Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

<< WAIT >>

tech / sci.physics.relativity / 2 slit experiment done without observer of light

SubjectAuthor
* 2 slit experiment done without observer of lightmitchr...@gmail.com
`* Re: 2 slit experiment done without observer of lightmitchr...@gmail.com
 +- Re: 2 slit experiment done without observer of lightmitchr...@gmail.com
 `- Re: 2 slit experiment done without observer of lightIke Dow

1
2 slit experiment done without observer of light

<dd0344cb-2ef7-4219-9f33-0bd3baaee5b1n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=67723&group=sci.physics.relativity#67723

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:405b:: with SMTP id j27mr6467291qtl.101.1631814924876;
Thu, 16 Sep 2021 10:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:67d7:: with SMTP id r23mr6337800qtp.227.1631814924690;
Thu, 16 Sep 2021 10:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 10:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:1c0:c803:ab80:44ce:28c9:fce7:9aff;
posting-account=Dg6LkgkAAABl5NRBT4_iFEO1VO77GchW
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:1c0:c803:ab80:44ce:28c9:fce7:9aff
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <dd0344cb-2ef7-4219-9f33-0bd3baaee5b1n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: 2 slit experiment done without observer of light
From: mitchrae...@gmail.com (mitchr...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:55:24 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 14
 by: mitchr...@gmail.com - Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:55 UTC

light alone kept it the same result instead of an observer
of the light. Observer's were not present.
They did set up and then start the experiment
then left for 2 hours and came back and
shut the experiment down.
Bohr's result was not what was at
the detection screen after the experiment
was over. According to Bohr it was supposed
to change to the wave distribution but
it did not. With light unobserved it remained
at the particle distribution. This disproves
Bohr's QMs and validates Einstein's win
since his beginning in history.

Mitchell Raemsch

Re: 2 slit experiment done without observer of light

<84567182-5f52-47a1-b6be-cd843a54f6d6n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=67738&group=sci.physics.relativity#67738

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:43d6:: with SMTP id w22mr6699116qtn.92.1631821436486;
Thu, 16 Sep 2021 12:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4b6c:: with SMTP id g12mr6787623qts.170.1631821436351;
Thu, 16 Sep 2021 12:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 12:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <dd0344cb-2ef7-4219-9f33-0bd3baaee5b1n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:1c0:c803:ab80:44ce:28c9:fce7:9aff;
posting-account=Dg6LkgkAAABl5NRBT4_iFEO1VO77GchW
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:1c0:c803:ab80:44ce:28c9:fce7:9aff
References: <dd0344cb-2ef7-4219-9f33-0bd3baaee5b1n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <84567182-5f52-47a1-b6be-cd843a54f6d6n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: 2 slit experiment done without observer of light
From: mitchrae...@gmail.com (mitchr...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 19:43:56 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 24
 by: mitchr...@gmail.com - Thu, 16 Sep 2021 19:43 UTC

On Thursday, September 16, 2021 at 10:55:26 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> light alone kept it the same result instead of an observer
> of the light. Observer's were not present.
> They did set up and then start the experiment
> then left for 2 hours and came back and
> shut the experiment down.
> Bohr's result was not what was at
> the detection screen after the experiment
> was over. According to Bohr it was supposed
> to change to the wave distribution but
> it did not. With light unobserved it remained
> at the particle distribution. This disproves
> Bohr's QMs and validates Einstein's win
> since his beginning in history.
>
> Mitchell Raemsch

Light at the two holes for the quantum wave particle passing through did the
job without observers for it present The observations of the detection screen
came after the end of the experiment. Bohr said the result would change
by his interpretation but they did not. Bohr's fiction for science did
not get to win Einstein real in history...

Mitchell Raemsch

Re: 2 slit experiment done without observer of light

<65602101-d31e-40d7-bba3-85da974d400en@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=67800&group=sci.physics.relativity#67800

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:43d6:: with SMTP id w22mr11601105qtn.92.1631904840809;
Fri, 17 Sep 2021 11:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:e8d2:: with SMTP id a201mr11291633qkg.347.1631904840685;
Fri, 17 Sep 2021 11:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 11:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <84567182-5f52-47a1-b6be-cd843a54f6d6n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:1c0:c803:ab80:1019:2e81:1fac:e4e4;
posting-account=Dg6LkgkAAABl5NRBT4_iFEO1VO77GchW
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:1c0:c803:ab80:1019:2e81:1fac:e4e4
References: <dd0344cb-2ef7-4219-9f33-0bd3baaee5b1n@googlegroups.com> <84567182-5f52-47a1-b6be-cd843a54f6d6n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <65602101-d31e-40d7-bba3-85da974d400en@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: 2 slit experiment done without observer of light
From: mitchrae...@gmail.com (mitchr...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 18:54:00 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 30
 by: mitchr...@gmail.com - Fri, 17 Sep 2021 18:54 UTC

On Thursday, September 16, 2021 at 12:43:57 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, September 16, 2021 at 10:55:26 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > light alone kept it the same result instead of an observer
> > of the light. Observer's were not present.
> > They did set up and then start the experiment
> > then left for 2 hours and came back and
> > shut the experiment down.
> > Bohr's result was not what was at
> > the detection screen after the experiment
> > was over. According to Bohr it was supposed
> > to change to the wave distribution but
> > it did not. With light unobserved it remained
> > at the particle distribution. This disproves
> > Bohr's QMs and validates Einstein's win
> > since his beginning in history.
> >
> > Mitchell Raemsch
> Light at the two holes for the quantum wave particle passing through did the
> job without observers for it present The observations of the detection screen
> came after the end of the experiment. Bohr said the result would change
> by his interpretation but they did not. Bohr's fiction for science did
> not get to win Einstein real in history...
>
> Mitchell Raemsch

The experiment demonstrated observers of light are not necessary
to collapse the waves of matter... or to disentangle them...
at high EM density waves are kept disentangled.
A planet has less EM density than its star. So
planetary waves entanglement will dominate.

Re: 2 slit experiment done without observer of light

<si2t63$1b66$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=67804&group=sci.physics.relativity#67804

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!Czu3gSeoVm9JuiYIubsXjA.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tyu...@iked.ow (Ike Dow)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: 2 slit experiment done without observer of light
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 20:18:12 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <si2t63$1b66$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <dd0344cb-2ef7-4219-9f33-0bd3baaee5b1n@googlegroups.com>
<84567182-5f52-47a1-b6be-cd843a54f6d6n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="44230"; posting-host="Czu3gSeoVm9JuiYIubsXjA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Evolution/2.32.1 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14.2)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Ike Dow - Fri, 17 Sep 2021 20:18 UTC

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> Light at the two holes for the quantum wave particle passing through
> did the job without observers for it present The observations of the
> detection screen came after the end of the experiment. Bohr said the
> result would change by his interpretation but they did not. Bohr's
> fiction for science did not get to win Einstein real in history...

let me see your second slit.

tech / sci.physics.relativity / 2 slit experiment done without observer of light

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor