Archimedes Plutonium
Jul 21, 2021, 2:17 AM
to sci.math
On Thursday, July 22, 2021 at 1:42:31 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> tarded:

That is right- Andrew, to keep your con-art FLT going as long as possible, keep your keeper of Kibo Parry M. with his 938 is 12% short of 945, when the real question you have to answer is why you missed spotting the error and gaping hole in Euler's exponent 3 proof of FLT.

Run and hide, Andrew and let your henchmen like Kibo scream their way on your behalf.

As I said earlier, back in 1993, Kin Chung of Princeton had more knowledge of FLT with his question of how 2+2=2x2 forms a Algebraic Basis for solutions and Berkeley's Roland Dreier offering the proof for exp 2.

So Andrew, run, hide, never address FLT because you have no FLT, and all you have is a Fake Con-Art Work. Once you start engaging in real questions of your work-- you end up with the realization you have no proof.

Andrew, do you pay Kibo Parry Moroney and Dan Christensen and Jan Burse, to attack, while you run and hide.

Why, Andrew, in your lifetime in math, why were you never able to see that calculus is geometry, and thus, you needed to do a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Is it because you have no real math abilities other than hoodwink others into thinking you know math.

Why did you fail to see Euler needed to prove A, B, C were not all three even numbers for A^3 + B^3= C^3, is it because, Andrew, you have no logical marbles to think mathematically. So you assumed that in A^2+B^2= C^2, that in exp 2 they are no primitive solutions of all three evens, not all three evens for you divide out the evens by 2. So you assumed what happened in exp2 and carried that over to exp3 and made the same mistake as Euler. So you failed on that as did Euler. It is a tricky piece of logic. A logic that is above your head Andrew for here is a solution in Shadowy FLT where all three A,B,C are evens 2^3 +2^3 = 2^4. So, Euler missed that had a gaping hole. Wiles missed that but was never cognizant of it.

So you can have solutions where all three A,B,C are evens. You cannot be a dunce idiot like Andrew Wiles and say-- because in Pythagorean theorem we divide out the evens and end up with 2 odds and 1 even.

So, Andrew, you were so dumb in FLT that you missed correcting Euler, and Euler was a powerhouse in math, but you missed Euler's mistake, yet you went ahead on your Con Art FLT.

How many more years are you going to hold-back on the truth behind FLT, leaving the math community in a cesspool of error that you larger was a contributing factor.

Your whole life, Andrew was not about chasing math truth, no, it was about fame and fortune at all cost.


AP
King of Science, especially Physics