From your very own Abel Prize winner!

"Don't trust Wackopedia."

https://youtu.be/1WepO8tFGto?t=103

LMAO

I didn't know that Euler wrote for wikipedia.

Bird brain John Gabriel currently having a paranoid breakdown.

LMAO!

Eram semper recta schrieb am Sonntag, 8. August 2021 um 14:11:00 UTC+2:
> From your very own Abel Prize winner!
>
> "Don't trust Wackopedia."
>
> https://youtu.be/1WepO8tFGto?t=103
>
> LMAO

You are fooling yourself, if you blindly trust Wikipedia.
Every Wikipedia has a list of references, where they stole
the text from, copy pasta basically.

So you can check the references, and of course you
can use other sources. Nobody works with Wikipedia
per se. You never see me citing Wikipedia as a proof

of something. But I am pretty sure you can lookup the
mRNA stuff else where, Wikipedia is a good summary to
start with. Thats all. No reason to get paranoid.

You are fooling yourself, if you blindly trust Wikipedia,
or think 0.999... = 1 has anything to do with Wikipedia.

Dang, you are stupid John Gabriel, grow up.

Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Sonntag, 8. August 2021 um 14:13:11 UTC+2:
> I didn't know that Euler wrote for wikipedia.
>
> Bird brain John Gabriel currently having a paranoid breakdown.
>
> LMAO!
> Eram semper recta schrieb am Sonntag, 8. August 2021 um 14:11:00 UTC+2:
> > From your very own Abel Prize winner!
> >
> > "Don't trust Wackopedia."
> >
> > https://youtu.be/1WepO8tFGto?t=103
> >
> > LMAO

Every time you use the word mainstream, it shatters into pieces.
Your "me against them" is just pathetic nonsense to hide your
total failure with your Geogebra new calculoose.

LoL

Eram semper recta schrieb am Sonntag, 8. August 2021 um 16:19:00 UTC+2:
> On Sunday, 8 August 2021 at 08:11:00 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > From your very own Abel Prize winner!
> >
> > "Don't trust Wackopedia."
> >
> > https://youtu.be/1WepO8tFGto?t=103
> >
> > LMAO
> Not that I have any respect for Uhlenbeck, but it's quite hilarious since she is very much part of the mainstream and Wikipedia is administered and run by mainstream morons. Chuckle.

Just sit in front of a mirror, and ask who is responsible for a never
ending series of utter nonsense. Who do you see in the mirror?

LMAO!

John Gabriel, the laughing stock of the internet. Clueless in
calculus. Clueless in biology, a few days ago he didn't even know

how mRNA works. Does he even know how toilet paper works?
Or is he just shitting his pants, so that Amanda has to clean?

Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Sonntag, 8. August 2021 um 17:44:35 UTC+2:
> Every time you use the word mainstream, it shatters into pieces.
> Your "me against them" is just pathetic nonsense to hide your
> total failure with your Geogebra new calculoose.
>
> LoL
> Eram semper recta schrieb am Sonntag, 8. August 2021 um 16:19:00 UTC+2:
> > On Sunday, 8 August 2021 at 08:11:00 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > From your very own Abel Prize winner!
> > >
> > > "Don't trust Wackopedia."
> > >
> > > https://youtu.be/1WepO8tFGto?t=103
> > >
> > > LMAO
> > Not that I have any respect for Uhlenbeck, but it's quite hilarious since she is very much part of the mainstream and Wikipedia is administered and run by mainstream morons. Chuckle.

On Sunday, 8 August 2021 at 08:11:00 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> From your very own Abel Prize winner!
>
> "Don't trust Wackopedia."
>
> https://youtu.be/1WepO8tFGto?t=103
>
> LMAO

My collection of papers in my free eBook is worth more than anything than the sum of all Abel Prize winners have produced:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO

On Sunday, August 8, 2021 at 12:20:29 PM UTC-4, I am Super Rectum (aka John Gabriel, Troll Boy) wrote:

> My collection of papers in my free eBook...

"Papers?" HA, HA, HA!!!!!

STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of JG's fake math

JG here claims to have a discovered as shortcut to mastering calculus without using limits. Unfortunately for him, this means he has no workable a definition of the derivative of a function. It blows up for functions as simple f(x)=|x|. Or even f(x)=0. As a result, he has had to ban 0, negative numbers and instantaneous rates of change rendering his goofy little system quite useless. What a moron!

Forget calculus. JG has also banned all axioms because he cannot even derive the most elementary results of basic arithmetic, e.g. 2+2=4. Such results require the use of axioms, so he must figure he's now off the hook. Again, what a moron!

Even at his advanced age (60+?), John Gabriel is STILL struggling with basic, elementary-school arithmetic. As he has repeatedly posted here:

"There are no points on a line."
--April 12, 2021

"Pi is NOT a number of ANY kind!"
--July 10, 2020

"1/2 not equal to 2/4"
--October 22, 2017

“1/3 does NOT mean 1 divided by 3 and never has meant that”
-- February 8, 2015

"3 =< 4 is nonsense.”
--October 28, 2017

"Zero is not a number."
-- Dec. 2, 2019

"0 is not required at all in mathematics, just like negative numbers."
-- Jan. 4, 2017

“There is no such thing as an empty set.”
--Oct. 4, 2019

“3 <=> 2 + 1 or 3 <=> 8 - 5, etc, are all propositions” (actually all are meaningless gibberish)
--Oct. 22, 2019

No math genius our JG, though he actually lists his job title as “mathematician” at Linkedin.com. Apparently, they do not verify your credentials.

Though really quite disturbing, interested readers should see: “About the spamming troll John Gabriel in his own words...” (lasted updated March 10, 2020) at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.math/PcpAzX5pDeY/1PDiSlK_BwAJ

Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my Math Blog a http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

Anonymous coward and king troll of sci.math Dan Christensen spammed:

> "There are no points on a line."

Lie. I never said that. What I did say is that a line does not consists of points. When we talk about points on a line, we really mean distances that are indicated much like road signs do for distances travelled along a road.

A line is one of innumerable distances between any two points.
A straight line is the shortest distance between two points.

> "Pi is NOT a number of ANY kind!"

True. Pi is merely a symbol for an incommensurable magnitude - apparently a concept too advanced for an imbecile like Dan Christensen.

> "1/2 not equal to 2/4"

Lie. I have NEVER said this. What I have talked about is the difference in the process of measure.
What does this mean? Well, 1/2 is the name given to a measure done by enumerating 1 of two equal parts of the unit.
2/4 is the name given to a measure done by enumerating 2 of four equal parts of the unit.

There is the case in geometry where 1/2 is not necessarily equal to 2/4. For example:

_ / _ _
_ _ / _ _ _ _

The length _ is not equal to the length _ _ .

> “1/3 does NOT mean 1 divided by 3 and never has meant that”

True. My brilliant article on how a genius mind discovers number and indeed how my brilliant ancestors (Ancient Greeks) realised number explains in detail:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hasWyQCZyRN3RkdvIB6bnGIVV2Rabz8w

Also, my article on pi not being a number of any kind:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FFg_9XCkIwTZ9N1jbU4oMYfHHHuFHYf3

The true story of how we got numbers:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-mOEooW03iLYTg1TGY4RTIwakU

No such thing as a "real number" or a "real number line":

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-mOEooW03iLMHVYcE8xcmRZRnc

There is no valid construction of "real number" - it's a myth:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-mOEooW03iLSTROakNyVXlQUEU

> "3 =< 4 is nonsense.”

True. In mathematics, it is called an invalid disjunction.

3 <= 4 means EITHER 3 < 4 OR 3 = 4

Actually, there is no "OR" part, so the logical disjunction is invalid.

> "Zero is not a number."

True. While not a number of any kind, it is very useful in mathematics.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1w2tt7IgoIu-ychDCoYi-4jOAzToy0ViM

> "0 is not required at all in mathematics, just like negative numbers."

Half-truth. While negative numbers are not required in mathematics, they are extremely useful.

> “There is no such thing as an empty set.”

True. Even the father of all mainstream mathematical cranks rejected the idea of empty set. But let's not go too far ... there isn't even a definition of "set" in set theory!

https://youtu.be/KvxjOMW6Q9w

https://youtu.be/1CcSsOG0okg

> “3 <=> 2 + 1 or 3 <=> 8 - 5, etc, are all propositions” (actually all are meaningless gibberish)

True. These are propositions that are implied by the given equations. For example, my historic geometric identity states:

[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h = dy/dx + Q(x,h)

And so, f(x+h)-f(x)]/h <=> dy/dx + Q(x,h)

The theorem:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj

How it provides a rigorous definition of integral for the flawed mainstream calculus:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uIBgJ1ObroIbkt0V2YFQEpPdd8l-xK6y

The day will come when this vicious anonymous troll Dan Christensen is convicted in a court of law.

Download for free the most important mathematics book ever written:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/view

On Monday, 9 August 2021 at 01:17:27 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> söndag 8 augusti 2021 kl. 14:11:00 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > From your very own Abel Prize winner!
> >
> > "Don't trust Wackopedia."
> >
> > https://youtu.be/1WepO8tFGto?t=103
> >
> > LMAO
> Everyone knows that wikipedia is not the end all be all answer to things. It is as I tell my students, a good place to start at, a terrible place to finish at.

You don't have any students. You are nothing but a crank. You do not even have a mathematics degree. You have never provided proof of such. Apparently because you know nothing, you constantly try to fall back onto this false argument by authority. You fool no one.

>
> She also say trust university pages yet you do not,

Of course she would say that.

> you cannot quote mine like that.

You have nothing to quote and if you did, no one in his right mind would quote an idiot like you.

On 8/9/2021 8:45 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Monday, 9 August 2021 at 01:17:27 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
>> söndag 8 augusti 2021 kl. 14:11:00 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>>> From your very own Abel Prize winner!
>>>
>>> "Don't trust Wackopedia."
>>>
>>> https://youtu.be/1WepO8tFGto?t=103
>>>
>>> LMAO
>> Everyone knows that wikipedia is not the end all be all answer to things. It is as I tell my students, a good place to start at, a terrible place to finish at.
>
> You don't have any students. You are nothing but a crank. You do not even have a mathematics degree. You have never provided proof of such. Apparently because you know nothing, you constantly try to fall back onto this false argument by authority. You fool no one.

You are projecting again, Buttbreath. It is you who has no students,
despite addressing some of your posts to your nonexistent "students".

Also your attempts to redefine "crank" will get you nowhere. You are,
and will always be, a crank.

>You don't have any students.

I do :) I teach them real mathematics unlike you.

>You are nothing but a crank.

Given by definition and the fact I agree with mainstream, I cannot be a crank. You however, is, by definition, a crank.

>You do not even have a mathematics degree.

False, I have a masters degree in mathematics from Uppsala :)

>You have never provided proof of such

Haven't provided proof is very different from not having.

And to you I'd never show the papers because you'd abuse it.

>Apparently because you know nothing

I know mathematics better than you :)

>You constantly try to fall back onto this false argument by authority. You fool no one.

I do not, you do not even know what argument by authority is.

>Of course she would say that.

Of course, because she knows things better than you,

>You have nothing to quote and if you did, no one in his right mind would quote an idiot like you.

You quote mine her, quote mining is a dishonest tactic.

On Tuesday, 10 August 2021 at 01:44:28 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:

<Malum whining and complaining>

> >You have nothing to quote and if you did, no one in his right mind would quote an idiot like you.

> You quote mine her, quote mining is a dishonest tactic.

Pull the mote out of your eye before you pull out the beam in your own eye!

A fool is known by his words is not the same as "quote mining" which you and the chief troll (Dan Christensen) on this newsgroup employ as your modus operandi.

Eram semper recta wrote:

>> You quote mine her, quote mining is a dishonest tactic.
>
> Pull the mote out of your eye before you pull out the beam in your own
> eye!
>
> A fool is known by his words is not the same as "quote mining" which you
> and the chief troll (Dan Christensen) on this newsgroup employ as your
> modus operandi.

so you dont want the climate to change? Who else around here dont want
the climate to change?

The current wild fires are a nice example how Journalists
don't have any clue. Are they disappointed by this here?

On the Greek island #Euböa has now burned so much
that the fires go out by themselves in places.
https://twitter.com/zeitonline/status/1425049604995928064

Thats also how Pandemics might cease to exist.
In mathematics this is called percolation theory:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percolation_theory

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perkolationstheorie#Anwendung_in_der_Epidemiologie

LoL

Coté Faucheux schrieb am Dienstag, 10. August 2021 um 13:23:05 UTC+2:
> Eram semper recta wrote:
>
> >> You quote mine her, quote mining is a dishonest tactic.
> >
> > Pull the mote out of your eye before you pull out the beam in your own
> > eye!
> >
> > A fool is known by his words is not the same as "quote mining" which you
> > and the chief troll (Dan Christensen) on this newsgroup employ as your
> > modus operandi.
> so you dont want the climate to change? Who else around here dont want
> the climate to change?

But the term "coffee percolator" is new to me ... I have to
see, maybe we could make a nice computer model that
shows an espresso machine or whatever.

Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Dienstag, 10. August 2021 um 13:46:32 UTC+2:
> The current wild fires are a nice example how Journalists
> don't have any clue. Are they disappointed by this here?
>
> On the Greek island #Euböa has now burned so much
> that the fires go out by themselves in places.
> https://twitter.com/zeitonline/status/1425049604995928064
>
> Thats also how Pandemics might cease to exist.
> In mathematics this is called percolation theory:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percolation_theory
>
> https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perkolationstheorie#Anwendung_in_der_Epidemiologie
>
> LoL
> Coté Faucheux schrieb am Dienstag, 10. August 2021 um 13:23:05 UTC+2:
> > Eram semper recta wrote:
> >
> > >> You quote mine her, quote mining is a dishonest tactic.
> > >
> > > Pull the mote out of your eye before you pull out the beam in your own
> > > eye!
> > >
> > > A fool is known by his words is not the same as "quote mining" which you
> > > and the chief troll (Dan Christensen) on this newsgroup employ as your
> > > modus operandi.
> > so you dont want the climate to change? Who else around here dont want
> > the climate to change?

On Tuesday, 10 August 2021 at 07:46:32 UTC-4, swiss Idiot Jan Burse aka Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> The current wild fires are a nice example how Journalists
> don't have any clue. Are they disappointed by this here?
>
> On the Greek island #Euböa has now burned so much
> that the fires go out by themselves in places.
> https://twitter.com/zeitonline/status/1425049604995928064
>
> Thats also how Pandemics might cease to exist.
> In mathematics this is called percolation theory:

Perhaps you could try percolating yourself away? Ja, Ja. Ich weiss. Die Theorie gilt nicht für Idioten wie Du!

The interesting thing about percolation models,
its kind of geometric. The distance between occupied
nodes or the abundance of links is related to tipping points.

Percolation models - wild fires, pandemics and extinctions
Tom Connor - May 15, 2020
https://medium.com/10x-curiosity/percolation-models-wild-fires-pandemics-and-extinctions-411d155f80be

Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Dienstag, 10. August 2021 um 13:46:32 UTC+2:
> The current wild fires are a nice example how Journalists
> don't have any clue. Are they disappointed by this here?
>
> On the Greek island #Euböa has now burned so much
> that the fires go out by themselves in places.
> https://twitter.com/zeitonline/status/1425049604995928064
>
> Thats also how Pandemics might cease to exist.
> In mathematics this is called percolation theory:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percolation_theory
>
> https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perkolationstheorie#Anwendung_in_der_Epidemiologie
>
> LoL
> Coté Faucheux schrieb am Dienstag, 10. August 2021 um 13:23:05 UTC+2:
> > Eram semper recta wrote:
> >
> > >> You quote mine her, quote mining is a dishonest tactic.
> > >
> > > Pull the mote out of your eye before you pull out the beam in your own
> > > eye!
> > >
> > > A fool is known by his words is not the same as "quote mining" which you
> > > and the chief troll (Dan Christensen) on this newsgroup employ as your
> > > modus operandi.
> > so you dont want the climate to change? Who else around here dont want
> > the climate to change?

This is a nice website, it has a SISa model to play with.

But what if we decide to start with nothing? Then we would
need (to see something) to model spontaneous activation —
the process by which a Susceptible node randomly becomes

Infected (without catching the infection from one of its neighbors)
(like zoonotic, Bat Soup etc..) This has been dubbed the SISa
model. The "a" stands for "automatic."

https://meltingasphalt.com/interactive/going-critical/

Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Dienstag, 10. August 2021 um 19:28:29 UTC+2:
> The interesting thing about percolation models,
> its kind of geometric. The distance between occupied
> nodes or the abundance of links is related to tipping points.
>
> Percolation models - wild fires, pandemics and extinctions
> Tom Connor - May 15, 2020
> https://medium.com/10x-curiosity/percolation-models-wild-fires-pandemics-and-extinctions-411d155f80be
> Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Dienstag, 10. August 2021 um 13:46:32 UTC+2:
> > The current wild fires are a nice example how Journalists
> > don't have any clue. Are they disappointed by this here?
> >
> > On the Greek island #Euböa has now burned so much
> > that the fires go out by themselves in places.
> > https://twitter.com/zeitonline/status/1425049604995928064
> >
> > Thats also how Pandemics might cease to exist.
> > In mathematics this is called percolation theory:
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percolation_theory
> >
> > https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perkolationstheorie#Anwendung_in_der_Epidemiologie
> >
> > LoL
> > Coté Faucheux schrieb am Dienstag, 10. August 2021 um 13:23:05 UTC+2:
> > > Eram semper recta wrote:
> > >
> > > >> You quote mine her, quote mining is a dishonest tactic.
> > > >
> > > > Pull the mote out of your eye before you pull out the beam in your own
> > > > eye!
> > > >
> > > > A fool is known by his words is not the same as "quote mining" which you
> > > > and the chief troll (Dan Christensen) on this newsgroup employ as your
> > > > modus operandi.
> > > so you dont want the climate to change? Who else around here dont want
> > > the climate to change?

>A fool is known by his words is not the same as "quote mining" which you and the chief troll (Dan Christensen) on this newsgroup employ as your modus operandi.

Never said it, you did however quote mine her. You only took the piece that fit you and then rejected the second part of it that didn't fit you.

That is typical quote mining, a creationist tactic.

You are just like flat earthers and creationists.

On Wednesday, 11 August 2021 at 00:55:36 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> >A fool is known by his words is not the same as "quote mining" which you and the chief troll (Dan Christensen) on this newsgroup employ as your modus operandi.
> Never said it, you did however quote mine her. You only took the piece that fit you and then rejected the second part of it that didn't fit you.
>
> That is typical quote mining, a creationist tactic.
>
> You are just like flat earthers and creationists.

You're a CRANK and always will be a CRANK.

You were born a Catholic and will die a Catholic!

onsdag 11 augusti 2021 kl. 14:39:57 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Wednesday, 11 August 2021 at 00:55:36 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >A fool is known by his words is not the same as "quote mining" which you and the chief troll (Dan Christensen) on this newsgroup employ as your modus operandi.
> > Never said it, you did however quote mine her. You only took the piece that fit you and then rejected the second part of it that didn't fit you.
> >
> > That is typical quote mining, a creationist tactic.
> >
> > You are just like flat earthers and creationists.
> You're a CRANK and always will be a CRANK.
>
> You were born a Catholic and will die a Catholic!

"Crank is a pejorative term used for a person who holds an unshakable belief that most of their contemporaries consider to be false"

So no, I am not a crank

And catholic? I am atheist thank you very much :) My father was atheist and my mother is protestant so you're just making up things now.

On Thursday, 12 August 2021 at 01:05:31 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> onsdag 11 augusti 2021 kl. 14:39:57 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Wednesday, 11 August 2021 at 00:55:36 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >A fool is known by his words is not the same as "quote mining" which you and the chief troll (Dan Christensen) on this newsgroup employ as your modus operandi.
> > > Never said it, you did however quote mine her. You only took the piece that fit you and then rejected the second part of it that didn't fit you.
> > >
> > > That is typical quote mining, a creationist tactic.
> > >
> > > You are just like flat earthers and creationists.
> > You're a CRANK and always will be a CRANK.
> >
> > You were born a Catholic and will die a Catholic!
> "Crank is a pejorative term used for a person who holds an unshakable belief that most of their contemporaries consider to be false"
>
> So no, I am not a crank
>
> And catholic? I am atheist thank you very much :) My father was atheist and my mother is protestant so you're just making up things now.

You are and always will be a crank according to the ONLY valid definition of crank:

A crank is one who cannot be convinced in the face of overwhelming evidence.

torsdag 12 augusti 2021 kl. 13:46:16 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Thursday, 12 August 2021 at 01:05:31 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > onsdag 11 augusti 2021 kl. 14:39:57 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > On Wednesday, 11 August 2021 at 00:55:36 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > >A fool is known by his words is not the same as "quote mining" which you and the chief troll (Dan Christensen) on this newsgroup employ as your modus operandi.
> > > > Never said it, you did however quote mine her. You only took the piece that fit you and then rejected the second part of it that didn't fit you.
> > > >
> > > > That is typical quote mining, a creationist tactic.
> > > >
> > > > You are just like flat earthers and creationists.
> > > You're a CRANK and always will be a CRANK.
> > >
> > > You were born a Catholic and will die a Catholic!
> > "Crank is a pejorative term used for a person who holds an unshakable belief that most of their contemporaries consider to be false"
> >
> > So no, I am not a crank
> >
> > And catholic? I am atheist thank you very much :) My father was atheist and my mother is protestant so you're just making up things now.
> You are and always will be a crank according to the ONLY valid definition of crank:
>
> A crank is one who cannot be convinced in the face of overwhelming evidence.

Your idea of "Valid" is always "Whatever fits Gabriel"

"Crank is a pejorative term used for a person who holds an unshakable belief that most of their contemporaries consider to be false."

Is the definition the rest goes on and that is you :)

On Friday, 13 August 2021 at 01:12:10 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> torsdag 12 augusti 2021 kl. 13:46:16 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Thursday, 12 August 2021 at 01:05:31 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > onsdag 11 augusti 2021 kl. 14:39:57 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > On Wednesday, 11 August 2021 at 00:55:36 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > >A fool is known by his words is not the same as "quote mining" which you and the chief troll (Dan Christensen) on this newsgroup employ as your modus operandi.
> > > > > Never said it, you did however quote mine her. You only took the piece that fit you and then rejected the second part of it that didn't fit you.
> > > > >
> > > > > That is typical quote mining, a creationist tactic.
> > > > >
> > > > > You are just like flat earthers and creationists.
> > > > You're a CRANK and always will be a CRANK.
> > > >
> > > > You were born a Catholic and will die a Catholic!
> > > "Crank is a pejorative term used for a person who holds an unshakable belief that most of their contemporaries consider to be false"
> > >
> > > So no, I am not a crank
> > >
> > > And catholic? I am atheist thank you very much :) My father was atheist and my mother is protestant so you're just making up things now.
> > You are and always will be a crank according to the ONLY valid definition of crank:
> >
> > A crank is one who cannot be convinced in the face of overwhelming evidence.
> Your idea of "Valid" is always "Whatever fits Gabriel"
>
> "Crank is a pejorative term used for a person who holds an unshakable belief that most of their contemporaries consider to be false."
>
> Is the definition the rest goes on and that is you :)

A crank is one who cannot be convinced in the face of overwhelming evidence.

Therefore, by definition, YOU Zelos Malum are a CRANK!

fredag 13 augusti 2021 kl. 17:47:12 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Friday, 13 August 2021 at 01:12:10 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > torsdag 12 augusti 2021 kl. 13:46:16 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > On Thursday, 12 August 2021 at 01:05:31 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > onsdag 11 augusti 2021 kl. 14:39:57 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > On Wednesday, 11 August 2021 at 00:55:36 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > >A fool is known by his words is not the same as "quote mining" which you and the chief troll (Dan Christensen) on this newsgroup employ as your modus operandi.
> > > > > > Never said it, you did however quote mine her. You only took the piece that fit you and then rejected the second part of it that didn't fit you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That is typical quote mining, a creationist tactic.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You are just like flat earthers and creationists.
> > > > > You're a CRANK and always will be a CRANK.
> > > > >
> > > > > You were born a Catholic and will die a Catholic!
> > > > "Crank is a pejorative term used for a person who holds an unshakable belief that most of their contemporaries consider to be false"
> > > >
> > > > So no, I am not a crank
> > > >
> > > > And catholic? I am atheist thank you very much :) My father was atheist and my mother is protestant so you're just making up things now.
> > > You are and always will be a crank according to the ONLY valid definition of crank:
> > >
> > > A crank is one who cannot be convinced in the face of overwhelming evidence.
> > Your idea of "Valid" is always "Whatever fits Gabriel"
> >
> > "Crank is a pejorative term used for a person who holds an unshakable belief that most of their contemporaries consider to be false."
> >
> > Is the definition the rest goes on and that is you :)
>
> A crank is one who cannot be convinced in the face of overwhelming evidence.
> Therefore, by definition, YOU Zelos Malum are a CRANK!
Nah, they are not.