12 reported Friday.

On 8/6/2021 12:57 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:

> I guess lying psychopath Jean Pierre Messager aka Python has chickened out. :)
>
> His imaginary students obviously could not create these projects as much as the delusional fool desired...
>

And your invisible students aren't imaginary, Buttbreath?

On Friday, 6 August 2021 at 14:02:08 UTC-4, Kolijn Sneijers wrote:
> Eram semper recta wrote:
>
> >> I guess his students were smart enough to figure out that Jean is an
> >> idiot. LMAO.
> >
> > I guess lying psychopath Jean Pierre Messager aka Python has chickened
> > out.
> Pfizer CEO's Israel visit canceled because he is not fully vaccinated

So what? He got vaccinated on March 21st.

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-pfizer-ceovaccine/fact-check-pfizer-ceo-received-his-second-dose-of-the-covid-19-vaccine-on-march-2021-idUSL1N2PD1UX

> https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/pfizer-ceos-israel-visit-cancelled-because-he-is-unvaccinated-report-661100

On Friday, 6 August 2021 at 16:49:52 UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 8/6/2021 12:57 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>
> > I guess lying psychopath Jean Pierre Messager aka Python has chickened out. :)
> >
> > His imaginary students obviously could not create these projects as much as the delusional fool desired...
> >
> And your invisible students aren't imaginary, Buttbreath?

You know MORONey, my butt is actually cleaner than your mouth. I haven't used toilet paper almost all of my life and there are never skid marks on my glutes. Being born in a Muslim country, I was taught to wash after a bowel movement.

You on the other hand, not only have a filthy arse (with bits of toilet paper stuck to your dried shit), but I bet if they did a count of bacteria in your mouth and my arse, your count would far exceed mine.

Let's just say that if I had a fetish for having my arse licked, I wouldn't trust your germ infested tongue anywhere near my butt hole. LMAO.

You can define:

3 =< 4 <=> 3 = 4 v 3 < 4

But you can also define it as, because of Trichotomy:

3 =< 4 <=> 3 = 4 xor 3 < 4

Doesn't change anything, gives the same truth value.

What is the truth value?

Eram semper recta schrieb am Freitag, 6. August 2021 um 23:52:00 UTC+2:
> On Friday, 6 August 2021 at 16:49:52 UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > On 8/6/2021 12:57 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >
> > > I guess lying psychopath Jean Pierre Messager aka Python has chickened out. :)
> > >
> > > His imaginary students obviously could not create these projects as much as the delusional fool desired...
> > >
> > And your invisible students aren't imaginary, Buttbreath?
> You know MORONey, my butt is actually cleaner than your mouth. I haven't used toilet paper almost all of my life and there are never skid marks on my glutes. Being born in a Muslim country, I was taught to wash after a bowel movement.
>
> You on the other hand, not only have a filthy arse (with bits of toilet paper stuck to your dried shit), but I bet if they did a count of bacteria in your mouth and my arse, your count would far exceed mine.
>
> Let's just say that if I had a fetish for having my arse licked, I wouldn't trust your germ infested tongue anywhere near my butt hole. LMAO.

On 8/6/2021 5:51 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Friday, 6 August 2021 at 16:49:52 UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> On 8/6/2021 12:57 PM, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>
>>> I guess lying psychopath Jean Pierre Messager aka Python has chickened out. :)
>>>
>>> His imaginary students obviously could not create these projects as much as the delusional fool desired...
>>>
>> And your invisible students aren't imaginary, Buttbreath?
>
> You know MORONey, my butt is actually

I wasn't talking about your butt/poop fetish, I was asking about your
invisible nonexistent students you (try to) talk to.

As I stated, you need to link up with ArchiePOO. He has a poop fetish
as well, and is looking for a bedwarmer. And a bodyguard. You should
get along marvelously, his fetish is "AnalButtfuckManure". You can
teach him your buttcleaning ritual as well.

On Thursday, 8 July 2021 at 10:21:42 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> Jean Pierre Messager aka YBM aka JPM aka Python wrote at the end of 2019 that his "students" would be producing projects that show my New Calculus to be unworkable and a fake.
>
> Well, I am still waiting for him to reveal to us here on sci.math where these can be found, if they exist at all. Chuckle.
>
> Ironically, a high school French boy translated my free eBook into French without any solicitation from my part at all:
>
> Introduction à la nouvelle méthode d'analyse à variable unique:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uKs2xsM9codbXZMJqmtsWkYersorRhnz
>
> There are currently 4 translations (English, German, Chinese, French) and several in progress.
>
> I guess his students were smart enough to figure out that Jean is an idiot. LMAO.

Refreshed due to troll activity.