Tom Kunich is a coward.

He posts threats and insults - I'll break his jaw, He's a bigot, or a
racist, or a Democrat, and on and on.

But when someone rebuts his threats and insults what does he do? Does
he defend his own statements? No! He runs away and hides his head and
never a word out of him.

A cringing Coward!
--
Cheers,

Schweik

On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 11:52:07 PM UTC, goodsoldi...@invalid.junk wrote:
> Tom Kunich is a coward.
>
> He posts threats and insults - I'll break his jaw, He's a bigot, or a
> racist, or a Democrat, and on and on.
>
> But when someone rebuts his threats and insults what does he do? Does
> he defend his own statements? No! He runs away and hides his head and
> never a word out of him.
>
> A cringing Coward!
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Schweik
>
You're blind as well as a hypocrite, Invalid Junk.

Tom's threads are so long because Tom doesn't "run away and hide his head and never a word out of him" as you lie. That's the whole point of the RBT Gang of Thugs, that Tom won't shut up after they've pronounced the Wastepedia Lowest Common Denominator Mass-Sourced Opinion. Only a blind person could miss that glaring truth.

And you're another scummy coward of a hypocrite, hiding behind a pseudonym.

Andre Jute
Another bumbler joins the RBT Gang of Thugs
>

On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 1:20:20 AM UTC-8, Andre Jute wrote:
> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 11:52:07 PM UTC, goodsoldi...@invalid.junk wrote:
> > Tom Kunich is a coward.
> >
> > He posts threats and insults - I'll break his jaw, He's a bigot, or a
> > racist, or a Democrat, and on and on.
> >
> > But when someone rebuts his threats and insults what does he do? Does
> > he defend his own statements? No! He runs away and hides his head and
> > never a word out of him.
> >
> > A cringing Coward!
> > --
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Schweik
> >
> You're blind as well as a hypocrite, Invalid Junk.
>
> Tom's threads are so long because Tom doesn't "run away and hide his head and never a word out of him" as you lie. That's the whole point of the RBT Gang of Thugs, that Tom won't shut up after they've pronounced the Wastepedia Lowest Common Denominator Mass-Sourced Opinion. Only a blind person could miss that glaring truth.
>
> And you're another scummy coward of a hypocrite, hiding behind a pseudonym.
>
> Andre Jute
> Another bumbler joins the RBT Gang of Thugs
> >

This is Seaton using a fake registration, angry because I outed him. Or possibly Flunky using the common language of Slocumb to throw the blame in his direction. There is no honor among thieves. It is pretty funny these comments that have nothing to say other than to call names. That means my postings are hitting home. As for Seaton, you'd think that I cared he was homosexual or not. I just prefer him to be open about where his false comments were coming from.

On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 09:55:08 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
<cyclintom@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 1:20:20 AM UTC-8, Andre Jute wrote:
>> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 11:52:07 PM UTC, goodsoldi...@invalid.junk wrote:
>> > Tom Kunich is a coward.
>> >
>> > He posts threats and insults - I'll break his jaw, He's a bigot, or a
>> > racist, or a Democrat, and on and on.
>> >
>> > But when someone rebuts his threats and insults what does he do? Does
>> > he defend his own statements? No! He runs away and hides his head and
>> > never a word out of him.
>> >
>> > A cringing Coward!
>> > --
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > Schweik
>> >
>> You're blind as well as a hypocrite, Invalid Junk.
>>
>> Tom's threads are so long because Tom doesn't "run away and hide his head and never a word out of him" as you lie. That's the whole point of the RBT Gang of Thugs, that Tom won't shut up after they've pronounced the Wastepedia Lowest Common Denominator Mass-Sourced Opinion. Only a blind person could miss that glaring truth.
>>
>> And you're another scummy coward of a hypocrite, hiding behind a pseudonym.
>>
>> Andre Jute
>> Another bumbler joins the RBT Gang of Thugs
>> >
>
>This is Seaton using a fake registration, angry because I outed him. Or possibly Flunky using the common language of Slocumb to throw the blame in his direction. There is no honor among thieves. It is pretty funny these comments that have nothing to say other than to call names. That means my postings are hitting home. As for Seaton, you'd think that I cared he was homosexual or not. I just prefer him to be open about where his false comments were coming from.

This is... or possibly...
Goodness Tommy you are really confused, aren't you?

Or maybe it was the man in the moon?

--
Cheers,

John B.

On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 11:48:57 PM UTC, John B. wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 09:55:08 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
> <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 1:20:20 AM UTC-8, Andre Jute wrote:
> >> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 11:52:07 PM UTC, goodsoldi...@invalid.junk wrote:
> >> > Tom Kunich is a coward.
> >> >
> >> > He posts threats and insults - I'll break his jaw, He's a bigot, or a
> >> > racist, or a Democrat, and on and on.
> >> >
> >> > But when someone rebuts his threats and insults what does he do? Does
> >> > he defend his own statements? No! He runs away and hides his head and
> >> > never a word out of him.
> >> >
> >> > A cringing Coward!
> >> > --
> >> > Cheers,
> >> >
> >> > Schweik
> >> >
> >> You're blind as well as a hypocrite, Invalid Junk.
> >>
> >> Tom's threads are so long because Tom doesn't "run away and hide his head and never a word out of him" as you lie. That's the whole point of the RBT Gang of Thugs, that Tom won't shut up after they've pronounced the Wastepedia Lowest Common Denominator Mass-Sourced Opinion. Only a blind person could miss that glaring truth.
> >>
> >> And you're another scummy coward of a hypocrite, hiding behind a pseudonym.
> >>
> >> Andre Jute
> >> Another bumbler joins the RBT Gang of Thugs
> >> >
> >
> >This is Seaton using a fake registration, angry because I outed him. Or possibly Flunky using the common language of Slocumb to throw the blame in his direction. There is no honor among thieves. It is pretty funny these comments that have nothing to say other than to call names. That means my postings are hitting home. As for Seaton, you'd think that I cared he was homosexual or not. I just prefer him to be open about where his false comments were coming from.
> This is... or possibly...
> Goodness Tommy you are really confused, aren't you?
>
> Or maybe it was the man in the moon?
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> John B.
>
Or maybe it was the Thai Turd.
>

On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 4:33:45 PM UTC-8, Andre Jute wrote:
> On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 11:48:57 PM UTC, John B. wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 09:55:08 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
> > <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 1:20:20 AM UTC-8, Andre Jute wrote:
> > >> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 11:52:07 PM UTC, goodsoldi...@invalid.junk wrote:
> > >> > Tom Kunich is a coward.
> > >> >
> > >> > He posts threats and insults - I'll break his jaw, He's a bigot, or a
> > >> > racist, or a Democrat, and on and on.
> > >> >
> > >> > But when someone rebuts his threats and insults what does he do? Does
> > >> > he defend his own statements? No! He runs away and hides his head and
> > >> > never a word out of him.
> > >> >
> > >> > A cringing Coward!
> > >> > --
> > >> > Cheers,
> > >> >
> > >> > Schweik
> > >> >
> > >> You're blind as well as a hypocrite, Invalid Junk.
> > >>
> > >> Tom's threads are so long because Tom doesn't "run away and hide his head and never a word out of him" as you lie. That's the whole point of the RBT Gang of Thugs, that Tom won't shut up after they've pronounced the Wastepedia Lowest Common Denominator Mass-Sourced Opinion. Only a blind person could miss that glaring truth.
> > >>
> > >> And you're another scummy coward of a hypocrite, hiding behind a pseudonym.
> > >>
> > >> Andre Jute
> > >> Another bumbler joins the RBT Gang of Thugs
> > >> >
> > >
> > >This is Seaton using a fake registration, angry because I outed him. Or possibly Flunky using the common language of Slocumb to throw the blame in his direction. There is no honor among thieves. It is pretty funny these comments that have nothing to say other than to call names. That means my postings are hitting home. As for Seaton, you'd think that I cared he was homosexual or not. I just prefer him to be open about where his false comments were coming from.
> > This is... or possibly...
> > Goodness Tommy you are really confused, aren't you?
> >
> > Or maybe it was the man in the moon?
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> >
> > John B.
> >
> Or maybe it was the Thai Turd.

Slocumb simply isn't bright enough to have some up with a name like "Goodsoldier" since it too obviously points directly at him. Though perhaps he is stupid enough since he figured that no one could figure out his age and he never denied that if I wasn't dead on I was very close. John really is an old fool though a completely harmless one since he hasn't the sense to use his own power of thought but rather looks everything up on Google. All you have to do is any search on Google to see it is entirely one sided and that almost always the wrong side.

On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 11:16:15 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
<cyclintom@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 4:33:45 PM UTC-8, Andre Jute wrote:
>> On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 11:48:57 PM UTC, John B. wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 09:55:08 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
>> > <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 1:20:20 AM UTC-8, Andre Jute wrote:
>> > >> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 11:52:07 PM UTC, goodsoldi...@invalid.junk wrote:
>> > >> > Tom Kunich is a coward.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > He posts threats and insults - I'll break his jaw, He's a bigot, or a
>> > >> > racist, or a Democrat, and on and on.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > But when someone rebuts his threats and insults what does he do? Does
>> > >> > he defend his own statements? No! He runs away and hides his head and
>> > >> > never a word out of him.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > A cringing Coward!
>> > >> > --
>> > >> > Cheers,
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Schweik
>> > >> >
>> > >> You're blind as well as a hypocrite, Invalid Junk.
>> > >>
>> > >> Tom's threads are so long because Tom doesn't "run away and hide his head and never a word out of him" as you lie. That's the whole point of the RBT Gang of Thugs, that Tom won't shut up after they've pronounced the Wastepedia Lowest Common Denominator Mass-Sourced Opinion. Only a blind person could miss that glaring truth.
>> > >>
>> > >> And you're another scummy coward of a hypocrite, hiding behind a pseudonym.
>> > >>
>> > >> Andre Jute
>> > >> Another bumbler joins the RBT Gang of Thugs
>> > >> >
>> > >
>> > >This is Seaton using a fake registration, angry because I outed him. Or possibly Flunky using the common language of Slocumb to throw the blame in his direction. There is no honor among thieves. It is pretty funny these comments that have nothing to say other than to call names. That means my postings are hitting home. As for Seaton, you'd think that I cared he was homosexual or not. I just prefer him to be open about where his false comments were coming from.
>> > This is... or possibly...
>> > Goodness Tommy you are really confused, aren't you?
>> >
>> > Or maybe it was the man in the moon?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > John B.
>> >
>> Or maybe it was the Thai Turd.
>
>Slocumb simply isn't bright enough to have some up with a name like "Goodsoldier" since it too obviously points directly at him. Though perhaps he is stupid enough since he figured that no one could figure out his age and he never denied that if I wasn't dead on I was very close. John really is an old fool though a completely harmless one since he hasn't the sense to use his own power of thought but rather looks everything up on Google. All you have to do is any search on Google to see it is entirely one sided and that almost always the wrong side.

"that almost always the wrong side"??

Yes, Tommy I can see how you would say that as any research inevitably
shows that you don't know what you are talking about. Or deliberately
lying.

--
Cheers,

John B.

On Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 11:35:32 PM UTC, John B. wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 11:16:15 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
> <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 4:33:45 PM UTC-8, Andre Jute wrote:
> >> On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 11:48:57 PM UTC, John B. wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 09:55:08 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
> >> > <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 1:20:20 AM UTC-8, Andre Jute wrote:
> >> > >> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 11:52:07 PM UTC, goodsoldi...@invalid.junk wrote:
> >> > >> > Tom Kunich is a coward.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > He posts threats and insults - I'll break his jaw, He's a bigot, or a
> >> > >> > racist, or a Democrat, and on and on.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > But when someone rebuts his threats and insults what does he do? Does
> >> > >> > he defend his own statements? No! He runs away and hides his head and
> >> > >> > never a word out of him.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > A cringing Coward!
> >> > >> > --
> >> > >> > Cheers,
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Schweik
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> You're blind as well as a hypocrite, Invalid Junk.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Tom's threads are so long because Tom doesn't "run away and hide his head and never a word out of him" as you lie. That's the whole point of the RBT Gang of Thugs, that Tom won't shut up after they've pronounced the Wastepedia Lowest Common Denominator Mass-Sourced Opinion. Only a blind person could miss that glaring truth.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> And you're another scummy coward of a hypocrite, hiding behind a pseudonym.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Andre Jute
> >> > >> Another bumbler joins the RBT Gang of Thugs
> >> > >> >
> >> > >
> >> > >This is Seaton using a fake registration, angry because I outed him.. Or possibly Flunky using the common language of Slocumb to throw the blame in his direction. There is no honor among thieves. It is pretty funny these comments that have nothing to say other than to call names. That means my postings are hitting home. As for Seaton, you'd think that I cared he was homosexual or not. I just prefer him to be open about where his false comments were coming from.
> >> > This is... or possibly...
> >> > Goodness Tommy you are really confused, aren't you?
> >> >
> >> > Or maybe it was the man in the moon?
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Cheers,
> >> >
> >> > John B.
> >> >
> >> Or maybe it was the Thai Turd.
> >
> >Slocumb simply isn't bright enough to have some up with a name like "Goodsoldier" since it too obviously points directly at him. Though perhaps he is stupid enough since he figured that no one could figure out his age and he never denied that if I wasn't dead on I was very close. John really is an old fool though a completely harmless one since he hasn't the sense to use his own power of thought but rather looks everything up on Google. All you have to do is any search on Google to see it is entirely one sided and that almost always the wrong side.
> "that almost always the wrong side"??
>
> Yes, Tommy I can see how you would say that as any research inevitably
> shows that you don't know what you are talking about. Or deliberately
> lying.
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> John B.
>
Anyone with eyes and a brain in his head can say the same about you, Slow Johnny, with the difference that you can google stuff all you want, and still you get it diametrically wrong because you don't have the education or the mind to grasp the subtleties; you end up looking like an idiot because you think the first thing you read, written by another ignorant jerk just like you, is gospel. -- Unsigned out of contempt.

On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 6:58:51 AM UTC-8, Andre Jute wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 11:35:32 PM UTC, John B. wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 11:16:15 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
> > <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 4:33:45 PM UTC-8, Andre Jute wrote:
> > >> On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 11:48:57 PM UTC, John B. wrote:
> > >> > On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 09:55:08 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
> > >> > <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > >On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 1:20:20 AM UTC-8, Andre Jute wrote:
> > >> > >> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 11:52:07 PM UTC, goodsoldi...@invalid.junk wrote:
> > >> > >> > Tom Kunich is a coward.
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > He posts threats and insults - I'll break his jaw, He's a bigot, or a
> > >> > >> > racist, or a Democrat, and on and on.
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > But when someone rebuts his threats and insults what does he do? Does
> > >> > >> > he defend his own statements? No! He runs away and hides his head and
> > >> > >> > never a word out of him.
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > A cringing Coward!
> > >> > >> > --
> > >> > >> > Cheers,
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > Schweik
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> You're blind as well as a hypocrite, Invalid Junk.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Tom's threads are so long because Tom doesn't "run away and hide his head and never a word out of him" as you lie. That's the whole point of the RBT Gang of Thugs, that Tom won't shut up after they've pronounced the Wastepedia Lowest Common Denominator Mass-Sourced Opinion. Only a blind person could miss that glaring truth.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> And you're another scummy coward of a hypocrite, hiding behind a pseudonym.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Andre Jute
> > >> > >> Another bumbler joins the RBT Gang of Thugs
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >This is Seaton using a fake registration, angry because I outed him. Or possibly Flunky using the common language of Slocumb to throw the blame in his direction. There is no honor among thieves. It is pretty funny these comments that have nothing to say other than to call names. That means my postings are hitting home. As for Seaton, you'd think that I cared he was homosexual or not. I just prefer him to be open about where his false comments were coming from.
> > >> > This is... or possibly...
> > >> > Goodness Tommy you are really confused, aren't you?
> > >> >
> > >> > Or maybe it was the man in the moon?
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Cheers,
> > >> >
> > >> > John B.
> > >> >
> > >> Or maybe it was the Thai Turd.
> > >
> > >Slocumb simply isn't bright enough to have some up with a name like "Goodsoldier" since it too obviously points directly at him. Though perhaps he is stupid enough since he figured that no one could figure out his age and he never denied that if I wasn't dead on I was very close. John really is an old fool though a completely harmless one since he hasn't the sense to use his own power of thought but rather looks everything up on Google. All you have to do is any search on Google to see it is entirely one sided and that almost always the wrong side.
> > "that almost always the wrong side"??
> >
> > Yes, Tommy I can see how you would say that as any research inevitably
> > shows that you don't know what you are talking about. Or deliberately
> > lying.
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> >
> > John B.
> >
> Anyone with eyes and a brain in his head can say the same about you, Slow Johnny, with the difference that you can google stuff all you want, and still you get it diametrically wrong because you don't have the education or the mind to grasp the subtleties; you end up looking like an idiot because you think the first thing you read, written by another ignorant jerk just like you, is gospel. -- Unsigned out of contempt.

To get into the Air Force and remain there, you have to have a minimal IQ. That it wasn't very high is shown by the fact that he was ground crew for an obsolete bomber that never dropped a single bomb in combat and never refueled anything but fighters that had sufficient control to be able to stay with something that hops around in the air. As a question I would have to ask why he has such a need to prove himself so clever that he is cutting and pasting crap out of Google. Why can't he see that such things make him look like a fool

Surely he has opinions ands ideas that pertain to a real subject and might at least agree with people that actually know about the subjects under discussion. But the very thing that he deems the most important to him he denies himself because at some point in the past I disagreed with him on a subject he dearly wanted to be expert in. So now he finds it impossible to agree with me on anything even if it is 2 +2 = 4. Rather than an experienced old man he has made himself a nobody.

Flunky is a cur not worthy of even reading which is why he is on my filter and I only see that lying sack of shit when someone else quotes him. If you think that he is working just look at his postings and the time stamps.

Frank has done more or less the same thing - why disagree with me on things he has absolutely no knowledge of? Especially things I have direct experience with? Then he has NEVER apologized even one time when he is proven 100% wrong. Does he really think that he has maintained a reputation of being smart after things like that?

Why would Liebermann make ANY comments when I achieved more as a technician in my early years than he has over his entire life? I do not say this to be mean and belittling to him, I have said before that most people do not work in their majors, He was simply not suited to the life of an engineer. So why does he pretend otherwise when he spent most of his life being a technician? My second job as a technician two years out of the Air Force I worked on the computer that was the west coast hub of the Internet. Like some horses ass, he denies that as if being a technician is a difficult task. Well, perhaps to him it is.

What is Scharf even doing posting. My cousin John became the police chief the fire captain and the mayor of the city directly north of him and he was a Counselman ONE election and he lost entire support because he claimed to be a Republican and then spouted socialist values because those are his core beliefs. I have no doubts that he would even give a NAZI salute. He argued that Naziism was different from socialism. How would he support that? Well at least he got the undying support of Liebermann who he would in a second send off to a death camp.

On 1/4/2023 12:17 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
>
> Frank has done more or less the same thing - why disagree with me on things he has absolutely no knowledge of? Especially things I have direct experience with? Then he has NEVER apologized even one time when he is proven 100% wrong.

??? I don't remember such an instance. Can you give a correct link to an
example?

Please don't use something you "remember." We all know that nobody can
trust your "memory."

Post an actual link.

--
- Frank Krygowski

On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 09:17:05 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
<cyclintom@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 6:58:51 AM UTC-8, Andre Jute wrote:
>> On Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 11:35:32 PM UTC, John B. wrote:
>> > On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 11:16:15 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
>> > <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 4:33:45 PM UTC-8, Andre Jute wrote:
>> > >> On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 11:48:57 PM UTC, John B. wrote:
>> > >> > On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 09:55:08 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
>> > >> > <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > >On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 1:20:20 AM UTC-8, Andre Jute wrote:
>> > >> > >> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 11:52:07 PM UTC, goodsoldi...@invalid.junk wrote:
>> > >> > >> > Tom Kunich is a coward.
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> > He posts threats and insults - I'll break his jaw, He's a bigot, or a
>> > >> > >> > racist, or a Democrat, and on and on.
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> > But when someone rebuts his threats and insults what does he do? Does
>> > >> > >> > he defend his own statements? No! He runs away and hides his head and
>> > >> > >> > never a word out of him.
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> > A cringing Coward!
>> > >> > >> > --
>> > >> > >> > Cheers,
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> > Schweik
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> You're blind as well as a hypocrite, Invalid Junk.
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> Tom's threads are so long because Tom doesn't "run away and hide his head and never a word out of him" as you lie. That's the whole point of the RBT Gang of Thugs, that Tom won't shut up after they've pronounced the Wastepedia Lowest Common Denominator Mass-Sourced Opinion. Only a blind person could miss that glaring truth.
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> And you're another scummy coward of a hypocrite, hiding behind a pseudonym.
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> Andre Jute
>> > >> > >> Another bumbler joins the RBT Gang of Thugs
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >This is Seaton using a fake registration, angry because I outed him. Or possibly Flunky using the common language of Slocumb to throw the blame in his direction. There is no honor among thieves. It is pretty funny these comments that have nothing to say other than to call names. That means my postings are hitting home. As for Seaton, you'd think that I cared he was homosexual or not. I just prefer him to be open about where his false comments were coming from.
>> > >> > This is... or possibly...
>> > >> > Goodness Tommy you are really confused, aren't you?
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Or maybe it was the man in the moon?
>> > >> >
>> > >> > --
>> > >> > Cheers,
>> > >> >
>> > >> > John B.
>> > >> >
>> > >> Or maybe it was the Thai Turd.
>> > >
>> > >Slocumb simply isn't bright enough to have some up with a name like "Goodsoldier" since it too obviously points directly at him. Though perhaps he is stupid enough since he figured that no one could figure out his age and he never denied that if I wasn't dead on I was very close. John really is an old fool though a completely harmless one since he hasn't the sense to use his own power of thought but rather looks everything up on Google. All you have to do is any search on Google to see it is entirely one sided and that almost always the wrong side.
>> > "that almost always the wrong side"??
>> >
>> > Yes, Tommy I can see how you would say that as any research inevitably
>> > shows that you don't know what you are talking about. Or deliberately
>> > lying.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > John B.
>> >
>> Anyone with eyes and a brain in his head can say the same about you, Slow Johnny, with the difference that you can google stuff all you want, and still you get it diametrically wrong because you don't have the education or the mind to grasp the subtleties; you end up looking like an idiot because you think the first thing you read, written by another ignorant jerk just like you, is gospel. -- Unsigned out of contempt.
>
>To get into the Air Force and remain there, you have to have a minimal IQ. That it wasn't very high is shown by the fact that he was ground crew for an obsolete bomber that never dropped a single bomb in combat and never refueled anything but fighters that had sufficient control to be able to stay with something that hops around in the air. As a question I would have to ask why he has such a need to prove himself so clever that he is cutting and pasting crap out of Google. Why can't he see that such things make him look like a fool
>
>Surely he has opinions ands ideas that pertain to a real subject and might at least agree with people that actually know about the subjects under discussion. But the very thing that he deems the most important to him he denies himself because at some point in the past I disagreed with him on a subject he dearly wanted to be expert in. So now he finds it impossible to agree with me on anything even if it is 2 +2 = 4. Rather than an experienced old man he has made himself a nobody.
>
>Flunky is a cur not worthy of even reading which is why he is on my filter and I only see that lying sack of shit when someone else quotes him. If you think that he is working just look at his postings and the time stamps.
>
>Frank has done more or less the same thing - why disagree with me on things he has absolutely no knowledge of? Especially things I have direct experience with? Then he has NEVER apologized even one time when he is proven 100% wrong. Does he really think that he has maintained a reputation of being smart after things like that?
>
>Why would Liebermann make ANY comments when I achieved more as a technician in my early years than he has over his entire life? I do not say this to be mean and belittling to him, I have said before that most people do not work in their majors, He was simply not suited to the life of an engineer. So why does he pretend otherwise when he spent most of his life being a technician? My second job as a technician two years out of the Air Force I worked on the computer that was the west coast hub of the Internet. Like some horses ass, he denies that as if being a technician is a difficult task. Well, perhaps to him it is.
>
>What is Scharf even doing posting. My cousin John became the police chief the fire captain and the mayor of the city directly north of him and he was a Counselman ONE election and he lost entire support because he claimed to be a Republican and then spouted socialist values because those are his core beliefs. I have no doubts that he would even give a NAZI salute. He argued that Naziism was different from socialism. How would he support that? Well at least he got the undying support of Liebermann who he would in a second send off to a death camp.

Oh My Goodness! Isn't Tommy wonderful?

Of course he lies, his fantastic resume starts with a lie"And all
those awful people that have the audacity to actually (gulp) post
facts which expose his inane comments as the foolishness that they
really are. Truly Awful!

One can only wonder why he posts here.

--
Cheers,

John B.

On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 09:17:05 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
<cyclintom@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 6:58:51 AM UTC-8, Andre Jute wrote:
>> On Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 11:35:32 PM UTC, John B. wrote:
>> > On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 11:16:15 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
>> > <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 4:33:45 PM UTC-8, Andre Jute wrote:
>> > >> On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 11:48:57 PM UTC, John B. wrote:
>> > >> > On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 09:55:08 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
>> > >> > <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > >On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 1:20:20 AM UTC-8, Andre Jute wrote:
>> > >> > >> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 11:52:07 PM UTC, goodsoldi...@invalid.junk wrote:
>> > >> > >> > Tom Kunich is a coward.
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> > He posts threats and insults - I'll break his jaw, He's a bigot, or a
>> > >> > >> > racist, or a Democrat, and on and on.
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> > But when someone rebuts his threats and insults what does he do? Does
>> > >> > >> > he defend his own statements? No! He runs away and hides his head and
>> > >> > >> > never a word out of him.
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> > A cringing Coward!
>> > >> > >> > --
>> > >> > >> > Cheers,
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> > Schweik
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >> You're blind as well as a hypocrite, Invalid Junk.
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> Tom's threads are so long because Tom doesn't "run away and hide his head and never a word out of him" as you lie. That's the whole point of the RBT Gang of Thugs, that Tom won't shut up after they've pronounced the Wastepedia Lowest Common Denominator Mass-Sourced Opinion. Only a blind person could miss that glaring truth.
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> And you're another scummy coward of a hypocrite, hiding behind a pseudonym.
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> Andre Jute
>> > >> > >> Another bumbler joins the RBT Gang of Thugs
>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >This is Seaton using a fake registration, angry because I outed him. Or possibly Flunky using the common language of Slocumb to throw the blame in his direction. There is no honor among thieves. It is pretty funny these comments that have nothing to say other than to call names. That means my postings are hitting home. As for Seaton, you'd think that I cared he was homosexual or not. I just prefer him to be open about where his false comments were coming from.
>> > >> > This is... or possibly...
>> > >> > Goodness Tommy you are really confused, aren't you?
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Or maybe it was the man in the moon?
>> > >> >
>> > >> > --
>> > >> > Cheers,
>> > >> >
>> > >> > John B.
>> > >> >
>> > >> Or maybe it was the Thai Turd.
>> > >
>> > >Slocumb simply isn't bright enough to have some up with a name like "Goodsoldier" since it too obviously points directly at him. Though perhaps he is stupid enough since he figured that no one could figure out his age and he never denied that if I wasn't dead on I was very close. John really is an old fool though a completely harmless one since he hasn't the sense to use his own power of thought but rather looks everything up on Google. All you have to do is any search on Google to see it is entirely one sided and that almost always the wrong side.
>> > "that almost always the wrong side"??
>> >
>> > Yes, Tommy I can see how you would say that as any research inevitably
>> > shows that you don't know what you are talking about. Or deliberately
>> > lying.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > John B.
>> >
>> Anyone with eyes and a brain in his head can say the same about you, Slow Johnny, with the difference that you can google stuff all you want, and still you get it diametrically wrong because you don't have the education or the mind to grasp the subtleties; you end up looking like an idiot because you think the first thing you read, written by another ignorant jerk just like you, is gospel. -- Unsigned out of contempt.
>
>To get into the Air Force and remain there, you have to have a minimal IQ. That it wasn't very high is shown by the fact that he was ground crew for an obsolete bomber that never dropped a single bomb in combat and never refueled anything but fighters that had sufficient control to be able to stay with something that hops around in the air. As a question I would have to ask why he has such a need to prove himself so clever that he is cutting and pasting crap out of Google. Why can't he see that such things make him look like a fool

Ah Tommy.... such a fool.

Yes I was the member of the "ground crew" both on B-29's and B -
actually RB - 50's and then I was a Crew Chief and then I was an
Engine conditioning Specialist and then I was a "Maintenance
Supervisor" coordinating an entire wing's maintenance, and then I was
a Machinist, and then I was a Machine Shop Chief and then I was the
Metal working Section Chief - welding shop, Machine shop and
SheetMetal Shop.

You see Tommy, people that "served their country" for an extended
period normally had more then one job during their career, as opposed
to you, a low ranking nobody who's "greatest claim to fame" was
carrying the tool box for a competent craftsman.

As for Google? It is called "research" and is, even in it's most
casual use far superior to your lies and fabrications.

>
>Surely he has opinions ands ideas that pertain to a real subject and might at least agree with people that actually know about the subjects under discussion. But the very thing that he deems the most important to him he denies himself because at some point in the past I disagreed with him on a subject he dearly wanted to be expert in. So now he finds it impossible to agree with me on anything even if it is 2 +2 = 4. Rather than an experienced old man he has made himself a nobody.

"people that actually know about the subjects under discussion"???

Surely you can't be referring to yourself. Can you? After all, you
have demonstrated your nearly total ignorance of every subject
discussed here. You were even crying for help to install a bicycle
seat post. "Poke it in the hole" Tommy.

--
Cheers,

John B.