SCI.MATH FAQ, 6Aug2021// Usenet science dead, but AP's newsgroup up and running-- today's topics-- establishing all the laws of Electromagnetic theory, via algebra matrices.

Alright, I was caught there in a logical gap where all the terms in V = CBE have functions except for voltage. So C the current is a function, a physical function of the movement of magnetic monopoles to make dipole electricity. The B term is a function of magnetic field and it has a physical entity of lines of force from a bar magnet, and we can say the bar magnet itself is a physical entity of magnetism. Next the E field, the electric field is a function and is more abstract than C and B. Here we see the E field as gravity or as in Coulomb law. However, we never had a physical entity of Voltage, we had only its name and no function.

Although some thought its function was "pressure". The units of pressure being Pressure = kg/m*s^2. Nothing like that of Voltage units, Voltage = kg*m^2 /A*s^3 = kg*m^2 /C*s^2.

So I needed a new name, a name of function, for I need to know what V' is, given V. So the differential of Capacitor.

And so here we see how Algebra matrix of 4 of the 6 laws of EM theory, help to establish all the laws of EM theory.

First a 3 by 3 matrix of divisional differential equations, C', B' and E'.

V'BE/(BE)^2 - VB'E/(BE)^2 - VBE'/(BE)^2
V'CE/(CE)^2 - VC'E/(CE)^2 - VCE')/(CE)^2
V'CB/(CB)^2 - VC'B/(CB)^2 - VCB'/(CB)^2

Then a 4 by 3 matrix of Algebra that includes V'

C'BE + CB'E + CBE'
V'BE/(BE)^2 - VB'E/(BE)^2 - VBE'/(BE)^2
V'CE/(CE)^2 - VC'E/(CE)^2 - VCE')/(CE)^2
V'CB/(CB)^2 - VC'B/(CB)^2 - VCB'/(CB)^2

What this row and column matrix allow me to do, is facilitate what each term is in the 4 differential equations. To see where Lenz's law is, to see where displacement current term is, to see where Coulomb's law is to see where AC current is, to see where Meissner effect is.

For details see:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Best FAQ ever written in Usenet once Alex Lopez-Ortiz of Univ. Waterloo FAQ stopped due to paid for stalkers. And this FAQ is up for 2 grammy and 2 emmy awards plus an Oscar.

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet in AP's newsgroup, for sci.physics and sci.math was sold by USA govt to a gang of stalkers, who pester everyone as they now own sci.physics, and the USA govt of NSF and dept of Educ probably laughing their arse off as the stalkers harass and pester everyone. In the 1980s we had fraud waste abuse of $900. toilet seats from the government. The govt learns quickly and now their fraud waste and abuse is pay Kibo Parry M, Jan Burse, Dan Christensen perhaps $100 per stalker post, providing everyone in USA govt entertainment in their soda coffee break at Washington DC. "Look, kibo just harassed AP with two more emoji's of "shit for brains". The Master in Dr. Who: ha ha ha,... ha ha ha....

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Sci. Math FAQ history

From 1993 onwards to sometime around 1996 SCI.MATH FAQs were admininstered by Univ Waterloo in Canada, warning young students and newcomers of what to expect in sci.math. It worked well. And I would have liked it to be the first post permanently in sci.math. And it was done "for free".

But then corruption and fraud entered sci.math and sci.physics, for when money can be made from something, easy money, then it is not long before a new arrangement is made. So instead of a "for free FAQ". Some persons convinced the USA govt to pay stalkers to go around and pester authors 24-7-365.

And here is where a awful choice was likely made. A choice of hiring Kibo Parry M. of World std as noted by Wikipedia reference to the NSF, National Science Foundation. That they likely (we need investigative journalist to unearth the facts) hired Kibo Parry M, not knowing or not caring that he was Gay (we have to prove this as a Wikipedia standards of journalism) and by hiring him to stalk Usenet sci.math and sci.physics, he brings along with him (unknown to NSF at the time) brings along with him a army of gay followers. Followers that laughed at every corny joke uttered by Kibo, So as they hire Kibo Parry M to stalk AP, then AP is not a one on one with Kibo attacks, no, AP is faced with a army of Kibo mannequins with no brains and all bad mouth, as seen in this recent exchange below. And hopefully this eye-witness testimony will win in Judge Judy's courtroom if it comes to that. So much of USA society is a contentious society, lawsuit this, lawsuit that, that we probably have more people in judicial functions than actual members of USA Air Force, Army, Navy, and Marines.

So, David, are you Gay and a member of the gang of 12 or want to join the gang by attacking AP.



On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 6:34:54 PM UTC-5, david...@gmail.com wrote:
> It seems that Archimedes Plutonium has written something like 175 books in the past two years. I'm sure that most of them are of top quality, but one needs to be retracted.
>
> He wrote a book in which he claims to prove experimentally that conic sections are never ellipses, but rather they're ovals. I'm claiming that he didn't do the experiments precisely enough.
>
> Here's how to do the experiment more precisely.
>
> First, use the flashlight on a smartphone. I'm think that all such phones have a flashlight consisting of a single bright LED, and that will serve as a very good approximation of a point sourse of light.
>
> Then, take a piece of cardboard--I recommend about 18"X18"--and precisely cut a round hole in the center about 5" in diameter.
>
> Then, in a darkened room, hold the flash light about 18" behind the sheet of cardboard, which will project a cone of light. Then project that cone of light onto a wall. The angle at which it is projected can be varied as desired.
>
> Then, so I claim, it will be visually obvious that the light cone will always intersect the plane of the wall in an ellipse (or a parabola, or a hyperbola, depending on the angle). And that will prove that Archimedes Plutonium is wrong when he says that ellipses are not conic sections.
>
> Just this once, he's going to have to admit that he has made a mistake. But maybe he's afraid to do the experiment?

So, is this David, a new kid on the block, or a old one with a nymchange, is he gay and just arrived at the Gay Pick Up Bar of sci.math. Of course, the truth of math and logic are nowhere to be seen in his scree, much like Zelos Malum, who when asked to do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus replied-- "> why would one need to do it geometrically?. Duh, ... because calculus is geometry.

So is David wanting to ply gay sex toys in sci.math, with a iphone light, fetish toy if a penis prick is oval or ellipse, proving once again, if Dan Christensen's brain were MRI-ed nothing but penis cock would fly out.

Dan, question: seriously, are Gay stalkers worse than Heterosexual stalkers? Are there proportionally more gay stalkers than heterosexual stalkers? The data from Usenet suggests Gay stalkers are proportionally more numerous and their persistence is more obnoxious. Part of the skew in numbers would be that there are more gay men than gay women.

Take for example Zelos here, every night a scree of spam on John Gabriel, signaling to John a pining for his dick, and forget about New Calculus.

Every night a spam scree by Zelos, of 1 sentence replies to John Gabriel, not for any math but to bury all the other posts onto the 2nd page.

So, is Zelos and John Gabriel gay? And is sci.math for them, some sort of pick up bar.

Is this why Kibo Parry, Dan Christensen, Jan Burse, Franz, and the gang of 12, see sci.math not as a forum of math, but as a gay bar counter pickup station. And why they argue for 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction a screw up of Boole logic, why the continue to want to keep the screw up in schools and education, because Boole himself may have been gay, and the image of a penis cock in the mouth or a bedwarmer is more important to Franz and his gang of gays than ever is the truth of math, logic or science.

So, Zelos, and Gabriel, are you gay lovers and this is how you use sci.math, as some daily pick up bar.

And where 1 attacks AP, even if the statement was --" the sky is blue" all 12 of the gang of 12 attack AP, for fear of missing a cock penis inserted in the rear. Is that why Jan Burse and Dan Christensen roam through sci.math daily-- cruising for penis-cock, and math is just foreplay. And when AP says the slant cut of cone is the Oval, never the Ellipse, conjures up images of John Gabriel's dick inserted in Dan Christensen's ear drum. While talking about penises forever in a Chris Thomasson fractal.

On Thursday, May 2, 2019 at 7:18:40 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote in sci.math:
sex motivation in science Re: curious, just curious-- is there a numbers correlation between percentage of stalkers and homosexuality? Re: Psychology behind the mental disorder of stalking-- Michael Moroney, Dan Christensen, Jan Burse, Jan Bielawski

On Thursday, May 2, 2019 at 5:21:29 PM UTC-5, Me(Franz) wrote:
> On Thursday, May 2, 2019 at 11:31:26 PM UTC+2, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
>> I am not suggesting that the 12 stalkers are 12 homosexuals.
(Franz) > I am not suggesting that the 12 stalkers are 12 [male --me] homosexuals.
>
(Franz)> I'm sure they are. That's why they are called /12 Angry Men/!

Of course we get the theory of the electric generator and motor from Faraday's law, but I wonder if the terms in V' = C'BE + CB'E + CBE' are the math of the electric generator. For as you push in the bar magnet then pull out the bar magnet in Faraday law you have a swing in signage of the current as alternating current. The rotor and stator in AC generators as the CBE' term or the CB'E term. So is V' the electric generator of both DC and AC.

Earlier I thought that AC current was a longitudinal wave versus DC as a transverse wave only. I am probably going to have to throw that idea out. And only use it for neutrino versus magnetic dipole. I suspect there is only transverse waves in electric current. And the assumption that all electric currents are waves, not particles.

V'BE/(BE)^2 - VB'E/(BE)^2 - VBE'/(BE)^2
current production - Lenz law - DC, AC direction

V'CE/(CE)^2 - VC'E/(CE)^2 - VCE')/(CE)^2
B production - Displacement current - parallel attract

V'CB/(CB)^2 - VC'B/(CB)^2 - VCB'/(CB)^2
E production - inverse square of distance - synchronicity

C'BE + CB'E + CBE'
V production + DC generator + AC generator

What I am doing in this mathematical-physics Matrix is using rows and columns to guide me in knowing what each term represents.

Alright, I was caught there in a logical gap where all the terms in V = CBE have functions except for voltage. So C the current is a function, a physical function of the movement of magnetic monopoles to make dipole electricity. The B term is a function of magnetic field and it has a physical entity of lines of force from a bar magnet, and we can say the bar magnet itself is a physical entity of magnetism. Next the E field, the electric field is a function and is more abstract than C and B. Here we see the E field as gravity or as in Coulomb law. However, we never had a physical entity of Voltage, we had only its name and no function.

Although some thought its function was "pressure". The units of pressure being Pressure = kg/m*s^2. Nothing like that of Voltage units, Voltage = kg*m^2 /A*s^3 = kg*m^2 /C*s^2.

So I needed a new name, a name of function, for I need to know what V' is, given V. So the differential of Capacitor.

And so here we see how Algebra matrix of 4 of the 6 laws of EM theory, help to establish all the laws of EM theory.

First a 3 by 3 matrix of divisional differential equations, C', B' and E'.

V'BE/(BE)^2 - VB'E/(BE)^2 - VBE'/(BE)^2
V'CE/(CE)^2 - VC'E/(CE)^2 - VCE')/(CE)^2
V'CB/(CB)^2 - VC'B/(CB)^2 - VCB'/(CB)^2

Then a 4 by 3 matrix of Algebra that includes V'

C'BE + CB'E + CBE'
V'BE/(BE)^2 - VB'E/(BE)^2 - VBE'/(BE)^2
V'CE/(CE)^2 - VC'E/(CE)^2 - VCE')/(CE)^2
V'CB/(CB)^2 - VC'B/(CB)^2 - VCB'/(CB)^2

What this row and column matrix allow me to do, is facilitate what each term is in the 4 differential equations. To see where Lenz's law is, to see where displacement current term is, to see where Coulomb's law is to see where AC current is, to see where Meissner effect is.

AP, King of Science, especially Physics

On Friday, August 6, 2021 at 2:54:02 AM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> SCI.MATH FAQ, 6Aug2021// AP's newsgroup if full of hate, lies and misinformation...

STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science

AP is a malicious internet troll who wants only to mislead and confuse you. He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can only be meant to promote failure in schools. One can only guess at his motives.

Note that AP will often delete his bizarre and hateful postings when his lies are called out, only to repost identical ones moments later in a NEW thread.

Readers should, of course, judge for themselves. In AP's OWN WORDS here:

“Primes do not exist, because the set they were borne from has no division.”
--June 29, 2020

“The last and largest finite number is 10^604.”
--June 3, 2015

“0 appears to be the last and largest finite number”
--June 9, 2015

“0/0 must be equal to 1.”
-- June 9, 2015

“0 is an infinite irrational number.”
--June 28, 2015

“No negative numbers exist.”
--December 22, 2018

“Rationals are not numbers.”
--May 18, 2019

According to AP's “chess board math,” an equilateral triangle is a right-triangle.
--December 11, 2019

Which could explain...

“The value of sin(45 degrees) = 1.”
--May 31, 2019

AP deliberately and repeatedly presented the truth table for OR as the truth table for AND:

“New Logic
AND
T & T = T
T & F = T
F & T = T
F & F = F”
--November 9, 2019

AP seeks aid of Russian agents to promote failure in schools:

"Please--Asking for help from Russia-- russian robots-- to create a new, true mathematics [sic]"
--November 9, 2017

And if that wasn't weird enough...

“The totality, everything that there is [the universe], is only 1 atom of plutonium [Pu]. There is nothing outside or beyond this one atom of plutonium.”
--April 4, 1994

“The Universe itself is one gigantic big atom.”
--November 14, 2019

AP's sinister Atom God Cult of Failure???

“Since God-Pu is marching on.
Glory! Glory! Atom Plutonium!
Its truth is marching on.
It has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat;
It is sifting out the hearts of people before its judgment seat;
Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer it; be jubilant, my feet!
Our God-Pu is marching on.”
--December 15, 2018 (Note: Pu is the atomic symbol for plutonium)

Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com