Richard,

You just reached a new low by creating a fake persona and pretending to be Christian Corda. You did the same thing before, by resurrecting Koobee Wublee from the dead. You are the lowest scumbag and you are not fooling anybody.

Dono. wrote:
> Richard,
>
> You just reached a new low by creating a fake persona and pretending to be Christian Corda. You did the same thing before, by resurrecting Koobee Wublee from the dead. You are the lowest scumbag and you are not fooling anybody.
>

Well, a quick look at headers shows that Christian Corda is posting
from Italy (IP owned by wind.it) while Richard Hertz is posting from
Argentina. I doubt that Richard is skilled enough to use some kind of
proxy to pretend posting from Italy.

On Thursday, September 16, 2021 at 7:50:02 AM UTC-7, Python wrote:
> Dono. wrote:
> > Richard,
> >
> > You just reached a new low by creating a fake persona and pretending to be Christian Corda. You did the same thing before, by resurrecting Koobee Wublee from the dead. You are the lowest scumbag and you are not fooling anybody.
> >
> Well, a quick look at headers shows that Christian Corda is posting
> from Italy (IP owned by wind.it) while Richard Hertz is posting from
> Argentina. I doubt that Richard is skilled enough to use some kind of
> proxy to pretend posting from Italy.
Yes, he is, he's done it before. Remember, he's an engineer.

On Thursday, September 16, 2021 at 11:32:27 AM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:

> Richard,
>
> You just reached a new low by creating a fake persona and pretending to be Christian Corda. You did the same thing
> before, by resurrecting Koobee Wublee from the dead. You are the lowest scumbag and you are not fooling anybody.

I knew that you was insane, but I never believe that you could reach such degree of psychopathy, losing any touch with
reality and now, having an acute psychotic episode that makes me wonder why authorities don't put you into a mental institution.

You are sick, very very sick, Dono. I think that you are dangerous for yourself or for anyone close to you.

And I'm saying this with some kind of pity. Persons with mental disorders always moved me, because of the fragility of the mind.

But they have to be under watch and interned for their own sake and for the sake of others around him.

Your post confirm that you spiraled down into madness in those last 5 years. It can be proven just how much your character
deteriorated in the last 5 years. Anyone can check it by searching "Dono 2015". for instance.

However, as this is REALLY SERIOUS, I want to tell you that there is hope, if you are properly medicated, which you obviously are not.

And who the fuck is Koobee Wublee??

On Thursday, September 16, 2021 at 8:54:24 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
> And who the fuck is Koobee Wublee??
A cretin. Just like you. You should know, you impersonated him a week ago.

On Thursday, September 16, 2021 at 11:50:02 AM UTC-3, Python wrote:

<snip>

> Well, a quick look at headers shows that Christian Corda is posting
> from Italy (IP owned by wind.it) while Richard Hertz is posting from
> Argentina. I doubt that Richard is skilled enough to use some kind of
> proxy to pretend posting from Italy.

And, if I knew how to do it (I don't), why I would make such effort just to post
against Paul, who I believe is a nice guy (even when we have different positions on relativity)?

Reading his resume, Christian Corda is involved with research on heavy stuff:

Current list of publications

Sole authored publications in peer reviewed international journals and in peer reviewed Proceedings
of international conferences:

1. Christian Corda, "Interferometric detection of gravitational waves: the definitive test for General
Relativity", Honorable Mention Winner at the 2009 Gravity Research Foundation Awards for Essays
on Gravitation, Int. Journ. Mod. Phys. D 18, 14, 22752282 (December 2009, Special Issue).

2. Christian Corda, “Effective temperature for black holes”, JHEP 08, 101 (2011).

3. Christian Corda, “Gravitational wave astronomy: the definitive test for the "Einstein frame versus
Jordan frame" controversy”, Astropart. Phys. 34,l 412419 (2011).

4. Christian Corda, “Precise response function for the magnetic component of Gravitational Waves in
ScalarTensor Gravity”, Phys. Rev. D 83, 062002 (2011).

5. Christian Corda, “Information on the inflaton field from the spectrum of relic gravitational waves”,
Gen. Rel. Grav. 42,13231333, (2010).

6. Christian Corda, “The production of matter from curvature in a particular linearized high order
theory of gravity and the longitudinal response function of interferometers”, J. Cosmol. Astropart.
Phys. JCAP 04, 009 (2007).

7. Christian Corda, “A solution of linearized Einstein field equations in vacuum used for the detection
of the stochastic background of gravitational waves”, Astropart. Phys. 27, 539549 (2007).

8. Christian Corda, “Tuning the Stochastic Background of Gravitational Waves Using the WMAP
Data” , Mod. Phys. Lett. A, vol. 22, 16, 11671173 (2007).

9. Christian Corda, “The Importance of the ''magnetic'' components of gravitational waves in the
response functions of interferometers”, Int. Journ. Mod. Phys. D, 16, 8, 14971517 (2007).

10.Christian Corda, “Extension of the frequencyrange of interferometers for the ''magnetic''
components of gravitational waves?”, Int. Journ. Mod. Phys. A ,22, 13, 23612381 (2007).

11.Christian Corda, “A longitudinal component in massive gravitational waves arising from a
bimetric theory of gravity”, Astropart. Phys. 28, 2, 247250 ( 2007)..

12. Christian Corda, “Analysis of the transverse effect of Einstein’s gravitational waves”, Int.. Journ.
Mod. Phys. A, 22, 26, 48594881 (2007).

13. Christian Corda , “The VirgoMinigrail Crosscorrelation for the detection of scalar gravitational
waves”, Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 22, 23, 17271735 (2007).

14. Christian Corda, “Massive gravitational waves from the R^2 theory of gravity: production and
response of interferometer”, Int. Journ. Mod. Phys. A 23, 10, 15211535 (2008).

15. Christian Corda, “A nongeodesic motion in the R^1 theory of gravity tuned with observations”,
Mod. Phys. Lett. A 23 No. 2 (2008) pp. 109114.

16. Christian Corda, “An oscillating Universe from the linearized R^{2} theory of gravity”, Gen. Rel.
Grav. 40, 10, 22012212 (2008).

17. Christian Corda, “A Repulsive Force from a Modification of General Relativity” , Int. Journ.
Theor. Phys. 47, 10, 26792685 (2008).

18. Christian Corda, “On the longitudinal response function of interferometers for massive
gravitational waves from a bimetric theory of gravity”, Astrop. Sp. Sci., 317, 12, 95106 (2008).

19. Christian Corda, “An oscillating, homogeneous and isotropic Universe from ScalarTensor
gravity” , Int. Journ. of Theor. Phys. Gr. Th. Nonlin. Opt. 13, 34, Par. 2 (2007).

20. Christian Corda, “Primordial production of massive relic gravitational waves from a weak
modification of General Relativity”, Astropart. Phys., 30, 4, 209215 (2008).

21. Christian Corda, “Massive relic gravitational waves from f(R) theories of gravity: production and
potential detection”, Eur. Phys. J. C 65 12 (2010) 257267.

22.Christian Corda, ”Magnetic'' components of gravitational waves and response functions of
interferometers” , invited review, Second Chapter of the book "The Handbook of Interferometers;
Research, Technology and Applications", Nova Science Publishers (2009).

23. Christian Corda, “Gravitational waves astronomy: the ultimate test for Einstein's General
Relativity”, invited review, Second Chapter of the book "The Big Challenge of Gravitational Waves:
A New Window in the Universe", Nova Science Publishers (2011).

24. Christian Corda, “A review of the stochastic background of gravitational waves in f(R) gravity
with WMAP constrains”, invited review, Op. Astr. Journ. 2011, 4, (Suppl 1M5) 7583.

25. Christian Corda, “Gravitational Waves Astronomy: a Cornerstone for Gravitational Theories ” in
“Cosmology, Quantum Vacuum, and Zeta Functions, Papers in honor of Emilio Elizalde on the
occasion of his 60th birthday” Springer Proceedings in Physics 137, 149 (2011) .

26. Christian Corda, “On the correctness of Relative Time Dilatation in Special Relativity in vacuum:
a rebuttal against the claims by Arthur Boltcho in European Journal of Scientific Research ISSN
1450216X Vol. 44 No. 4 (2010), pp. 610611”,Hadronic Journal 34, 161164 (2011).

27.Christian Corda, “A clarification on the debate on "the original Schwarzschild solution" Electron.
J. Theor. Phys. 8, 25, 6582 (2011) .

28. Christian Corda, “A clarification on a common misconception about interferometric detectors of
gravitational waves" Hadronic Journal 34, 133148 (2011).

29. Christian Corda, “Primordial gravity's breath”, Electron. J. Theor. Phys. 9, 26, 110 (2012).

30. Christian Corda, “The LigoLigo cross correlation for the detection of relic scalar gravitational
waves ”, to appear in New Astronomy (2012), preprint in arXiv:astroph/ 0611333.

31. Christian Corda, “Will gravitational waves confirm Einstein's General Relativity?”, AIP Conf.
Proc. 1168, 10901093 (2009).

32.Christian Corda, “Primordial inflation from gravity's rainbow ”, AIP Conf. Proc. 1281, 847 (2010).

33. Christian Corda, “Interferometric detection of gravitational waves arising from extended theories
of gravity ”, in Proceedings of the 3rd Stueckelberg Workshop, July 2008, Cambridge, U.K.,
Cambridge Scientific Publishers (2010).

34. Christian Corda, “Extension of the frequencyrange of interferometers for the ''magnetic''
components of gravitational waves?”, Proceedings of the XLIInd Rencontres de Moriond,
Gravitational Waves and Experimental Gravity, p. 95, Ed. J. Dumarchez and J. T. Tran, Than Van,
THE GIOI Publishers (2007) .
Co-authored publications in peer reviewed international journals and in peer reviewed
Proceedings of international conferences:

1. Christian Corda and Herman J. Mosquera Cuesta, “Removing black holes singularities with
nonlinear electrodynamics”, Mod. Phys. Lett A, 25, 28, 24232429 (2010).

2. Christian Corda and Herman J. Mosquera Cuesta, “Inflation from R^2 gravity: a new approach
using nonlinear electrodynamics”, Astropart. Phys. 34, 587590 (2011).

3. Lorenzo Iorio and Christian Corda , “Gravitomagnetism and gravitational waves”, invited review,
Op. Astr. Journ. 3, 172185, Special Issue (2010).

4. Saleem S. Ali , Carlo Cafaro, Salvatore Capozziello and Christian Corda, “On the Poincare Gauge
Theory of Gravitation”, invited review, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 48, 34263448 (2009).
5. Christian Corda, Giorgio Fontana and Gloria Garcia Cuadrado, “Gravitational waves in the
Hyperspace?”, Mod. Phys. Lett A 24, 575582 (2009).

6. Salvatore Capozziello, Christian Corda (correspondent author) and Maria Felicia De Laurentis,
“Gravitational waves from f(R) Theories of Gravity: potential detection with LISA” , Phys. Lett. B
669, 255259, (2008).

7. Christian Corda and Herman J. Mosquera Cuesta, “A spherically symmetric and stationary universe
from a weak modification of general relativity”, Europhys.Lett. 86 , 2, 20004 (April 2009).

8. Christian Corda, S. A. Ali and C. Cafaro, “Interferometer response to scalar gravitational waves”
Intern. Journ. Mod. Phys. D 19, 20952109 (2010).

9. Salvatore Capozziello and Christian Corda, “Scalar gravitational waves from Scalartensor gravity:
production and response of interferometers”, Intern. Journ. Mod. Phys. D, 15, 7, 11191150 (2006).

10.S.A. Alix, C. Cafaro, S. Capozziello and C. Corda, “A bound quantum particle in a Riemann–
Cartan space with topological defects and planar potential”, Phys. Lett. A, 366, 45, 315323 (2007).

On Thursday, September 16, 2021 at 12:15:23 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:

<snip>

> Yes, he is, he's done it before. Remember, he's an engineer.

And a very upset one. I had to interrupt my work at my home-made particle accelerator down in
the garage, where I was this close to disproof special relativity, to reply your insane post.

Can't believe how a mentally ill person like you still is on the loose.

On Thursday, September 16, 2021 at 9:12:52 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Thursday, September 16, 2021 at 11:50:02 AM UTC-3, Python wrote:
>
> <snip>
> > Well, a quick look at headers shows that Christian Corda is posting
> > from Italy (IP owned by wind.it) while Richard Hertz is posting from
> > Argentina. I doubt that Richard is skilled enough to use some kind of
> > proxy to pretend posting from Italy.
> And, if I knew how to do it (I don't), why I would make such effort just to post
> against Paul, who I believe is a nice guy (even when we have different positions on relativity)?
>

Because you are a deceptive piece of shit who would stoop to nothing. Besides, you have already done it, when you impersonated the long dead Koobee. You are a liar, Dick, an odious one.

On Thursday, September 16, 2021 at 9:24:47 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Thursday, September 16, 2021 at 12:15:23 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
>
> <snip>
> > Yes, he is, he's done it before. Remember, he's an engineer.
> And a very upset one. I had to interrupt my work at my home-made particle accelerator down in
> the garage, where I was this close to disproof special relativity,

You are off your meds, Dick. Again

On Thursday, September 16, 2021 at 1:25:40 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:

<snip>

> > > Well, a quick look at headers shows that Christian Corda is posting
> > > from Italy (IP owned by wind.it) while Richard Hertz is posting from
> > > Argentina. I doubt that Richard is skilled enough to use some kind of
> > > proxy to pretend posting from Italy.

> > And, if I knew how to do it (I don't), why I would make such effort just to post
> > against Paul, who I believe is a nice guy (even when we have different positions on relativity)?

> Because you are a deceptive piece of shit who would stoop to nothing. Besides, you have already done it, when you impersonated the long dead Koobee. You are a liar, Dick, an odious one.

Well, this is the Corda's post, at this thread:

The creation of a myth: Mercury and Newton vs Gerber-Einstein.
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/E1QUf6JLLPI

Not my style for writing, a much better use of English, precise data, etc.
Accept it, Dono. Christian Corda probably found out about that thread because someone here
who know him, told Dr. Corda that he was referenced here.

Copy of Corda's post:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Mr. Paul B. Andersen,

You claim that my paper is nonsense. I regret to inform you that your understanding of such a paper is completely null. You indeed wrote:

"What does this mean?
It means that if a test particle and a planet
with mass m are orbiting in the same orbit,
then the planet will move faster and move
an extra angle Δϕ ≈ π⋅m/M while the test particle
makes one orbit.

What has this to do with the perihelion advance
of the planet?
Obviously nothing whatsoever, the idea is ludicrous."

It is quite evident that you understand nothing of basic science. In fact, for more than 160 years astronomers considered planets as being test masses in both Newtonian gravity and general relativity. Although this approximation is very precise in both the theories, differently from general relativity, it is not sufficient to find the perihelion advance of the planet in Newtonian gravity. The extra angle Δϕ ≈ π⋅m/M is EXACTLY the perihelion advance of the planet. In fact, contrary to your claim, the planet seen as being a test mass orbites in a DIFFERENT orbit with respect to the planet seen as being a non-negligible mass. This is the key point. Thus, they are your crackpot claims which are ludicrous, not my idea. I also must inform you that a revised and improved version of my paper, which was indeed only a pioneristic approach, has been published in Physics of the Dark Universe, see http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2021.100834, which is a well known mainstream journal having a IF higher than 4. In such a paper I also clarify that, overall, the general theory of relativity remains more precise than Newtonian physics, but my approach shows that the Newtonian framework is more powerful than researchers and astronomers were thinking before this paper, at least for the case of Mercury. On the other hand, my Newtonian formula of the advance of planets' perihelion breaks down for the other planets, as you correctly stated. The predicted Newtonian result is indeed too large for Venus and Earth. Therefore, in my paper it is also shown that corrections due to gravitational and rotational time dilation, in an intermediate framework that analyzes gravity between Newton and Einstein, solve the problem. By adding such corrections, I found a result consistent with the one of general relativity. Thus, the most important results of my published paper are: (1) It is not correct that Newtonian theory cannot predict the anomalous rate of precession of the perihelion of planets' orbit. The real problem is instead that a pure Newtonian prediction is too large. (2) Perihelion's precession can be achieved with the same precision of general relativity by extending Newtonian gravity through the inclusion of gravitational and rotational time dilation effects.
Thus, please be sure to understand the situation before slandering serious researchers like me with ridiculous crackpottery and elementary misunderstandings.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Christian Corda" Google search gives:

About 40,600 results (0.35 seconds), with 8 pages.

I checked, randomly, several links along the 8 pages: 99.9% correspond to him and his work.

The guy is popular.

Now you started to reply to C. Corda!

You are mentally ill beyond any possible treatment, fucking paranoid slug.

The creation of a myth: Mercury and Newton vs Gerber-Einstein.
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/E1QUf6JLLPI

and he's answering you right now, as I write this.

This is GOLD, PRICELESS!

********************************************************************
On Wednesday, September 15, 2021 at 11:29:44 PM UTC-7, Christian Corda wrote:
> Dear Mr. Dono,
>
> You wrote:
>
> "> This paper is obviously nonsense.
> This is why his paper has been sitting in the crank repository vixra, no peer reviewed journal will pick it up."
>
> I regret to inform you that a revised and improved version of my paper, which was indeed only a pioneristic approach, has been published in Physics of the Dark Universe, see http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2021.100834, which is a well known mainstream journal having a IF higher than 4. By the way, I am NOT a crank. I am instead a well known researcher in the fields of general relativity and gravitation, see my papers in arXiv: https://arxiv.org/search/?query=c.+corda&searchtype=author&source=header
> Thus, after Mr. Paul B. Andersen, I invite also you to connect your mind with your hand before writing idiocies.

I know who you are.
The only reason you got published is that Physics of the Dark Universe is an all-Italian editorship
I did not call you a crank (you are a fringe physicist) , I called vixra a crank repository.
As for your paper, if you start "correcting" Newtonian mechanics with relativistic effects, it is no longer Newtonian, it is a hack that you hatched in order to match the experimental observations.
********************************************************************

On Thursday, September 16, 2021 at 10:15:14 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
> Now you started to reply to C. Corda!
>
> You are mentally ill beyond any possible treatment, fucking paranoid slug..
> The creation of a myth: Mercury and Newton vs Gerber-Einstein.
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/E1QUf6JLLPI
> and he's answering you right now, as I write this.
>
> This is GOLD, PRICELESS!
>
>
> ********************************************************************
> On Wednesday, September 15, 2021 at 11:29:44 PM UTC-7, Christian Corda wrote:
> > Dear Mr. Dono,
> >
> > You wrote:
> >
> > "> This paper is obviously nonsense.
> > This is why his paper has been sitting in the crank repository vixra, no peer reviewed journal will pick it up."
> >
> > I regret to inform you that a revised and improved version of my paper, which was indeed only a pioneristic approach, has been published in Physics of the Dark Universe, see http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2021.100834, which is a well known mainstream journal having a IF higher than 4. By the way, I am NOT a crank. I am instead a well known researcher in the fields of general relativity and gravitation, see my papers in arXiv: https://arxiv.org/search/?query=c.+corda&searchtype=author&source=header
> > Thus, after Mr. Paul B. Andersen, I invite also you to connect your mind with your hand before writing idiocies.
>
> I know who you are.
> The only reason you got published is that Physics of the Dark Universe is an all-Italian editorship
> I did not call you a crank (you are a fringe physicist) , I called vixra a crank repository.
> As for your paper, if you start "correcting" Newtonian mechanics with relativistic effects, it is no longer Newtonian, it is a hack that you hatched in order to match the experimental observations.
> ********************************************************************

I stand by every word above, Dick head

On Thursday, September 16, 2021 at 2:22:33 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:

<snip>

> I stand by every word above, Dick head

Of course you do, imbecile cretin pile of shit!

As you did all along this thread, starting with the topic:

"Piece of shit Richard Hertz impersonates Christian Corda"

This post:
"You just reached a new low by creating a fake persona and pretending to be Christian Corda. You did the same
thing before, by resurrecting Koobee Wublee from the dead."

This post:

> Well, a quick look at headers shows that Christian Corda is posting
> from Italy (IP owned by wind.it) while Richard Hertz is posting from
> Argentina.

Yes, he is, he's done it before. Remember, he's an engineer.

And the posts that, simultaneously, you exchanged with me (proxying from Italy) while
you exchanged with me (proxying from Argentina).

You have no spine, no morale, no decency of any kind.
You are a deviant psychopath, beyond most human comprehension.

On Thursday, September 16, 2021 at 10:41:37 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz admitted:

> Of course you do, since I am just an imbecile cretin pile of shit!

On Thursday, September 16, 2021 at 2:45:07 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:

<snip demential alteration of a post >

> > Of course you do, since I am just an imbecile cretin pile of shit!

Now I'm certain that you embody a Funktionshäftling, cynical and hypocrite lying son of a bitch!

On Thursday, September 16, 2021 at 10:56:00 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:

> Of course you do, since I am just an imbecile cretin pile of shit!
> Now I'm certain that I am embodying a Funktionshäftling, cynical and hypocrite lying son of a bitch!

On Thursday, 16 September 2021 at 19:57:25 UTC+2, Dono. wrote:
> On Thursday, September 16, 2021 at 10:56:00 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
>
> > Of course you do, since I am just an imbecile cretin pile of shit!
> > Now I'm certain that I am embodying a Funktionshäftling, cynical and hypocrite lying son of a bitch!

He didn't. Poor Dono is lying, as expected from a relativistic scum.