novaBBS - sci.math - 46) MATHOPEDIA-- Listing of 70 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. AP's 174th book. Last revision was 28JUN2021. Preface: I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held

46) MATHOPEDIA-- Listing of 70 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. AP's 174th book.

Last revision was 28JUN2021.

Preface: I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds question of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

Some of these can be found in AP's TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS series, but the entries keep changing and added on new, means I need to have a separate book for these fakes, mistakes and errors of Old Math.

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for ages 18-19 Freshperson College, math textbook series, book 3
Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
Listing the Errors of Old Math, list of 1 to 50.

Alright, well, mathematics is a closed subject. What I mean by that is due to the textbook series of Archimedes Plutonium TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, that once you learn the polynomial transform and learn the two Power Rules of Calculus, you reached the peak, the pinnacle of all of mathematics, and anything further in math is just details of what you learn in that textbook series. Math is a completed science because it has this "peak of calculus", unlike the other 5 hard sciences of physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy. Those other five will continue to find new ideas, new things, while math remains static and complete to its peak of calculus understanding. Mathematics is finished complete as far as a science goes because the peak of math is going nowhere. And even though Physics will find new science such as how the proton toruses inside of atoms are configured in geometry, the geometry and calculus used in that configuration, that new science does not change nor does it create or require a new math peak/summit to handle the new physics.

Now I do need to discuss the Errors of Math in General and the errors of math in geometry in particular. I have the feeling that Geometry is the more important of the two-- algebra - geometry. This list appears in most of AP's Teaching True Mathematics textbook series by Archimedes Plutonium, meant to be a guide and orientation, and a organizing of what must be covered before graduating from College, and what math to steer clear of.

Errors mostly, but not always, for some are included because too much time spent on them.

The listings in Mathopedia of errors, mistakes and fakes is based on the idea that Calculus is the supreme achievement of all of mathematics for it is the essential math of doing Physics electricity and magnetism. And in order to have a proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, we must clean up and clean out all the mistakes, fakes and errors of Old Math, erst, we have no Calculus. So calculus is the consistency maker for the rest of all of mathematics.

1) Calculus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, a proof that derivative and integral are inverses of one another, just as addition and subtraction are inverses, or, multiplication and division are inverses. The only way to obtain a geometry proof is to clean up and clean out all the fakes, mistakes and errors of Old Math, such as their fake numbers-- the Reals. Their fake definition of function allowing anything be a function. Their fakery of a continuum when even physics by 1900 with Planck onwards in Quantum Mechanics proving the Universe is discrete Space not a continuum, yet by 1900 onwards those in mathematics following the idiotic continuum in the Continuum Hypothesis with even more avid interest, when they should have thrown the continuum on a trashpile of shame.

2) The true numbers of mathematics are the Decimal Grid Numbers, because you have to need and apply one mechanism only to obtain the true numbers of mathematics-- Mathematical Induction. In Old Math they had just a tiny few intelligent mathematicians, Kronecker, who emerged from the gaggle crowd of kooks to notice that Naturals all come from one single mechanism-- Mathematical Induction. But Old Math never had a crowd of mathematicians with logical brains to say-- all our numbers need to come from the one mechanism of Mathematical Induction.

3) The true numbers of math have empty space between successor and predecessor numbers. For example the 10 Grid is 0, .1, .2, .3, . . . , 9.8, 9.9, 10..0. Where no numbers exist between .1 and .2, etc. Only discrete numbers allow us to give a proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

4) All functions of mathematics must be a polynomial, and if not a polynomial, convert the offering to a polynomial over a specific interval.

5) Space is discrete and all lines in space are strings of attached straight lines.

6) No curves exist in Geometry, only finer and smaller straight line segments attached to one another.
We can still keep the name "curve" as long as we know it is a string of fine tiny straightline segments strung together in what looks like a smooth curve. If curves exist, then the Calculus in Fundamental Theorem of Calculus cannot be proven and thus Calculus does not exist. We all know that we have to have Calculus, and so we throw out onto the trash pile the curve of Old Math. And this is reasonable because starting in 1900 in physics there arose the Quantum Mechanics of Space being discrete. And a discrete space has no continuum, has no curve of Old Math.

7) Space has gaps in between one point and the next point. These gaps are empty space from one point to the next point, for example in 10 Grid there is no number between .1 and .2, and in 100 Grid there exists no number between .01 and .02.

8) Limit analysis was an insane fakery in Old Math, concocted because Old Math needed the excuse of some proof, so they invented the monster con-artist trick that a limit analysis would divert the fact it is no proof at all, but a Non Sequitur argument. Limit analysis is juju totem witchcraft dance around a desire to prove the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Just as idiotic as dancing around a sick person of a virus is going to cure the person.

9) Infinity has a borderline and there is a microinfinity compared to a macroinfinity. For example in 10 Grid, the microinfinity is .1 if we exclude 0 and so there is no number smaller than .1 and no number larger than 10 in 10 Grid, where 10 is macroinfinity.

10) The 1st Quadrant Only in Coordinate System Geometry. Sad that the first coordinate system of Descartes was correct but soon became corrupted with 4 quadrants. See Mathematical Thought, Volume 1, Kline, 1972, page 303. Where Fermat then Descartes starts the Cartesian Coordinate System as 1 axis only and from 0 rightwards, meaning in our modern day math, 1st Quadrant Only. Why did math screw up on coordinate systems? I suppose some clowns thought negative numbers were true and they wanted ease of drawing a circle with center at 0. When they could have just as easily drawn the circle in 1st Quadrant Only.

11) Calculus needed a Geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, but Old Math never provided such, instead they provided some stupid Limit argument. The reason for the creation of the Limit disaster was that the French mathematician Cauchy got sick and tired of hearing his smartest students complain that the width of rectangles in the integral are 0 width, and those smart students could not, for the life of them understand how a rectangle with 0 width has any interior area. So instead of the math community denouncing the limit, instead they elevated the fakery.

12) Further in Calculus, they knew you could do a transform of coordinate points to turn any function into a polynomial function, a method of Lagrange.. However, they in Old Math were too stupid to take this transform to its highest form-- all functions are polynomial functions and only polynomial functions. When you learn that-- the derivative and integral of any and every function of math is a snap breeze simple and easy.

13) With the error filled 4 quadrants, when it should be 1st Quadrant Only, we have Trigonometry's sine and cosine with the fakery of sinusoid wave when it never was that. The sine and cosine are semicircle waves, and no sinusoid wave exists.

14) There is only one Geometry-- Euclidean, and there is not three distinct geometries of elliptical Riemannian or hyperbolic Lobachevsky. Those two are just duals that make up Euclidean.

15) Torus, volume and surface area formulas in Old Math are all screwed up and in error because they imagined bending a cylinder to form a torus. This brings back memories, for I had to do a percentage formula, since I could not follow the fake way of bending a cylinder. Where 78.5% of Disc Torus (pi)R^2h - (pi)r^2h is the volume of Circle Torus, and 78.5% of Disc Torus 2(pi)Rh + 2(pi)rh + 2 ((pi)R^2 - (pi)r^2) is the surface area of Circle Torus..

16) Ellipse is never a single cone slant cut, always a cylinder slant cut. Although you do get an ellipse from double cones of this configuration <> which in Old Math was the hyperbola, but two hyperbolas joined together to form a ellipse.

17) All Parallelepipeds reduced to a Rectangular Box by making 2 cuts and pastes. Volume of the original Parallelepiped is simply a*b*c of the Rectangular Box length*width*depth formed. Old Math never understood that a precise definition of Parallelepiped has two kinds, the parallelepiped that has 90 degree angles and the parallelepiped that has no 90 degree angle.

Click here to read the complete article

NSF, Dr. Panchanathan, do you pay Kibo Parry M $100 per stalker post? For that is more money than college professors are paid to actually teach math and physics in classrooms. Do you pay him "per diem", free ride to and from home to office with breakfast included, before he reaches his desk to "send his first stalker posts". Dr. Panchanathan, do you not think it silly to spend taxpayer dollars paying stalkers to stalk forums of science and math. If anyone reading sci.math or sci.physics and cannot tell the difference between con-artist-scientists, they do not deserve to be in science in the first place, and you need not pay people to stalk. For it is a life-principle that we constantly have to weed out truth from falsehood, and there is no payed-stalker to help you to weed.

sci.physics

Web results for "Harvard Dr Hau"
3rd hit 1st page "Harvard Dr.Hau"

Thanks Google for Balanced Search Hits on Harvard's Dr. Hau ...

3rd hit 1st page "Harvard Dr.Hau" is fair honest balanced Google Search list with Counterpoint as 3rd hit// Contrast that to the dishonest corrupt ...

sci.physics
Google, great job on Harvard Dr. Hau, lousy pitiful job on Thomas Hales ...
Google, great job on Harvard Dr. Hau, lousy pitiful job on Thomas Hales, Sheldon Glashow as some propaganda pitch as if Search engines have become science-propaganda-kiosks, instead of Balanced Journalism with Counterpoint. Is Google trying to
Archimedes Plutonium Jun 25, 2021, 8:43:01 PM

sci.physics
Balanced & Counterpoint Google Search for Steven Weinberg, not ...

sci.physics
1st page 2nd & 3rd hits for Univ Texas Steven Weinberg, under Google Search ...

sci.physics
Balanced & Counterpoint Google Search list for Steven Weinberg, Sheldon ...
to Plutonium Atom Universe. Balanced & Counterpoint Google Search list for Steven Weinberg, Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, the day when millions of search hits ...

sci.physics
1 -Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Sheldon Glashow who ...

sci.math
Excellent job Google Search for Queen's James Leech, hope of fixing logic and ...

sci.math

2nd page under "Michael Meighen McGill"

Re: 176,232-Student Victims of Michael Meighen McGill Univ by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of ...

sci.math
Possible explanation for bias & prejudicial Google search engine ...

sci.math
Andrew Wiles plutonium or Terence Tao plutonium. As evidenced by this. with his fake FLT, for he lusts for fame ... to Plutonium Atom Universe. Math Con-Artist ...

sci.math
Re: 2Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test - Google Groups

sci.math
Math Con-Artist Andrew Wiles with his fake FLT, for he lusts for fame ...
to Plutonium Atom Universe. Math Con-Artist Andrew Wiles with his fake FLT, for he lusts for fame and fortune but never the truth of mathematics. The nitwit ...

sci.math
3) AP proved Fermat's Last Theorem in 1991-1993 while Andrew Wiles has a ....

sci.math
2nd page under "Rose M Patten".

8-Student victims of Rose M. Patten Univ Toronto from stalker Dan ...
8-Student victims of Rose M. Patten Univ Toronto from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of ...

8-Student victims of Rose M. Patten Univ Toronto from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus On Monday, April 5, 2021 at 7:45:08 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrot
Archimedes Plutonium Apr 5, 2021, 11:12:19 AM

sci.math

1st page first 3 hits for Univ Toronto Rose M Patten, under Google Search "Rose M ...

1st page first 3 hits for Univ Toronto Rose M Patten, under Google Search "Rose M Patten plutonium", should be on 1st page of search list for "Rose M Patten"
Archimedes Plutonium Jul 4, 2021, 4:29:00 PM

Subject	Author
46) MATHOPEDIA-- Listing of 70 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. AP's	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: 46) MATHOPEDIA-- Listing of 70 fakes and mistakes of Old Math.	Michael Moroney
Re: 46) MATHOPEDIA-- Listing of 70 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. AP's 174th bo	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: 46) MATHOPEDIA-- Listing of 70 fakes and mistakes of Old Math.	Hagan Echelbarger
Re: 46) MATHOPEDIA-- Listing of 70 fakes and mistakes of Old Math.	Hagan Echelbarger

I haven't lost my mind -- it's backed up on tape somewhere.

tech / sci.math / 46) MATHOPEDIA-- Listing of 70 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. AP's 174th book. Last revision was 28JUN2021. Preface: I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held