Jim Pennino wrote:
>
> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > Jim Pennino wrote:
> >>
> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> <snip old crap>
> >>
> >> > Lets for example you are looking for the nearest Martian. Do a Google search for
> >> >
> >> > Where is the nearest Martian?
> >> >
> >> > Google might have a little trouble...
> >>
> >> Since google is nothing more than an index of phrases found in web pages
> >> and it is highly unlikely that anyone on the planet has a web page about
> >> the nearest Martian, anyone with the slightest bit of intelligence or
> >> common sense would not expect much of anything for such a search.
> >
> > Don't forget the 727,000,000, that includes you and many others here...
>
> That would be 727,000,000 web pages about the sky being blue, which has
> nothing to do with me or anyone else here.

727,000,000? You 'also' seem to have a memory problem...are you one of
those people with one foot in the grave?

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > How many basic forces in nature are there? 3 or 4??
> >
> > It has to be one or the other, but which one, 3 or 4?
> >
> > Unless of course you people don't know, then nevermind.
> >
> > My information sez there are only 3..and 4 is wrong.
>
> Now, let me elaborate on 'my sources'..
>
> it comes from a Regents Professor.
>
> a Regents Professor
> The title Regents Professor serves as recognition of the highest academic merit and is awarded to
> faculty members who have made a unique contribution to the quality of the University through distinguished
> accomplishments in teaching scholarship, research or creative work.
>
> also, he is a theoretical physicist and cosmologist.
>
> And he sez, "In actual fact, there are only three forces."
>
> Now, I don't give a fuck what Google says or what 727,000,000 others think...
>
> I'm only interested in facts...not lemming science.
>
> Now, I repeat...those of yous who believe that there are only four basic forces in nature are WRONG!
>
> How many basic forces in nature are there? Do I hear a 3 from any of yous????
>
> A factual 3? In actual fact, 3?
>

Now imagine if you will, that if Stephen Hawking were alive today and he said..."In actual fact, there are only three forces." Would you believe him (regardless what Google claims)????

>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

Is isotopic decay identical to the Weak force?
Man's called them the splitting of the atom...
Should that not be a same phenomenon
for both? Why a force for one and not
the other?

Atoms are unstable instead of a force...

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> Is isotopic decay identical to the Weak force?
> Man's called them the splitting of the atom...
> Should that not be a same phenomenon for both? Why a force for one and
> not the other? Atoms are unstable instead of a force...

you confuse ions with isotopes. Which country are you?

On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 10:52:03 AM UTC-8, Gregor Bicha wrote:
> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Is isotopic decay identical to the Weak force?
> > Man's called them the splitting of the atom...
> > Should that not be a same phenomenon for both? Why a force for one and
> > not the other? Atoms are unstable instead of a force...
> you confuse ions with isotopes. Which country are you?

No. Isotopes are unstable not ions you moron...

Mitchell Raemsch

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>> >
>> > How many basic forces in nature are there? 3 or 4??
>> >
>> > It has to be one or the other, but which one, 3 or 4?
>> >
>> > Unless of course you people don't know, then nevermind.
>> >
>> > My information sez there are only 3..and 4 is wrong.
>>
>> Now, let me elaborate on 'my sources'..
>>
>> it comes from a Regents Professor.
>>
>> a Regents Professor
>> The title Regents Professor serves as recognition of the highest academic merit and is awarded to
>> faculty members who have made a unique contribution to the quality of the University through distinguished
>> accomplishments in teaching scholarship, research or creative work.
>>
>> also, he is a theoretical physicist and cosmologist.
>>
>> And he sez, "In actual fact, there are only three forces."
>>
>> Now, I don't give a fuck what Google says or what 727,000,000 others think...
>>
>> I'm only interested in facts...not lemming science.
>>
>> Now, I repeat...those of yous who believe that there are only four basic forces in nature are WRONG!
>>
>> How many basic forces in nature are there? Do I hear a 3 from any of yous????
>>
>> A factual 3? In actual fact, 3?
>>
>
> Now imagine if you will, that if Stephen Hawking were alive today and he said..."In actual fact, there are only three forces." Would you believe him (regardless what Google claims)????
>

Since Stephen Hawking would never say such a thing, this is just moronic
arm waving on your part.

>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>> the unchallengeable.

To babble nonsense and moronic drivel.

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> Jim Pennino wrote:
>>
>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> > Jim Pennino wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> <snip old crap>
>> >>
>> >> > Lets for example you are looking for the nearest Martian. Do a Google search for
>> >> >
>> >> > Where is the nearest Martian?
>> >> >
>> >> > Google might have a little trouble...
>> >>
>> >> Since google is nothing more than an index of phrases found in web pages
>> >> and it is highly unlikely that anyone on the planet has a web page about
>> >> the nearest Martian, anyone with the slightest bit of intelligence or
>> >> common sense would not expect much of anything for such a search.
>> >
>> > Don't forget the 727,000,000, that includes you and many others here...
>>
>> That would be 727,000,000 web pages about the sky being blue, which has
>> nothing to do with me or anyone else here.
>
>
> 727,000,000? You 'also' seem to have a memory problem...are you one of
> those people with one foot in the grave?
Since you keep dancing around from subject to subject, it becomes
difficult to keep such things in order.

So, that would be 727,000,000 web pages about the forces of nature,
which has nothing to do with me or anyone else here.

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 10:52:03 AM UTC-8, Gregor Bicha wrote:
>> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> > Is isotopic decay identical to the Weak force?
>> > Man's called them the splitting of the atom...
>> > Should that not be a same phenomenon for both? Why a force for one
>> > and not the other? Atoms are unstable instead of a force...
>> you confuse ions with isotopes. Which country are you?
>
> No. Isotopes are unstable not ions you moron...

but ions give you emf, electrostatics etc, which is a force. Carbon
dating isn't a force.

On 11/11/2021 12:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Jim Pennino wrote:
>>
>
>
> 727,000,000? You 'also' seem to have a memory problem...are you one of
> those people with one foot in the grave?
>
>
>

From the pistol in 2016 he said he carried I figured he must be 90
years old then. 95 now.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Clutterfreak wrote:
>
> On 11/11/2021 12:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Jim Pennino wrote:
> >>
> >
> >
> > 727,000,000? You 'also' seem to have a memory problem...are you one of
> > those people with one foot in the grave?
> >
> >
> >
>
> From the pistol in 2016 he said he carried I figured he must be 90
> years old then. 95 now.

you mean dat colt 45 alec baldwin used with that great shooting he did
at the set?

i bet jim pennyno gots notches on it...

>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=paul+davies+what%27s+eating+the+universe+and+is+there+something+magical+about+four+%28really+three%29

or
goto

Google Books

https://books.google.com/?hl=en&tab=wp

and insert this in the search bar:

paul davies what's eating the universe and is there something magical about four (really three)

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > How many basic forces in nature are there? 3 or 4??
> > >
> > > It has to be one or the other, but which one, 3 or 4?
> > >
> > > Unless of course you people don't know, then nevermind.
> > >
> > > My information sez there are only 3..and 4 is wrong.
> >
> > Now, let me elaborate on 'my sources'..
> >
> > it comes from a Regents Professor.
> >
> > a Regents Professor
> > The title Regents Professor serves as recognition of the highest academic merit and is awarded to
> > faculty members who have made a unique contribution to the quality of the University through distinguished
> > accomplishments in teaching scholarship, research or creative work.
> >
> > also, he is a theoretical physicist and cosmologist.
> >
> > And he sez, "In actual fact, there are only three forces."
> >
> > Now, I don't give a fuck what Google says or what 727,000,000 others think...
> >
> > I'm only interested in facts...not lemming science.
> >
> > Now, I repeat...those of yous who believe that there are only four basic forces in nature are WRONG!
> >
> > How many basic forces in nature are there? Do I hear a 3 from any of yous????
> >
> > A factual 3? In actual fact, 3?
> >
>
> Now imagine if you will, that if Stephen Hawking were alive today and he said..."In actual fact, there are only three forces." Would you believe him (regardless what Google claims)????
>
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> Clutterfreak wrote:
>>
>> On 11/11/2021 12:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> > Jim Pennino wrote:
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > 727,000,000? You 'also' seem to have a memory problem...are you one of
>> > those people with one foot in the grave?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> From the pistol in 2016 he said he carried I figured he must be 90
>> years old then. 95 now.
>
> you mean dat colt 45 alec baldwin used with that great shooting he did
> at the set?
>
>
> i bet jim pennyno gots notches on it...
>

This is what you get when a retarded moron has a conversation with a
delusional idiot living in a fantasy land.

https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=paul+davies+what%27s+eating+the+universe+whittled+down+to+three

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=paul+davies+what%27s+eating+the+universe+and+is+there+something+magical+about+four+%28really+three%29
>
> or
> goto
>
> Google Books
>
> https://books.google.com/?hl=en&tab=wp
>
> and insert this in the search bar:
>
> paul davies what's eating the universe and is there something magical about four (really three)
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > How many basic forces in nature are there? 3 or 4??
> > > >
> > > > It has to be one or the other, but which one, 3 or 4?
> > > >
> > > > Unless of course you people don't know, then nevermind.
> > > >
> > > > My information sez there are only 3..and 4 is wrong.
> > >
> > > Now, let me elaborate on 'my sources'..
> > >
> > > it comes from a Regents Professor.
> > >
> > > a Regents Professor
> > > The title Regents Professor serves as recognition of the highest academic merit and is awarded to
> > > faculty members who have made a unique contribution to the quality of the University through distinguished
> > > accomplishments in teaching scholarship, research or creative work.
> > >
> > > also, he is a theoretical physicist and cosmologist.
> > >
> > > And he sez, "In actual fact, there are only three forces."
> > >
> > > Now, I don't give a fuck what Google says or what 727,000,000 others think...
> > >
> > > I'm only interested in facts...not lemming science.
> > >
> > > Now, I repeat...those of yous who believe that there are only four basic forces in nature are WRONG!
> > >
> > > How many basic forces in nature are there? Do I hear a 3 from any of yous????
> > >
> > > A factual 3? In actual fact, 3?
> > >
> >
> > Now imagine if you will, that if Stephen Hawking were alive today and he said..."In actual fact, there are only three forces." Would you believe him (regardless what Google claims)????
> >
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

"As a result, the four fundamental forces have now convincingly been whittled down to three." -Paul Davies

"..is there something magical about four (really three) basic forces.." -Paul Davies

So, How many basic forces in nature are there?

My information sez there are only 3..

https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=paul+davies+what%27s+eating+the+universe+whittled+down+to+three

https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=paul+davies+what%27s+eating+the+universe+and+is+there+something+magical+about+four+%28really+three%29

Now, a little Englisg lesson for our international friends: "(really three)"

The word "really" means:

1.
in actual fact, as opposed to what is said or imagined to be true or possible.

"(really three)" means... in actual fact, three.

or,

The fact is, there are three basic forces in nature.

Now, those of yous that don't know what the word "fact" means...a thing that is known or proved to be true.

So, the correct answer to the question: How many basic forces in nature are there? is three. 3.

To what is said or imagined to be 4 is actually..in fact 3.

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=paul+davies+what%27s+eating+the+universe+whittled+down+to+three
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=paul+davies+what%27s+eating+the+universe+and+is+there+something+magical+about+four+%28really+three%29

> >
> > or
> > goto
> >
> > Google Books
> >
> > https://books.google.com/?hl=en&tab=wp
> >
> > and insert this in the search bar:
> >
> > paul davies what's eating the universe and is there something magical about four (really three)
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > How many basic forces in nature are there? 3 or 4??
> > > > >
> > > > > It has to be one or the other, but which one, 3 or 4?
> > > > >
> > > > > Unless of course you people don't know, then nevermind.
> > > > >
> > > > > My information sez there are only 3..and 4 is wrong.
> > > >
> > > > Now, let me elaborate on 'my sources'..
> > > >
> > > > it comes from a Regents Professor.
> > > >
> > > > a Regents Professor
> > > > The title Regents Professor serves as recognition of the highest academic merit and is awarded to
> > > > faculty members who have made a unique contribution to the quality of the University through distinguished
> > > > accomplishments in teaching scholarship, research or creative work.
> > > >
> > > > also, he is a theoretical physicist and cosmologist.
> > > >
> > > > And he sez, "In actual fact, there are only three forces."
> > > >
> > > > Now, I don't give a fuck what Google says or what 727,000,000 others think...
> > > >
> > > > I'm only interested in facts...not lemming science.
> > > >
> > > > Now, I repeat...those of yous who believe that there are only four basic forces in nature are WRONG!
> > > >
> > > > How many basic forces in nature are there? Do I hear a 3 from any of yous????
> > > >
> > > > A factual 3? In actual fact, 3?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Now imagine if you will, that if Stephen Hawking were alive today and he said..."In actual fact, there are only three forces." Would you believe him (regardless what Google claims)????
> > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> "As a result, the four fundamental forces have now convincingly been whittled down to three." -Paul Davies
>
> "..is there something magical about four (really three) basic forces.." -Paul Davies

Paul Davies is well known for saying some "questionable" things, such as
his infamous claim to have discovered bacteria based on arsnic instead
of phosphorus.

> So, How many basic forces in nature are there?

The general concensus among the non-brain dead subject matter experts is
there are four, and possibly 5.

<snip moron babble>