JanPB wrote:
>
> On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 10:19:06 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > JanPB wrote:
> > >
> > > On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 9:50:39 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > Sylvia Else wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 23-Oct-21 7:14 am, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > His "scientific method": invent any shit that can be proven experimentally,
> > > > > > make use of mathematics in the most absurd way to get gains while let
> > > > > > people confused with fallacies and paradoxes, make an extraordinary PR
> > > > > > effort to sell yourself (a la Musk or Kardashian way), destroy opponents
> > > > > > with racist insinuations and enjoy whatever you are given.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Einstein explains his thinking, and the motivation for the postulates.
> > > > > He then provides the math that shows the consequences of those postulates.
> > > > > Sylvia.
> > > >
> > > > He failed with the grand unified theory because he couldn't do the
> > > > ...math.
> > >
> > > No, it's because (as we know now) one cannot get anywhere with this
> > > without quantum field theory or something very much like it. Einstein
> > > was hoping this would be avoidable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jan
> > No one can do the math because the math needed does not exist.
>
> That's unlikely.

Very much likely.

> It's much more likely we simply do not yet have the right
> physical model.

Imagine there in no God for a moment..

then your idea of a "physical model" could be
two model cars in an accident..

How do you unify accidents?

a million monkeys typed an airplane????

(your moment is up)

on the other hand, I can give you a clue on
how to unify the grand
by just delving into The Code..

'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.'

If you notice the heavens/earth is...connected.

There is a connection between "the heavens and the earth."

Like time and space are connected.

(time being 'beginning' and 'heavens' being space.)

Heaven and the earth both products of nature are connected.

Study the 'connection'. No math required.

All 'things' have connections.

All things are connected.

The disappearing bees and the black holes are ...connected.

Or is this all just incomprehensible verbiage to you? rubbish?

Or how the wankers say in England....googly doo, gobbledgook, gobbie goop???

>
> --
> Jan

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> JanPB wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 10:19:06 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > JanPB wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 9:50:39 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > Sylvia Else wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 23-Oct-21 7:14 am, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > His "scientific method": invent any shit that can be proven experimentally,
> > > > > > > make use of mathematics in the most absurd way to get gains while let
> > > > > > > people confused with fallacies and paradoxes, make an extraordinary PR
> > > > > > > effort to sell yourself (a la Musk or Kardashian way), destroy opponents
> > > > > > > with racist insinuations and enjoy whatever you are given.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Einstein explains his thinking, and the motivation for the postulates.
> > > > > > He then provides the math that shows the consequences of those postulates.
> > > > > > Sylvia.
> > > > >
> > > > > He failed with the grand unified theory because he couldn't do the
> > > > > ...math.
> > > >
> > > > No, it's because (as we know now) one cannot get anywhere with this
> > > > without quantum field theory or something very much like it. Einstein
> > > > was hoping this would be avoidable.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jan
> > > No one can do the math because the math needed does not exist.
> >
> > That's unlikely.
>
> Very much likely.
>
> > It's much more likely we simply do not yet have the right
> > physical model.
>
> Imagine there in no God for a moment..
>
> then your idea of a "physical model" could be
> two model cars in an accident..
>
> How do you unify accidents?
>
> a million monkeys typed an airplane????
>
> (your moment is up)
>
> on the other hand, I can give you a clue on
> how to unify the grand
> by just delving into The Code..
>
> 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.'

One can look at that statement instead of The Code, but an equation.

'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' can be converted into an equation.

Sometimes you need to get rid of all the math and just do...an experimnet.

The 'universe and the earth' are both the same exact age...but that may take thousands of years to discover that.

For example" 'God created the heavens' means, a body released the energy.

Now, what does God and body mean? The Odd Bodkin????

>
> If you notice the heavens/earth is...connected.
>
> There is a connection between "the heavens and the earth."
>
> Like time and space are connected.
>
> (time being 'beginning' and 'heavens' being space.)
>
> Heaven and the earth both products of nature are connected.
>
> Study the 'connection'. No math required.
>
> All 'things' have connections.
>
> All things are connected.
>
> The disappearing bees and the black holes are ...connected.
>
> Or is this all just incomprehensible verbiage to you? rubbish?
>
> Or how the wankers say in England....googly doo, gobbledgook, gobbie goop???
>
> >
> > --
> > Jan
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.