Changing speed has an opposite weight or an opposing heaviness
order for limiting below light speed...

Mitchell Raemsch

On Saturday, October 16, 2021 at 1:34:31 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> Changing speed has an opposite weight or an opposing heaviness
> order for limiting below light speed...
>
> Mitchell Raemsch

Let's assume that Lorentz invariant works, then What? Lorentz (1899) uses the invariant to reverse the negative result of Michelson experiment to justify the ether, composed of matter, and, Einstein (1917) uses the reversal of MMX to justify the ether yet vacuum proves the ether does not exist. Also, both Lorentz and Einstein use relativity (coordinate system transformation) to justify Maxwell theory but Maxwell equations are derived using Faraday induction effect that is not luminous. Using mumble jumble mathematical gymnastics cannot be used to justify the wave theory of light and modern theoretical physics (QM, QED, string theory, QFT,......etc. etc. that are based on the gauge since an electromagnetic wave (quantized or not) is based on a wave formed by the motion of an ether, composed of matter, where the physical structure (ether) has precedence before any abstract mathematical formulation.

Einstein is structurally unifying an electromagnetic field with a mass (m) using the inertial mass Eo/c2 (equ 52) since the formation of a light wave requires a medium (ether) composed of matter but the inertial mass (m = Eo/c2) is massless since Eo represents the energy of an electromagnetic photon. Compton photon momentum (p = λ/h) is used to justify the inertial mass but experimentally, a 3 W laser beam does not displace a gold foil which invalids Einstein concept the photon inertial mass.

This is the twilight zone-----imagine every time someone searches for "special relativity" there is a possibility that they will find this posts--------- would that make your nappies alittle tighter around your butt? or make you scream? Maybe you can use time-space to make it disappear........cheers..